Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Ther Drug Monit ; 40(5): 526-548, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29957667

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the mainstay of epilepsy treatment. Since 1989, 18 new AEDs have been licensed for clinical use and there are now 27 licensed AEDs in total for the treatment of patients with epilepsy. Furthermore, several AEDs are also used for the management of other medical conditions, for example, pain and bipolar disorder. This has led to an increasingly widespread application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of AEDs, making AEDs among the most common medications for which TDM is performed. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the indications for AED TDM, to provide key information for each individual AED in terms of the drug's prescribing indications, key pharmacokinetic characteristics, associated drug-drug pharmacokinetic interactions, and the value and the intricacies of TDM for each AED. The concept of the reference range is discussed as well as practical issues such as choice of sample types (total versus free concentrations in blood versus saliva) and sample collection and processing. METHODS: The present review is based on published articles and searches in PubMed and Google Scholar, last searched in March 2018, in addition to references from relevant articles. RESULTS: In total, 171 relevant references were identified and used to prepare this review. CONCLUSIONS: TDM provides a pragmatic approach to epilepsy care, in that bespoke dose adjustments are undertaken based on drug concentrations so as to optimize clinical outcome. For the older first-generation AEDs (carbamazepine, ethosuximide, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, and valproic acid), much data have accumulated in this regard. However, this is occurring increasingly for the new AEDs (brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, piracetam, pregabalin, rufinamide, stiripentol, sulthiame, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide).


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/farmacocinética , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/tendências , Interações Medicamentosas , Humanos , Valores de Referência
2.
Ther Drug Monit ; 35(1): 4-29, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23288091

RESUMO

Blood (serum/plasma) antiepileptic drug (AED) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has proven to be an invaluable surrogate marker for individualizing and optimizing the drug management of patients with epilepsy. Since 1989, there has been an exponential increase in AEDs with 23 currently licensed for clinical use, and recently, there has been renewed and extensive interest in the use of saliva as an alternative matrix for AED TDM. The advantages of saliva include the fact that for many AEDs it reflects the free (pharmacologically active) concentration in serum; it is readily sampled, can be sampled repetitively, and sampling is noninvasive; does not require the expertise of a phlebotomist; and is preferred by many patients, particularly children and the elderly. For each AED, this review summarizes the key pharmacokinetic characteristics relevant to the practice of TDM, discusses the use of other biological matrices with particular emphasis on saliva and the evidence that saliva concentration reflects those in serum. Also discussed are the indications for salivary AED TDM, the key factors to consider when saliva sampling is to be undertaken, and finally, a practical protocol is described so as to enable AED TDM to be applied optimally and effectively in the clinical setting. Overall, there is compelling evidence that salivary TDM can be usefully applied so as to optimize the treatment of epilepsy with carbamazepine, clobazam, ethosuximide, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, topiramate, and zonisamide. Salivary TDM of valproic acid is probably not helpful, whereas for clonazepam, eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, pregabalin, retigabine, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, and vigabatrin, the data are sparse or nonexistent.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/análise , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Saliva/química , Anticonvulsivantes/administração & dosagem , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacocinética , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Saliva/metabolismo
3.
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol ; 19(11): 829-847, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37925741

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Antiseizure medications (ASMs) and antipsychotic drugs are frequently coadministered with the potential for drug-drug interactions. Interactions may either be pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic, resulting in a decrease or increase in efficacy and/or an increase or decrease in adverse effects. AREAS COVERED: The clinical evidence for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between ASMs and antipsychotics is reviewed based on the results of a literature search in MEDLINE conducted in April 2023. EXPERT OPINION: There is now extensive published evidence for the clinical importance of interactions between ASMs and antipsychotics. Enzyme-inducing ASMs can decrease blood concentrations of many of the antipsychotics. There is also evidence that enzyme-inhibiting ASMs can increase antipsychotic blood concentrations. Similarly, there is limited evidence showing that antipsychotic drugs may affect the blood concentrations of ASMs through pharmacokinetic interactions. There is less available evidence for pharmacodynamic interactions, but these can also be important, as can displacement from protein binding. The lack of published evidence for an interaction should not be interpreted as meaning that the given interaction does not occur; the evidence is building continually. There is no substitute for careful patient monitoring and sound clinical judgment.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Humanos , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Antipsicóticos/farmacocinética , Prova Pericial , Interações Medicamentosas , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos
4.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 48(7): 612-5, 2006 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16780634

RESUMO

A four-year-old male with symptomatic generalized epilepsy presented with ataxia, eye rolling, and episodes of back arching which were of non-epileptic origin following the introduction of clobazam at 0.75mg/kg/day. Concurrent antiepileptic medication was lamotrigine at 13mg/kg/day. Clobazam plasma levels were within the normal range, while N-desmethylclobazam (DCLB) concentrations were between five and seven times above the upper limit of the normal range. The plasma elimination half-life for DCLB was prolonged, suggesting a genetic variability in DCLB metabolism leading to toxicity. Reduction in the dose of clobazam to 0.3mg/kg/day was associated with resolution of the non-epileptic neurological symptoms, reduction in DCLB plasma levels, and maintenance of seizure control.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Benzodiazepinas/efeitos adversos , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos da Motilidade Ocular/induzido quimicamente , Anticonvulsivantes/sangue , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Benzodiazepinas/sangue , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Pré-Escolar , Clobazam , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Epilepsia/sangue , Epilepsia/complicações , Humanos , Lamotrigina , Masculino , Transtornos da Motilidade Ocular/sangue , Resultado do Tratamento , Triazinas/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA