Outcomes of Transversus Abdominis Release With Macroporous Polypropylene Mesh.

INTRODUCTION: Transversus abdominis release (TAR) is increasingly being performed for reconstruction of complex incisional and recurrent ventral hernias, with complication rates ranging from 17.4% to 33.3% after open TAR (oTAR) or robotic TAR (rTAR). The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes of patients undergoing TAR with macroporous polypropylene mesh (MPM) and to compare outcomes between oTAR and rTAR. METHODS: A retrospective review of 183 consecutive patients undergoing TAR with MPM performed by a single surgeon at a single institution from 2015 to 2021 was performed. Patients with less than one year of follow-up were excluded. Univariate analysis was performed to compare outcomes between oTAR and rTAR patients. RESULTS: Average patient age was 59.4 y, median body mass index was 33.2 kg/m2, and median hernia width was 12.0 cm. Forty 2 (23%) patients underwent oTAR, 127 (69%) underwent rTAR, and 14 (8%) underwent laparoscopic TAR. Patients experienced 16.4%, 10.4%, 3.8%, and 6.0% rates of overall complications, surgical site occurrences, surgical site infections, and other complications, respectively. At average follow-up of 2.3 y, a 2.7% hernia recurrence rate was observed. In comparison to patients undergoing oTAR, rTAR patients required shorter operative times and length of stay, and were less likely to experience postoperative complications overall, and other complications. Recurrence rates were similar between oTAR and rTAR. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing TAR with MPM experienced complication and recurrence rates in alignment with previously published results. In comparison to oTAR, rTAR was associated with more favorable perioperative outcomes and complication rates, but similar recurrence rates.

Pitfalls and complications of enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal approach to abdominal wall reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal access technique (eTEP) to minimally invasive retromuscular abdominal wall reconstruction is a relatively novel technique that has continued to gain popularity. There is a paucity of information regarding the prevention and management of eTEP complications. We reviewed the literature to evaluate the complications reported with eTEP ventral hernia repair and discuss the main complications associated with this technique. METHODS: A literature search via PubMed was performed focusing on eTEP ventral hernia repair. Based on the available literature and own practice experience, the authors discuss key strategies for preventing and managing complications associated with the eTEP approach. RESULTS: One hundred fifty studies were identified. Forty-seven studies were fully reviewed and twenty-four were included in this review. The technical details of the technique were described as performed by the authors. Postoperative complications were classified into different categories and discussed separately. CONCLUSION: As the eTEP approach continues to gain popularity, it is essential to consider its unique complications. A focus on prevention with anatomical bearings and sound surgical technique is paramount.

Hybrid versus open retromuscular abdominal wall repair: early outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The hybrid approach to abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) for abdominal wall hernias combines minimally invasive posterior component separation and retromuscular dissection with open fascial closure and mesh implantation. This combination may enhance patient outcomes and recovery compared to the open approach alone. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the operative outcomes of hybrid vs. open abdominal wall reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted to compare patients who underwent open versus hybrid AWR between September 2015 and August of 2018 at Anne Arundel Medical Center. Patient demographics and perioperative data were collected and analyzed using univariate analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included in the final analysis: 10 in the hybrid and 55 in the open groups. Mean age was higher in the hybrid vs. open group (65.1 vs. 56.2 years, p < 0.05). The hybrid and open groups were statistically similar (p > 0.05) in gender distribution, mean BMI, and ASA score. Intraoperative comparison found hybrid patients parallel to open patients (p > 0.05) in mean operative time (294.5 vs. 267.5 min), defect size (14.4 vs. 13.6 cm), mesh area, and drain placement. The mean total hospital cost was lower in the hybrid group compared to the open group ($16,426 vs. $19,054, p = 0.43). The hybrid group had a shorter length of stay (5.3 vs. 3.6 days, p = 0.03) after surgery and was followed for a similar length of time (12.3 vs. 12.6 months, p = 0.91). The hybrid group showed a lower trend of seroma, hematoma, wound infection, ileus, and readmission rates after surgery. CONCLUSION: A review of patient outcomes after hybrid AWR highlights a trend towards shorter length of stay, lower hospital cost, and fewer complications without significant addition to operative time. Long-term studies on a larger number of patients are definitively needed to characterize the comprehensive benefits of this approach.

Impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on perioperative outcomes following minimally invasive retromuscular abdominal wall reconstruction: a comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Morbidity and recurrence rates are higher in obese patients undergoing open abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). Historically, body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 has served as a relative contraindication to open AWR. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) on outcomes after AWR for higher versus lower BMI patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was conducted of all patients who underwent MIS AWR between September 2015 and April 2019 at our institution. Patients were subdivided into two groups based on their BMI: BMI ≤ 35 kg/m2 and BMI > 35 kg/m2. Patient demographics and perioperative data were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: 461 patients were identified and divided into two groups: BMI ≤ 35 (n = 310) and BMI > 35 (n = 151). The two groups were similar in age (BMI ≤ 35: 56.3 ± 14.1 years vs. BMI > 35: 54.4 ± 11.9, p = .154). BMI > 35 group had more patients with ASA score of 3 (81% vs. 32%, p < .001) and comorbid conditions such as hypertension (70% vs. 45%, p < .001), diabetes mellitus (32% vs. 15%, p < .001), and history of recurrent abdominal wall hernia (34% vs. 23%, p = .008). BMI > 35 group underwent a robotic approach at higher rates (74% vs. 45%, p < .001). Patients who underwent a Rives-Stoppa repair from the higher BMI cohort also had a larger defect size (5.6 ± 2.4 cm vs. 6.7 ± 2.4 cm, p = .004). However, there were no differences in defect size in patients who underwent a transversus abdominus release (BMI ≤ 35: 9.7 ± 4.9 cm vs. BMI > 35: 11.1 ± 4.6 cm, p = .069). Both groups benefited similarly from a short length of stay, similar hospital charges, and lower postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Initial findings of our data support the benefits of elective MIS approach to AWR for patients with higher BMI. These patients derive similar benefits, such as faster recovery with low recurrence rates, when compared to lower BMI patients, while avoiding preoperative hernia incarceration, postoperative wound complications, and hernia recurrences. Future follow-up is required to establish long-term perioperative and quality of life outcomes in this patient cohort.

Comparative review of outcomes: laparoscopic and robotic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) access retrorectus repairs.

BACKGROUND: Building on the principles of eTEP access, described by Dr. Jorge Daes, our group has previously described and standardized a novel minimally invasive approach to restoration of the linea alba and repair of lateral atypical defects of the abdominal wall. The purpose of this report is to present comparative analysis of laparoscopic and robotic eTEP access retrorectus repairs. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted in patients who underwent laparoscopic eTEP (lap-eRS) and robotic-assisted eTEP (robo-eRS) Rives-Stoppa repairs between September 2015 and May 2018 at our institution. We analyzed the preoperative demographics and the perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: Our review identified 206 patients (Lap-eRS 120 vs. robo-eRS 86). The groups were comparable (p > 0.05) in gender distribution (47.6% vs. 53% male) and mean age (53.2 vs. 50.8 years), but different (p < 0.05) in mean BMI (31.3 vs. 34.4 kg/m2) and ASA score (2.1 vs. 2.4). The robo-eRS group had a larger defect size (5.5 vs. 7.1 cm, p < 0.05), a longer mean operative time (120.4 vs. 174.7 min, p < 0.05), and a higher hospitalization cost ($5,091 vs. $6,751, p = 0.005) compared to the lap-eRS group. Average length of stay (0.2 vs. 0.1 days), length of drain placement (5.3 vs. 5.7 days), and reoperations (2.5% vs. 2.3%) were similar between lap-eRS and robo-eRS (p > 0.05). Patients in both groups (lap-eRS vs. robo-eRS) were followed for an average of 5.7 months vs. 5.5 months (p = .735) and showed similar recurrence rates (1.7% vs. 1.2%, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We present the largest series to-date of eTEP access laparoscopic and robotic ventral hernia retrorectus repairs. Morbidly obese patients and those with more complex abdominal wall defects were more likely to undergo a robo-eRS. The significantly longer operative time and higher hospital cost associated with the robo-eRS group may be in part due to these factors. Both robotic and laparoscopic eTEP Rives-Stoppa repairs are associated with favorable perioperative outcomes and low recurrence rates.

Minimally Invasive Multidisciplinary Approach to Chronic Giant Inguinoscrotal Hernias.

Background. Giant inguinoscrotal hernias (GIH) are defined as groin hernias extending below the mid-thigh when standing, often significantly encumbering activities of daily living. To date, there are no reports utilizing the combination of progressive pneumoperitoneum (PPP), botulinum toxin A injection (BTI), and enhanced view-totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) technique for GIH repair. In this report, we present 2 such cases of this unique minimally invasive multidisciplinary approach to address GIH. Series Presentation. Two individuals with lifelong complaints of GIH presented for elective hernia repair, each with significant morbidity relating to their pathology and profound loss of abdominal domain. Four weeks prior to surgery, BTI was administered to the lateral abdominal compartment muscles to facilitate regional paralysis, followed by PPP to develop larger intraabdominal domain. Utilizing the eTEP access technique and transversus abdominis release, a wide retromuscular dissection was performed to aid in the increase of intraabdominal domain and to develop a large space for mesh placement. Reconstruction including partial scrotectomy and scrotoplasty using adjacent tissue transfer technique was completed. Both patients tolerated the procedures well without recurrence in the first postoperative year. Conclusion. In this article, we present the first series of GIH patients undergoing combined PPP, BTI, and eTEP access approach to retromuscular dissection. This multidisciplinary approach to patient care has proven both safe and effective.

Carolinas Comfort Scale as a Measure of Hernia Repair Quality of Life: A Reappraisal Utilizing 3788 International Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study was to reaffirm the psychometric properties of the CCS using an expansive, multinational cohort. BACKGROUND: The Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) is a validated, disease-specific, quality of life (QOL) questionnaire developed for patients undergoing hernia repair. METHODS: The data were obtained from the International Hernia Mesh Registry, an American, European, and Australian prospective, hernia repair database designed to capture information delineating patient demographics, surgical findings, and QOL using the CCS at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 3788 patients performed 11,060 postoperative surveys. Patient response rates exceeded 80% at 1 year postoperatively. Acceptability was demonstrated by an average of less than 2 missing items per survey. The formal test of reliability revealed a global Cronbach's alpha exceeding 0.95 for all hernia types. Test-retest validity was supported by the correlation found between 2 different administrations of the CCS using the kappa coefficient. Principal component analysis identified 2 components with a good distribution of variance, with the first component explaining approximately 60% of the variance, regardless of hernia type. Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing survey responses and use of pain medication at 1 month postoperatively and analysis revealed that symptomatic patients demonstrated significantly higher odds of requiring pain medication in all activity domains and for all hernia types. CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirms that the CCS questionnaire is a validated, sensitive, and robust instrument for assessing QOL after hernia repair, which has become a predominant outcome measure in this discipline of surgery.

Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes of robotic versus open transversus abdominis release.

BACKGROUND: Transversus abdominis release (TAR) has evolved as an effective approach to complex abdominal wall reconstructions. Although the role of robotics in hernia surgery is rapidly expanding, the benefits of a robotic approach for abdominal wall reconstruction have not been established well. We aimed to compare the impact of the application of robotics to the TAR procedure on the perioperative outcomes when compared to the open TAR repairs. METHODS: Case-matched comparison of patients undergoing robotic TAR (R-TAR) at two specialized hernia centers to a matched historic cohort of open TAR (O-TAR) patients was performed. Outcome measures included patient demographics, operative details, postoperative complications, and length of hospitalization. RESULTS: 38 consecutive patients undergoing R-TAR were compared to 76 matched O-TAR. Patient demographics were similar between the groups, but ASA III status was more prevalent in the O-TAR group. The average operative time was significantly longer in the R-TAR group (299 ± 95 vs.. 211 ± 63 min, p < 0.001) and blood loss was significantly lower for the R-TAR group (49 ± 60 vs. 139 ± 149 mL, p < 0.001). Wound morbidity was minimal in the R-TAR, but the rate of surgical site events and surgical site infection was not different between groups. Systemic complications were significantly less frequent in the R-TAR group (0 vs. 17.1%, p = 0.026). The length of hospitalization was significantly reduced in the R-TAR group (1.3 ± 1.3 vs. 6.0 ± 3.4 days, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our early experience, robotic TAR was associated with longer operative times. However, we found that the use of robotics was associated with decreased intraoperative blood loss, fewer systemic complications, shorter hospitalizations, and eliminated readmissions. While long-term outcomes and patient selection criteria for robotic TAR repair are under investigations, we advocate selective use of robotics for TAR reconstructions in patients undergoing AWR.

A novel approach using the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) technique for laparoscopic retromuscular hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: The enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) technique has been previously described for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair. We present a novel application of the eTEP access technique for the repair of ventral and incisional hernias. METHODS: Retrospective review of consecutive laparoscopic retromuscular hernia repair cases utilizing the eTEP access approach from five hernia centers between August 2015 and October 2016 was conducted. Patient demographics, hernia characteristics, operative details, perioperative complications, and quality of life outcomes utilizing the Carolina's Comfort Scale (CCS) were included in our data analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients with mean age of 54.9 years, mean BMI of 31.1 kg/m2, and median ASA of 2.0 were included in this analysis. Thirty-four percent of patients had a prior ventral or incisional hernia repair. Average mesh area of 634.4 cm2 was used for an average defect area of 132.1 cm2. Mean operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 218.9 min, 52.6 mL, and 1.8 days, respectively. There was one conversion to intraperitoneal mesh placement and one conversion to open retromuscular mesh placement. Postoperative complications consisted of seroma (n = 2) and trocar site dehiscence (n = 1). Comparison of mean pre- and postoperative CCS scores found significant improvements in pain (68%, p < 0.007) and movement limitations (87%, p < 0.004) at 6-month follow-up. There were no readmissions within 30 days and one hernia recurrence at mean follow-up of 332 ± 122 days. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial multicenter evaluation of the eTEP access technique for ventral and incisional hernias has found the approach feasible and effective. This novel approach offers flexible port set-up optimal for laparoscopic closure of defects, along with wide mesh coverage in the retromuscular space with minimal transfascial fixation.

The trend toward minimally invasive complex abdominal wall reconstruction: is it worth it?

BACKGROUND: Open abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) was previously one of the only methods available to treat complex ventral hernias. We set out to identify the impact of laparoscopy and robotics on our AWR program by performing an economic analysis before and after the institution of minimally invasive AWR. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed inpatient hospital costs and economic factors for a consecutive series of 104 AWR cases that utilized separation of components technique (57 open, 38 laparoscopic, 9 robotic). Patients were placed into two groups by date of procedure. Group 1 (Pre MIS) was July 2012-June 2015 which included 52 open cases. Group 2 (Post MIS) was July 2015-August 2016 which included 52 cases (5 open, 38 laparoscopic, 9 robotic). RESULTS: A total of 104 patients (52 G1 vs. 52 G2) with mean age (54.2 vs. 54.1 years, p = 0.960), BMI (34.7 vs. 32.1 kg/m2, p = 0.059), and ASA score (2.5 vs. 2.3, p = 0.232) were included in this review. Total length of stay (LOS) was significantly shorter for patients in the Post MIS group (5.3 vs. 1.4 days, p < 0.001). Although operating room (OR) supply costs were $1705 higher for the Post MIS group (p = 0.149), total hospital costs were $8628 less when compared to the Pre MIS group (p < 0.001). Multiple linear regressions identified increased BMI (p = 0.021), longer OR times (p = 0.003), and LOS (p < 0.001) as predictors of higher total costs. Factors that were predictive of longer LOS included older patients (p = 0.003) and patients with larger defect areas (p = 0.004). MIS was predictive of shorter hospital stays (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increase in operating room supply costs, transition to performing MIS AWR in cases that were previously done through an open approach decreased LOS and translated into significant overall total cost savings.

