Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 27
Filtrar
Mais filtros

País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pediatr Transplant ; 24(5): e13747, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32497335

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: PTLD is the most frequent malignancy following SOT in children and the second most common SOT complication in adults. However, factors determining outcomes in children are poorly understood due to its relative rarity. METHODS: This study was performed at the University of Florida. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify prognostic factors in pediatric patients diagnosed with PTLD. RESULTS: We reviewed records of 54 pediatric (younger than 18 years old at diagnosis) patients diagnosed with PTLD from 1994 to 2017. The median follow-up was 28.8 months. The estimated 5-year survival rate was 87.6% (95% CI 74.3-94.2%). Univariate analysis showed that organ transplanted (specifically heart transplant), poor response to initial treatment, allograft rejection, and low Karnofsky score were statistically significant for negative prognostic factors in determining survival. Multivariate analysis determined progression in response to initial treatment and presence of allograft rejection as statistically significant prognostic factors affecting overall survival. We found no statistically significant impact of EBV serological status on PTLD prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Disease progression and allograft rejection were strong negative prognostic indicators in our study cohort. Close attention to graft status and development of therapies that protect the graft from rejection while bolstering anti-EBV immunity will be essential to further improving PTLD outcomes in children.


Assuntos
Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/etiologia , Transplante de Órgãos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/mortalidade , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Transplante de Órgãos/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida
2.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila) ; 14(1): 113-122, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32938642

RESUMO

CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening has been proved to be effective and cost-saving. CT colonography uses minimally invasive evaluation of colorectum and has better patient acceptance, which appears to be a promising screening modality to improve low colorectal cancer screening rate. This study investigated the utilization patterns of CT colonography and factors associated with its use among U.S. adult population. This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed the National Health Interview Survey 2015 and 2018. U.S. adults ages 45 or older without a history of colorectal cancer were included. Survey design-adjusted Wald F tests were used to compare the utilization of CT colonography during the study period. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of CT colonography among individual socioeconomic and health-related characteristics. The study sample included 34,768 individuals representing 129,430,319 U.S. adult population ages 45 or older. The overall utilization of CT colonography increased from 0.79% in 2015 to 1.33% in 2018 (P < 0.001). 54.5% study participants reported being up-to-date on recommended colorectal cancer screening; of those, 1.8% used CT colonography. Compared with individuals ages 65+, those ages 45-49 years were 2.08 times (OR, 2.08, 95% confidence interval, 1.01-4.35) more likely to use CT colonography. Socioeconomically disadvantaged characteristics (e.g., racial/ethnic minority, low income, publicly funded insurance) were associated with a greater likelihood of CT colonography. This study demonstrated an increasing trend in utilization of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening in U.S. adults. Younger individuals, racial/ethnic minorities, or those with lower income appear to have a higher CT colonography utilization. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Although computed tomographic (CT) colonography has been proved to be cost-effective and have better patient acceptance, its overall utilization for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is low (<1.4%) among US adults aged 45+ in 2018. More efforts are needed to implement strategies to increase CT colonography for effective CRC prevention.


Assuntos
Colonografia Tomográfica Computadorizada/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colonografia Tomográfica Computadorizada/tendências , Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Estudos Transversais , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/tendências , Minorias Étnicas e Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos
3.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 62(5): 1123-1128, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33327817

RESUMO

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a well-known complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplant and solid organ transplant. While reduction in immunosuppression (RIS) is the first-line treatment for PTLD, outcomes of allograft function as a result of RIS remain understudied. In this retrospective study, we examine rates of allograft rejection and graft failure after RIS in 141 patients diagnosed with PTLD at the University of Florida. Compared to prior literature demonstrating around 32-40% rate of allograft rejection as result of RIS, our institutional analysis revealed a much lower treatment-related allograft rejection rate of 18.4%. Out of the patients who experienced acute allograft rejection, 23.1% ultimately progressed to allograft failure. Interestingly, acute allograft rejection episodes during PTLD treatment were not statistically found to impact overall survival. RIS remains an overall beneficial treatment modality of PTLD due to its low allograft rejection rate relative to treatment rate.


Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos , Aloenxertos , Rejeição de Enxerto/etiologia , Humanos , Terapia de Imunossupressão , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/etiologia , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Cancer Med ; 10(1): 70-78, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33169938

RESUMO

Carfilzomib was approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma in 2012 and since then there have been concerns for cardiovascular toxicity from its use. With this study, we aim to further study the hazards and underlying risk factors for cardiovascular adverse events associated with carfilzomib. This study was conducted using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data set of multiple myeloma from 2001 to 2015. Data were analyzed for hazards ratio of cardiovascular adverse events between carfilzomib users and nonusers. We identified 7330 patients with multiple myeloma of whom 815 were carfilzomib users. Carfilzomib users had a statistically significant hazard ratio of 1.41 with p < 0.0001 for all cardiovascular adverse events as compared to nonusers. Carfilzomib use was significantly associated with increased risk of heart failure (HR 1.47, p = 0.0002), ischemic heart disease (HR 1.45, p = 0.0002), and hypertension (HR 3.33, p < 0.0001), whereas there was no association between carfilzomib use and cardiac conduction disorders (arrhythmia and heart blocks). Carfilzomib users were at higher risk of new-onset edema (HR 5.09, p < 0.0001), syncope (HR 4.27, p < 0.0001), dyspnea (HR 1.33, p < 0.0001), and chest pain (HR 1.18, p < 0.0001) as compared to carfilzomib nonusers. Age above 75 years, preexisting cardiovascular disease, obesity, and twice a week carfilzomib schedule were significant risk factors associated with cardiovascular adverse events in carfilzomib users. The median time of the onset for all cardiovascular adverse events was 3.1 months. This study has identified a significantly higher likelihood of cardiovascular adverse events in elderly Medicare patients receiving carfilzomib.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Cardiopatias/induzido quimicamente , Hipertensão/induzido quimicamente , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Oligopeptídeos/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteases/efeitos adversos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cardiotoxicidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Cardiopatias/diagnóstico , Cardiopatias/epidemiologia , Humanos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Incidência , Masculino , Medicare , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Programa de SEER , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
Cureus ; 13(4): e14712, 2021 Apr 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34055551

RESUMO

Background Cluster of differentiation 26/dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) is a cell surface glycoprotein with multifaceted roles, including immune regulation, glucose metabolism, and tumorigenesis. Recent literature has identified DPP4 inhibitors to improve survival in diabetic patients with prostate cancer. DPP4 inhibitors have been proposed to play a role in prostate cancer, as DPP4 is found at higher levels in malignant prostate tissue compared to benign and correlates with PSA levels and cancer stage. In this multi-center retrospective study, we aim to define the effects of DPP4 inhibitors on progression-free survival (PFS) in diabetic patients with advanced-stage prostate cancer. Methodology We performed a retrospective analysis of 161 patients with diabetes and advanced-stage (III or IV) prostate cancer at the University of Florida Health Cancer Center and Moffitt Cancer Center. Our cohort included 120 patients on metformin (control group) and 41 on a DPP4 inhibitor (study group). Results No significant difference in progression of prostate cancer was identified between those on DPP4 inhibitors versus metformin (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-1.61; p = 0.955). Median time to progression was 3.5 years (range: 2.4-4.6 years). Conclusions Despite prior literature indicating survival benefit of DPP4 inhibitors in prostate cancer, our study did not identify a statistically significant improvement of PFS in diabetic patients with advanced prostate cancer. Additional analysis with larger sample sizes and prospective investigation with study of tumor microenvironment are needed to evaluate clinical impact and potential survival benefit of DPP4 inhibitors in prostate cancer.

