Molecular and immunophenotypic characterization of anal squamous cell carcinoma reveals distinct clinicopathologic groups associated with HPV and TP53 mutation status.

Squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) is the most common malignancy of the anal canal, where it is strongly associated with HPV infection. Characteristic genomic alterations have been identified in anal SqCC, but their clinical significance and correlation with HPV status, pathologic features, and immunohistochemical markers are not well established. We examined the molecular and clinicopathologic features of 96 HPV-positive and 20 HPV-negative anal SqCC. HPV types included 89 with HPV16, 2 combined HPV16/HPV18, and 5 HPV33. HPV-positive cases demonstrated frequent mutations or amplifications in PIK3CA (30%; p = 0.027) or FBXW7 mutations (10%). HPV-negativity was associated with frequent TP53 (53%; p = 0.00001) and CDKN2A (21%; p = 0.0045) mutations. P16 immunohistochemistry was positive in all HPV-positive cases and 3/20 HPV-negative cases (p < 0.0001; sensitivity: 100%; specificity: 85%) and was associated with basaloid morphology (p = 0.0031). Aberrant p53 immunohistochemical staining was 100% sensitive and specific for TP53 mutation (p < 0.0001). By the Kaplan-Meier method, HPV-negativity, aberrant p53 staining, and TP53 mutation were associated with inferior overall survival (OS) (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0103, p = 0.0103, respectively) and inferior recurrence-free survival (p = 0.133, p = 0.0064, and p = 0.0064, respectively). TP53/p53 status stratified survival probability by HPV status (p = 0.013), with HPV-negative/aberrant p53 staining associated with the worst OS, HPV-positive/wild-type p53 with best OS, and HPV-positive/aberrant p53 or HPV-negative/wild-type p53 with intermediate OS. On multivariate analysis HPV status (p = 0.0063), patient age (p = 0.0054), T stage (p = 0.039), and lymph node involvement (p = 0.044) were independently associated with OS. PD-L1 expression (CPS ≥ 1) was seen in 30% of HPV-positive and 40% of HPV-negative cases, and PD-L1 positivity was associated with a trend toward inferior OS within the HPV-negative group (p = 0.064). Our findings suggest that anal SqCC can be subclassified into clinically, pathologically, and molecularly distinct groups based on HPV and TP53 mutation status, and p16 and p53 immunohistochemistry represent a clinically useful method of predicting these prognostic groups.

First-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Metastatic pancreatic cancer is an aggressive malignancy that is difficult to treat. Gemcitabine monotherapy has been used first line and many contemporary treatment approaches have focused on gemcitabine plus experimental agents. The 2012 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium Abstract #213 is a study of gemcitabine with IPI-926, a novel hedgehog pathway inhibitor. Abstract #227 is a study of gemcitabine with 9°Y-hPAM4 radioimmunotherapy with yttrium labeled anti-mucin humanized antibody. Abstract #296 is a study of gemcitabine with temsirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor. Gemcitabine and erlotinib has shown slight advantages to gemcitabine alone. Abstract #253 takes this one step further and evaluates gemcitabine and erlotinib with apricoxib, a COX-2 inhibitor. FOLFIRINOX has shown superiority to gemcitabine; however, doing so at the cost of significantly greater toxicity. Abstract #199, is a study which examines the cost effectiveness of first line FOLFIRINOX approaches. Another cost effective study is portrayed in Abstract #372, a study evaluating the survival of unresectable pancreatic cancer patients treated with gemcitabine and the disease course is followed clinically without radiographic follow-up.

