Attitudes toward and preparedness for lung transplantation among individuals with cystic fibrosis in the era of highly effective modulators.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes for individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) have improved due to highly effective modulator therapy (HEMT). However, lung transplant (LTx) remains an important treatment for people with advanced lung disease. This study assessed attitudes and knowledge about LTx in the HEMT era. METHODS: All patients from the University of Washington CF clinic were surveyed March 25-May 30, 2020. Questions addressed self-rated LTx preparedness and knowledge, as well as barriers and facilitators to discussing LTx. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from the electronic health record. RESULTS: There were 159/224 (71%) responses. Respondents had a median forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 70%, and 142 (89%) were on modulatory therapy. One hundred thirteen (71%) respondents felt that it was moderately or very important to be prepared to make decisions about LTx, though only 56 (35%) felt moderately or very prepared. Only 83 (30%) and 47 (52%) participants correctly answered questions about life expectancy and improved quality of life after LTx, respectively. Respondents with Medicaid insurance less frequently answered questions correctly. The most common barriers to discussing LTx were fear of being a burden on loved ones for 58 respondents (36%) and cost of LTx for 46 (29%). Most participants (94%) trusted their CF doctor, and 75% of participants selected trust as a facilitator for LTx discussions. CONCLUSIONS: Many individuals with CF, especially those with lower socioeconomic status, lacked knowledge and did not feel very prepared for decisions about LTx. Earlier education and discussions about LTx represent an area for improvement in CF care.

A longitudinal analysis of respiratory symptoms in people with cystic fibrosis with advanced lung disease on and off ETI.

People with CF (PwCF), particularly those with advanced lung disease (ALD), experience frequent respiratory symptoms. A major CF breakthrough was the approval of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) in 2019, which has been shown to improve symptoms and lung function in the CF population, and decrease pulmonary exacerbations. The purpose of this study was to analyze longitudinal changes in respiratory symptoms over 24 months in ETI-treated and untreated PwCF with ALD Symptoms were measured among CF adults with ppFEV1 < 40% (N = 48, 24 ETI-treated, 24 untreated) using the CFRSD-CRISS and the CFQ-R [respiratory]. Two multilevel growth models assessed the rate of change in symptoms overall and within the ETI-treated and untreated groups. PwCF on ETI had significantly lower symptom severity over 24 months than those not on ETI as measured by the CRISS and CFQ-R. The ETI-treated group maintained an -11.7 and +19.3 point difference(p<0.01) in CRISS and CFQ-R scores over the study compared to the non-ETI group, achieving minimal clinically important differences on average between groups on both instruments. No change in the symptom burden trajectory between groups was observed (p = 0.58). Even with ALD, ETI-treated PwCF have a lower respiratory burden than those not on ETI. This may be confounded by survivorship bias in the non-ETI group. Of note, in this ALD cohort, neither instrument demonstrated ceiling effects. Our results suggest that, while ETI has significantly improved the lived experience, PwCF with ALD are still plagued by respiratory symptoms.

Qualitative Analysis of Perspectives on Lung Transplant among People with Cystic Fibrosis.

Rationale: Lung transplant (LTx) is a potentially lifesaving treatment option for individuals with advanced cystic fibrosis (CF), but more people with CF (PwCF) and advanced lung disease die each year than undergo transplant in the United States. Little is known about these individuals' LTx information needs and factors influencing their decision-making process related to transplant. Objectives: To examine PwCF's experiences with and preferences for provision of LTx information and to identify transplant information needs that CF clinicians are well positioned to address. Methods: We performed semistructured qualitative interviews in two separate cohorts: PwCF without LTx and PwCF with LTx between July 2019 and June 2020. Questions focused on awareness and knowledge about LTx, perspectives related to communication about transplant in the CF clinic, and experiences with LTx. Thematic analysis was used to organize the qualitative data. Exemplar quotes were chosen to llustrate domains that emerged pertaining to the research objectives. Results: Fifty-five PwCF, including 35 without LTx and 20 with LTx, participated. One-third of PwCF without LTx had normal or near-normal lung function. Key common domains among PwCF with and without LTx were identified, including information needs, connections with LTx recipients, and conversations with CF clinicians. For PwCF with and without transplant, concrete information needs were identified: success or survival, social support, surgery, recovery/pain, and quality of life post-transplant. The importance of connecting with LTx recipients to hear their stories and experiences was emphasized by both PwCF with and without transplant. Important considerations for timing and content of discussions with CF clinicians were identified, including having information presented early (before LTx referral is needed) and in limited detail at first. PwCF without LTx wanted to understand how LTx was relevant to them, with a focus on the unique experience of CF. PwCF with LTx emphasized the need for a centralized resource for LTx information. Conclusions: The findings provide content areas for CF clinicians to focus on as they proactively initiate conversations about LTx and support the development of tools to aid in discussions about LTx for PwCF.

The impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on fat-soluble vitamin levels in people with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: While elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has improved the pulmonary health of many people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF), less is known about ETI effectiveness for extra-pulmonary manifestations, including fat-soluble vitamin malabsorption. This study aims to evaluate ETI's impact on vitamin A, D, E, and international normalized ratio (INR, an indirect marker for Vitamin K) serum levels. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of PwCF ≥12 years receiving ETI. Vitamin levels up to four years preceding and up to two years following ETI initiation were collected. Pairwise comparisons of vitamin levels pre/post-ETI initiation were made using Wilcoxon signed rank and McNemar's tests. Linear mixed effect models were used to regress vitamin levels on time since starting ETI, ETI use (yes/no), the interaction between time and ETI use, and age. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-four participants met study inclusion, and 169 (64%) had post-ETI initiation vitamin levels. Median vitamin A levels increased from 422.0 to 471.0 mcg/L (p < 0.001), median vitamin D levels increased from 28.5 to 30.8 ng/mL (p = 0.003), and there were no significant changes in median vitamin E or INR. Vitamin A levels rose at a rate of 40.7 mcg/L/year (CI 11.3, 70.2) after ETI start. CONCLUSIONS: ETI initiation is associated with increased median vitamin A and vitamin D levels, but no change in median vitamin E or INR levels. Ongoing monitoring of vitamin levels after ETI initiation is needed to screen for potential deficiencies and toxicities, particularly in light of case reports of hypervitaminosis A following ETI initiation.

Patient perspectives on elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor after lung transplant.

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators, including elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), significantly improve outcomes and quality of life for people with cystic fibrosis (CF). However, little is known about how lung transplant recipients (LTRs) perceive the use of ETI. We conducted a survey to assess perspectives on ETI among LTRs with CF at our lung transplant program. Of 81 CF LTRs, 46 participants (58 %) responded. The majority of respondents (88 %) were aware of ETI. Over 80 % considered treating non-lung symptoms of CF to be very important. Concerns regarding ETI included potential drug interactions with transplant medications (77 %), side effects (53 %), cost of medication (49 %), and lack of clinical trial data for LTRs (43 %). Half reported they would only consider taking ETI if their CF or transplant doctor recommended it. The findings suggest that CF LTRs seek informational support and shared decision-making about ETI from their clinicians.

Use of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor among cystic fibrosis lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) lung transplant (LT) recipients may warrant treatment with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) to improve extrapulmonary manifestations of CF. Our objectives were to identify reasons for prescribing ETI after LT and evaluate changes in body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin A1c, hemoglobin, and liver enzymes. METHODS: This was an electronic health record-based cohort study, October 2019-September 2020, at 14 CF LT Consortium sites in North America. The study included CF LT recipients prescribed ETI after transplant. Differences in BMI, A1c, and hemoglobin were assessed with paired t-tests. RESULTS: There were 94 patients prescribed ETI; indications included sinus disease (68%), GI symptoms (39%), or low BMI (19%). Prescriptions were written by CF physicians (34%), LT physicians (27%), or physicians who practice both CF and LT (39%). Forty patients (42%) stopped ETI at a median of 56 days [IQR 26, 139] after start/prescription date. ETI was not associated with a significant change in BMI (0.2 kg/m2, 95% CI [-0.1, 0.6], p = 0.150), but was associated with decreased A1c (0.4%, 95% CI 0.2, 0.7, p = 0.003), and increased hemoglobin for patients with anemia (0.6 g/dL, 95% CI 0.2, 1.0, p = 0.007). Three people (3%) stopped ETI due to elevated transaminases. CONCLUSIONS: ETI is rarely prescribed for non-pulmonary indications after LT for CF. Further study is needed to determine the risks and benefits of ETI in the CF lung transplant population given the potential for drug interactions, side effects leading to discontinuation of ETI, and the possible mechanisms for ETI to positively impact long-term post-transplant outcomes.

Usability preferences of people living with cystic fibrosis about a lung transplant education website.

People living with cystic fibrosis (CF) need educational resources about lung transplant prior to engaging in shared decision making with their medical providers. We conducted a usability study to elicit preferences of people living with CF about how didactic and experiential content could be used in an educational resource to learn about lung transplant. We created two prototypes with different design features that participants used in a scenario-based task and evaluated using the System Usability Scale. We interviewed participants and analyzed the data to understand their preferences for educational content and design. Study participants indicated that didactic resource articles were important to understanding their illness trajectory, while experiential patient stories supported fear reduction and knowledge discovery. When learning about lung transplant participants stated a preference to control the amount of information they receive and preferred a combination of didactic and experiential knowledge.

Take on transplant: human-centered design of a patient education tool to facilitate informed discussions about lung transplant among people with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE: Lung transplant (LTx) saves lives in cystic fibrosis (CF). However, many potential candidates express uncertainty about LTx and die before receiving this treatment. CF guidelines recommend LTx education and clinical discussions well before the need for LTx arises, but limited patient resources exist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We engaged people with CF and CF physicians in human-centered design of "Take On Transplant" (TOT), a web-based education tool to prepare patients for LTx discussions. Across 3 phases, needs assessment, design groups, and iterative user testing of TOT, we refined TOT from wireframe prototypes, to an interactive website, to a fully functional intervention ready for clinical trials. RESULTS: Fifty-five people with CF and 105 physicians identified information needs to prepare for LTx discussions. Design groups (n = 14 participants) then established core requirements: didactic education ("Resource Library"), patient narratives ("CF Stories"), frequently asked questions ("FAQ"), and self-assessment to tailor content ("My CF Stage"). Iterative usability testing (n = 39) optimized the design of CF Stories and prototype layout. We then developed the TOT website and demonstrated feasibility and preliminary efficacy of use through 2-week field testing (n = 9). DISCUSSION: Our human-centered design process provided guidance for educational tools to serve the evolving needs of potential LTx candidates. Our findings support the process of patient deliberation as a foundation for shared decision-making in CF, and inform educational tools that could potentially translate beyond LTx. CONCLUSION: TOT fills a critical gap in preparing people with CF for shared decision-making about LTx and may serve as a model for educational tools for other preference-sensitive decisions.