Report of the 2006 RSPCA/UFAW Rodent Welfare Group meeting.

The RSPCA/UFAW Rodent Welfare Group holds a one-day meeting every autumn to discuss current welfare research and to exchange views on rodent welfare issues. A key aim of the group is to encourage people to think about the lifetime experience of laboratory rodents, ensuring that every potential influence on their well-being has been reviewed and refined. Speakers at the 2006 meeting presented preliminary findings of ongoing studies and discussed regulatory updates. Topics included the housing and husbandry of mice and rats, refining the use of rodents in asthma research, good practice for the euthanasia of rodents using carbon dioxide and achieving reduction by sharing genetically modified mice.

Dissociation by steroids of eosinophilic inflammation from airway hyperresponsiveness in murine airways.

BACKGROUND: The link between eosinophils and the development of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) in asthma is still controversial. This question was assessed in a murine model of asthma in which we performed a dose ranging study to establish whether the dose of steroid needed to inhibit the eosinophil infiltration correlated with that needed to block AHR. METHODS: The sensitised BALB/c mice were dosed with vehicle or dexamethasone (0.01-3 mg/kg) 2 hours before and 6 hours after each challenge (once daily for 6 days) and 2 hours before AHR determination by whole-body plethysmography. At 30 minutes after the AHR to aerosolised methacholine the mice were lavaged and differential white cell counts were determined. Challenging with antigen caused a significant increase in eosinophils in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and lung tissue, and increased AHR. RESULTS: Dexamethasone reduced BAL and lung tissue eosinophilia (ED50 values of 0.06 and 0.08 mg/kg, respectively), whereas a higher dose was needed to block AHR (ED50 of 0.32 mg/kg at 3 mg/ml methacholine. Dissociation was observed between the dose of steroid needed to affect AHR in comparison with eosinophilia and suggests that AHR is not a direct consequence of eosinophilia. CONCLUSION: This novel pharmacological approach has revealed a clear dissociation between eosinophilia and AHR by using steroids that are the mainstay of asthma therapy. These data suggest that eosinophilia is not associated with AHR and questions the rationale that many pharmaceutical companies are adopting in developing low-molecular-mass compounds that target eosinophil activation/recruitment for the treatment of asthma.

Comprehensive gene expression profiling of rat lung reveals distinct acute and chronic responses to cigarette smoke inhalation.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a smoking-related disease that lacks effective therapies due partly to the poor understanding of disease pathogenesis. The aim of this study was to identify molecular pathways that could be responsible for the damaging consequences of smoking. To do this, we employed Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to analyze differences in global gene expression, which we then related to the pathological changes induced by cigarette smoke (CS). Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to whole body CS for 1 day and for various periods up to 8 mo. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of microarray data identified that metabolic processes were most significantly increased early in the response to CS. Gene sets involved in stress response and inflammation were also upregulated. CS exposure increased neutrophil chemokines, cytokines, and proteases (MMP-12) linked to the pathogenesis of COPD. After a transient acute response, the CS-exposed rats developed a distinct molecular signature after 2 wk, which was followed by the chronic phase of the response. During this phase, gene sets related to immunity and defense progressively increased and predominated at the later time points in smoke-exposed rats. Chronic CS inhalation recapitulated many of the phenotypic changes observed in COPD patients including oxidative damage to macrophages, a slowly resolving inflammation, epithelial damage, mucus hypersecretion, airway fibrosis, and emphysema. As such, it appears that metabolic pathways are central to dealing with the stress of CS exposure; however, over time, inflammation and stress response gene sets become the most significantly affected in the chronic response to CS.

In vitro and in vivo pharmacological characterization of 5-[(R)-2-(5,6-diethyl-indan-2-ylamino)-1-hydroxy-ethyl]-8-hydroxy-1H-quinolin-2-one (indacaterol), a novel inhaled beta(2) adrenoceptor agonist with a 24-h duration of action.

Here, we describe the preclinical pharmacological profile of 5-[(R)-2-(5,6-diethyl-indan-2-ylamino)-1-hydroxy-ethyl]-8-hydroxy-1H-quinolin-2-one (indacaterol), a novel, chirally pure inhaled beta(2) adrenoceptor agonist, in comparison with marketed drugs. Indacaterol is close to a full agonist at the human beta(2) adrenoceptor (E(max) = 73 +/- 1% of the maximal effect of isoprenaline; pEC(50) = 8.06 +/- 0.02), whereas salmeterol displays only partial efficacy (38 +/- 1%). The functional selectivity profile of indacaterol over beta(1) human adrenoceptors is similar to that of formoterol, whereas its beta(3) adrenoceptor selectivity profile is similar to that of formoterol and salbutamol. In isolated superfused guinea pig trachea, indacaterol has a fast onset of action (30 +/- 4 min) similar to formoterol and salbutamol, and a long duration of action (529 +/- 99 min) comparable with salmeterol. In the conscious guinea pig, when given intratracheally as a dry powder, indacaterol inhibits 5-hydroxytryptamine-induced bronchoconstriction for at least 24 h, whereas salmeterol, formoterol, and salbutamol have durations of action of 12, 4, and 2 h, respectively. When given via nebulization to anesthetized rhesus monkeys, all of the compounds dose-dependently inhibit methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction, although indacaterol produces the most prolonged bronchoprotective effect and induces the lowest increase in heart rate for a similar degree of antibronchoconstrictor activity. In conclusion, the preclinical profile of indacaterol suggests that this compound has a superior duration of action compatible with once-daily dosing in human, together with a fast onset of action and an improved cardiovascular safety profile over marketed inhaled beta(2) adrenoceptor agonists.

Pharmacological assessment of the nitric-oxide synthase isoform involved in eosinophilic inflammation in a rat model of sephadex-induced airway inflammation.

Excessive local production of nitric oxide (NO) has been suggested to play a role in rodent models of airway inflammation and in pulmonary diseases such as asthma. However, even given the plethora of data available including gene expression data, pharmacological data, and gene deletion studies in animal models, it is still not clear which nitric-oxide synthase (NOS) isoform is involved in eosinophilic airway inflammation. In this rat study, the nonselective NOS inhibitor L-NAME (N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester), but not a selective inducible NOS (iNOS) inhibitor 1400W (N-3-(aminomethyl)benzyl)acetamidine), impacted on Sephadex-induced inflammation by significantly inhibiting lung edema, eosinophil infiltration, tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-13, and eotaxin levels in the lung tissue. Furthermore, iNOS gene expression was not induced following Sephadex administration, which confirms that iNOS does not play a role in this model. To demonstrate that this phenomenon was not restricted to this model of asthma, L-NAME, but not 1400W, was shown to reduce eosinophilia in an antigen-induced model. However, in contrast to the Sephadex model, there was an induction of iNOS gene expression after antigen challenge. In a model of aerosolized lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation, where iNOS gene expression is increased, 1400W inhibited the increased neutrophilia. These data suggest that the compound has been administered using an appropriate dosing regimen for iNOS inhibition in the rat lung. In conclusion, it appears that constitutive, not inducible, NOS isoforms are important in NO production in models of allergic inflammation, which questions whether there is a role for iNOS inhibitors as therapy for the treatment of asthma.

Critical role for T cells in Sephadex-induced airway inflammation: pharmacological and immunological characterization and molecular biomarker identification.

Intratracheal instillation of Sephadex particles is a convenient model for assessing the impact of potential anti-inflammatory compounds on lung eosinophilia thought to be a key feature in asthma pathophysiology. However, the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms involved are poorly understood. We have studied the time course of Sephadex-induced lung eosinophilia, changes in pulmonary T cell numbers, and gene and protein expression as well as the immunological and pharmacological modulation of these inflammatory indices in the Sprague Dawley rat. Sephadex increased T cell numbers (including CD4(+) T cells) and evoked a pulmonary eosinophilia that was associated with an increase in gene/protein expression of the Th2-type cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 and eotaxin in lung tissue. Sephadex instillation also induced airway hyperreactivity to acetylcholine and bradykinin. A neutralizing Ab (R73) against the alphabeta-TCR caused 54% depletion of total (CD2(+)) pulmonary T cells accompanied by a significant inhibition of IL-4, IL-13 and eotaxin gene expression together with suppression (65% inhibition) of eosinophils in lung tissue 24 h after Sephadex treatment. Sephadex-induced eosinophilia and Th2 cytokine gene and/or protein expression were sensitive to cyclosporin A and budesonide, compounds that inhibit T cell function, suggesting a pivotal role for T cells in orchestrating Sephadex-induced inflammation in this model.