Child-therapist and parent-therapist alliances and outcome in the treatment of children with oppositional defiant/conduct disorder.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the quality of therapeutic alliance from different rater perspectives (child, parent, therapist) in cognitive behavioural therapy for children with oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and conduct disorder (CD), and its association with symptom severity. Further, a panel model with an autoregressive cross-lagged panel design was used to explore whether therapist-rated and parent-rated therapeutic alliance influences change in symptom severity, or vice versa. METHODS: Sixty boys aged 6-12 years with a principal diagnosis of ODD/CD, and their parents, received individually delivered social competence training for childhood aggressive behaviour problems. Child, therapist, and parent ratings of therapeutic alliance and symptom severity were measured twice. RESULTS: Our results indicate good to very good therapeutic alliance that was relatively stable over time. The cross-sectional analyses of the alliance-symptom association revealed moderate correlations. However, effects of early alliance on later treatment outcome or of early symptom severity on later alliance were marginal. The only significant association was found between early parent-rated therapist-parent alliance and later parent-rated symptom severity. CONCLUSION: Our study shows a moderate correlation between simultaneously assessed therapeutic alliance and symptoms. The findings of the panel model indicate that an early good therapeutic alliance is a component of later therapeutic success (parent perspective).

Efficacy of individualized social competence training for children with oppositional defiant disorders/conduct disorders: a randomized controlled trial with an active control group.

Patient-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy in children with aggressive behavior, which uses group-based social skills training, has resulted in significant reductions in behavioral problems, with effect sizes in the small-to-medium range. However, effects of individually delivered treatments and effects on aggressive behavior and comorbid conditions rated from different perspectives, child functional impairment, child quality of life, parent-child relationship, and parental psychopathology have rarely been assessed. In a randomized controlled trial, 91 boys aged 6-12 years with a diagnosis of oppositional defiant disorder/conduct disorder and peer-related aggression were randomized to receive individually delivered social competence training (Treatment Program for Children with Aggressive Behavior, THAV) or to an active control involving group play that included techniques to activate resources and the opportunity to train prosocial interactions in groups (PLAY). Outcome measures were rated by parents, teachers, or clinicians. Mostly moderate treatment effects for THAV compared to PLAY were found in parent ratings and/or clinician ratings on aggressive behavior, comorbid symptoms, psychosocial impairment, quality of life, parental stress, and negative expressed emotions. In teacher ratings, significant effects were found for ADHD symptoms and prosocial behavior only. THAV is a specifically effective intervention for boys aged 6-12 years with oppositional defiant disorder/conduct disorder and peer-related aggressive behavior as rated by parents and clinicians.

Efficacy of an individualized social competence training for children with Oppositional Defiant Disorders/Conduct Disorders.

OBJECTIVES: Group-based Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy of children with aggressive behavior has resulted in significant reductions of behavior problems with small to medium effect sizes. We report the efficacy of an individualized Treatment Program for Children with Aggressive Behavior. METHOD: A within-subject design with two phases (waiting, treatment) was chosen. Sixty boys aged 6-12 years with peer-related aggressive behavior were included. The course of the outcome measures (growth rates) during a 6-week waiting phase was compared with those in the subsequent treatment phase (24 weekly child sessions together with an average of 8 parent contacts) by multilevel modeling. Primary outcome was peer-related aggressive behavior rated by parents. Further outcome measures included parent ratings and patient self-reports of aggressive and prosocial behavior. RESULTS: During the treatment, growth rates for all parent-rated outcome measures were significant (p < .001) and comparison with the waiting phase indicated a stronger decrease in aggressive behavior and a stronger increase in prosocial behavior. For all self-rated outcome measures, growth rates during the treatment were significant (p < .01), but comparison with the waiting phase indicated a stronger decrease only for disturbance of social interaction. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment program is an effective intervention for children with peer-related aggressive behavior.