Effect of Six-Month Postoperative Endothelial Cell Density on Graft Survival after Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To analyze if 6-month endothelial cell density (ECD) affects long-term ECD outcome and graft survival 5 years after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in eyes with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 585 DMEK eyes were included. The study group was divided into 4 groups based on 6-month ECD quartiles: group 1 (n = 146) with 313 to 1245 cells/mm2, group 2 (n = 148) with 1246 to 1610 cells/mm2, group 3 (n = 145) with 1611 to 1938 cells/mm2, and group 4 (n = 146) with 1939 to 2760 cells/mm2. Group 1 was further split into subgroups 1a (n = 36) with 6-month ECD of ≤828 cells/mm2, 1b (n = 37) with 829 to 1023 cells/mm2, 1c (n = 37) with 1024 to 1140 cells/mm2, and 1d (n = 36) 1141 to 1245 cells/mm2. METHODS: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Long-term ECD, graft survival, and postoperative complication rates. RESULTS: For group 1, 6-month ECD decreased from 951 (±233) cells/mm2 (n = 146) to 735 (±216) cells/mm2 (n = 99) at 5 years postoperatively. Group 1 graft survival probability was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.99] at 5 years postoperatively, which was lower than for groups 2 to 4 (P = 0.001). Five-year graft survival in subgroup 1a was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.67-0.94), which was lower than in subgroups 1b to 1d (P = 0.001). Preoperative ECD did not influence graft survival (P = 0.400), and higher 6-month ECD values were associated with lower graft failure rates (hazard ratio, 0.994; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Six-month ECD is associated with DMEK graft survival. High early cell loss after DMEK negatively affects long-term ECD outcome and graft survival. Grafts in the lowest 6-month ECD subgroup (≤828 cells/mm2) are at higher risk of failure within 5 years after DMEK. To ensure sufficiently high 6-month ECD, preoperative graft quality assessment should be optimized, and cellular stress induced to the graft should be minimized. Additionally, developing therapeutic options for the treatment of low postoperative ECD could further improve DMEK graft longevity.

Bowman layer transplantation: 5-year results.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 5-year clinical results of isolated Bowman layer (BL) transplantation in the treatment of advanced keratoconus. METHODS: In this prospective, single-center, interventional case series at a tertiary referral center, 20 eyes of 17 patients with advanced keratoconus underwent BL transplantation, i.e. an isolated Bowman layer graft was positioned into a manually dissected mid-stromal pocket. Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography measurements, best corrected spectacle and contact lens visual acuities (BSCVA and BCLVA), endothelial cell density, and complications were evaluated up to 5 years after surgery. RESULTS: Measured simulated and maximum keratometry (Kmean and Kmax) values were stable up to 5 years after surgery (P = .310 and P = .195 for 5 years compared to 1 month follow-up, respectively), following an initial decrease from pre- to 1 month postoperatively (P < .001 each). Mean LogMAR BSCVA remained stable (P > .99), after an initial improvement from pre- to 12 months postoperatively (P = .007). Mean BCLVA did not change from preoperative to 5 years postoperatively (P = .219). During all postoperative follow-ups, mean densitometry values were higher than preoperatively (P < .001). A corneal hydrops occurred in one eye at 4.5 years postoperatively; no other postoperative complications were observed. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed an estimated success rate of 84% at 5 years postoperatively. Endothelial cell density remained stable from before to 5 years after surgery (P = .319). CONCLUSIONS: After early postoperative corneal flattening, topographies were stable up to 5 years after BL transplantation, preserving BCLVA and contact lens tolerance, potentially allowing long term postponement of penetrating or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and refractive surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has become a first-line treatment in corneal endothelial diseases because of its exceptional clinical outcomes and low complication rates. Because of its improved refractive predictability, DMEK is now also considered for managing cases with endothelial decompensation following previous refractive procedures, or in combination with those. This article reviews the clinical outcomes in these cases and discusses the possibility of refractive interventions following DMEK. RECENT FINDINGS: DMEK has been successfully performed in eyes after laser in-situ keratomileusis, eyes after anterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and aphakic eyes. Often, DMEK is combined with cataract surgery (triple-DMEK). Initial reports on reducing the refractive cylinder by toric IOL implantation are available. Although there are some reports on phacoemulsification and IOL implantation after phakic DMEK, reports on laser refractive procedures following DMEK are lacking. SUMMARY: In contrast to earlier keratoplasty techniques, DMEK induces on average only mild refractive shifts owing to the 'natural' restoration of the cornea. As such, DMEK may be ideal in managing corneal decompensation in refractive patients. However, further studies are required to assess the safety and efficacy of DMEK after refractive treatment and of refractive procedures following DMEK.

Clinical outcome of 500 consecutive cases undergoing Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome of 500 consecutive cases after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and the effect of technique standardization. DESIGN: Prospective, interventional case series at a tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 500 eyes of 393 patients who underwent DMEK for Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy, bullous keratopathy, or previous corneal transplant failure. METHODS: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), pachymetry, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were evaluated before and 1, 3, and 6 months after DMEK. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison between 2 groups (group I: cases 1-250, outcome of "early surgeries" during transition to technique standardization; group II: cases 251-500, outcome of "late surgeries" after technique standardization). RESULTS: At 6 months, 75% of eyes reached a BCVA of ≥20/25 (≥0.8), 41% of eyes achieved ≥20/20 (≥1.0), and 13% of eyes achieved ≥20/18 (≥1.2) (n=418) when excluding eyes with ocular comorbidities (n=57). When including all available eyes at 6 months (n=475), 66% of eyes reached a BCVA of ≥20/25 (≥0.8), and 36% of eyes achieved ≥20/20 (≥1.0). Mean ECD decreased by 37% (±18%) to 1600 (±490) cells/mm2 (n=447) at 6 months (P<0.001). Postoperative pachymetry averaged 525 (±46) µm compared with 667 (±92) µm preoperatively (P<0.001). None of these parameters differed among the 2 groups (P>0.05). (Partial) graft detachment presented in 79 eyes (15.8%), and 26 eyes (5.2%) required a secondary surgery within the first 6 months (re-bubbling in 15, secondary keratoplasty in 11). With technique standardization, the postoperative complication rate decreased from 23.2% to 10% (P<0.001) and the rate of secondary surgeries decreased from 6.8% to 3.6% (P=0.10). CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with earlier endothelial keratoplasty techniques, DMEK may consistently give higher visual outcomes and faster visual rehabilitation. When used for the extended spectrum of endothelial pathologies, DMEK proved feasible with a relatively low risk of complications. Technique standardization may have contributed to a lower graft detachment rate and a relatively low secondary intervention rate. As such, DMEK may become the first choice of treatment in corneal endothelial disease.

Repeat Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty after complicated primary Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To describe the clinical outcome and complications of repeat Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (re-DMEK). DESIGN: Retrospective case series study at a tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: From a series of 550 consecutive DMEK surgeries with ≥ 6 months follow-up, 17 eyes underwent re-DMEK for graft detachment after initial DMEK (n = 14) and/or endothelial graft failure (n = 3). The outcomes were compared with an age-matched control group of uncomplicated primary DMEK surgeries. METHODS: The re-DMEK eyes were evaluated for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), densitometry, endothelial cell density (ECD), pachymetry, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility and clinical outcome of re-DMEK. RESULTS: In all eyes, re-DMEK was uneventful. At 12 months, 12 of 14 eyes (86%) achieved a BCVA of ≥ 20/40 (≥ 0.5); 8 of 14 eyes (57%) achieved ≥ 20/25 (≥ 0.8), 3 of 14 eyes (21%) achieved ≥ 20/20 (≥ 1.0), and 1 eye (7%) achieved 20/17 (1.2); 5 eyes were fitted with a contact lens. Average donor ECD decreased from 2580 ± 173 cells/mm(2) before to 1390 ± 466 cells/mm(2) at 6 months after surgery, and pachymetry from 703 ± 126 µm to 515 ± 39 µm, respectively. No difference in densitometry could be detected between re-DMEK and control eyes (P = 0.99). Complications after re-DMEK included primary graft failure (n = 1), secondary graft failure (n = 2), graft detachment requiring rebubbling (n = 1), secondary glaucoma (n = 2), cataract (n = 1), and corneal ulcer (n = 1). One eye received tertiary DMEK. CONCLUSIONS: In the management of persistent graft detachment and graft failure after primary DMEK, re-DMEK proved a feasible procedure. Acceptable BCVA may be achieved, albeit lower than after DMEK in virgin eyes, and some cases may benefit from contact lens fitting. Complications after re-DMEK may be better anticipated than after primary DMEK because graft detachment and graft failure tended to recur, suggesting that intrinsic properties of the host eye play a role in graft adherence and graft failure.

