Effects of high-flow nasal cannula in patients with persistent hypercapnia after an acute COPD exacerbation: a prospective pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Persistent hypercapnia after COPD exacerbation is associated with excess mortality and early rehospitalization. High Flow Nasal cannula (HFNC), may be theoretically an alternative to long-term noninvasive ventilation (NIV), since physiological studies have shown a reduction in PaCO2 level after few hours of treatment. In this clinical study we assessed the acceptability of HFNC and its effectiveness in reducing the level of PaCO2 in patients recovering from an Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure (AHRF) episode. We also hypothesized that the response in CO2 clearance is dependent on baseline level of hypercapnia. METHODS: Fifty COPD patients recovering from an acute exacerbation and with persistent hypercapnia, despite having attained a stable pH (i.e. pH > 7,35 and PaCO2 > 45 mmHg on 3 consecutive measurements), were enrolled and treated with HFNC for at least 8 h/day and during the nighttime RESULTS: HFNC was well tolerated with a global tolerance score of 4.0 ± 0.9. When patients were separated into groups with or without COPD/OSA overlap syndrome, the "pure" COPD patients showed a statistically significant response in terms of PaCO2 decrease (p = 0.044). In addition, the subset of patients with a lower pH at enrolment were those who responded best in terms of CO2 clearance (score test for trend of odds, p = 0.0038). CONCLUSIONS: HFNC is able to significantly decrease the level of PaCO2 after 72 h only in "pure" COPD patients, recovering from AHRF. No effects in terms of CO2 reduction were found in those with overlap syndrome. The present findings will help guide selection of the best target population and allow a sample size calculation for future long-term randomized control trials of HFNC vs NIV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with www. clinicaltrials.gov with identifier number NCT03759457.

Ivacaftor improves lung disease in patients with advanced CF carrying CFTR mutations that confer residual function.

BACKGROUND: Ivacaftor is an innovative treatment for CF. Ivacaftor monotherapy in a phase III trial for patients with F508del and a residual function (RF) mutation showed improvement in lung function. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of ivacaftor in patients with severe CF carrying RF mutations. METHODS: Data were collected from Italian CF centers with patients enrolled in an ivacaftor compassionate use program. Data were collected 1 year before and 1 year after commencement of ivacaftor. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received ivacaftor. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] percent predicted FEV1 significantly increased from 33.9% (8.3) before treatment to 44.0% (10.7) after 12 months of treatment (p < 0.00001). The mean distance in the 6-min walking-test significantly improved from 458.2 (110.5) m at baseline to 524.8 (91.9) m after 12 months (p < 0.00001). The overall number of days of antibiotic therapy decreased from 1693 during the year before ivacaftor to 714 in the year following ivacaftor, and the number of days of intravenous antibiotic treatment dropped from 714 to 88; both results were statistically significant (p < 0.00001). Patients needing intravenous therapy decreased from 23 to 5 of 26. The mean (SD) sweat chloride level decreased from a baseline of 79 (22.3) mmol/L to 65 (30.6) mmol/L, but this variation was not significant (p = 0.26). No safety concerns were registered. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CFTR mutations that confer RF with severe lung disease, treatment with Ivacaftor is safe and results in a clinically significant improvement that was evident at 1 month and maintained at 12 months.