Addition of Androgen-Deprivation Therapy or Brachytherapy Boost to External Beam Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

PURPOSE: In men with localized prostate cancer, the addition of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) or a brachytherapy boost (BT) to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) have been shown to improve various oncologic end points. Practice patterns indicate that those who receive BT are significantly less likely to receive ADT, and thus we sought to perform a network meta-analysis to compare the predicted outcomes of a randomized trial of EBRT plus ADT versus EBRT plus BT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review identified published randomized trials comparing EBRT with or without ADT, or EBRT (with or without ADT) with or without BT, that reported on overall survival (OS). Standard fixed-effects meta-analyses were performed for each comparison, and a meta-regression was conducted to adjust for use and duration of ADT. Network meta-analyses were performed to compare EBRT plus ADT versus EBRT plus BT. Bayesian analyses were also performed, and a rank was assigned to each treatment after Markov Chain Monte Carlo analyses to create a surface under the cumulative ranking curve. RESULTS: Six trials compared EBRT with or without ADT (n = 4,663), and 3 compared EBRT with or without BT (n = 718). The addition of ADT to EBRT improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.62 to 0.81]), whereas the addition of BT did not significantly improve OS (HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.78 to 1.36]). In a network meta-analysis, EBRT plus ADT had improved OS compared with EBRT plus BT (HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.89]). Bayesian modeling demonstrated an 88% probability that EBRT plus ADT resulted in superior OS compared with EBRT plus BT. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that current practice patterns of omitting ADT with EBRT plus BT may result in inferior OS compared with EBRT plus ADT in men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. ADT for these men should remain a critical component of treatment regardless of radiotherapy delivery method until randomized evidence demonstrates otherwise.

Application of a Novel Murine Ear Vein Model to Evaluate the Effects of a Vascular Radioprotectant on Radiation-Induced Vascular Permeability and Leukocyte Adhesion.

Vascular injury after radiation exposure contributes to multiple types of tissue injury through a cascade of events. Some of the earliest consequences of radiation damage include increased vascular permeability and promotion of inflammation, which is partially manifested by increased leukocyte-endothelial (L/E) interactions. We describe herein a novel intravital imaging method to evaluate L/E interactions, as a function of shear stress, and vascular permeability at multiple time points after local irradiation to the ear. This model permitted analysis of quiescent vasculature that was not perturbed by any surgical manipulation prior to imaging. To evaluate the effects of radiation on vascular integrity, fluorescent dextran was injected intravenously and its extravasation in the extravascular space surrounding the ear vasculature was measured at days 3 and 7 after 6 Gy irradiation. The vascular permeability rate increased approximately twofold at both days 3 and 7 postirradiation ( P < 0.05). Leukocyte rolling, which is indicative of L/E interactions, was significantly increased in mice at 24 h postirradiation compared to that of nonirradiated mice. To assess our model, as a means for assessing vascular radioprotectants, we treated additional cohorts of mice with a thrombopoietin mimetic, TPOm (RWJ-800088). In addition to stimulating platelet formation, thrombopoietin can protect vasculature after several forms of injury. Thus, we hypothesized that TPOm would reduce vascular permeability and L/E adhesion after localized irradiation to the ear vasculature of mice. If TPOm reduced these consequences of radiation, it would validate the utility of our intravital imaging method. TPOm reduced radiation-induced vascular leakage to control levels at day 7. Furthermore, L/E cell interactions were also reduced in irradiated mice treated with TPOm, compared with mice receiving irradiation alone, particularly at high shear stress ( P = 0.03, Kruskal-Wallis). We conclude that the ear model is useful for monitoring quiescent normal tissue vascular injury after radiation exposure. Furthermore, the application of TPOm, for preventing early inflammatory response created by damage to vascular endothelium, suggests that this drug may prove useful in reducing toxicities from radiotherapy, which damage microvasculature that critically important to tissue function.