Utility of HNF-1B and a panel of lineage-specific biomarkers to optimize the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents one of the most common cancers with dismal prognosis. Definitive diagnosis of PDAC remains challenging due to the lack of specific biomarkers. A transcription factor essential for pancreatic development named HNF-1B can be a potential biomarker for PDAC. However, HNF-1B was not entirely specific for PDAC and can be expressed in cancers of Müllerian tract, kidney, lung, bladder and prostate. To solve this issue, we investigated the expression of a panel of well-established lineage-specific biomarkers for non-pancreatic origins, including TTF1 and Napsin A for lung, RCC for kidney, ER and PR for breast, NKX3.1 for prostate, PAX8 for Müllerian tract, GATA3 for breast and bladder, and keratin CK7 and CK20 in 149 PDACs, using immunohistochemistry and tissue microarray. A two-tier scoring system for HNF-1B expression in tumor cells was used. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were performed using SAS software version 9.4 to test the association between HNF-1B expression and tumor morphology and differentiation. The results showed that PAX8 was focally positive in 6 cases (4.0%). GATA3 was focally positive in 5 cases (3.4%). Napsin A was all negative except for 1 case with focal weak staining. All other lineage-specific markers such as TTF1, RCC, ER, PR and NKX3.1 were completely negative in all PDACs. Consistent with our previous result, the majority of PDACs (88.6%) was positive for HNF-1B, including 78 cases (59.1%) with "strong" and 54 cases (40.9%) with "weak" staining pattern. There was no significant association between HNF-1B expression and cytoplasmic clearing morphology. Addition of keratins may further aid the diagnosis of PDAC since the majority of PDACs (84.6%) was CK7+/CK20-, only a minority of PDACs (11.4%) was CK7+/CK20+, 2.7% were CK-/CK20-, and 1.3% were CK7-/CK20+. In conclusion, HNF-1B can serve as a useful biomarker to aid the diagnosis of PDAC when combined with other lineage-specific biomarkers to exclude the other origins.

Coordination and optimization of FDG PET/CT and COVID-19 vaccination; Lessons learned in the early stages of mass vaccination.

As the world embarks on mass vaccination for COVID-19, we are beginning to encounter unintended dilemmas in imaging oncology patients; particularly with regards to FDG PET/CT. In some cases, vaccine-related lymphadenopathy and FDG uptake on PET/CT can mimic cancer and lead to confounding imaging results. These cases where findings overlap with cancer pose a significant dilemma for diagnostic purposes, follow-up, and management leading to possible treatment delays, unnecessary repeat imaging and sampling, and patient anxiety. These cases can largely be avoided by optimal coordination between vaccination and planned imaging as well as preemptive selection of vaccine administration site. This coordination hinges on patient, oncologist, and radiologists' awareness of this issue and collaboration. Through close communication and patient education, we believe this will eliminate significant challenges for our oncology patients as we strive to end this pandemic.

Successful Long-term Anticoagulation with Enoxaparin in a Patient with a Mechanical Heart Valve.

Thromboembolism related to a mechanical heart valve (MHV) is a major complication after surgical valve replacement. Warfarin remains as guideline-endorsed thromboprophylaxis in patients with MHVs. Alternative anticoagulation therapy for patients who do not tolerate or who fail warfarin is not adequately covered in the current guidelines. We report a case of successful long-term anticoagulation with enoxaparin in a patient with a mechanical aortic valve who had a contraindication to warfarin. The patient developed a left thigh hematoma requiring surgical evacuation 1 month after initiation of weight-based dosing of enoxaparin. His dose was then titrated based on peak anti-factor Xa levels (goal 0.6-1.0 IU/ml). He remained free of signs and symptoms of thromboembolic events, valve dysfunction, bleeding complications, or major adverse effects from long-term enoxaparin use for the next 13 years. Our case provides promising evidence of the potential role of enoxaparin in patients with MHVs in whom warfarin thromboprophylaxis is not possible. Meticulous monitoring of anti-factor Xa levels and dosage adjustments are crucial to treatment success.

Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPACT): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer are scarce. Results from a subanalysis of the phase 3 MPACT trial in metastatic pancreatic cancer suggested potential activity of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine against locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The objective of this phase 2 trial was to evaluate safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in previously untreated locally advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: This international, open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial (LAPACT) took place at 35 sites in five countries (USA, France, Spain, Canada, and Italy). Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of up to 1 underwent six cycles of induction with nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle). After induction, patients without progressive disease or unacceptable adverse events were eligible to receive continued therapy per investigator's choice: continued nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, chemoradiation, or surgery. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure; secondary endpoints were disease control rate, overall response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, and quality of life. The reported efficacy outcomes were analysed in the intention-to-treat population, and safety outcomes were analysed in the treated population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02301143, and EudraCT, 2014-001408-23 and is complete. FINDINGS: Between April 21, 2015, and April 26, 2018, 107 patients were enrolled in the study. 106 received the study treatment; one patient enrolled but did not receive treatment. 44 (41%) of 107 enrolled patients discontinued induction; the most common reason for discontinuing induction was adverse events (22 [21%] patients). 62 (58%) of 107 enrolled patients completed induction treatment and 47 (44%) patients subsequently received continued treatment per investigator's choice: 12 (11%) continued nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, 18 (17%) received chemoradiation, and 17 (16%) underwent surgery (seven had R0 resection status, nine had R1). 15 (14%) patients completed induction treatment but did not receive continued treatment. Median time to treatment failure was 9·0 months (90% CI 7·3-10·1); median progression-free survival was 10·9 months (90% CI 9·3-11·6), and median overall survival was 18·8 months (90% CI 15·0-24·0). During induction, 83 patients achieved disease control and the disease control rate was 77·6% (90% CI 70·3-83·5). 36 patients had a best response of partial response; the overall response rate during induction was 33·6% (90% CI 26·6-41·5). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events that were grade 3 or higher in the treated population during induction were neutropenia (35 [33%] of 106 patients), anaemia (12 [11%]), and fatigue (11 [10%]). The most common treatment-emergent serious adverse events during induction were pneumonia (five [5%] patients), pyrexia (five [5%]), and febrile neutropenia (three [3%]). No deaths were caused by treatment-related adverse events during the induction phase, and global quality of life was maintained in most patients. INTERPRETATION: The data from this trial support the tolerability and activity of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer, and a potential to convert unresectable, locally advanced disease to surgically resectable disease. The safety profile was generally consistent with previous findings. FUNDING: Celgene.

Novel Cancer Therapeutics in Geriatrics: What is Unique to the Aging Patient?

With the worldwide trend of aging populations, the number of older adults who develop and survive cancer is likely to increase. In the last decade, oncology drug development has shifted away from conventional chemotherapeutics towards agents that can 'target' a driver mutation of a specific cancer or 'unleash' the patient's native immune system to attack the cancer-so-called molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapeutics. The basic algorithms of cancer treatment in elderly patients are essentially the same as in younger patients; however, one needs to pay exceptional attention to the effects of co-morbidities, interaction with other drugs, and the organ function reserve of an older individual before determining his/her 'eligibility' for a specific cancer treatment modality. Despite the growing evidence of safety and effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in fit elderly patients, the data are still lacking concerning the use of currently approved targeted agents and immunotherapies. The current evidence, though limited, suggests reasonable tolerability with comparable efficacy in patients > 65 years old treated with immune-based therapies to that in younger controls; however, it is unclear if this leads to significant patient-relevant gains such as improved survival with an acceptable quality of life. Nonetheless, these newer agents remain better tolerated than cytotoxic chemotherapy in clinical practice, particularly in older patients. Alternatively, a personalized approach for elderly patients with consideration of the incidence and management of adverse effects, as well as strategies for optimizing efficacy in the context of an aging immune system, would be of utmost value in our aging cancer population. Future trials should also explore immune markers to predict response to these therapeutics in elderly patients, taking into consideration the effects of immunosenescence and immune modulation in aging hosts.

Heterogeneous mutational profile and prognosis conferred by TP53 mutations in appendiceal mucinous neoplasms.