A prospective randomized double-blinded controlled trial evaluating indocyanine green fluorescence angiography on reducing wound complications in complex abdominal wall reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial was to investigate the utility of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) in reducing wound complications in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consented patients underwent ICG-FA with SPY Elite after hernia repair and before flap closure. They were randomized into the control group, in which the surgical team was blinded to ICG-FA images and performed surgery as they normally would, or the experimental group, in which the surgery team viewed the images and could modify tissue flaps according to their findings. Patient variables and wound complications were compared with standard statistical methods. RESULTS: Among 95 patients, n = 49 control versus n = 46 experimental, preoperative characteristics were similar including age (58.3 versus 56.7 y; P = 0.4), body mass index (34.9 versus 33.6 kg/m(2); P = 0.8), tobacco use (8.2% versus 8.7%; P = 0.9), diabetes (30.6% versus 37.0%; P = 0.5), and previous hernia repair (71.4% versus 60.9%; P = 0.3). Operative characteristics were also similar, including rate of panniculectomy (69.4% versus 58.7%; P = 0.3) and component separation (73.5% versus 69.6%; P = 0.6). The experimental group more often had advancement flaps modified (37% versus 4.1%, P < 0.0001). There was no difference between groups in rates of skin necrosis (6.1% versus 2.2%; P = 0.3), fat necrosis (10.2% versus 13.0%, P = 0.7), reoperation (14.3% versus 26.1%, P = 0.7), wound infection (10.2% versus 21.7%; P = 0.12), or overall wound-related complications (32.7% versus 37.0%, P = 0.7). Skin/subcutaneous hypoperfusion on ICG-FA was associated with higher rates of wound infection (28% versus 9.4%, P < 0.02), but flap modification after viewing images did not prevent wound-related complications (15.6% versus 12.5%, P = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial to evaluate ICG-FA in abdominal wall reconstruction. Although ICG-FA guidance and intraoperative modification of flaps did not prevent wound-related complications or reoperation, it did identify at risk patients.

Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Release, a Novel Minimally Invasive Approach to Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Open abdominal wall reconstruction is used to repair complex abdominal wall hernias with contour abnormalities. We present a novel minimally invasive approach to address these types of defects, completed entirely laparoscopically. METHODS: Three patients underwent laparoscopic abdominal wall reconstruction for complex hernias in August and September of 2015. Operative approach consisted of laparoscopic transversus abdominis components separation, defect closure, and wide mesh implantation in the retromuscular space. RESULTS: Two males and one female with mean age and body mass index of 70 and 30.1, respectively, underwent a mean operation room time of 329 minutes. Estimated blood loss and length of stay were 91.7 cc and 4.7 days, respectively. No subcutaneous flaps were raised avoiding the need for subcutaneous drains. There were no perioperative complications. All of the subfascial drains were removed prior to patient discharge. On initial follow-up visit at 3 weeks, there was no evidence of wound complications, bulging, or hernia recurrences. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic abdominal wall reconstruction with transversus abdominis release is a unique and feasible approach to complex abdominal wall defects with the potential to reduce pain, facilitate recovery, and decrease length of hospital stay for patients.