One year outcome of hemi-Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the 1-year clinical outcome after semi-circular Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (hemi-DMEK) in a first case series. METHODS: In three eyes of three patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), pachymetry, and intra- and postoperative complications were evaluated after transplantation of a semi-circular ~12 mm diameter Descemet graft (hemi-DMEK graft). RESULTS: All corneas cleared within 6 months and showed a stable pachymetry thereafter (527, 535, and 490 µm, respectively). Compared to preoperative measurements, average central ECDs dropped by 51 % (56, 39, and 59 %, respectively) at 3 months, 53 % (57, 38, and 63 %, respectively) at 6 months, and 59 % (60, 47, and 71 %, respectively) at 12 months. Denuded stromal areas adjacent to the hemi-DMEK graft cleared and at 12 months peripheral ECD counts ranged from 724 to 1051 cells/mm(2). At 12 months, BCVA was 20/22 (0.9), 20/40 (0.5, amblyopic eye) and 20/17 (1.2). No postoperative complications occurred throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Hemi-DMEK may provide visual outcomes similar to those in standard DMEK at the 1-year postoperative mark. If also graft survival and complication rates prove to be similar, hemi-DMEK could become the next step in endothelial keratoplasty, owing to its potential to double the yield of transplants from the same donor pool (two hemi-DMEK grafts can be prepared from one donor cornea).

Clinical Outcomes of Repeat Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty After Graft Failure.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes after repeat Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for technical failure (TF) and secondary graft failure (SGF). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 49 eyes that underwent repeat DMEK either for TF (ie, persistent graft detachment, n = 24) or for SGF (ie, late endothelial graft failure, n = 25). Surgery indications for primary DMEK were Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD, 80%) and bullous keratopathy (BK, 20%). Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), corneal backscattering, pachymetry, and graft survival. Outcomes were compared with an age-matched control group of 49 primary DMEK eyes. RESULTS: Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution BCVA improved from 0.92 ± 0.6 before to 0.20 ± 0.3 at 1 year after repeat DMEK with better outcomes for eyes with TF than those with SGF (P = 0.046). Donor ECD decreased from 2618 ± 171 cells/mm2 before to 1247 ± 422 cells/mm2 at 1 year postoperatively, with no difference between technical TF and SGF eyes (P > 0.05). One-year BCVA and ECD outcomes were better in the control group than in the repeat DMEK group (P < 0.05). Five-year graft survival probability after repeat DMEK was better for TF than for SGF eyes (100% vs. 75%, P = 0.010) and better for eyes with FECD than BK as primary indication for surgery (92% vs. 65%, P = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Repeat DMEK gives acceptable clinical outcomes especially when performed for TF in the early period after primary DMEK. Long-term graft survival probability after repeat DMEK is comparable to primary DMEK for FECD eyes, whereas BK eyes may show an elevated risk to develop graft failure again.

Combined or sequential DMEK in cases of cataract and Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare the outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) performed after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation (sequential DMEK) and DMEK combined with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation (combined DMEK) in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and cataract. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis performed according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. Literature searches were conducted in Medline and Scopus. Comparative studies reporting sequential DMEK and combined DMEK in FECD patients were included. The main outcome measure of the study was the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) improvement. Secondary outcomes were postoperative endothelial cell density (ECD), rebubbling rate and primary graft failure rate. Bias risk was assessed and a quality appraisal of the body of evidence was completed using the Cochrane Robin-I tool. A total of 667 eyes (5 studies) were included in this review, 292 eyes (43.77%) underwent a combined DMEK, while 375 (56.22%) eyes underwent a sequential DMEK surgery. We found no evidence of a difference between the two groups (mean difference, 95% CI) regarding: (1) CDVA improvement (-0.06; -0.14, 0.03 LogMAR; 3 studies, I2 : 0%; p = 0.86); (2) postoperative ECD (-62; -190, 67 cells/mm2 ; 4 studies, I2 : 67%; p = 0.35); (3) rebubbling (risks ratio: 1.04; 0.59, 1.85; 4 studies, I2 : 48%; p = 0.89); and primary graft failure rate (risks ratio: 0.91; 0.32, 2.57; 3 studies, I2 : 0%; p = 0.86). Of all the 5 non-randomized studies, all (100%) were graded as low quality. The overall quality of the analysed studies was low. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm no difference or superiority of one approach in terms of CDVA, endothelial cell count and postoperative complication rate between the two arms.

