Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 40(7): 1579-1582, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33580843

RESUMO

We aimed to compare respiratory pathogen carriage by PCR during three different time periods in 2020 in sheltered homeless people in Marseille, France. The overall prevalence of respiratory pathogen carriage in late March-early April (69.9%) was significantly higher than in late April (42.3%) and mid-July (45.1%). Bacterial carriage significantly decreased between late March-early April and late April. SARS-CoV-2 was detected only in late March-early April samples (20.6%). Measures aiming at mitigating SARS-CoV-2 transmission were effective and also impacted bacterial carriage. Seasonal variations of bacterial carriage between winter and summer in this population were not marked.


Assuntos
Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Pessoas Mal Alojadas/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bactérias/classificação , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Portador Sadio/diagnóstico , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Estações do Ano , Vírus/classificação , Vírus/isolamento & purificação , Adulto Jovem
2.
Viruses ; 13(8)2021 08 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34452483

RESUMO

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivations represent a significant morbidity and mortality problem in transplant patients. Reliable and rapid measurement of CMV viral load is a key issue for optimal patient management. We report here the evaluation of NeuMoDx™ (Qiagen) in a routine hospital setting (University Hospitals of Marseille, France) in comparison with our classical reference technique R-GENE. During one month, 719 CMV viral loads from 507 patients were measured in parallel in both techniques. Using the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve and our biological experience we suggest that values <52 IU/mL (geometric mean) correspond to negative samples, values >140 IU/mL (Fowlkes-Mallows index) correspond to quantifiable positive results and values ranging from 52 to 140 IU/mL represent non-quantifiable positive results. Follow-up of 15 transplant patients who developed CMV reactivation during the study showed that NeuMoDx™ provided higher viral load measurement during the first two weeks of follow-up for three patients. These important intra-individual variations resulted in a significant median increase considering the whole data set (6.7 points of difference expressed as a percentage of the initial viral load). However, no difference between the two techniques was noticeable after two weeks of treatment. Subsequent to this first study we conclude that NeuMoDx™, used with optimized logistics and an adapted threshold, allows a rapid CMV viral load measurement and that its use does not lead to any difference in patient management compared to the reference technique R-GENE®.


Assuntos
Automação Laboratorial/normas , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/virologia , Citomegalovirus/genética , DNA Viral/genética , Transplantados/estatística & dados numéricos , Carga Viral/instrumentação , Automação Laboratorial/instrumentação , Automação Laboratorial/métodos , Citomegalovirus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/sangue , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Retroalimentação , França , Humanos , Laboratórios Clínicos , Infecção Latente/virologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Carga Viral/métodos , Carga Viral/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Int J Infect Dis ; 105: 1-6, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33578010

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surveillance of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among sheltered homeless and other vulnerable people might provide the information needed to prevent its spread within accommodation centres. METHODS: Data were obtained from 698 participants in different accommodation centres (411 homeless individuals, 77 asylum-seekers, 58 other people living in precarious conditions and 152 employees working in these accommodation centres) who completed questionnaires and had nasal samples collected between 26 March and 17 April 2020. SARS-CoV-2 carriage was assessed by quantitative PCR. RESULTS: We found a high acceptance rate (78.9%) for testing. Overall, 49 people (7.0%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2, including 37 homeless individuals (of 411, 9.0%) and 12 employees (of 152, 7.9%). SARS-CoV-2 positivity correlated with symptoms, although 51% of patients who tested positive did not report respiratory symptoms or fever. Among homeless people, being young (18-34 years) (odds ratio 3.83, 95% confidence interval 1.47-10.0, p = 0.006) and being housed in one specific shelter (odds ratio 9.13, 95% confidence interval 4.09-20.37, p < 0.001) were independent factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 positivity (rates of 11.4% and 20.6%, respectively). DISCUSSION: Symptom screening alone is insufficient to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission in vulnerable sheltered people. Systematic testing should be promoted.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pessoas Mal Alojadas , Refugiados , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/transmissão , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Pessoas Mal Alojadas/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA