The National Cancer Institute's Cancer Disparities Research Partnership Program: a unique funding model 20 years later.

The burden of cancer and access to effective treatment are not experienced equally by all in the United States. For underserved populations that often access the health-care system when their cancers are in advanced disease stages, radiation oncology services are essential. In 2001, the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Radiation Research Program created and implemented the Cancer Disparities Research Partnership Program (CDRP). CDRP was a pioneering funding model whose goal was to increase participation of medically underserved populations in NCI clinical trials. CDRP's Cooperative Agreement funding supported for awardees the planning, development, and conduct of radiation oncology clinical research in institutions not traditionally involved in NCI-sponsored research and cared for a disproportionate number of medically underserved, health-disparities populations. The awardee secured and provided support for mentorship from 1 of 2 NCI comprehensive cancer centers named in its application. Six CDRP awards were made over two 5-year funding periods ending in 2013, with the end-of-program accomplishments previously reported. With the current focus on addressing equity, diversity, and inclusion, the 6 principal investigators were surveyed, 5 of whom responded about the impact of CDRP on their institutions, communities, and personal career paths. The survey that was emailed included 10 questions on a 5-point Likert scale. It was not possible to collect patient data this long after completion of the program. This article provides a 20-year retrospective of the experiences and observations from those principal investigators that can inform those now planning, building, and implementing equity, diversity, and inclusion programs.

Thymic carcinoma: state of the art review.

Thymic carcinoma is a rare neoplasm with distinct clinical and pathological characteristics. The prognosis is often poor with an aggressive course that belies its numerical rarity. Potentially prognostic factors for survival include histopathologic grade, clinical stage, and resectability of the tumor. Five-year survival rates for all patients are approximately 30-50%, with a significant survival time differential between low-grade and high-grade neoplasms. Owing to the paucity of cases, optimal management of thymic carcinoma has yet to be defined. At present, a multimodality approach involving aggressive surgical resection, platinum-based combination chemotherapeutic interventions, and radiotherapy represent the preferred therapeutic approach. Though our knowledge remains somewhat speculative at present, several scientific, technological and therapeutic innovations may have a potentially significant impact on the future of this disease.

Colorectal cancer screening among Latinos from U.S. cities along the Texas-Mexico border.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are comparatively low for U.S. Hispanics. To learn more about the factors influencing CRC screening among Hispanics living along the U.S.-Mexico border, 12 focus groups were conducted with Hispanic men and women aged 50 years and older in three Texas counties; Cameron County (Brownsville), Webb County (Laredo), and El Paso County, (El Paso). The focus group guide contained questions about health care behavior, knowledge about CRC, experiences with cancer, and factors that influence CRC screening. A total of 92 individuals participated with the majority aged 50-69 (75%). Twenty percent were born in the United States and 51% had lived in the United States for more than 20 years. Participants had low levels of education, income, and insurance coverage. The analysis revealed several overarching and contextual themes relating to knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and emotions about cancer and CRC screening. A prevalent theme that emerged from all groups was frustration and a lack of confidence in the U.S. healthcare system. Few participants had been advised by their providers to obtain CRC screening. Lack of patient knowledge about colorectal cancer and screening appeared to be a critical factor influencing screening. Themes about death and pain due to cancer were prevalent as were cultural factors such as machismo and embarrassment. System level barriers such as cost, medical insurance and transportation also impacted screening. These findings suggest that strategies are needed to educate Hispanic residents of border communities about CRC and to motivate them to undergo CRC screening.

High-dose-rate remote afterloading intracavitary brachytherapy for the treatment of extrahepatic biliary duct carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a dose response exists for extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma (EBDC) when treated with increasingly higher radiation doses delivered via a combination of external beam radiation (EBRT) and high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDRIB). To establish the best tolerated dose of HDRIB. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighteen patients with pathologically proven, locoregional but unresectable or incompletely resected EBDC were studied from 1991-1998 in this phase I/II trial. All patients received EBRT, delivered via megavoltage photons at standard fractionation schedules, for a total dose of 45 Gy. The HDRIB was delivered using the nucleotron HDR remote afterloading unit with a 10 Ci Ir192 source. Each treatment of HDRIB delivered 7 Gy at 1 cm depth. The first group of eight patients received one treatment of HDRIB (Group 1, total dose = 52 Gy). The second group of six patients received two weekly treatments (Group 2, total dose = 59 Gy). The last group of four patients received three weekly treatments of HDRIB (Group 3, total dose = 66 Gy). HDRIB was delivered once weekly concomitant with the EBRT. Acute adverse reactions were evaluated after for each group of patients before escalating to the next higher dose level of HDRIB. RESULTS: The median follow up time for all 18 patients was 15 months. The median survival for all 18 patients was 12.2 months (range 2 to 79.6 months). Overall two-year survival was 27.8%. Three patients (16.7%) had survival of more than 5 years. Dose response is suggested by the median survival of the three groups (9, 12.2, and 20.3 months for Group 1, 2, and 3, respectively), although this did not reach statistical significance. Complete or partial response (>50% reduction in tumor size) was seen in 25% of patients receiving total of 52 Gy compared to 80% of patients (5 patients in Group 2 and 3 patients in Group 3) receiving greater than 59 Gy (P = 0.05). No patients developed Grade 4 complications. One patient in Group 2 developed Grade 3 toxicity after second treatment of HDRIB. CONCLUSION: High dose rate brachytherapy of 21 Gy in three divided weekly treatments, plus 45 Gy of external beam radiation is well tolerated. A dose response is shown with significant increase of PR and CR rate for dose >59 Gy. This modality of treatment appears to be safe and effective for inoperable extrahepatic biliary duct carcinoma.