P45-A154†DMEK in complicated eyes: influence of donor characteristics, outcomes, and prognosis.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has become the goldstandard in the treatment of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy and early stages of (pseudophakic) bullous keratopathy due to the safer ´closed globe` surgery, the fast and excellent visual recovery and low complication rates. In those cases, DMEK can often be performed in a standardized manner. Given the outstanding clinical outcomes, the spectrum of indications has expanded in the past years: thus, also more complex cases, such as eyes with advanced corneal edema, altered anterior chamber anatomy, failed lamellar grafts, failed penetrating keratoplasty, as well as, phakic, aphakic and vitrectomized eyes are being treated with DMEK. Although DMEK surgery in complicated eyes proved feasible, the procedure is technically more challenging because of the impaired visualization during surgery and the unpredictable graft behaviour. Surgical strategies to accomplish DMEK in complex eyes have been suggested and customization of recipient/donor characteristics (donor age, graft size) may facilitate the surgery. Still, clinical outcomes appear not as good as in standard indications and there is uncertainty concerning the long-term graft survival.

Machine Learning Analysis of Postkeratoplasty Endothelial Cell Images for the Prediction of Future Graft Rejection.

Purpose: This study developed machine learning (ML) classifiers of postoperative corneal endothelial cell images to identify postkeratoplasty patients at risk for allograft rejection within 1 to 24 months of treatment. Methods: Central corneal endothelium specular microscopic images were obtained from 44 patients after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), half of whom had experienced graft rejection. After deep learning segmentation of images from all patients' last and second-to-last imaging, time points prior to rejection were analyzed (175 and 168, respectively), and 432 quantitative features were extracted assessing cellular spatial arrangements and cell intensity values. Random forest (RF) and logistic regression (LR) models were trained on novel-to-this-application features from single time points, delta-radiomics, and traditional morphometrics (endothelial cell density, coefficient of variation, hexagonality) via 10 iterations of threefold cross-validation. Final assessments were evaluated on a held-out test set. Results: ML classifiers trained on novel-to-this-application features outperformed those trained on traditional morphometrics for predicting future graft rejection. RF and LR models predicted post-DMEK patients' allograft rejection in the held-out test set with >0.80 accuracy. RF models trained on novel features from second-to-last time points and delta-radiomics predicted post-DMEK patients' rejection with >0.70 accuracy. Cell-graph spatial arrangement, intensity, and shape features were most indicative of graft rejection. Conclusions: ML classifiers successfully predicted future graft rejections 1 to 24 months prior to clinically apparent rejection. This technology could aid clinicians to identify patients at risk for graft rejection and guide treatment plans accordingly. Translational Relevance: Our software applies ML techniques to clinical images and enhances patient care by detecting preclinical keratoplasty rejection.

