RESUMO
We conducted a phase I/II multicenter trial using 6 cycles of brentuximab vedotin (BV) in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (R-CHP) for treatment of patients with CD30-positive (+) B-cell lymphomas. Thirty-one patients were evaluable for toxicity and 29 for efficacy including 22 with primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), 5 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and 2 with gray zone lymphoma (GZL). There were no treatment-related deaths; 32% of patients had non-hematological grade 3/4 toxicities. The overall response rate was 100% (95% CI: 88-100) with 86% (95% CI: 68-96) of patients achieving complete response at the end of systemic treatment. Consolidative radiation following end of treatment response assessment was permissible and used in 52% of all patients including 59% of patients with PMBCL. With a median follow-up of 30 months, the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 85% (95% CI: 66-94) and 100%, respectively. In the PMBCL cohort, 2-year PFS was 86% (95% CI: 62-95). In summary, BV-R-CHP with or without consolidative radiation is a feasible and active frontline regimen for CD30+ B-cell lymphomas (NCT01994850).
Assuntos
Imunoconjugados , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Brentuximab Vedotin , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Doxorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Imunoconjugados/uso terapêutico , Antígeno Ki-1 , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Vincristina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) has been an integral component in the treatment of many hematologic malignancies. Since the development of HCT nearly 50 years ago, the role of this modality has evolved as newer treatment approaches have been developed and integrated into the standard of care. In the last decade, novel and highly active targeted therapies and immunotherapies have been approved for many hematologic malignancies, raising the question of whether HCT continues to retain its prominent role in the treatment paradigms of various hematologic malignancies. In this review, the authors have described the current role of autologous and allogeneic HCT in the treatment of patients with acute leukemias, aggressive B-cell lymphomas, and multiple myeloma and discussed how novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies have changed the potential need, timing, and goal of HCT in patients with these diseases.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Humanos , Imunoterapia , Medicina de Precisão , Padrão de Cuidado , Transplante Autólogo , Transplante HomólogoRESUMO
Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) have limited options for salvage, and checkpoint blockade therapy (CBT) has little efficacy. Usage in solid malignancies suggests that CBT sensitises tumours to subsequent chemotherapy. We performed the first analysis of CBT on subsequent NHL treatment. Seventeen North American centres retrospectively queried records. The primary aim was to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) to post-CBT treatment. Secondary aims included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR) and overall survival (OS). Fifty-nine patients (68% aggressive NHL, 69% advanced disease) were included. Patients received a median of three therapies before CBT. Fifty-three (90%) discontinued CBT due to progression. Post-CBT regimens included chemotherapy (49%), targeted therapy (30%), clinical trial (17%), transplant conditioning (2%) and chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy (2%). The ORR to post-CBT treatment was 51%, with median PFS of 6·1 months. In patients with at least stable disease (SD) to post-CBT, the median DOR was significantly longer than to pre-CBT (310 vs. 79 days, P = 0·005) suggesting sensitisation. Nineteen patients were transplanted after post-CBT therapy. Median overall survival was not reached, nor affected by regimen. Prospective trials are warranted, as this may offer R/R NHL patients a novel therapeutic approach.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/administração & dosagem , Imunoterapia Adotiva , Linfoma não Hodgkin , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aloenxertos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Linfoma não Hodgkin/mortalidade , Linfoma não Hodgkin/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
Atypical response patterns following immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) led to the concept of continuation of treatment beyond progression (TBP); however, the longitudinal benefit of this approach is unclear. We therefore performed a retrospective analysis of 64 patients treated with ICB; 20 who received TBP (TBP cohort) and 44 who stopped ICB at initial progression (non-TBP cohort). The TBP cohort received ICB for a median of 4.7 months after initial progression and delayed subsequent treatment by a median of 6.6 months. Despite receiving more prior lines of therapy, the TBP cohort achieved longer progression-free survival with post-ICB treatment (median, 17.5 months vs. 6.1 months, p = .035) and longer time-to-subsequent treatment failure, defined as time from initial ICB progression to failure of subsequent treatment (median, 34.6 months vs. 9.9 months, p = .003). With the limitations of a retrospective study, these results support the clinical benefit of TBP with ICB for selected patients.
Assuntos
Doença de Hodgkin , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Estudos de Coortes , Doença de Hodgkin/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is highly curable, 20%-30% of patients will not be cured with conventional treatments. The programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (PD-1i) nivolumab and pembrolizumab have been Food and Drug Administration-approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) cHL. There is limited data on the real-world experience with PD-1i in cHL and it is unknown whether fewer selected patients treated with PD-1i derive benefits similar to those observed in published trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective analysis of R/R cHL patients treated with PD-1i in the nontrial setting. The primary objective was to describe progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in this population. Secondary objectives were to characterize response rates, toxicities, discontinuation patterns, and post-PD-1i therapies. RESULTS: The study included 53 patients from nine U.S. centers. Overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), and partial response (PR) to PD-1i were 68%, 45%, and 23%, respectively. Twelve-month OS and PFS were 89% and 75%, respectively; median PFS was 29 months. Ninety-six percent of patients with CR continue to respond at a median follow-up of 20 months. Toxicities were similar to those previously described. Seventy percent of patients treated with systemic therapy after PD-1i demonstrated objective responses. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this analysis is the first describing real-world experience with PD-1i in cHL patients in the U.S. Here, we demonstrate similar response rates compared to prior studies. The toxicity profile of PD-1i was similar to that seen in previous studies; we further describe toxicity patterns in those with prior autoimmune disease or allogeneic transplant. Post-PD-1i systemic therapies appear active. These results support the effectiveness and tolerability of PD-1i therapy in R/R cHL in a real-world setting. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Two PD-1 inhibitors have recently been approved for patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma based on results from nonrandomized clinical trials. However, to date, there have been no studies evaluating the effectiveness and toxicity profile of these drugs in the real-world setting in the U.S. The present study demonstrates that patients treated in a real-world context experience similar rates of overall effectiveness compared with published clinical trials. Patients who discontinue PD-1 inhibitors may experience clinical responses to subsequent treatment with systemic chemotherapy or targeted therapy. This study provides clinicians with further insight into the effectiveness and tolerability of PD-1 inhibitors and suggests that when patients progress while on these drugs, conventional systemic chemotherapy may be an effective treatment option.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/mortalidade , Doença de Hodgkin/tratamento farmacológico , Nivolumabe/efeitos adversos , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Adolescente , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/tratamento farmacológico , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/etiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Doença de Hodgkin/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Studies of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have demonstrated the potential to produce deep remissions-and possibly cures-in some patients with heavily pretreated, high-risk, relapsed, and refractory disease. Unfortunately, most clinical trials of CAR T cells in CLL report complete responses only in the minority of patients, although recent studies have begun to elucidate the factors most predictive of response. These studies have suggested strategies for optimizing CAR T-cell fitness as well as the pre-existing host immune response, approaches that will likely lead to improvements in the efficacy of CAR T cells in CLL. Treating patients earlier in the course of their disease or using combination therapies with CAR T cells may further enhance efficacy. In this review, we summarize the existing literature on CAR T cell therapy in CLL, discuss mechanisms of response and resistance, and describe challenges facing the field.
