Plasma cystatin C is a marker of renal glomerular injury in children treated with cisplatin or ifosfamide.

BACKGROUND: Plasma cystatin C is a potential marker of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and urinary cystatin C has been proposed as a marker of tubular dysfunction. PROCEDURE: A prospective study (NCT02822404) was conducted to assess the benefit of considering cystatin C plasma and urinary levels to better evaluate cisplatin and/or ifosfamide renal toxicity in children with cancer. Plasma 51 Cr-EDTA clearance as a marker of GFR and urinary markers of tubular toxicity were monitored in 40 children treated by cisplatin and/or ifosfamide. Several equations previously proposed to estimate GFR, with or without inclusion of plasma cystatin C level, were compared. A population pharmacokinetic approach was also used to analyze plasma 51 Cr-EDTA data, and evaluate the relationship between patient covariates (including plasma cystatin C level) and GFR during the course of chemotherapy treatment. RESULTS: Equations including plasma cystatin C described GFR changes during chemotherapy better than those without this variable. An equation based on plasma cystatin C, serum creatinine, and body weight enabled us to accurately describe the evolution of GFR during chemotherapy. The urinary cystatin C/creatinine ratio was compared between children with or without tubular toxicity, according to a standard assessment of tubular dysfunction. However, although the urinary cystatin C/creatinine ratio was increased in children with tubular toxicity, this marker does not provide additional information to the well-known markers of tubulopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring of plasma cystatin C may be substituted to radionucleide glomerular exploration in children treated by cisplatin and/or ifosfamide.

MRP4 is responsible for the efflux transport of mycophenolic acid ß-d glucuronide (MPAG) from hepatocytes to blood.

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) has become a cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy, in particular for transplant patients. In the gastrointestinal tract, the liver and the kidney, MPA is mainly metabolized into phenyl-ß-d glucuronide (MPAG). Knowledge about the interactions between MPA/MPAG and membrane transporters is still fragmented. The aim of the present study was to explore these interactions with the basolateral hepatic MRP4 transporter. The inhibition of the MRP4-driven transport by various drugs which can be concomitantly prescribed was also evaluated. In vitro experiments using vesicles overexpressing MRP4 showed an ATP-dependent transport of MPAG driven by MRP4 (Michaelis-Menten constant of 233.9 ± 32.8 µM). MPA was not effluxed by MRP4. MRP4-mediated transport of MPAG was inhibited (from -43% to -84%) by ibuprofen, cefazolin, cefotaxime and micafungin. An in silico approach based on molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations rationalized the mode of binding of MPAG to MRP4. The presence of the glucuronide moiety in MPAG was highlighted as key, being prone to make electrostatic and H-bond interactions with specific residues of the MRP4 protein chamber. This explains why MPAG is a substrate of MRP4 whereas MPA is not.

Intra-individual Dose Escalation of Abiraterone According to Its Plasma Exposure in Patients with Progressive Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Results of the OPTIMABI Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Trough abiraterone concentration (ABI Cmin) of 8.4 ng/mL has been identified as an appropriate efficacy threshold in patients treated for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The aim of the phase II OPTIMABI study was to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacokinetics (PK)-guided dose escalation of abiraterone acetate (AA) in underexposed patients with mCRPC with early tumour progression. METHODS: This multicentre, non-randomised study consisted of two sequential steps. In step 1, all patients started treatment with 1000 mg of AA once daily. Abiraterone Cmin was measured 22-26 h after the last dose intake each month during the first 12 weeks of treatment. In step 2, underexposed patients (Cmin < 8.4 ng/mL) with tumour progression within the first 6 months of treatment were enrolled and received AA 1000 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was the rate of non-progression at 12 weeks after the dose doubling. During step 1, adherence to ABI treatment was assessed using the Girerd self-reported questionnaire. A post-hoc analysis of pharmacokinetic (PK) data was conducted using Bayesian estimation of Cmin from samples collected outside the sampling guidelines (22-26 h). RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis (ITT), 81 patients were included in step 1. In all, 21 (26%) patients were underexposed in step 1, and 8 of them (38%) experienced tumour progression within the first 6 months. A total of 71 patients (88%) completed the Girerd self-reported questionnaire. Of the patients, 62% had a score of 0, and 38% had a score of 1 or 2 (minimal compliance failure), without a significant difference in mean ABI Cmin in the two groups. Four patients were enrolled in step 2, and all reached the exposure target (Cmin > 8.4 ng/mL) after doubling the dose, but none met the primary endpoint. In the post-hoc analysis of PK data, 32 patients (39%) were underexposed, and ABI Cmin was independently associated with worse progression-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 2.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-5.81; p = 0.03], in contrast to the ITT analysis. CONCLUSION: The ITT and per-protocol analyses showed no statistical association between ABI underexposure and an increased risk of early tumour progression in patients with mCRPC, while the Bayesian estimator showed an association. However, other strategies than dose escalation at the time of progression need to be evaluated. Treatment adherence appeared to be uniformly good in the present study. Finally, the use of a Bayesian approach to recover samples collected outside the predefined blood collection time window could benefit the conduct of clinical trials based on drug monitoring. OPTIMABI trial is registered as National Clinical Trial number NCT03458247, with the EudraCT number 2017-000560-15).

Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (LC-HRMS) Analysis Following Voluntary Carvedilol Poisoning in a Subject with Cirrhosis: A Case Report.

Accidental or intentional carvedilol poisoning is rarely reported. Here, we describe a case of attempted suicide with a large quantity of immediate-release carvedilol (75 mg) and alcohol. In order to determine the kinetics, liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry analyses were performed. The results for the plasma concentration of carvedilol were 906 µg/L 3 h after ingestion, 288 µg/L 12 h after ingestion and 103 µg/L 24 h after ingestion. A one-compartment model with linear and first order best described the elimination of the carvedilol, and the estimated half-life was 5.8 h. The result 3 h after ingestion represented the highest concentration ever observed for this drug. However, the patient was cirrhotic, and liver function was impaired with decreased Factor V (45%) and prothrombin ratio (61%). These conditions may explain the high concentrations of carvedilol. The patient was treated with glucagon and discharged from the hospital the following day.

Case report: 5-Fluorouracil treatment in patient with an important partial DPD deficiency.

Esophageal cancer is a cancer with poor prognosis and the standard 1st line treatment for metastatic or recurrent EC is systemic chemotherapy with doublet chemotherapy based on platinum and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). However, 5-FU could be a source of severe treatment-related toxicities due to deficiency of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). In this case report, a 74-year-old man with metastatic esophageal cancer was found to have partial DPD deficiency based on uracilemia measurements (about 90 ng/mL). Despite this, 5-FU was safely administered thanks to therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The case report highlights the importance of TDM in administering 5-FU to patients with partial DPD deficiency, as it allows individualized dosing and prevents severe toxicity.

Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 in pharmacology: Overview of its contribution to pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics.

MRP4 is an ABC membrane transporter involved in clinical outcomes as it is located in many tissues that manages the transport and the elimination of many drugs. This review explores the implication of MRP4 in clinical pharmacology and the importance of its genetic variability. Although there is no specific recommendation regarding the study of MRP4 in drug development, it should be considered when drugs are eliminated by the kidney or liver or when drug-drug interactions are expected.