Long-Term Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Effect of Surgical Indication and Disease Severity.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and graft survival in a large patient cohort up to 10 years after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) based on surgical indication and Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) severity. METHODS: The cohort in this retrospective study included 750 eyes that underwent DMEK for FECD (86%), bullous keratopathy (BK, 9%), and other indications (5%). Based on the modified Krachmer grading, 186 eyes (29%) had moderate FECD (Krachmer grade 3-4) and 440 eyes (68%) had advanced FECD (Krachmer grade 5-6). Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness, endothelial cell density (ECD), endothelial cell loss (ECL), postoperative complication rate, and graft survival. RESULTS: The mean 10-year BCVA was 0.08 ± 0.28 logMAR (n = 96), and the BCVA remained stable between 5 and 10 years postoperatively (all P > 0.05). The mean ECL at 5 and 10 years was 56% ± 17% (n = 460) and 66% ± 14% (n = 96), respectively ( P < 0.05). The 10-year graft survival rate for the total cohort was 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.89). BCVA and ECD differed at 1 to 5 years between eyes with different surgical indications (all P < 0.05), and FECD eyes had higher graft survival compared with BK eyes (0.90 vs. 0.60, P = 0.001). Moderate FECD eyes had better BCVA, ECD, and graft survival outcomes than advanced FECD eyes (all P < 0.05). Minor graft detachment ( P = 0.04) and lower donor ECD ( P = 0.01) were related to lower 10-year ECD. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcomes and graft survival after DMEK were better in FECD eyes than BK eyes and were also related to FECD disease severity. Eyes operated for moderate FECD showed the highest graft survival probability and excellent long-term outcomes.

Long-Term Outcome After Bilateral DMEK for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term clinical outcome, complications, and graft survival of bilateral Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 181 patients (362 eyes) with sequential bilateral DMEK for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Clinical outcomes were assessed up to 5 years postoperatively. Outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity, pachymetry, endothelial cell density, graft survival, and complication rates. RESULTS: Contralateral DMEK was performed on average 15 ± 11 months (range: 2-60 months) after the first eye. From 1 until 5 years after DMEK, best-corrected visual acuity, pachymetry, endothelial cell density, and graft survival did not differ between the first and second eyes (all P > 0.05). Graft detachment occurred in 67 eyes (19% [18% first eyes, 19% second eyes], 6% bilateral), graft rejection in 9 eyes (3% [3% first eyes, 2% second eyes], 1% bilateral), glaucoma in 25 eyes (7% [8% first eyes, 6% second eyes], 2% bilateral), and graft failure in 22 eyes (6% [4% first eye, 8% second eye], 2% bilateral). All differences were not significant (all P > 0.05). Five-year graft survival rates were comparable for first and second eyes (0.95 and 0.92, respectively; P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes after bilateral DMEK are similar in both eyes and sustainable in the longer term. Within the first 5 years, the same complication may rarely occur in the contralateral eye.

Preoperative surgeon evaluation of corneal endothelial status: the Viability Control of Human Endothelial Cells before Keratoplasty (V-CHECK) study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: The success of keratoplasty strongly depends on the health status of the transplanted endothelial cells. Donor corneal tissues are routinely screened for endothelial damage before shipment; however, surgical teams have currently no means of assessing the overall viability of corneal endothelium immediately prior to transplantation. The aim of this study is to validate a preoperative method of evaluating the endothelial health of donor corneal tissues, to assess the proportion of tissues deemed suitable for transplantation by the surgeons and to prospectively record the clinical outcomes of a cohort of patients undergoing keratoplasty in relation to preoperatively defined endothelial viability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this multicentre cohort study, consecutive patients undergoing keratoplasty (perforating keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), ultra-thin DSAEK (UT-DSAEK) or Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty) will be enrolled and followed-up for 1 year. Before transplantation, the endothelial viability of the donor corneal tissue will be evaluated preoperatively through trypan blue staining and custom image analysis to estimate the overall percentage of trypan blue-positive areas (TBPAs), a proxy of endothelial damage. Functional and structural outcomes at the end of the follow-up will be correlated with preoperatively assessed TBPA values. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol will be reviewed by the ethical committees of participating centres, with the sponsor centre issuing the final definitive approval. The results will be disseminated on ClinicalTrials.gov, at national and international conferences, by partner patient groups and in open access, peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05847387.

37†Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): 10-year clinical outcomes and graft survival.