Assuntos
Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/terapia , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Tolerância Imunológica , Imunoterapia Adotiva/tendências , Indução de RemissãoRESUMO
Patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (RR-HL) who progress or relapse following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have historically had a poor prognosis. Several novel agents, particularly brentuximab vedotin, have shown efficacy in this setting. However, there remains a paucity of data characterizing outcomes outside of clinical trials and how these novel agents have impacted prognosis in general population of patients with RR-HL. Here, we conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate outcomes in 87 patients with RR-HL with relapse post-ASCT. Treatment with novel agents (including brentuximab vedotin) was associated with significant improvement in median overall survival (OS) compared to patients who did not receive novel agents (85.6 vs 17.1 months; P < .001). Additional factors associated with improved OS in univariate analysis include treatment with radiation therapy post-ASCT (34.1 vs 17.0 months; P = .015), chemosensitivity (i.e., relapsed compared to primary refractory disease; 51.8 vs 25.6 months; p = 0.013), initial response to ASCT (i.e., CR/PR compared to SD/PD; 46.1 vs 20.4 months; P = .011), and transplantation in 2010 and later compared to prior to 2010 (not reached vs 24.5 months; P = .025). The current study demonstrates markedly improved OS in RR-HL patients treated with novel therapeutics and lends "real world" credence to the role of these agents in improving outcomes in the current era.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Doença de Hodgkin/mortalidade , Doença de Hodgkin/terapia , Imunoconjugados/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Autoenxertos , Brentuximab Vedotin , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) has extended survival of patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, limited durability of response and prevalent toxicities remain problematic. Identifying patients who are at high risk of disease progression, toxicity, and death would inform treatment decisions. Although the cumulative illness rating scale (CIRS) has been shown to correlate with survival in B-cell malignancies, no prognostic score has been independently validated in CART recipients. We retrospectively identified 577 patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL indicated for CART at 9 academic centers to form a learning cohort (LC). Random survival forest modeling of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was performed to determine the most influential CIRS organ systems and severity grades. The presence of a severe comorbidity (CIRS score ≥ 3) in the respiratory, upper gastrointestinal, hepatic, or renal system, herein termed "Severe4," had the greatest impact on post-CART survival. Controlling for other prognostic factors (number of prior therapies, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, BCL6 translocation, and molecular subtype), Severe4 was strongly associated with shorter PFS and OS in the LC and in an independent single-center validation cohort (VC). Severe4 was also a significant predictor of grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome in the LC, while maintaining this trend in the VC. Thus, our results indicate that adverse outcomes for patients with DLBCL meant to receive CART can be predicted using a simplified CIRS-derived comorbidity index.
Assuntos
Imunoterapia Adotiva , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Humanos , Prognóstico , Imunoterapia Adotiva/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , ComorbidadeRESUMO
In the pivotal study ECHELON-1, brentuximab vedotin (BV), doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A + AVD) demonstrated superior efficacy compared with bleomycin + AVD for the treatment of advanced-stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). However, there are minimal available data regarding the frequency of dose reductions or omission of BV during curative therapy and the potential impact on patient outcomes. In a real-world analysis, we retrospectively reviewed the characteristics and outcomes of 179 patients with stage III or IV cHL treated with frontline A + AVD from January 2010 to April 2022. Treatment consisted of up to 1.2 mg/kg of BV and standard dose AVD IV on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for up to 6 cycles. At the time of treatment, the median patient age was 37 years, and a high-risk International Prognostic Score was observed in 46% of patients. Overall, 91% of patients received 6 cycles of AVD; 55% of patients did not receive the intended cumulative dose of BV (CDB); 28% of patients received two-thirds or less than the planned CDB. At a median follow-up time of 27.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.8-29), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached, and the 12-month PFS was 90.3% (95% CI, 85.9-95.0). The impact of CDB on PFS was not significant (P = .15), nor was high CDB significantly associated with increased adverse events. In real-world experience, A + AVD is a highly effective treatment for patients with advanced-stage cHL, including for patients with prominent dose reductions of BV.
