Low-dose colchicine for atherosclerosis: long-term safety.

Low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg daily) is now FDA-approved for secondary prevention in patients with coronary disease and will be increasingly prescribed in clinical practice. In this State-of-the-Art Review, data were collated from contemporary systemic reviews of case reports, drug registries, and placebo-controlled trials that assessed specific issues of safety related to the continuous use of colchicine in a range of clinical settings to inform physicians, pharmacists, and patients of the absolute risks of continuous use of low-dose colchicine, including among individuals taking statin therapy. Based upon these collective data, it is concluded that aside mild diarrhoea on initiation of colchicine that typically subsides in the vast majority of patients within a week of therapy, continuous use of low-dose colchicine is well tolerated and very safe. It does not affect renal, liver, or cognitive function, has no adverse effects on bleeding, wound healing, fertility, or pregnancy, and does not increase risks of cancer, serious infection, or cause-specific mortality. When appropriately prescribed to patients without significant renal or hepatic impairment, reports of myelosuppression, myotoxicity, and serious drug-drug interactions are rare and no more frequent than placebo, including in patients taking statin therapy. Physicians, pharmacists, and patients can be reassured that in the absence of significant renal or hepatic impairment continuous use of low-dose colchicine can be used safely in patients with atherosclerosis for the purpose of reducing cardiovascular risk.

Old paradigms and new concepts in familial Mediterranean fever (FMF): an update 2023.

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a hereditary autoinflammatory disease characterized by recurrent attacks of fever and polyserositis. Its first description as a new entity was published by Siegal in 1945. Colchicine has been the treatment of choice for this disease since 1972. Significant progress has been made over the years in understanding FMF's clinical features, diagnosis, mode of inheritance, pathogenesis and therapeutic approach. However, many old paradigms related to FMF have proven inaccurate, leading to the emergence of new concepts that provide more precise insights. The term 'FMF' is no longer appropriate as the disease is found beyond the Mediterranean basin. The concept of diagnosis based only upon clinical ground proved to be wrong. The paradigm that MEFV mutations in FMF lead to loss of function of the encoded peptide pyrin turned out to be a gain of function mutation. Finally, the concept that as a genetic disease FMF should be treated for life was found to be inaccurate for the subpopulation of the heterozygote patients. Thus, the breakthroughs of identifying the gene associated with the disease (MEFV) and the deciphering of its pathogenesis revolutionized our old paradigms and replaced them with new and more precise insights.

The significance of carrying MEFV variants in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is an autoinflammatory disease characterized by recurrent attacks of fever, serositis (peritonitis, pleuritis, or synovitis), and erysipelas-like erythema. Genetic variants in the MEFV gene are associated with this disease. Familial Mediterranean fever is considered an autosomal recessive disease. However, in Middle Eastern countries, a third of the patients expressing FMF manifestations, carry a single mutation only. Moreover, some cases of pure dominant inheritance linked to specific single MEFV variants have also been described. This complex inheritance of MEFV-associated inflammatory diseases poses a serious challenge when interpreting the results of genetic testing in patients having recurrent fever syndromes. In addition, in certain situations, asymptomatic individuals may be incidentally found to carry MEFV variants. These cases pose the question of their exact diagnosis and whether they should be treated. Previous studies have focused on genetic results interpretations among symptomatic patients. In the current article, we would like to elaborate on the genetic interpretation in cases of symptomatic individuals suspected to have FMF and on asymptomatic individuals carrying MEFV variants. We aim to assist physicians unfamiliar with FMF to cope with genetic results interpretation when facing symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals carrying MEFV variants and suggest a management plan accordingly.

IL-1 inhibition in familial Mediterranean fever: clinical outcomes and expectations.

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a hereditary auto-inflammatory disease, characterised by recurrent episodes of fever and serositis. Since 1972, colchicine is the drug of choice for FMF. It is effective in preventing the attacks and withholding amyloidosis in most patients with FMF. Colchicine blood and tissue levels are regulated by a glycoprotein pump (GLP) and by Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP450 3A4). It is secreted through the bile system and the kidneys. Over the years several problems have been raised following the use of colchicine in FMF. These include potential side effects (particularly gastrointestinal), non-compliance, inefficacy due to drug resistance, many drug-drug interactions and high risk for intoxication due to a narrow therapeutic range. In addition, colchicine does not prevent protracted febrile myalgia or exertional leg pain. Based upon our current understanding of the pathogenesis of FMF, it seems that anti-interleukin-1 (anti-IL-1) agents can solve many of the aforementioned problems related to colchicine therapy. The gastrointestinal side effects of colchicine are extremely uncommon with anti-IL-1 biologics. Drug-drug interactions are also unlikely, and their therapeutic window is not narrow. The once daily injection of anakinra, the once weekly injection of rilonacept, and the once monthly injection of canakinumab result in a better compliance to therapy. Nevertheless, there are no controlled trials showing the efficacy of anti-IL-1 agents in preventing amyloidosis or their safety in pregnancy. Therefore, it is still needed to give IL-1 blockers with concomitant colchicine in its tolerable dose effective in preventing amyloidosis (1.5 mg daily in adult).

