Understanding the relationship between type 2 diabetes and depression: lessons from genetically informative study designs.

AIMS: To conduct a systematic review in order to comprehensively synthesize the findings from a diverse range of genetically informative studies on comorbid depression and type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Database searches (1 January 2008 to 1 June 2020) in PubMed and EMBASE were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligible reports employed any type of genetically informed design, including twin modelling, Mendelian randomization, genome-wide association studies, polygenetic risk scores, or linkage disequilibrium score regression. Searches generated 451 unique citations, and 16 manuscripts met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The included studies addressed three aetiological models of the depression-diabetes relationship: uni- or bi-directional phenotypic causation; shared genetic liability; or gene-environment interaction. From these studies, there is modest evidence that type 2 diabetes is causally related to risk of developing depression, but much more limited evidence that depression is causally related to risk of diabetes. There is little evidence of shared genetic liability between depression and diabetes or of gene-environment interaction. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from genetically informed studies are mixed but provide some support for the uni- or bi-directional phenotypic model of depression and type 2 diabetes. Future studies should also explore the hypothesis that this relationship may be influenced by shared environmental risk factors. Findings can inform multifaceted approaches to diabetes prevention and care that reflect how psychosocial factors contribute to type 2 diabetes risk and outcomes.

Increased serum soluble CD8 or suppressor/cytotoxic antigen concentrations in depression: suppressive effects of glucocorticoids.

There is now some evidence that depression and, in particular, major depression, is accompanied by signs of an immune response, and that there are reciprocal relationships between immune function and increased hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity in depression. To further examine the above phenomena, this study has assayed serum soluble CD8 (sCD8) concentrations in 22 normal controls, 27 minor depressed, 37 major depressed, and 26 melancholic depressed patients. Serum sCD8 was significantly higher in depressed patients versus normal controls. Thirty-five percent of the depressed subjects had increased sCD8 serum levels (i.e., > 560 U/mL) with a specificity of 95.4%. Dexamethasone administration (1 mg PO) had a significant suppressive effect on serum sCD8. In depressed subjects, there were significant and negative relationships between serum sCD8 and postdexamethasone cortisol values. The results suggest the presence of an ongoing lymphocyte activation in depression, which may be down-regulated by increased HPA axis activity in that illness.

Increased plasma concentrations of interleukin-6, soluble interleukin-6, soluble interleukin-2 and transferrin receptor in major depression.

Recently, it was found that major depression may be accompanied by significant changes in cell-mediated and humoral immunity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the plasma concentrations of interleukin (IL)-6, soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R), sIL-2R and transferrin receptor (TfR) in patients with major depression in an acute phase of illness, in remission and during antidepressive treatment. Plasma concentrations of IL-6, sIL-6R, sIL-2R and TfR were significantly higher in major depressed subjects than in healthy controls. In major depressed subjects, but not in normal controls, there were significant positive correlations between the plasma concentrations of IL-6 and sIL-6R, IL-6 and sIL-2R, IL-6 and TfR, and between sIL-2R and TfR. Subchronic treatment with antidepressive drugs, such as fluoxetine or tricyclic antidepressants, did not significantly affect plasma IL-6, sIL-6R, sIL-2R or TfR. The latter did not significantly differ between major depressed patients in an acute phase of illness or in complete clinical remission. It is suggested that: (1) a coordinated and upregulated production of IL-6, sIL-6R, sIL-2R and TfR may constitute a trait marker of major depression; and that (2) an upregulated production of IL-6 may represent a contributing factor to the various immune disorders encountered in major depression and maybe to the pathophysiology or pathogenesis of that illness.

Increased serum interleukin-1-receptor-antagonist concentrations in major depression.

Recently, it has been shown that major depression may be accompanied by an increased production of interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), an acute phase (AP) response and simultaneous signs of activation and suppression of cell-mediated immunity. The interleukin-1-receptor antagonist (IL-1-rA) is released in vivo during an AP response and serum levels are increased in many immune disorders. The release of IL-1-rA may limit the pro-inflammatory effects of IL-1. This study has been carried out to examine serum IL-1-Ra in 68 depressed subjects (21 minor, 25 simple major and 22 melancholic subjects) vs. 22 normal controls. Depressed subjects showed significantly higher serum IL-1-rA concentrations than healthy controls. 29% of all depressed subjects had serum IL-1-rA levels higher than the mean value +2 standard deviations of normal controls; 44% depressed subjects had IL-1-rA values greater than 0.215 ng/ml with a specificity of 90%. In depressed subjects, there was a significant and positive relationship between serum IL-1-rA and severity of illness. In depression, there were no significant relationships between serum IL-1-rA concentrations and indicants of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA)-axis activity, such as 24-h urinary cortisol and postdexamethasone cortisol values. Women had significantly higher serum IL-1-rA levels than men. The findings support the thesis that depression is accompanied by an immune-inflammatory response.