PURPOSE: To evaluate graft survival and clinical outcomes up to 10 years after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). SETTING/VENUE: Retrospective cohort study conducted at the Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery. METHODS: 750 consecutive DMEK eyes, not including the very first 25 DMEK eyes that constitute the technique learning curve, were included. Main outcome parameters (survival, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central endothelial cell density (ECD)) was evaluated up to 10-years postoperatively and postoperative complications were documented. Outcomes were analyzed for the entire study group and separately for the subgroup of the first 100 DMEK eyes. RESULTS: For the subgroup of 100 DMEK eyes, 82% and 89% reached a BCVA of ≥20/25 (Decimal VA ≥0.8) at 5- and 10 years postoperatively, respectively, and preoperative donor ECD decreased by 59% at 5 years and 68% at 10 years postoperatively. Graft survival probability for the first 100 DMEK eyes was 0.83 [95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.75-0.92] and 0.79 [95% CI, 0.70 -0.88] at 5- and 10-years postoperatively, respectively. For the total study group, clinical outcome in terms of BCVA and ECD were comparable, but graft survival probability was significantly higher at 5- and 10-year postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Most eyes operated in the pioneering phase of DMEK showed excellent and stable clinical outcomes with a promising graft longevity over the first decade after surgery. The increase in DMEK experience resulted in a lower graft failure rate and positively affected longer-term graft survival probability.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Ten-Year Graft Survival and Clinical Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the 10-year graft survival and clinical outcomes of the first case series after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional case series. METHODS: After excluding the very first 25 DMEK eyes that constitute the technique learning curve, the following 100 consecutive primary DMEK eyes (88 patients) were included. Main outcome parameters (survival, best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], central endothelial cell density [ECD], and central corneal thickness [CCT]) were evaluated up to 10 years postoperatively, and postoperative complications were documented. RESULTS: At 5 and 10 years after DMEK, 68 and 57 of 100 eyes, respectively, were still available for analysis. Of those eyes, 82% and 89% reached a BCVA of ≥20/25 (decimal VA ≥0.8) at 5- and 10 years postoperatively, respectively. Preoperative donor ECD decreased by 59% at 5 years and 68% at 10 years postoperatively. CCT averaged 668 ±74 µm preoperatively and 540 ± 33 µm and 553 ± 43 µm at 5 and 10 years, respectively, after surgery. Within 10 years, 4% of eyes developed allograft rejection, no primary graft failures occurred, and 6% of the eyes developed secondary graft failure. Graft survival probability was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.92) and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70-0.88) at 5 and 10 years postoperatively, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Most eyes that underwent surgery in the pioneering phase of DMEK showed excellent and stable clinical outcomes with low postoperative complication rates and promising graft longevity over the first decade after surgery. This suggests that DMEK may be a safe long-term treatment option for corneal endothelial diseases.

Combined specular microscopy and Scheimpflug imaging to improve detection of an upcoming allograft rejection after DMEK.

PURPOSE: To assess whether combined analysis of specular microscopy and Scheimpflug imaging improves detection of an upcoming allograft rejection following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 22 eyes that had developed a clinical proven allograft rejection 28 (±22) months (range: 4-84 months) after DMEK. Specular microscopy and Scheimpflug images routinely made after DMEK were retrospectively analysed for changes in endothelial cell morphology (e.g. nuclear activation), cell density (>10%) and pachymetry (>7%), and/or the presence of subclinical keratic precipitates. The same parameters were evaluated for 22 control eyes matched for age, gender and surgery indication. RESULTS: A total of 20/22 eyes (91%) showed detectable changes 0.25-75 months before allograft rejection became clinically manifest: 13/22 (59%) showed both specular microscopy and Scheimpflug imaging changes; 5/22 (23%) only had changes on Scheimpflug imaging; and 2/22 (9%) only had specular microscopy changes. In 18/22 (82%) and 14/22 (64%) eyes, subclinical keratic precipitates and endothelial cell morphology changes could be detected, respectively. A total of 11/22 (50%) eyes concurrently showed a >10% drop in endothelial cell density and 4/22 (18%) a >7% pachymetry increase. Of the control eyes, 7/22 (32%) showed changes with specular microscopy but not with Scheimpflug imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Combined analysis of specular microscopy and Scheimpflug imaging may allow recognizing an upcoming allograft rejection in over 90% of eyes and up to 6 years before rejection becomes clinically manifest. Early recognition of eyes at risk may allow for targeted intensified steroid treatment to prevent endothelial cell damage associated with rejection.

