Lessons Learned: The Varied Responses of Massachusetts' Local Health Departments During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

CONTEXT: Massachusetts' decentralized public health model holds tightly to its founding principle of home rule and a board of health system established in 1799. Consequently, Massachusetts has more local health departments (n = 351) than any other state. During COVID-19, each health department, steeped in centuries of independence, launched its own response to the pandemic. OBJECTIVES: To analyze local public health resources and responses to COVID-19. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews and a survey gathered quantitative and qualitative information about communities' responses and resources before and during the pandemic. Municipality demographics (American Community Survey) served as a proxy for community health literacy. We tracked the frequency and content of local board of health meetings using minutes and agendas; we rated the quality of COVID-19 communications on town Web sites. SETTING: The first 6 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Massachusetts: March-August 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Health directors and agents in 10 south-central Massachusetts municipalities, identified as the point of contact by the Academic Public Health Corps. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured municipality resources using self-reported budgets, staffing levels, and demographic-based estimates of community health literacy. We identified COVID-19 responses through communities' self-reported efforts, information on town Web sites, and meeting minutes and agendas. RESULTS: Municipalities excelled in communicating with residents, local businesses, and neighboring towns but lacked the staffing and funding for an efficient and coordinated response. On average, municipal budgets ranged from $5 to $16 per capita, and COVID-19 consumed 75% of health department staff time. All respondents noted extreme workload increases. While municipal Web sites received high scores for Accurate Information, other categories (Navigability; Timeliness; Information Present) were less than 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Increased support for regionalization and sustained public health funding would improve local health responses during complex emergencies in states with local public health administration.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Related Abstracts Presented at National Conferences in the USA Are Frequently Unpublished as Full Manuscripts.

BACKGROUND: Numerous abstracts related to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are presented at national conferences in the USA. The overall rate of publication of these abstracts as complete manuscripts is unknown . METHODS: Abstracts submitted to the 2010 American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), Advances in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (AIBD), and the American Gastroenterological Association abstracts at Digestive Disease Week (DDW) were reviewed. Each abstract was reviewed manually by two authors for type of research, study design, patient population, and outcome. Both PubMed and Google were then searched to determine whether the abstract was published as a full manuscript within five years of the conference. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out using Stata 14.1. RESULTS: In total, 872 abstracts were reviewed. 49% (426/872) were published as complete manuscripts within five years of the conference. The average length of time to publication was 1.87 years (range 0-5). 42% of abstracts from ACG, 58% from AIBD, and 23% from DDW were eventually published (p < 0.0001). However, abstracts presented at DDW had the shortest time to publication compared to the other conferences (p = 0.002). Factors predictive of eventual publication include: number of authors (mean 7.5 for published vs 6.4 for unpublished p = 0.0001), clinical research compared to basic and translational (p = 0.026), and studies assessing drug safety with no adverse effects reported (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Nearly 50% of the abstracts presented at major gastroenterology conferences in the USA are published as full manuscripts 5 years after the conference. Further studies are needed to assess why so many abstracts are not published.