A framework to measure the wildness of managed large vertebrate populations.

As landscapes continue to fall under human influence through habitat loss and fragmentation, fencing is increasingly being used to mitigate anthropogenic threats and enhance the commercial value of wildlife. Subsequent intensification of management potentially erodes wildness by disembodying populations from landscape-level processes, thereby disconnecting species from natural selection. Tools are needed to measure the degree to which populations of large vertebrate species in formally protected and privately owned wildlife areas are self-sustaining and free to adapt. We devised a framework to measure such wildness based on 6 attributes relating to the evolutionary and ecological dynamics of vertebrates (space, disease and parasite resistance, exposure to predation, exposure to limitations and fluctuations of food and water supply, and reproduction). For each attribute, we set empirical, species-specific thresholds between 5 wildness states based on quantifiable management interventions. We analysed data from 205 private wildlife properties with management objectives spanning ecotourism to consumptive utilization to test the framework on 6 herbivore species representing a range of conservation statuses and commercial values. Wildness scores among species differed significantly, and the proportion of populations identified as wild ranged from 12% to 84%, which indicates the tool detected site-scale differences both among populations of different species and populations of the same species under different management regimes. By quantifying wildness, this framework provides practitioners with standardized measurement units that link biodiversity with the sustainable use of wildlife. Applications include informing species management plans at local scales; standardizing the inclusion of managed populations in red-list assessments; and providing a platform for certification and regulation of wildlife-based economies. Applying this framework may help embed wildness as a normative value in policy and mitigate the shifting baseline of what it means to truly conserve a species.

Un Marco de Trabajo para Medir el Estado Salvaje de Poblaciones de Vertebrados Mayores bajo Manejo Resumen Conforme los paisajes siguen cayendo bajo la influencia del humano por causa de la pérdida del hábitat y la fragmentación, cada vez se usa más el encercado para mitigar las amenazas antropogénicas o incrementar el valor comercial de la fauna. La intensificación subsecuente del manejo tiene el potencial para erosionar el estado salvaje al desincorporar a las poblaciones de los procesos a nivel de paisaje, desconectando así a las especies del proceso de selección natural. Por lo tanto, se necesitan herramientas para medir el grado al cual las poblaciones de especies de vertebrados mayores dentro de áreas de fauna protegidas y privadas son autosostenibles y libres de adaptarse. Diseñamos un marco de trabajo para medir dicho estado salvaje con base en seis atributos relacionados con las dinámicas evolutivas y ecológicas de los vertebrados (espacio, resistencia a las enfermedades y a los parásitos, exposición a la depredación, exposición a las limitaciones y fluctuaciones en las reservas de agua y alimentos, y reproducción). Para cada atributo, establecimos umbrales empíricos y específicos por especie entre cinco estados salvajes basados en las intervenciones de manejo cuantificables. Usamos datos de 205 propiedades privadas de fauna con objetivos de manejo que abarcan desde el ecoturismo hasta el uso para consumo para probar el marco de trabajo en seis especies de herbívoros con una gama de estados de conservación y valores comerciales. Los puntajes de estado salvaje entre las especies difirieron significativamente y la proporción de poblaciones identificadas como salvajes osciló del 12% al 84%, lo que indica que la herramienta detectó diferencias a escala de sitio entre las poblaciones de diferentes especies y las poblaciones de la misma especie bajo diferentes regímenes de manejo. Si cuantificamos el estado salvaje, este marco de trabajo les proporciona a los practicantes las unidades de medida estandarizadas que vinculan a la biodiversidad con el uso sostenible de la fauna. Las aplicaciones de este marco de trabajo incluyen informar a los planes de manejo de las especies a escalas locales; estandarizar la inclusión de las poblaciones manejadas en las evaluaciones de listas rojas; y proporcionar una plataforma para la certificación y regulación de las economías basadas en la fauna. La aplicación de este marco de trabajo puede ayudar a insertar a la fauna como un valor normativo dentro de la política y a mitigar la línea base cambiante de lo que significa conservar verdaderamente a una especie.