6.
Lung Cancer ; 150: 172-177, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33186859

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In recent years immunotherapy has escalated to frontline treatment options for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Cardiovascular toxicity from chemotherapeutic agents is well described in this patient population with common underlying risk factors like smoking. We explored cardiovascular toxicity form the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to traditional chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study from SEER-Medicare datasets which represents 34 % of the US population. This study included patients age ≥ 65 years-old with newly diagnosed metastatic non-small cell lung cancer between the years 2013 and 2015. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts, one who received traditional chemotherapy only (control arm) and the others who received immune checkpoint inhibitors in addition to traditional chemotherapy (study arm). The primary endpoint was the hazards of new cardiovascular toxicity in the study versus the control arm. RESULTS: We identified 6405 patients who met our study criteria. Of these, 5730 patients received chemotherapy only while 675 patients received chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Results showed that the hazard ratio for all cardiovascular toxicity was 0.81 (95 % CI:0.72-0.91, p = 0.0003) in patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy. Among the subgroups, hazards ratio for acute coronary syndrome was 0.82 (95 % CI: 0.64-1.05, p = 0.10), hazards ratio for heart failure was 0.74 (95 % CI: 0.62-0.88, p = 0.0007), hazards ratio for cardiac arrhythmia was 0.72 (95 % CI: 0.63-0.82, p < 0.0001) and hazards ratio for heart blocks was 0.48 (95 % CI: 0.30-0.76, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in hazards for cardiomyopathy, pericarditis, and myocarditis between the two cohorts. Patients above 75 years, with comorbidities and pre-existing heart disease, were at higher risk. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study are reassuring that adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy is safe and does not result in increased cardiovascular toxicity but instead showed lower hazards.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Idoso , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/complicações , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Humanos , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Medicare , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 16(7): e610-e621, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32074011

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Some elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) do not receive chemotherapy likely because of fear of toxicity and uncertainty regarding benefits. Thus, we aimed to study real-world trends in utilization of antineoplastics over the years and predictors of utilization, survival, and Medicare expenditure in elderly patients with extensive-stage (ES) SCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the linked SEER and Medicare database, we identified elderly patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC between 2001 and 2013. The Wald test was used to determine the significance of trends. Cox proportional hazards models were applied for survival analyses. We used SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). RESULTS: We identified 15,763 patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC. Approximately 6,838 patients (43.38%) received antineoplastics, and 8,925 patients (56.61%) received supportive care only. Every year since 2001, the percentage of patients receiving antineoplastics has decreased (45.8% v 36.6% in 2001 and 2013, respectively; Ptrend < .0001). Patients with advanced age (P < .001), patients from high-poverty areas (P < .001) or rural areas (P = .005), patients with Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3 (P < .001), and non-Hispanic blacks (P = .003) and Hispanics (P = .001) were less likely to receive antineoplastics. Mean Medicare spending per patient decreased over the study period for patients treated with antineoplastics ($45,998 in 2001 and $35,053 in 2013; Ptrend < .001) and for those receiving supportive care only ($34,197 in 2001 and $25,265 in 2013; Ptrend < .001). CONCLUSION: Decreasing utilization of antineoplastics in elderly patients with ES-SCLC since 2001 could be partly secondary to higher comorbidities and physiologic age, leading to poor candidacy. Medicare expenditures decreased likely as a result of value-based treatment initiatives by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services. However, expenditures are likely to increase with use of expensive novel agents.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Medicare , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/tratamento farmacológico , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos
8.
Int J Med Inform ; 139: 104140, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32325370

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Febrile neutropenia (FN) has been associated with high mortality among adults with cancer. Current systems for early detection of inpatient FN mortality are based on scoring indexes that require intensive physicians' subjective evaluation. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we leveraged machine learning techniques to build a FN mortality risk evaluation tool focused on FN admissions without physicians' subjective evaluation. METHODS: We used the National Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) that included mortality data among adult inpatients who were diagnosed with FN during a hospital admission. Machine learning techniques that we compared included linear models (ridge logistic regression and linear support vector machine) and non-linear models (gradient boosting tree and neural network). The primary outcome for this study was death among individuals with a recorded FN admission. Model comparison was evaluated based on areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and model performance was estimated using 30 % test set created via stratified split. RESULTS: Our analysis detected 126,013 adult admissions within the NIS data that were diagnosed with FN, among which 5,856 were declared as deceased (4.6 %). Our machine learning results demonstrate linear models and non-linear models achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) around 92 % in survival prediction. CONCLUSIONS: We developed machine learning models that do not require physicians' subjective evaluation for FN mortality risk prediction.


