Attitudes and barriers to breastfeeding among women at high-risk for not breastfeeding: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Rates of breastfeeding are lower among minority and underserved populations in the United States. Our study objective was to assess pregnant persons attitudes and barriers to breastfeeding among a cohort at high risk for not breastfeeding. METHODS: We disseminated the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale (IIFAS) to 100 pregnant persons at least 18 years of age attending a prenatal visit in a low-resource, academic practice in south-central Louisiana (Woman's Hospital). The IIFAS, as well as questions collecting information on breastfeeding experience and sociodemographic characteristics, were administered via interview. Medical records were reviewed to investigate associations between attitudes about breastfeeding in pregnancy and patient's feeding choices during the delivery hospital stay. Fisher exact tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to assess associations between categorical and continuous variables respectively. RESULTS: Of the 98 participants who completed the study, 8% were Hispanic, 63% were Black, 95% were Medicaid eligible, and 50% were unemployed. 59% (n = 58) went on to breastfeed/combination breast-formula feed (called "Any-Breastfeeding Group") during the delivery stay. Total IIFAS score during pregnancy was significantly higher among those who went on to breastfeed during delivery hospital stay (Any-Breastfeeding Group vs. Formula-Feeding-Only Group: 58.9 ± 5.5 vs. 53.7 ± 6.2 respectively, p < 0.001). In the group that went on to only formula feed (Formula-Feeding-Only Group), only 4% agreed breastfeeding was more convenient when surveyed during pregnancy, compared to 45% of the Any-Breastfeeding Group. 60% of Formula-Feeding-Only Group agreed formula is as healthy as breast milk. CONCLUSION: The three major themes that coincided with favorability toward breastfeeding in the study, and can be addressed during prenatal counseling, are: mother-infant bonding, convenience, and health benefits. By identifying attitudes and barriers to breastfeeding for patients during pregnancy who went on to not breastfeed, directed educational opportunities can be developed to address these specific attitudes to ultimately increase breastfeeding initiation and continuation.

Co-occurrence of depression, anxiety, and perinatal posttraumatic stress in postpartum persons.

BACKGROUND: The study aim was to describe the incidence of depression, anxiety, perinatal-post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and their co-occurrences in the early postpartum period in a low-resource OB/GYN clinic serving majority Medicaid-eligible persons. We hypothesized that postpartum persons screening positive for depression will have an increased risk of a positive screen for anxiety and perinatal PTSD. METHODS: A retrospective study of postpartum persons receiving care in Baton Rouge, Louisiana was conducted using responses abstracted from the electronic medical record (EMR) of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD7), and Perinatal Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Questionnaire-II (PPQII). Categorical distributions were compared using Fisher exact tests, while t-tests were used to compare continuous covariates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to predict anxiety (GAD7) and perinatal PTSD (PPQII) scores while adjusting for potential confounders, as well as to predict continuous PPQII and GAD7 based on continuous PHQ9 scores. RESULTS: There were 613 birthing persons 4-12 weeks postpartum that completed mental health screening (PHQ9, GAD7, and PPQII) between November 2020 and June 2022 as part of routine postpartum care in the clinic. The incidence of screening positive for symptoms of depression (PHQ9 > 4) was 25.4% (n = 156), while the incidence of positive screening for symptoms of anxiety (GAD7 > 4) and perinatal PTSD (PPQII [Formula: see text] 19) were 23.0% (n = 141) and 5.1% (n = 31) respectively. Postpartum patients with mild anxiety or more (i.e. GAD7 > 4) had 26 times higher odds of screening positive for symptoms of depression (PHQ9 > 4) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 26.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 15.29-46.92; p < 0.001). Postpartum persons with a PPQII score indicating symptoms of perinatal PTSD (PPQII [Formula: see text] 19) had 44 times higher odds of screening positive for symptoms of depression (PHQ > 4) (aOR 44.14; 95%CI 5.07-5856.17; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Depression, anxiety, and perinatal PTSD are each independent risk factors for each other. To comply with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommendations, providers should universally screen postpartum persons with validated screening tools for mood disturbances. However, if a complete full mood assessment is not feasible, this study provides evidence to support screening patients for depression, and if the patient screens positive, prompt additional screening for anxiety and perinatal PTSD.