Quality of life following component separation versus standard open ventral hernia repair for large hernias.

INTRODUCTION: Component separation (CS) has become a viable alternative to repair large ventral defects when the fascia cannot be reapproximated. However, the impact of transecting the external oblique to facilitate closure of the abdomen on quality of life (QOL) has yet to be investigated. The study goal was to investigate QOL and outcomes after standard open ventral hernia repair (OVHR) versus CS for large ventral hernias. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective data for all CSs were reviewed and compared with matched OVHR controls. All defects were 100 to 1000 cm2 in size and repaired with mesh. Comorbidities, complications, outcomes, and Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) scores, were reviewed. RESULTS: Seventy-four CS patients were compared with 154 patients undergoing standard OVHR with similar defect sizes. Age (56.7±13.0 vs. 54.7 ± 12.3 years, P = .26), defect sizes (299 ± 160 vs. 304 ± 210 cm2, P = .87), and BMI (32.7 ± 6.9 vs. 34.2 ± 9.0 kg/m2, P = .26) were similar in both groups, respectively. There were no differences in major postoperative complications (P = .22), mesh infections (P = 1.00), wound infections (P = .07), or hernia recurrence (P = .09), but wound breakdown increased after CS (10% vs. 1%, P < .001) as did seroma interventions (15% vs. 4%, P = .005). Postoperative CCS scores were similar at 1 month (P = .82) and 1 year (P = .14). CONCLUSIONS: In the first comparative study of its kind, it is found that patient undergoing CS with mesh reinforcement had equal short- and long-term QOL outcomes compared with similar patients who underwent standard OVHR. Whereas wound breakdown and seroma formation are higher, the overall complication, mesh infection, and recurrence rates are similar.

Impact of the establishment of a specialty hernia referral center.

BACKGROUND: Creating a surgical specialty referral center requires a strong interest, expertise, and a market demand in that particular field, as well as some form of promotion. In 2004, we established a tertiary hernia referral center. Our goal in this study was to examine its impact on institutional volume and economics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The database of all hernia repairs (2004-2011) was reviewed comparing hernia repair type and volume and center financial performance. The ventral hernia repair (VHR) patient subset was further analyzed with particular attention paid to previous repairs, comorbidities, referral patterns, and the concomitant involvement of plastic surgery. RESULTS: From 2004 to 2011, 4927 hernia repairs were performed: 39.3% inguinal, 35.5% ventral or incisional, 16.2% umbilical, 5.8% diaphragmatic, 1.6% femoral, and 1.5% other. Annual billing increased yearly from 7% to 85% and averaged 37% per year. Comparing 2004 with 2011, procedural volume increased 234%, and billing increased 713%. During that period, there was a 2.5-fold increase in open VHRs, and plastic surgeon involvement increased almost 8-fold, (P = .004). In 2005, 51 VHR patients had a previous repair, 27.0% with mesh, versus 114 previous VHR in 2011, 58.3% with mesh (P < .0001). For VHR, in-state referrals from 2004 to 2011 increased 340% while out-of-state referrals jumped 580%. In 2011, 21% of all patients had more than 4 comorbidities, significantly increased from 2004 (P = .02). CONCLUSION: The establishment of a tertiary, regional referral center for hernia repair has led to a substantial increase in surgical volume, complexity, referral geography, and financial benefit to the institution.

Laparoscopic versus open hernia repair: outcomes and sociodemographic utilization results from the nationwide inpatient sample.