Canakinumab for the Treatment of Autoinflammatory Recurrent Fever Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Familial Mediterranean fever, mevalonate kinase deficiency (also known as the hyperimmunoglobulinemia D syndrome), and the tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) are monogenic autoinflammatory diseases characterized by recurrent fever flares. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with genetically confirmed colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever, mevalonate kinase deficiency, or TRAPS at the time of a flare to receive 150 mg of canakinumab subcutaneously or placebo every 4 weeks. Patients who did not have a resolution of their flare received an add-on injection of 150 mg of canakinumab. The primary outcome was complete response (resolution of flare and no flare until week 16). In the subsequent phase up to week 40, patients who had a complete response underwent a second randomization to receive canakinumab or placebo every 8 weeks. Patients who underwent a second randomization and had a subsequent flare and all other patients received open-label canakinumab. RESULTS: At week 16, significantly more patients receiving canakinumab had a complete response than those receiving placebo: 61% vs. 6% of patients with colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever (P<0.001), 35% versus 6% of those with mevalonate kinase deficiency (P=0.003), and 45% versus 8% of those with TRAPS (P=0.006). The inclusion of patients whose dose was increased to 300 mg every 4 weeks yielded a complete response in 71% of those with colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever, 57% of those with mevalonate kinase deficiency, and 73% of those with TRAPS. After week 16, an extended dosing regimen (every 8 weeks) maintained disease control in 46% of patients with colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever, 23% of those with mevalonate kinase deficiency, and 53% of those with TRAPS. Among patients who received canakinumab, the most frequently reported adverse events were infections (173.3, 313.5, and 148.0 per 100 patient-years among patients with colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever, those with mevalonate kinase deficiency, and those with TRAPS, respectively), with a few being serious infections (6.6, 13.7, and 0.0 per 100 patient-years). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, canakinumab was effective in controlling and preventing flares in patients with colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever, mevalonate kinase deficiency, and TRAPS. (Funded by Novartis; CLUSTER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02059291 .).

Incidence and course of COVID-19 hospitalizations among patients with familial Mediterranean fever.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of hospitalization for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with FMF, as compared with the general population, and to compare the disease course between FMF inpatients, and age-, sex-, ethnicity- and comorbidity-matched non-FMF COVID-19 inpatients. METHODS: We used electronic medical records to obtain data about the total number of the insured population and the number of FMF patients in the two largest health management organizations in Jerusalem, Clalit and Meuhedet. The total number of COVID-19 inpatients at the Hadassah Medical Center, including those with FMF, for the period between 1 February 2020 and 10March 2021, was retrieved from the electronic medical records of Hadassah. COVID-19 course was compared between the FMF inpatient group and age-, sex-, ethnicity- and comorbidity-matched non-FMF COVID-19 inpatients. Each FMF inpatient was matched with two non-FMF controls. RESULTS: We found no statistically significant difference in the odds of hospitalization for COVID-19 between FMF patients and the non-FMF population (0.46% vs 0.41%, P = 0.73). Furthermore, we found similar disease severity and therapeutic approach in FMF COVID-19 inpatients and matched non-FMF COVID-19 inpatients. CONCLUSIONS: Neither FMF nor baseline colchicine therapy, appear to affect the incidence of hospitalization for COVID-19 or the disease course, in terms of severity and therapeutic approach.

Defining colchicine resistance/intolerance in patients with familial Mediterranean fever: a modified-Delphi consensus approach.

