RESUMO
Advanced cancer treatments increase survival rates and with that the importance of Quality of Life (QoL). QoL is well studied in trials, but the transition to standard care is little. For this reason, we identified the challenges for a regular integration to conceptualize an applicable solution together with patients and health professionals (HP). We conducted two meetings based on the design thinking method. Two Physicians, one employee of cancer counseling centers, one psycho-oncologists, and five patients were included. Based on the discussions a system was conceptualized to solve current thresholds. All participants had experience with the documentation of QoL, but none had shared it digitally from home. Therefore, the main threshold was the lack of system for data transition between agents, followed by lack of time for HP and acceptance of QoL for patients. HP were mainly interested in data on the trend of QoL whereas patients preferred information on their activity, energy level and social contacts. The conceptualized solution is based on a health app on the patients' side with a browser-based implementation for HP. Within the system, automatized data interpretation, alarm systems, support information, standardized input fields as an orientation for documentation with expandable options for specific restrictions as well as interinstitutional networking for HP to better refer patients to others was wished for. This article describes the concept of such a system developed with HP and patients. Implementation and transfer to clinical care has yet to be done.
Assuntos
Aplicativos Móveis , Neoplasias , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia , Atitude do Pessoal de SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The treatment for cancer can have a negative impact not only on physical well-being but also on mental health and the quality of life (QoL). Health apps enable the monitoring of different parameters, but to date, there are only few that support patients with cancer and none that focuses on the assessment of QoL. Furthermore, patients as stakeholders are often only integrated at the late stage of the development process, if at all. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research was to develop and evaluate a smartphone app (Lion-App) to enable patients with cancer to autonomously measure the QoL with an iterative, user-centered approach. METHODS: Patients with cancer were involved in a 3-stage process from conceptualization to the point when the app was available on the tester's private device. First, focus groups with members (N=21) of cancer support groups were conducted to understand their expectations and needs. Thereafter, individual tests were performed. After developing a prototype that incorporated findings from the focus groups, a second test cycle was conducted, followed by a beta test lasting 2 months. In our app, the QoL can be assessed via a patient diary and an integrated questionnaire. Through all stages, usability was evaluated using the modular extended version of the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ+), including the calculation of a key performance indicator (KPI). If possible, the impact of sex on the results was evaluated. As part of the beta test, usage rates as well as age-dependent differences were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 21 participants took part in the initial 3 focus groups. In the subsequent usability testing (N=18), 17 (94%) participants rated their impression through the UEQ+, with a mean KPI of 2.12 (SD 0.64, range: -3 to 3). In the second usability test (N=14), the mean KPI increased to 2.28 (SD=0.49). In the beta test, the usage rate of 19 participants was evaluated, of whom 14 (74%) also answered the UEQ+ (mean KPI 1.78, SD 0.84). An influence of age on the number of questionnaire responses in Lion-App was observed, with a decrease in responses with increasing age (P=.02). Sex-dependent analyses were only possible for the first usability test and the beta test. The main adjustments based on user feedback were a restructuring of the diary as well as integration of a shorter questionnaire to assess the QoL. CONCLUSIONS: The iterative, user-centered approach for development and usability testing resulted in positive evaluations of Lion-App. Our app was rated as suitable for everyday use to monitor the QoL of patients with cancer. Initial results indicated that the sex and age of participants seem to play only a minor role.
RESUMO
Quality of life (QoL) is affected by environmental influences and varies between patients. A combined measurement through Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient Generated Data (PGD) may enhance the detection of QoL impairments by a longitudinal survey. Leveraging different approaches of QoL measurement techniques, the challenge is to combine data in a standardized, interoperable way. We developed an app (Lion-App) to semantically annotate data from sensor systems as well as PROs to be merged in an overall analysis of QoL. A FHIR implementation guide was defined for a standardized assessment. To access sensor data the interfaces of Apple Health or Google Fit are used instead of integrating various provider directly into the system. Since QoL cannot be collected exclusively via sensor values, a combination of PROs and PGD is necessary. PGD enable a progression of QoL which offers more insight into personal limitations whereas PROs give insight about personal burden. The use of FHIR enables structured exchange of data while personalized analyses might improve therapy and outcome.
Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Dados de Saúde Gerados pelo Paciente , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Cooperação do PacienteRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) as a parameter for patient well-being is becoming increasingly important.[1] Nevertheless, it is mainly used as an endpoint in studies rather than as an indicator for adjustments in therapy. In this paper we will present an approach to gradually integrate quality of life (QoL) as a control element into the care delivery of oncology. CONCEPT: Acceptance, usability, interoperability and data protection were identified and integrated as key indicators for the development. As an initial approach, a questionnaire tool was developed to provide patients a simplified answering of questionnaires and physicians a clearer presentation of the results. IMPLEMENTATION: As communication standard HL7 FHIR was used and known security concepts like OpenID Concept were integrated. In a usability study, first results were achieved by asking patients in the waiting room to answer a questionnaire, which will be discussed with the physician in the appointment. This study was conducted in 2019 at theSLK Clinics Heilbronn and achieved 86% participation of all respondents with an average age of 67 years. DISCUSSION: Although the evaluation study could prove positive results in usability and acceptance, it is necessary to aim for longitudinal surveys in order to include QoL as a control element in the therapy. However, a longitudinal survey through questionnaires leads to decreasing compliance and increasing response bias. [2] For this reason, the concept needs to be expanded. With sensors a continuous monitoring can be carried out and the data can be mapped to the individual, interpreted by machine learning. CONCLUSION: Questionnaires are a concept that has been successfully applied in studies for years. However, since care delivery poses different challenges, the integration of new concepts is inevitable. The authors are currently working on an extension of the use of questionnaires with patient generated data through sensors.