INTRODUCTION: The differences and advantages of laparoscopic (LVHR) and open ventral hernia repair (OVHR) have been debated since laparoscopic hernia repair was first described. The purpose of this study is to compare LVHR and OVHR with mesh in the United States using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). METHODS: The NIS, a representative sample of approximately 20% of all inpatient encounters in the United States, was queried for all ventral hernia repairs with graft or prosthesis in 2009 using ICD-9-CM codes. The patients were stratified into LVHR and OVHR groups. Sociodemographic data, comorbidities, complications, and outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 18,223 cases were documented in the NIS sample after inclusion and exclusion criteria were met. LVHR was performed in 27.6% of cases. There were no statistically significant differences in gender or mean income by zip code of residence. Mean age (58.8 years in open group vs. 58.1 years, p = 0.014) and mean Charlson score (0.97 vs. 0.77, p < 0.0001) differed significantly between groups. OVHR more often was associated with emergent admissions (21.7 vs. 15.2%, p < 0.0001). There were significant differences comparing outcomes between groups: complication rate (OVHR: 8.24 vs. LVHR: 3.97%, p < 0.0001), average length of stay (5.2 vs. 3.5 days, p < 0.0001), total charge ($45,708 vs. $35,947, p < 0.0001), frequency of routine discharge (80.8 vs. 91.1%, p < 0.0001), and mortality rate (0.88 vs. 0.36%, p = 0.0002). After controlling for confounding variables with multivariate regression, all outcomes remained significant between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have undergone LVHR with mesh had fewer complications, shorter length of stay, lower hospital charges, more frequent routine discharge, and decreased mortality compared with those who received open repair. Patient comorbidities, selection bias, and emergency operations may limit the number of patients who receive laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Regionalization studies may better illuminate the low rates of laparoscopic surgery.

Prospective, long-term comparison of quality of life in laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair.

OBJECTIVES: To compare laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) versus open ventral hernia repair (OVHR) for quality of life (QOL), complications, and recurrence in a large, prospective, multinational study. INTRODUCTION: As recurrence rates have decreased for LVHR and OVHR, QOL has become an extremely important differentiating outcomes measure. METHODS: A prospective, international database was queried from September 2007 to July 2011 for LVHR and OVHR. Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) was utilized to quantify QOL (pain, movement limitation, and mesh sensation) preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 710 repairs included 402 OVHR and 308 LVHR. Demographics were mean age 57.1 ± 13.3 years, 49.6% male, 21.7% recurrent hernias, mean body mass index of 30.3 ± 6.6, and mean defect size of 89.4 ± 130.8. Preoperatively, 56.9% had pain, and 53.2% experienced movement limitation. At 1-month follow-up, 587 (82.7%) patients were provided CCS scores; more LVHR patients experienced pain (P < 0.001) and movement limitations (P < 0.001). At 6 and 12 months, there were no differences in QOL with 466 (65.6%) and 478 (67.3%) patients responding, respectively. After controlling for confounding variables, LVHR was independently associated with more frequent discomfort [odds ratio (OR) = 1.9, confidence interval (CI): 1.2-3.1], movement limitation (OR = 1.6, CI: 1.0-2.7), and overall symptoms (OR = 1.6, CI: 1.0-2.6) at 1 month. LVHR resulted in a shorter length of stay (LOS) (P < 0.001) and fewer infections (P = 0.004), but overall complication rates were equal. Recurrence rates were also equal (P = 0.66). CONCLUSION: In the largest, prospective QOL study comparing LVHR and OVHR, LVHR is associated with a decrease in QOL in the short term. LOS and infection rates are decreased in LVHR, but overall complication and recurrence rates are equal.

Preliminary results of surgical and quality of life outcomes of Physiomesh in an international, prospective study.

Physiomesh is a novel, lightweight, large pore, polypropylene mesh designed to have flexibility that matches the compliance of the abdominal wall in an effort to improve patient quality of life (QOL). The International Hernia Mesh Registry was queried for ventral hernia repair (VHR) and inguinal hernia repair (IHR) with Physiomesh. Demographics, operative and postoperative details, and the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) as a measure of QOL were recorded. Physiomesh was used in 100 patients, 29 IHR and 71 VHR. Their average age was 56.8 +/- 13.7, and BMI was 34.0 +/- 21.0 kg/m2. For IHR, preoperative pain (CCS > or = 2) was present in 41%, but decreased at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively to 25.9%, 0%, and 1.6%, while movement limitation decreased from 42.9% to 18.5%, 1.6%, and 3.1%. There were no complications or recurrences. The average VHR measured 66.4 cm2; 93% underwent a laparoscopic repair. Pain was present in 59.1% preoperatively but 21% at 12 months. Movement limitations reduced from 43.2% to 15.8% at 12 months. Mesh sensation was reported in only 10.5% at 1 year. There was 1 recurrence. Physiomesh is well tolerated by patients undergoing IHR and VHR. It is associated with a very favorable long-term QOL.

