Evaluation of interferon alpha 2b as adjunctive therapy for conjunctival melanoma.

PURPOSE: Interferon alpha 2b (IFN-α2b) has been used as an adjunctive agent to treat conjunctival melanoma (CM), however its efficacy is unproved due to a paucity of data. We present 5 cases of incompletely excised CM lesions to inform clinical decision making regarding the adjunctive use of IFN-α2b. OBSERVATIONS: We identified all biopsy proven CM cases treated between 1997 and 2017 at the University of Iowa. Of these, we analyzed cases in which topical IFN-α2b drops were prescribed after the initial excision to treat surgical margins that were positive for primary acquired melanosis [PAM] with or without atypia or invasive CM. We noted the origin of CM (nevus, PAM, or de novo), presence and location of margins positive for residual melanoma, duration of IFN-α2b treatment, recurrences, time to recurrence, and outcome at last follow-up. Topical IFN-α2b drops (1 million IU/mL 4 times daily for 3-6 months) were used as adjunctive therapy in 5 cases following incomplete surgical excision of CM. The preceding lesion was PAM in 4 cases and compound nevus in 1 case. In 2 cases, margins were positive for PAM with atypia and both resulted in remission of melanoma at 54 and 33 months, respectively. However, in 3 cases, margins were positive for invasive melanoma and all 3 developed recurrence of melanoma despite IFN-α2b use. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: There are limited data regarding the efficacy of IFN-α2b as adjunctive therapy for incomplete excision of CM lesions. In this series, adjunctive topical IFN-α2b did not prevent recurrence in cases with surgical margins positive for invasive melanoma. Our results indicate that caution should be exercised when considering adjunctive IFN-α2b to treat CM lesions not excised completely.

DMEK outcomes using nondiabetic grafts for recipients with diabetes mellitus.

PURPOSE: To compare Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) outcomes using nondiabetic grafts in diabetic and nondiabetic recipients. METHODS: All eyes that underwent DMEK between February 2013 and October 2016 (follow-up ≥3 months, without prior keratoplasty) were included. Recipients were divided into diabetic (insulin dependent [IDDM] or noninsulin dependent [NIDDM]) and nondiabetic groups. Main outcome measures included postoperative visual acuity, rebubble procedure rates, and graft failure rates. RESULTS: Of 334 eyes (243 subjects) included for analysis, 63 eyes (18.8%) were from diabetic recipients. At each timepoint, best-corrected visual acuity trended lower for IDDM recipients compared to NIDDM and nondiabetic recipients. There were no statistically significant differences in rebubble rates of diabetic compared to nondiabetic recipients (20.6% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.17), or IDDM compared to nondiabetic recipients (27.3% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.08; hazard ratio 2.26). Overall, 13 grafts (3.9%) failed (mean follow-up, 565 days; range, 90-1293 days). Graft failures did not differ between diabetic and nondiabetic recipients (4.0% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.15) regardless of subgroup (p = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: DMEK provides excellent outcomes for patients with and without diabetes. DMEK outcomes were excellent with improvements in visual acuity and low rates of graft failure. Our findings were unable to determine differences between rebubble procedure rates but do emphasize the need for further research using stratified groups based on diabetes severity.

Uveal Melanoma with Histopathologic Intratumoral Heterogeneity Associated with Gene Expression Profile Discordance.

PURPOSE: To report a case of intratumoral gene expression profile discordance in a malignant uveal melanoma, associated with intratumoral heterogeneity based upon histopathologic features. METHODS: The clinical history, fundus findings, imaging and histopathologic features, and DecisionDx-UM gene expression profile results (Castle Biosciences, Inc., Phoenix, AZ, USA) of the tumor were reviewed. RESULTS: A trans-retinal fine-needle aspiration biopsy was performed for a thin, pigmented choroidal tumor in a 33-year-old man. Cells obtained from this biopsy were tested using the DecisionDx-UM gene expression profile test and the tumor was classified as class 1A. Cytology confirmed melanoma. The patient subsequently elected to undergo enucleation. On microscopic examination of the globe, the tumor was composed primarily of spindle B cells, but had a focal area composed of epithelioid cells. This portion of the tumor was subsequently tested and demonstrated a class 1B gene expression profile. CONCLUSION: Intratumoral discordance in gene expression profile results has been described in uveal melanomas. Here we demonstrate that this discordance may be associated in some cases with intratumoral heterogeneity based upon histopathologic features.