OBJECTIVES: Colchicine is the main treatment for FMF. Although a number of individuals with FMF are intolerant/resistant to colchicine, there is no standard definition of colchicine resistance/intolerance. We developed a set of evidence-based core statements defining colchicine resistance/intolerance in patients with FMF that may serve as a guide for clinicians and health authorities. METHODS: A set of statements was identified using a modified-Delphi consensus-based approach. The process involved development of an initial colchicine resistance/intolerance-related questionnaire derived from a systematic literature review. The questionnaire, which was completed by an international panel of 11 adult and paediatric rheumatologists with expertise in FMF, was analysed anonymously. The results informed draft consensus statements that were discussed by a round-table expert panel, using a nominal group technique to agree on the selection and wording of the final statements. RESULTS: Consensus among the panel was achieved on eight core statements defining colchicine resistance/intolerance in patients with FMF. A definition of resistance was agreed upon that included recurrent clinical attacks (average one or more attacks per month over a 3-month period) or persistent laboratory inflammation in between attacks. Other core statements recognize the importance of assessing treatment adherence, and the impact of active disease and intolerance to colchicine on quality of life. CONCLUSION: Based on expert opinion, a set of evidence-based core statements defining colchicine resistance/intolerance in patients with FMF were identified to help guide clinicians and health authorities in the management of patients with FMF.

Palindromic rheumatism following COVID-19 infection evolved to rheumatoid arthritis after COVID-19 reinfection.

A 33-year-old woman developed palindromic rheumatism (PLR) several weeks following an infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Three months later, she developed full blown seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) following COVID-19 reinfection. Although the occurrence of the joint diseases and the COVID-19 infections maybe fortuitous, knowing the enormous effects of COVID-19 infection on the human immune system, it is difficult to ignore the temporal relationship between the appearance of PLR after the first COVID-19 infection and the transition to full blown RA following her COVID-19 re-infection.

ISSAID/EMQN Best Practice Guidelines for the Genetic Diagnosis of Monogenic Autoinflammatory Diseases in the Next-Generation Sequencing Era.

BACKGROUND: Monogenic autoinflammatory diseases are caused by pathogenic variants in genes that regulate innate immune responses, and are characterized by sterile systemic inflammatory episodes. Since symptoms can overlap within this rapidly expanding disease category, accurate genetic diagnosis is of the utmost importance to initiate early inflammation-targeted treatment and prevent clinically significant or life-threatening complications. Initial recommendations for the genetic diagnosis of autoinflammatory diseases were limited to a gene-by-gene diagnosis strategy based on the Sanger method, and restricted to the 4 prototypic recurrent fevers (MEFV, MVK, TNFRSF1A, and NLRP3 genes). The development of best practices guidelines integrating critical recent discoveries has become essential. METHODS: The preparatory steps included 2 online surveys and pathogenicity annotation of newly recommended genes. The current guidelines were drafted by European Molecular Genetics Quality Network members, then discussed by a panel of experts of the International Society for Systemic Autoinflammatory Diseases during a consensus meeting. RESULTS: In these guidelines, we combine the diagnostic strength of next-generation sequencing and recommendations to 4 more recently identified genes (ADA2, NOD2, PSTPIP1, and TNFAIP3), nonclassical pathogenic genetic alterations, and atypical phenotypes. We present a referral-based decision tree for test scope and method (Sanger versus next-generation sequencing) and recommend on complementary explorations for mosaicism, copy-number variants, and gene dose. A genotype table based on the 5-category variant pathogenicity classification provides the clinical significance of prototypic genotypes per gene and disease. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines will orient and assist geneticists and health practitioners in providing up-to-date and appropriate diagnosis to their patients.

Consensus proposal for taxonomy and definition of the autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs): a Delphi study.

Autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs) are a relatively new family of disorders, defined about 19 years ago. Some of them are hereditary and some are not. The names given to these diseases do not follow any systematic guidelines, and sometimes the same disorder carries several names. The aim of this study is to refine the definition of AIDs and to provide some conventions for their naming. We focused mainly on monogenetic AIDs. Delphi technique, which enables consensus among a group of experts through internet and mail communication and questionnaires, was employed. After achieving 100% consensus among six members of a steering committee, the questionnaire containing AID definitions and the agreed-upon conventions were sent to 26 physicians and researchers working in the field of AIDs in order to gain broader support for the committee's proposals. The committee proposed the following definition for AIDs: "Autoinflammatory diseases are clinical disorders caused by defect(s) or dysregulation of the innate immune system, characterized by recurrent or continuous inflammation (elevated acute phase reactants-APR) and the lack of a primary pathogenic role for the adaptive immune system (autoreactive T-cells or autoantibody production)." Several rules were defined for guiding the naming of these diseases among which are: abandoning eponyms and preferring the name of the gene over its encoded protein. The new definition for AIDs allows inclusion of clinical disorders mainly associated with defects in the innate immune system. The new conventions propose names with clinical meaning and in some cases even clues for treatment.