Assuntos
Neutropenia Febril/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Aprendizado de Máquina , Redes Neurais de Computação , Máquina de Vetores de Suporte , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Curva ROC , Taxa de Sobrevida
9.
Cureus ; 12(2): e6912, 2020 Feb 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32190467

RESUMO

Background Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a rare complication following transplant (solid organ or allogeneic) due to the proliferation of lymphoid cells in the immunosuppressed state. The incidence of PTLD follows a bimodal distribution, with high incidence immediately after transplant (early-onset PTLD), followed by a decline and then a high-incidence again five years after transplantation (late-onset PTLD). This study exclusively aims to identify prognostic factors for the subgroup of PTLD, described as very late-onset PTLD, occurring after 10 years of transplant. Methods This study was conducted at the University of Florida, with the requisite study population identified through the cancer registry. Data were collected by individual chart review and analyzed. Survival estimates and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to measure the effects of each variable on overall survival. Results A total of 33 patients were identified, with a median age at transplant of 42.3 years, while the median age at PTLD diagnosis was 54.7 years. Median time from transplant to PTLD diagnosis was 13.3 years. Kidney (30.3%), liver (27.3%), and heart (24.2%) transplants were the most common allografts associated with very late PTLD development. The most common pathology was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in 45.5% of patients. CHOP+/-R (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride (hydroxydaunorubicin), vincristine sulfate (Oncovin), prednisone, rituximab) was the most common chemo regimen used as the initial choice in 36.4% of patients. Median survival was 5.4 years. Univariate analysis showed that age at diagnosis over 65, male gender, bone marrow involvement, past medical history (PMH) of malignancy, immunosuppression regimen at PTLD diagnosis, and initial and final best response to treatment were statistically significant (p <0.05) factors associated with survival. On multivariate analysis, bone marrow involvement was significantly associated with poor survival (p=0.008). Surprisingly, performance status, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status, pathology type, Ann-Arbor stage, and chemotherapy regimen were not significantly associated with survival. At the end of the study, 48.5% of patients achieved complete remission and the allograft survived in 84.8%. Conclusions In this retrospective study of very-late onset PTLD, we identified factors associated with survival different from early and late PTLD. These factors should be considered during the treatment of this subgroup of PTLD patients.

10.
Front Oncol ; 10: 405, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32296640

RESUMO

Background: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4), a cell surface protein, exhibits a crucial role in tumor biology and regulation of the immune system. We aim to study the impact of DPP4 inhibitors (DPP4i) in patients with prostate cancer (PRC), pancreatic cancer (PC) and breast cancer (BC). Methods: Using the SEER and Medicare linked database, we identified patients with PRC or PC or BC with coexisting type II diabetes mellitus between 2007 and 2015. Patients were classified into four groups: (1) not on either DPP4i or metformin (reference group), this group included patient that were on anti-diabetic agents other than metformin or DPP4i (2) metformin only, (3) DPP4i only, and (4) DPP4i along with metformin (combination group). Overall survival (OS) analyses were performed using SAS®, version 9.4. Results: We identified 15,330 patients with PRC, 5,359 patients with PC and 16,085 patients with BC. In PRC cohort, patients on DPP4i had significant survival advantage with HR 0.77 (95% CI: 0.64-0.93), P = 0.005 when compared to the reference group. Patients taking metformin also had significant OS benefit with HR 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81-0.93), P < 0.0001 when compared to the reference group. However, in BC cohort, OS did not favor the patients taking DPP4i with HR 1.07 (95% CI: 0.93-1.25, P = 0.33). Similarly, in PC cohort, OS was indifferent for the patients on DPP4i with HR 1.07 (95% CI: 0.93-1.24, P = 0.68). Upon subgroup analyses of PRC patients, the survival favored the group taking DPP4i, irrespective of stage, use of chemotherapy, androgen-deprivation therapy, and prostatectomy or radiation therapy. Conclusions: DPP4i seems to improve survival in PRC patients; however, not in PC or BC patients. While the exact mechanism involved remains to be elucidated, a prospective clinical trial would help to confirm these findings.

