Correction to: Imaging of Bronchial Pathology in Antibody Deficiency: Data from the European Chest CT Group.

In the original version of this article unfortunately two authors were missing: Dr. Jürgen Weidemann and Dr. Daniel Berthold. The correct list of authors is presented above.

Imaging of Bronchial Pathology in Antibody Deficiency: Data from the European Chest CT Group.

Studies of chest computed tomography (CT) in patients with primary antibody deficiency syndromes (ADS) suggest a broad range of bronchial pathology. However, there are as yet no multicentre studies to assess the variety of bronchial pathology in this patient group. One of the underlying reasons is the lack of a consensus methodology, a prerequisite to jointly document chest CT findings. We aimed to establish an international platform for the evaluation of bronchial pathology as assessed by chest CT and to describe the range of bronchial pathologies in patients with antibody deficiency. Ffteen immunodeficiency centres from 9 countries evaluated chest CT scans of patients with ADS using a predefined list of potential findings including an extent score for bronchiectasis. Data of 282 patients with ADS were collected. Patients with common variable immunodeficiency disorders (CVID) comprised the largest subgroup (232 patients, 82.3%). Eighty percent of CVID patients had radiological evidence of bronchial pathology including bronchiectasis in 61%, bronchial wall thickening in 44% and mucus plugging in 29%. Bronchiectasis was detected in 44% of CVID patients aged less than 20 years. Cough was a better predictor for bronchiectasis than spirometry values. Delay of diagnosis as well as duration of disease correlated positively with presence of bronchiectasis. The use of consensus diagnostic criteria and a pre-defined list of bronchial pathologies allows for comparison of chest CT data in multicentre studies. Our data suggest a high prevalence of bronchial pathology in CVID due to late diagnosis or duration of disease.

Imaging pneumonia in immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The article aims to indicate the current role of radiological imaging in immune competent and immunocompromised patients with pneumonia. The radiological findings in the most common conditions will be reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: Three basic patterns of radiographic abnormality are recognized: lobar (nonsegmental) pneumonia; bronchopneumonia (lobular pneumonia); and interstitial pneumonia. The chest radiograph remains the initial radiological investigation. Computed tomography (CT) is more sensitive than the chest radiograph. The appearances on CT with certain infections such as mycoplasma, invasive aspergillosis, and pneumocystis, in the appropriate clinical setting, may allow a treatment decision to be made when obtaining fluid or tissue for culture is problematical. MRI technology is advancing and this technique may provide an option for follow-up of chronic disease in younger patients in whom radiation exposure is a concern, but MRI does not yet match CT as a diagnostic test in this field. SUMMARY: Radiology retains a key role in diagnosing pneumonia, excluding pneumonia, following up patients to check for resolution and to evaluate potential complications. The chest radiograph remains the initial examination. CT is more sensitive and with certain infections more specific. MRI provides an option for monitoring progress, although cannot yet match CT as an initial diagnostic test.

The role of cranial CT in the investigation of meningitis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the usage of cranial computed tomography (CT) in patients admitted with meningitis. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Heart of England NHS foundation trust, a teaching hospital in the West Midlands. PARTICIPANTS: Two groups of adult patients admitted with meningitis between April 2001 and September 2004 and from September 2006 until September 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The numbers of patients having cranial CT and lumbar puncture and whether any complications had arisen following lumbar puncture. The appropriateness of the CT request according to local criteria. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients were admitted in the initial time period and 47 patients in the second time period. In the first group, 67 patients underwent CT (61%), compared with 36 patients (80%) in the second group. There were eight abnormal scans (12%) in the initial group including three patients with radiological features of cerebral oedema. Of these patients, one underwent lumbar puncture and had no neurological sequelae. In the second group, there were five abnormal scans (14%) with one presenting a contraindication for lumbar puncture due to mild ventricular dilatation. A lumbar puncture was performed in this patient without complication. All patients with abnormal scans had clinical features to suggest raised intracranial pressure. CT scan requests were considered inappropriate in 26% of patients in the initial study period and 56% of patients in the second study period. CONCLUSION: More patients with meningitis are undergoing CT and the number of inappropriate requests are increasing. There are few abnormal CT scans presenting a contraindication for lumbar puncture and the majority of these patients usually have clinical signs to suggest raised intracranial pressure.