Vasculitis in the autoinflammatory diseases.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article addresses the prevalence and relationship between autoinflammatory diseases and vasculitis. RECENT FINDINGS: Autoimmune diseases (AIDs) are a group of syndromes characterized by episodes of unprovoked inflammation due to dysregulation of the innate immune system. Despite the common occurrence of rashes and other skin lesions in these diseases, vasculitis is reported in only a few. On the other hand, neutrophilic dermatoses are more prevalent. Large vessel vasculitis is reported in patients with Behcet's and Blau's syndromes. Small and medium size vasculitides are reported in familial Mediterranean fever mainly as Henoch-Schonlein purpura and polyarteritis nodosa, respectively. It is rarely described in hyper IgD with periodic fever syndrome, cryopyrin associated periodic syndromes, TNF receptor-associated periodic syndrome, deficiency of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and pyoderma gangrenosum and acne syndrome. In most AID where bones and skin are mainly involved (CRMO, Majeed syndrome, Cherubism and DITRA) - vasculitis has not been described at all. In AID small vessel vasculitis affects mainly the skin with no involvement of internal organs. SUMMARY: In AID, neutrophilic dermatoses are more common and prominent than vasculitis. This may reflect a minor role for interleukin-1 in the pathogenesis of vasculitis. The rarity of vasculitis in AID suggests that in most reported cases its occurrence has been probably coincidental rather than being an integral feature of the disease.

A novel cluster of patients with Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) in southern Italy.

BACKGROUND: Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is an autosomal recessive autoinflammatory disorder characterised by recurrent attacks of fever and serositis (peritonitis, pleuritic or synovitis) affecting mainly populations of Mediterranean origin. AIM: To describe a relatively new cluster of FMF subjects from Apulia and Basilicata regions (southern Italy). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects were screened for FMF using the Tel-Hashomer criteria and genetic analysis. Demographic data were taken from patients' files and direct interviews. Patients were investigated about attack duration, intensity and site, body temperature, skin manifestations and overall quality of life before and after treatment with colchicine. Inflammatory parameters were also measured between these periods. RESULTS: Forty-nine subjects had FMF (M : F = 26 : 23, age 38 years ± 2 SE) and followed-up up to 8 years. The age at disease onset was 22·1 years ± 1·2SE and the diagnostic delay was 15·5 years ± 1·9SE. The majority of patients (82%) suffered from abdominal pain, and 35% had undergone prior abdominal surgery or laparotomy. Severity score (ISSF) was mild in 43% of patients and intermediate in 57% of patients. Serum amyloid A (SAA) was increased in 20% of patients (16·9 ± 3·7, normal range < 6·4 mg/dL). In over 95% of patients, inflammation markers, duration and intensity of febrile painful attacks, quality of life and ISSF score improved dramatically following colchicine treatment. CONCLUSION: The Apulia region represents a new endemic area for FMF. Clinical presentation of FMF can be misleading and requires a complete and early workup to recognise the disease and avoid unjustified surgery. Colchicine remains the gold standard therapy to prevent FMF attacks and fatal long-term complications.

The liver in familial Mediterranean fever: is it involved?

OBJECTIVES: Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is characterised by recurrent attacks of fever and serositis. It may affect the peritoneum, pleura, synovia and the skin. Usually the liver is intact in FMF. Recently, this concept was challenged by some groups which claimed that hepatitis is a feature of FMF and that non-alcoholic liver disease (NAFLD) and cryptogenic cirrhosis are more common among FMF patients. Scope of this paper is to critically review the relevant literature and to answer the question whether or not the liver is involved in FMF. METHODS: We used Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science database for searching articles dealing with FMF and the liver since 1960. We also reviewed some manuscripts which were not identified by the above searching engines. RESULTS: Some cases reported that hepatitis is a feature of FMF based upon transaminase elevations without liver biopsy. Due to this questionable diagnosis and the paucity of similar reports, it seems that hepatitis is not a feature of FMF. Cryptogenic cirrhosis is considered as the end stage of NAFLD. Since NAFLD is prevalent in 25% of the general population it is more plausible to relate the occurrence of cryptogenic cirrhosis in FMF patients to NAFLD rather than to FMF. M694V mutation carriage was relatively more frequent among FMF patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis or "hepatitis". CONCLUSIONS: The literature review indicates that FMF and liver disease are not generally associated. However, carriage of M694V mutations may play a role in the pathogenesis of liver disease.