Wet versus dry age-related macular degeneration in patients with central field loss: different effects on maximum reading speed.

PURPOSE: To describe new, efficient predictors of maximum reading speed (MRS) in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients with central field loss. Type of AMD (wet versus dry) was scrutinized, because this factor seems to offer a promising model of differential visual adaptation induced by different temporal courses of disease progression. METHODS: Linear mixed-effects (LME) analyses were performed on a dataset initially collected to assess the effect of interline spacing on MRS. MRS was measured with MNread-like French sentences in 89 eyes (64 dry and 25 wet) of 61 patients with AMD. Microperimetry examination was performed on each eye. The eyes were included only if they had a dense macular scotoma including the fovea, to ensure that patients used eccentric viewing. RESULTS: Analyses show the unique contributions--after adjustment for the effects of other factors--of three new factors: (1) MRS was higher for wet than for dry AMD eyes; (2) an advantage of similar amplitude was found for phakic eyes compared with pseudophakic eyes; and (3) MRS decreased when distance between fixation preferred retinal locus (PRL) and fovea increased. In addition, the instantaneous slope of the relationship between scotoma area and MRS was much shallower than reported in two other studies. CONCLUSIONS: The four effects improve the ability to predict MRS reliably for AMD patients. The wet/dry difference is a major finding that may result from the different time courses of the two types of disease, thus involving different types of visuomotor and attentional adaptation processes.

Small effect of interline spacing on maximal reading speed in low-vision patients with central field loss irrespective of scotoma size.

PURPOSE: It has been suggested that crowding, the adverse low-level effect due to the proximity of adjacent stimuli, explains slow reading in low-vision patients with absolute macular scotomas. According to this hypothesis, crowding in the vertical dimension should be released by increasing the vertical spacing between lines of text. However, studies with different experimental paradigms and only a few observers have given discrepant results on this question. The purpose of this study was to investigate this issue with a large number of patients whose macular function was carefully assessed. METHODS: MP1 microperimetry examination was performed for each low-vision patient. Only eyes with an absolute macular scotoma and no foveal sparing (61 patients with AMD, 90 eyes; four patients with Stargardt disease, eight eyes) were included. Maximal reading speed was assessed for each eye with French sentences designed on the MNREAD test principles. RESULTS: The effect of interline spacing on maximal reading speed (MRS) was significant although small; average MRS increased by 7.1 words/min from standard to double interline spacing. The effect was weak irrespective of PRL distance from the fovea and scotoma area and regardless of whether an eccentric island of functional vision was present within the scotoma. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing interline spacing is advisable only for very slow readers (<20 words/min) who want to read a few words (spot reading). Vertical crowding does not seem to be a major determinant of maximal reading speed for patients with central scotomas.