Prospective, comparative study of postoperative quality of life in TEP, TAPP, and modified Lichtenstein repairs.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative quality of life (QOL) in patients undergoing laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP), transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), or modified Lichtenstein (ML) hernia repairs. METHODS: The International Hernia Mesh Registry (2007-2010) was interrogated. 2086 patients who underwent 2499 inguinal hernia repairs were identified. A Carolinas Comfort Score was self-reported at 1-, 6-, 12-months and results were compared. Subgroups analysis and logistic regression were used to identify confounders and to control for significant variables. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-two patients met the exclusion criteria. The distribution of unilateral procedures was TEP (n = 217), TAPP (n = 331), and ML (n = 953). Average follow-up was 12 months. Use of >10 tacks, lack of prostate pathology, recurrent hernia repairs, and bilateral hernia repairs were significant predictors of postoperative pain. One month after surgery 8.9%, 16.6%, and 16.5% were symptomatic for TEP (P = 0.038 vs. ML), TAPP and ML, respectively. At 6 months and 1 year no differences were observed. The number of tacks used varied significantly, with 18.1% of TAPP and 2.3% of TEP with >10 tacks (P = 0.005). The incidence of hernia recurrences were equivalent: TEP (0.42%), TAPP (1.34%), and ML (1.27%). The number or type of tacks utilized did not impact recurrence rates. CONCLUSION: Use of >10 tacks doubles the incidence of early postoperative pain while having no effect on rates of recurrence. There was no difference in chronic postoperative pain comparing ML, TEP, and TAPP including when controlled for tack use.

The addition of lysostaphin dramatically improves survival, protects porcine biomesh from infection, and improves graft tensile shear strength.

BACKGROUND: Lysostaphin (LS), a naturally occurring Staphylococcal endopeptidase, has the ability to penetrate biofilm, and has been identified as a potential antimicrobial to prevent mesh infection. The goals of this study were to determine if LS adhered to porcine mesh (PM) can impact host survival, reduce the risk of long-term PM infection, and to analyze lysostaphin bound PM (LS-PM) mesh-fascial interface in an infected field. METHODS: Abdominal onlay PMs measuring 3×3 cm were implanted in select groups of rats (n=75). Group assignments were based on bacterial inoculum and presence of LS on mesh. Explantation occurred at 60 d. Bacterial growth and mesh-fascial interface tensile strength were analyzed. Standard statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Only one out of 30 rats with bacterial inoculum not treated with LS survived. All 30 LS treated rats survived and had normal appearing mesh, including 20 rats with a bacterial inoculum (10(6) and 10(8) CFU). Mean tensile strength for controls and LS and no inoculum samples was 3.47±0.86 N versus 5.0±1.0 N (P=0.008). LS groups inoculated with 10(6) and 10(8) CFU exhibited mean tensile strengths of 4.9±1.5 N and 6.7±1.6 N, respectively (P=0.019 and P<0.001 compared with controls). CONCLUSION: Rats inoculated with S. aureus and not treated with LS had a mortality of 97%. By comparison, LS treated animals completely cleared S. aureus when challenged with bacterial concentrations of 1×10(6) and 1×10(8) with maintenance of mesh integrity at 60 d. These findings strongly suggest the clinical use of LS-treated porcine mesh in contaminated fields may translate into more durable hernia repair.