Reproductive Health in Trans and Gender Diverse Patients: Fertility related knowledge, attitudes, and decision-making among gender diverse youth - A narrative review.

In brief: Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth demonstrate low utilization of fertility preservation before medical and surgical gender-affirming interventions. However, a significant number of TGD youth have goals for parenthood and/or recognize that their attitude toward future family-building goals may change over time. In this narrative review, we conclude that TGD young people should have ongoing opportunities to discuss their family-building goals and options for fertility preservation. Validated decision tools can help facilitate these discussions. Abstract: The number of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth seeking care continues to increase, necessitating comprehensive counseling about potential long-term effects of gender-affirming medical interventions on fertility. The objective of this narrative review was to examine fertility-related knowledge, attitudes, and decision-making (including factors influencing decisions, decision regret, and decision tools) among TGD youth. We searched PubMed, PsycInfo, and Google Scholar for original, peer-reviewed research investigating TGD youth attitudes and knowledge of fertility and fertility preservation, perspectives on fertility counseling and fertility preservation decision-making, as well as fertility-related decision tools. We reviewed 106 studies; eight were included in this narrative review. Four studies assessed TGD youth knowledge and attitudes of fertility and fertility preservation, three examined perspectives on fertility counseling and fertility preservation decision-making, and three discussed development of decision tools. Key findings were that: (1) many TGD youth are aware of potential fertility-related impacts of gender-affirming treatments, but there are still unmet informational needs, (2) some TGD youth report an interest in future biological parenthood, and of those who are not currently interested in biological parenthood, many acknowledge their desires may change over time, (3) ongoing discussions about fertility and fertility preservation are critical, and (4) decision tools are in development. In conclusion, TGD youth and their caregivers should receive ongoing, comprehensive fertility counseling and decision tools may be helpful to facilitate these discussions and decisions in each youth's gender-affirming care journey.

A prospective comparison study of subcutaneous and intramuscular testosterone injections in transgender male adolescents.

OBJECTIVES: This prospective study compares testosterone injection type and effects on biochemical changes, clinical effects, and quality of life amongst transgender and gender diverse (TGD) adolescents assigned female at birth (AFAB) over the first 6 months of subcutaneous (SQ) vs. intramuscular (IM) testosterone injections as part of their gender affirming care. METHODS: Subjects were testosterone-naïve transgender adolescents, AFAB, ages 14-18 years old. Subjects were either randomized to injection type or selected a preferred injection type. At enrollment, subjects completed baseline labs and PedsQL™ quality of life questionnaire. At 3 month and 6 month follow up, subjects completed peak and trough testosterone levels, PedsQL™, masculinizing effects, and medication experience questionnaires. RESULTS: Twenty-six subjects participated with a median age 15.5 years. By 6-month follow up, trough testosterone levels were comparable between the two groups. Peak testosterone levels were higher in the IM group at 3-month follow up. Mild adverse effects were rare (12 %, all in SQ subjects) and limited to skin reaction only. Self-reported masculinization effects and quality of life were not statistically different between injection groups. A total of 92 % of participants was self-injecting by 3-month follow up. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study, clinical and biochemical effects are similar between SQ and IM testosterone injections for transgender adolescents. Subjects expressed preference for both injection types. Both SQ and IM injection modalities are safe and effective for TGD youth initiating testosterone and both options should be offered to patients.

A self-guided curriculum on endocrinology standard of care for gender diverse youth, including ethical considerations.

Objective: While the field of pediatric endocrinology, and the American Board of Pediatrics, continues expanding training to include gender-affirming care, many pediatric endocrinology fellowship programs do not have formal curriculum for this patient population. Members of the Pediatric Endocrine Society (PES) that have a special interest in transgender health designed a curriculum based on Endocrine Society practice guidelines to expand the knowledge of gender affirming care for medical trainees' and faculty. Methods: PES members designed a 5-part self-guided educational module series with embedded knowledge questions. Uniquely, medical ethical reflections were included within each module. Participants completed baseline demographic and baseline and follow-up knowledge surveys. Results: Most participants were pediatric endocrinology fellows and 44 % percent (n = 21) completed all study components, including the follow up knowledge survey. Knowledge question data analysis demonstrated knowledge gained in medical management of pubertal youth and surgical interventions. Conclusion: This is the first medical education curriculum in gender-affirming care created by pediatric endocrinologists grounded in the Endocrine Society practice guidelines. This study demonstrates medical knowledge gained in caring for gender diverse youth and is the first to incorporate ethical considerations for this patient population. While initially designed for pediatric endocrinology trainees and faculty, this curriculum may be of great utility for any provider interested in caring for gender diverse youth.