The Contribution of Digital Sequence Information to Conservation Biology: A Southern African Perspective.

Many recent contributions have made a compelling case that genetic diversity is not adequately reflected in international frameworks and policies, as well as in local governmental processes implementing such frameworks. Using digital sequence information (DSI) and other publicly available data is supported to assess genetic diversity, toward formulation of practical actions for long-term conservation of biodiversity, with the particular goal of maintaining ecological and evolutionary processes. Given the inclusion of specific goals and targets regarding DSI in the latest draft of the Global Biodiversity Framework negotiated at the 15th Conference of the Parties (COP15) in Montreal in December 2022 and the crucial decisions on access and benefit sharing to DSI that will be taken in the coming months and future COP meetings, a southern African perspective on how and why open access to DSI is essential for the conservation of intraspecific biodiversity (genetic diversity and structure) across country borders is provided.

Lessons for conservation management: Monitoring temporal changes in genetic diversity of Cape mountain zebra (Equus zebra zebra).

The Cape mountain zebra (Equus zebra zebra) is a subspecies of mountain zebra endemic to South Africa. The Cape mountain zebra experienced near extinction in the early 1900's and their numbers have since recovered to more than 4,800 individuals. However, there are still threats to their long-term persistence. A previous study reported that Cape mountain zebra had low genetic diversity in three relict populations and that urgent conservation management actions were needed to mitigate the risk of further loss. As these suggestions went largely unheeded, we undertook the present study, fifteen years later to determine the impact of management on genetic diversity in three key populations. Our results show a substantial loss of heterozygosity across the Cape mountain zebra populations studied. The most severe losses occurred at De Hoop Nature Reserve where expected heterozygosity reduced by 22.85% from 0.385 to 0.297. This is alarming, as the De Hoop Nature Reserve was previously identified as the most genetically diverse population owing to its founders originating from two of the three remaining relict stocks. Furthermore, we observed a complete loss of multiple private alleles from all populations, and a related reduction in genetic structure across the subspecies. These losses could lead to inbreeding depression and reduce the evolutionary potential of the Cape mountain zebra. We recommend immediate implementation of evidence-based genetic management and monitoring to prevent further losses, which could jeopardise the long term survival of Cape mountain zebra, especially in the face of habitat and climate change and emerging diseases.

Quantitative evaluation of hybridization and the impact on biodiversity conservation.

Anthropogenic hybridization is an increasing conservation threat worldwide. In South Africa, recent hybridization is threatening numerous ungulate taxa. For example, the genetic integrity of the near-threatened bontebok (Damaliscus pygargus pygargus) is threatened by hybridization with the more common blesbok (D. p. phillipsi). Identifying nonadmixed parental and admixed individuals is challenging based on the morphological traits alone; however, molecular analyses may allow for accurate detection. Once hybrids are identified, population simulation software may assist in determining the optimal conservation management strategy, although quantitative evaluation of hybrid management is rarely performed. In this study, our objectives were to describe species-wide and localized rates of hybridization in nearly 3,000 individuals based on 12 microsatellite loci, quantify the accuracy of hybrid assignment software (STRUCTURE and NEWHYBRIDS), and determine an optimal threshold of bontebok ancestry for management purposes. According to multiple methods, we identified 2,051 bontebok, 657 hybrids, and 29 blesbok. More than two-thirds of locations contained at least some hybrid individuals, with populations varying in the degree of introgression. HYBRIDLAB was used to simulate four generations of coexistence between bontebok and blesbok, and to optimize a threshold of ancestry, where most hybrids will be detected and removed, and the fewest nonadmixed bontebok individuals misclassified as hybrids. Overall, a threshold Q-value (admixture coefficient) of 0.90 would remove 94% of hybrid animals, while a threshold of 0.95 would remove 98% of hybrid animals but also 8% of nonadmixed bontebok. To this end, a threshold of 0.90 was identified as optimal and has since been implemented in formal policy by a provincial nature conservation agency. Due to widespread hybridization, effective conservation plans should be established and enforced to conserve native populations that are genetically unique.