Application and Uses of Electronic Noses for Clinical Diagnosis on Urine Samples: A Review.

The electronic nose is able to provide useful information through the analysis of the volatile organic compounds in body fluids, such as exhaled breath, urine and blood. This paper focuses on the review of electronic nose studies and applications in the specific field of medical diagnostics based on the analysis of the gaseous headspace of human urine, in order to provide a broad overview of the state of the art and thus enhance future developments in this field. The research in this field is rather recent and still in progress, and there are several aspects that need to be investigated more into depth, not only to develop and improve specific electronic noses for different diseases, but also with the aim to discover and analyse the connections between specific diseases and the body fluids odour. Further research is needed to improve the results obtained up to now; the development of new sensors and data processing methods should lead to greater diagnostic accuracy thus making the electronic nose an effective tool for early detection of different kinds of diseases, ranging from infections to tumours or exposure to toxic agents.

Assessment of the chemical-physical variables affecting the evaporation of organic compounds from aqueous solutions in a sampling wind tunnel.

The aim of this work is the evaluation and the analysis of the different chemical-physical variables that affect the emission of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and odours from passive liquid area sources inside a wind tunnel, which is typically used for emission sampling. Three different compounds (acetone, butanol and ethanol), having different volatilization properties (e.g., boiling point, solubility), were studied in solution with water at different concentrations. The following physical parameters affecting the VOC volatilization in the Wind Tunnel system were evaluated: the velocity of the air flowing through the device, in a range from 0.01 to about 0.05 m/s, and the temperature of both the liquid source and the sweep air flow, in a range from 12 °C to 42 °C. The experimental results were compared with the existing volatilization models available in literature. In most cases the proposed theoretical model predicts well the experimentally measured concentration. Some discrepancies were observed for lower velocities and also by moving from the room temperature (20 °C); and those were discussed by making some considerations about the volatilization phenomenon. Moreover, the study clearly shows that it is not the gas phase temperature that controls the emission, but the temperature of the liquid phase, due to the effect of the latter on the vapour pressure of the compound, which is the main driving force of the phenomenon.