The eighth edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) advocates a 3-tier grading system for appendiceal mucinous tumors. The mutational profile for each tumor grade and the impact of TP53 mutation on survival are unknown. We classified appendiceal mucinous tumors into 3 grades based on the eighth edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer: 21 G1 low-grade mucinous neoplasms, 21 G2 appendiceal adenocarcinomas, and 26 G3 signet ring cell carcinomas. Mutation profiles were obtained using next-generation sequencing. The impact of TP53 on prognosis was investigated by multivariable analysis. Most G1 tumors harbor KRAS/GNAS mutations with TP53 and SMAD4 in a small subset of cases. G2 and G3 tumors show a more complex mutation pattern carrying PIK3CA, BRAF, or TP53 mutations in addition to KRAS/GNAS. PTEN mutations were detected exclusively in G2 tumors. The prevalence of KRAS and GNAS mutations is significantly lower in G3 tumors relative to G1/G2, whereas TP53, PIK3CA, or BRAF mutations are common. Mutations in NRAS, IDH2, CDH1, RB1, CTNNB1, CDKN2A, PTPN11, and KIT genes were observed in single cases. Patients with TP53-mutated disseminated G2 and G3 tumors had worse progression-free survival than did those with wild-type TP53 tumors (P = .0315). A trend toward worse overall survival was observed in TP53-mutated G3 tumors (P = .102). p53 expression correlated with mutation status. We demonstrate a distinct but overlapping pattern of gene mutations in each grade of appendiceal mucinous tumors and the independent impact of TP53 mutation on progression-free survival but not overall survival.

Rare gene fusion rearrangement SPTNB1-PDGFRB in an atypical myeloproliferative neoplasm.

The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia recognizes a distinct class of myeloid and lymphoid tumors with eosinophilia-related proliferations associated with specific gene rearrangements, one of which involves rearrangements of platelet-derived growth factor receptor B (PDGFRB) gene. We report a case of a rare PDGFRB rearrangement with SPTNB1 (spectrin beta, nonerythrocytic 1) that presented as atypical myeloproliferative neoplasm.

Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Pharmacodynamic Separation of Pemetrexed and Intercalated Erlotinib Versus Pemetrexed Alone for Advanced Nonsquamous, Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacodynamic separation of pemetrexed and erlotinib avoids negative cellular interactions and results in antitumor synergy in erlotinib-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells, independent of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) genotype. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with platinum-treated metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC were randomly assigned 1:2 to pemetrexed alone (500 mg/m2 provided intravenously on day 1) or pemetrexed followed by erlotinib (150 mg provided orally once daily on days 2-17) every 21 days. EGFR genotype was centrally confirmed by Sequenom multiplex oncogenotyping assay. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), which would be considered promising for future study if median PFS was ≥ 4.5 months. RESULTS: Of 83 patients enrolled, 79 were randomized to either pemetrexed alone (n = 27) or in combination (n = 52). Fifty-nine (79%) of 75 eligible patients had tumors with confirmed EGFR genotype: 7 with activating mutations and 52 wild type. Median PFS was 4.7 and 2.9 months in the combination and pemetrexed-alone groups, respectively. In patients with EGFR wild-type tumors, median PFS was 5.3 and 3.5 months in the combination and pemetrexed-alone groups, respectively. Objective response rate (29% vs. 10%, P = .17), 6-month PFS (45% vs. 29%, P = .26), and 12-month PFS (23% vs. 10%, P = .28) were all higher in the combination arm. Rash (67% vs. 26%, P = .0007) and diarrhea (44% vs. 11%, P = .003) were significantly more common in the combination arm. CONCLUSION: In patients with unselected or EGFR wild-type advanced nonsquamous NSCLC, pharmacodynamic separation of pemetrexed and intercalated erlotinib had promising antitumor activity without new safety concerns. The combination merits further evaluation as maintenance or second-line therapy against new standards in patients with EGFR wild-type advanced NSCLC.

A Phase II Trial of Cetuximab, Gemcitabine, 5-Fluorouracil, and Radiation Therapy in Locally Advanced Nonmetastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States. A minority of patients present with localized disease and surgical resection still offers patients the only hope for long-term survival. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer is defined as surgically unresectable, but has no evidence of distant metastases. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab in combination with gemcitabine and 5-FU along with radiation therapy in locally advanced non-resectable, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, using progression free survival as the primary end point. METHODS: This was a prospective, single arm, open label pilot phase II study to evaluate the anti-tumor activity of gemcitabine (200 mg/m(2) per week) and cetuximab (250 mg/m(2) per week after an initial 400 mg/m(2) loading dose) with continuous infusion 5-FU (800 mg/m(2) over 96 hours) and daily concurrent external beam radiation therapy (50.4 Gy total dose) for six weeks (cycle 1) in patients with non-metastatic, locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Following neoadjuvant treatment, subjects were re-evaluated for response and surgical candidacy with restaging scans. After resection, or also if not resected; subjects received further therapy with four 28-day cycles (cycles 2-5) of weekly gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) and cetuximab (250 mg/m(2)) on days 1, 8, and 15. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2011, twenty-six patients were screened and eleven of them were enrolled in the study. Most common reasons for screen failures were having resectable disease, metastatic disease or co-morbidity. Ten patients were able to tolerate and complete cycle 1 of chemoradiotherapy. One patient stopped the study prematurely due to grade III diarrhea. All except this one patient received planned radiation therapy. The response evaluation after cycle 1 showed one Partial Response, eight Stable Disease and two Progressive Disease. Four patients subsequently underwent surgical resection of the tumor. All patients had R0 resections. There was one preoperative mortality due to multiple organ failure. Median progression free survival (PFS) for four resected patients was 9.0 months while for unresected patients median PFS was 7.1 months. Median overall survival (OS) for four resected patients was 47.4 months and for unresected patients median OS was 17.0 months. Most common adverse events were hematologic (27%). Only two patients developed grade 3 neutropenia. Most common treatment related non-hematologic adverse events were diarrhea (10 of 11), nausea (8 of 11) and skin rash (10 of 11 patients). Only 9.5% of all reported non-hematologic adverse events were grade 3 or higher. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cetuximab, weekly gemcitabine and continuous infusion of 5-FU with radiotherapy was quite well tolerated with intriguing clinical benefit and survival results in carefully selected patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A trial with larger sample size will be necessary to confirm these results.

Phase-I/II study of bortezomib in combination with carboplatin and bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly bortezomib in combination with fixed standard doses of carboplatin and bevacizumab, and to estimate the efficacy (response rate and progression free survival [PFS]) and safety of combination therapy with carboplatin, bortezomib, and bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients were assigned to three dose levels of weekly bortezomib with the fixed standard doses of carboplatin AUC 6 and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) every 3 weeks using a standard phase-I design. Bortezomib doses were 1.3 mg/m, 1.6 mg/m, and 1.8 mg/m weekly on day 1 and day 8 of every 3-week cycle. A maximum of six cycles was administered. Patients with complete, partial response or stable disease were continued on single-agent bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) as maintenance therapy. In phase II, either level III or MTD was administered to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled (three, four, and nine patients in dose level I, II, and III, respectively). There was no predefined dose limiting toxicity in cycle 1 in all 16 patients. The recommended phase-II dose is bortezomib 1.8 mg/m weekly on day 1 and day 8 in combination with carboplatin AUC 6 and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on every 21-day cycle. Totally 9 patients were treated at the recommended phase-II dose level. The most common treatment related grade-3/4 toxicities during the subsequent cycles were thrombocytopenia (58%), lymphopenia (25%), neutropenia (12%), and diarrhea (25%). The grade-1/2 neuropathy was seen in 7 out of 16 patients (44%). The response rate, PFS, and overall survival in all patients were 37.5% (95%CI 13.8%-61.2%), 5.0 months (95%CI: 3.1-8.4), 9.9 months (95% CI: 8.2-14.1), and among the 9 patients in phase-II portion are 44% (95%CI 15.3%-77.3%), 5.5 months (95%CI: 3.1-2.2) and 10.9 months (95%CI: 8.0-14.1). CONCLUSION: The recommended phase-II dose for this combination is: carboplatin AUC 6, bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on day 1 and bortezomib 1.8 mg/m on day 1 and day 8 on every 21-day cycle. The regimen was very well tolerated with interesting clinical activity in first-line treatment of NSCLC.

Effective role of hormonal therapy in metastatic primary neuroendocrine breast carcinoma.

Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma (PNEC) of the breast is extremely rare.(1) Because of the rarity of this cancer, long-term prognosis, biologic behavior, and treatment are not well known. PNEC can have high expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR). It is important to differentiate PNEC of the breast from other metastatic diseases to the breast because of the differences in treatment. We herein report the successful treatment of a patient with PNEC of the breast and high expression of ER and PR by means of hormonal therapy.