Assuntos
Doença de Hodgkin , Humanos , Adulto , Doença de Hodgkin/terapia , Brentuximab Vedotin/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Bleomicina/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Brentuximab vedotin (BV) in combination with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD) is increasingly used for frontline treatment of stage III/IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Peripheral neuropathy (PN) was the most common and treatment-limiting side effect seen in clinical trials but has not been studied in a nontrial setting, in which clinicians may have different strategies for managing it. We conducted a multisite retrospective study to characterize PN in patients who received BV + AVD for newly diagnosed cHL. One hundred fifty-three patients from 10 US institutions were eligible. Thirty-four patients (22%) had at least 1 ineligibility criteria for ECHELON-1, including stage, performance status, and comorbidities. PN was reported by 80% of patients during treatment; 39% experienced grade (G) 1, 31% G2, and 10% G3. In total, BV was modified in 44% of patients because of PN leading to BV discontinuation in 23%, dose reduction in 17%, and temporary hold in 4%. With a median follow-up of 24 months, PN resolution was documented in 36% and improvement in 33% at the last follow-up. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) for the advanced-stage patients was 82.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.90) and overall survival was 97.4% (95% CI, 0.94-1.00). Patients who discontinued BV because of PN did not have inferior PFS. In the nontrial setting, BV + AVD was associated with a high incidence of PN. In our cohort, which includes patients who would not have been eligible for the pivotal ECHELON-1 trial, BV discontinuation rates were higher than previously reported, but 2-year outcomes remain comparable.
Assuntos
Doença de Hodgkin , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico , Humanos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Brentuximab Vedotin/uso terapêutico , Doença de Hodgkin/complicações , Doença de Hodgkin/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Hodgkin/patologia , Incidência , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/etiologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/induzido quimicamente , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Hodgkin lymphoma, a B-cell malignancy, is most common in patients younger than 55 years. Between 70% and 90% are cured with standard approaches. The high cure rate and long-term survival resulted in a need to minimize therapy toxicity. Response-adapted approaches have been developed to de-escalate therapy in those likely to be cured and intensifying therapy in those not responding to initial treatment. FDG-PET after chemotherapy is highly predictive of outcome. Thus, FDG-PET has been incorporated into response-adapted treatments. Use of FDG-PET to guide treatment in Hodgkin lymphoma has been recommended. We summarize literature and discuss challenges and future directions.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Doença de Hodgkin/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença de Hodgkin/tratamento farmacológico , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/métodos , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Humanos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is one of the most common lymphomas in the Western world. Although most patients are cured with standard first-line therapy, up to 20% of patients will have relapsed or refractory disease. Although the conventional approach to treatment has consisted of chemotherapy, radiation, and for those who relapse, autologous or allogeneic transplantation, newer approaches have become available in recent years, including immunoconjugates and checkpoint inhibitors. These approaches have shown significant efficacy in clinical trials and might be associated with fewer long-term toxicities compared with conventional therapies. In this review we discuss the biology of cHL as it pertains to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and then review the existing clinical trial results of several emerging immunotherapies in this context, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive cellular therapy. Finally, several clinical practice issues pertaining to the use of immunotherapies are discussed.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Doença de Hodgkin/terapia , Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/farmacologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Receptores Coestimuladores e Inibidores de Linfócitos T/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptores Coestimuladores e Inibidores de Linfócitos T/imunologia , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/imunologia , Doença de Hodgkin/imunologia , Doença de Hodgkin/patologia , Humanos , Imunoconjugados/uso terapêutico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/imunologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Microambiente Tumoral/efeitos dos fármacos , Microambiente Tumoral/imunologiaRESUMO
Novel cancer therapies targeting tumor angiogenesis have revolutionized treatment options in a variety of tumors. Specifically, VEGF signaling pathway (VSP) inhibitors have been introduced into clinical practice at a rapid pace over the last decade. It is becoming increasingly clear that VSP inhibitors can cause cardiovascular toxicities including hypertension, thrombosis, and heart failure. This review highlights these toxicities and proposes several strategies in their prevention and treatment. However, we recognize the dearth of data in this area and advocate a multi-disciplinary approach involving cardiologists and oncologists, as well as clinical and translational studies, in understanding and treating VSP-inhibitor associated toxicities.