Blood Pressure after Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke (BEST): A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.

Background and Purpose- To identify the specific post-endovascular stroke therapy (EVT) peak systolic blood pressure (SBP) threshold that best discriminates good from bad functional outcomes (a priori hypothesized to be 160 mm Hg), we conducted a prospective, multicenter, cohort study with a prespecified analysis plan. Methods- Consecutive adult patients treated with EVT for an anterior ischemic stroke were enrolled from November 2017 to July 2018 at 12 comprehensive stroke centers accross the United States. All SBP values within 24 hours post-EVT were recorded. Using Youden index, the threshold of peak SBP that best discriminated primary outcome of dichotomized 90-day modified Rankin Scale score (0-2 versus 3-6) was identified. Association of this SBP threshold with the outcomes was quantified using multiple logistic regression. Results- Among 485 enrolled patients (median age, 69 [interquartile range, 57-79] years; 51% females), a peak SBP of 158 mm Hg was associated with the largest difference in the dichotomous modified Rankin Scale score (absolute risk reduction of 19%). Having a peak SBP >158 mm Hg resulted in an increased likelihood of modified Rankin Scale score 3 to 6 (odds ratio, 2.24 [1.52-3.29], P<0.01; adjusted odds ratio, 1.29 [0.81-2.06], P=0.28, after adjustment for prespecified variables). Conclusions- A peak post-EVT SBP of 158 mm Hg was prospectively identified to best discriminate good from bad functional outcome. Those with a peak SBP >158 had an increased likelihood of having a bad outcome in unadjusted, but not in adjusted analysis. The observed effect size was similar to prior studies. This finding should undergo further testing in a future randomized trial of goal-targeted post-EVT antihypertensive treatment.

Thrombectomy in DAWN- and DEFUSE-3-Ineligible Patients: A Subgroup Analysis From the BEST Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Because of the overwhelming benefit of thrombectomy for highly selected trial patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO), some trial-ineligible patients are being treated in practice. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of thrombectomy in DAWN/DEFUSE-3-ineligible patients. METHODS: Using a multicenter prospective observational study of consecutive patients with anterior circulation LVO who underwent late thrombectomy, we compared symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and good outcome (90-d mRS 0-2) among DAWN/DEFUSE-3-ineligible patients to trial-eligible patients and to untreated DAWN/DEFUSE-3 controls. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients had perfusion imaging and underwent thrombectomy >6 h; 46 (47%) were trial ineligible (41% M2 occlusions, 39% mild deficits, 28% ASPECTS <6). In multivariable regression, the odds of a good outcome (aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.49-1.19) and sICH (aOR 3.33, 95% CI 0.42-26.12) were not different among trial-ineligible vs eligible patients. Patients with mild deficits were more likely to achieve a good outcome (aOR 3.62, 95% CI 1.48-8.86) and less sICH (0% vs 10%, P = .16), whereas patients with ASPECTS <6 had poorer outcomes (aOR 0.14, 95% CI 0.05-0.44) and more sICH (aOR 24, 95% CI 5.7-103). Compared to untreated DAWN/DEFUSE-3 controls, trial-ineligible patients had more sICH (13%BEST vs 3%DAWN [P = .02] vs 4%DEFUSE [P = .05]), but were more likely to achieve a good outcome at 90 d (36%BEST vs 13%DAWN [P < .01] vs 17%DEFUSE [P = .01]). CONCLUSION: Thrombectomy is used in practice for some patients ineligible for the DAWN/DEFUSE-3 trials with potentially favorable outcomes. Additional trials are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of thrombectomy in broader populations, such as large core infarction and M2 occlusions.

Noncontrast CT versus Perfusion-Based Core Estimation in Large Vessel Occlusion: The Blood Pressure after Endovascular Stroke Therapy Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The 2018 AHA guidelines recommend perfusion imaging to select patients with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) for thrombectomy in the extended window. However, the relationship between noncontrast CT and CT perfusion imaging has not been sufficiently characterized >6 hours after last known normal (LKN). METHODS: From a multicenter prospective cohort of consecutive adults who underwent thrombectomy for anterior LVO 0-24 hours after LKN, we correlated baseline core volume (rCBF < 30%) and the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scale (ASPECTS) score. We compared perfusion findings between patients with an unfavorable ASPECTS (<6) against those with a favorable ASPECTS (≥6), and assessed findings over time. RESULTS: Of 485 enrolled patients, 177 met inclusion criteria (median age: 69 years, interquartile range [IQR: 57-81], 49% female, median ASPECTS 8 [IQR: 6-9], median core 10 cc [IQR: 0-30]). ASPECTS and core volume moderately correlated (r = -.37). A 0 cc core was observed in 54 (31%) patients, 70% of whom had ASPECTS <10. Of the 28 patients with ASPECTS <6, 3 (11%) had a 0 cc core. After adjustment for age and stroke severity, there was a lower ASPECTS for every 1 hour delay from LKN (cOR: 0.95, 95% confidence of interval [CI]: 0.91-1.00, P = .04). There was no difference in core (P = .51) or penumbra volumes (P = .87) across patients over time. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter prospective cohort of patients who underwent thrombectomy, one-third of patients had normal CTP core volumes despite nearly three quarters of patients showing ischemic changes on CT. This finding emphasizes the need to carefully assess both noncontrast and perfusion imaging when considering thrombectomy eligibility.