Parameters Associated With Endothelial Cell Density Variability After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To evaluate which parameters may affect endothelial cell loss after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) by comparing eyes in the low vs high quartile of endothelial cell loss over a follow-up period of 4 years. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Donor endothelial cell density (ECD) decline was evaluated for 351 eyes of 275 patients up to 4 years after DMEK for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). Eyes with a postoperative endothelial cell loss in the lower quartile at all available follow-up moments were assigned to Group 1 (n = 51) and those in the upper quartile to Group 2 (n = 42). Multinomial regression was used to assess which covariates were related to greater ECD decline. RESULTS: Mean endothelial cell loss as compared to preoperative donor ECD for the entire study group was 33 (±16)%, 36 (±17)%, and 52 (±18)% at 1, 6, and 48 months postoperatively. Endothelial cell loss of Group 1 was 12 (±7)%, 13 (±6)%, and 26 (±8)% at, respectively, 1, 6, and 48 months postoperatively, and 59 (±10)%, 64 (±9)%, and 75 (±5)% in Group 2. Partial graft detachment, donor death cause cardiovascular/stroke (vs cancer), postoperative complications other than graft detachment, and severity of preoperative FECD (all P < .01) showed the strongest relation with greater ECD decline. CONCLUSIONS: DMEK eyes with a completely attached graft and operated in an early stage of FECD may show the lowest endothelial cell loss postoperatively.

Effect of Surgical Indication and Preoperative Lens Status on Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To analyze 6-month results of 1000 consecutive Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) cases, and to evaluate if outcomes are influenced by surgical indication and preoperative lens status. DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional case series. METHODS: A series of 1000 eyes (738 patients) underwent DMEK mainly for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD; 85.3%) or bullous keratopathy (BK; 10.5%). Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density, postoperative complications, and retransplantations. RESULTS: At 6 months after DMEK, there was no difference in BCVA outcome between FECD and BK eyes (P = .170), or between phakic and pseudophakic FECD eyes (P = .066) after correcting for patient age and preoperative BCVA. Endothelial cell loss at 6 months postoperatively was similar for phakic and pseudophakic FECD eyes (39%; P = .852), but higher for BK eyes than for FECD eyes (46% vs 39%, P = .001). Primary and secondary graft failure occurred in 3 (0.3%) and 2 eyes (0.2%), respectively, and 7 eyes developed allograft rejection (0.7%). Eighty-two eyes (8.2%) received rebubbling for graft detachment and retransplantation was performed in 20 eyes (2.0%). Rebubbling was more often required in eyes treated for BK vs FECD eyes (12.4% vs 7.4%, P = .022). CONCLUSION: DMEK consistently provides excellent short-term results, with similar high visual acuity levels for both FECD and BK eyes. As preoperative lens status did not influence DMEK outcomes, for phakic FECD eyes with a still relatively clear crystalline lens, lens preservation may be preferable in a selected group of younger patients, who may still benefit from their residual accommodative capacity.

Quarter-Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: One- to Two-Year Clinical Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To report clinical outcomes of the first Quarter-Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (Quarter-DMEK) case series performed for central Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. METHODS: This is a prospective, interventional case series analyzing the clinical outcomes of 19 eyes of 19 patients with central Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, that is, with guttae predominantly in the 6- to 7-mm optical zone, who underwent unilateral Quarter-DMEK at a tertiary referral center. Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), and postoperative complications. Included eyes had up to 2 years of postoperative follow-up. RESULTS: At 6 months postoperatively, all eyes reached a BCVA of ≥20/40 (≥0.5): 18 of 19 eyes (95%) with ≥20/25 (≥0.8) and 9 of 19 eyes (42%) with ≥20/20 (≥1.0). Thereafter, BCVA remained stable up to 2 years postoperatively. The mean donor ECD decreased from 2842 ± 139 cells/mm (n = 19) before implantation to 913 ± 434 cells/mm (-68%) at 6 months (n = 19), 869 ± 313 cells/mm (-70%) at 12 months (n = 18), and 758 ± 225 cells/mm (-74%) at 24 months (n = 13) after Quarter-DMEK. Visually significant graft detachment requiring rebubbling occurred in 8 of 19 eyes (42%). CONCLUSIONS: Quarter-DMEK surgery yields visual outcomes similar to those of conventional DMEK and may potentially quadruple the availability of endothelial grafts. Further modifications of the graft preparation and the surgical technique may improve clinical outcomes in terms of lower ECD decrease and fewer graft detachments.