11.
Cureus ; 12(5): e8339, 2020 May 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32617214

RESUMO

Intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) remains one of the most commonly used anticoagulants in the hospital setting. The optimal protocol for initiation and maintenance of UFH has been difficult to determine. Over the past two decades, weight-based nomogram protocols have gained favor. Herein, we present a retrospective study of 377 patients at a single tertiary academic center treated with low intensity (LI) and standard intensity (SI) UFH protocols for therapeutic anticoagulation. UFH levels are measured by anti-Xa assay activity with therapeutic levels of 0.30 to 0.70 IU/mL for SI and 0.25 to 0.35 IU/mL for LI.  Patients treated on the LI protocol were more likely to have had a previous history of bleeding and lower baseline hemoglobin. Incidence of new or worsening thrombus while on UFH was comparable between both protocols (odds ratio (OR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-2.98, p=0.899). Patients on LI protocol had higher incidence of bleeding while on UFH (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.51-2.89, p=0.667). Our study thus suggests that the LI protocol may have comparable efficacy to the SI protocol in treating venous thromboembolism (VTE) and that target anti-Xa levels of 0.25 to 0.35 IU/mL may be more optimal in high-risk patients.

12.
Cureus ; 11(4): e4552, 2019 Apr 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31275776

RESUMO

Introduction Multiple primary malignancies (MPMs) are seen in ~5% of all tumors. The aim of this study was to determine the quantitative impact on overall survival (OS) and treatment choices in patients with MPMs. Methods A retrospective analysis to determine patients with MPMs was conducted over a six-year period. Patients were defined as simultaneous MPMs if the second malignancy was discovered within 60 days of the first, and as sequential MPMs if discovered after 60 days of the first. Results Fifty-six patients with MPMs as defined above were identified, 38 (68%) simultaneous and 18 (32%) sequential. Development of second malignancy did not affect treatment in 47 (84%) of patients. Median OS after diagnosis of first malignancy was 13.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 10.3-15.8 months), compared to 10.6 months (95% CI 7.1-13.9 months) after the diagnosis of second malignancy. Median OS for the simultaneous MPM group was 13.5 months (95% CI 7.1-19.9 months), compared to 3.2 months (95% CI 0.0-9.8 months) for the sequential MPM group. Conclusions The development of a second malignancy impacts OS and treatment decisions. Patients who developed sequential MPM performed poorer than those who developed simultaneous MPM. This was likely in part due to effects of existing treatment on performance status as well as treatment preferences when second MPM is diagnosed (as many patients opted for supportive care after second MPM). Further analysis with larger patient cohorts is necessary to ascertain the aforementioned effects of OS and treatment options with respect to tumor pathology, stage, and performance status.

13.
Cancer Med ; 8(8): 3918-3927, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31124302

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) is a cell surface protein that can act as a tumor suppressor or activator, depending upon the level of expression and interaction with the microenvironment and chemokines. DPP4 inhibitors are used to treat diabetes. METHODS: We conducted this Surveillance Epidemiology and Endpoint Research-Medicare database study to evaluate the role of DPP4 inhibitors on the overall survival (OS) of diabetic patients diagnosed with colorectal (CRC) and lung cancers. RESULTS: Diabetic patients with CRC or lung cancer who were treated with DPP4 inhibitors exhibited a statistically significant survival advantage (hazard ratio [HR] of 0.89; CI: 0.82-0.97, P = 0.007) that remained significant after controlling for all other confounders. When DPP4 inhibitors were used in combination of metformin which is known to suppress cancer, the survival advantage was even more pronounced (HR of 0.83; CI: 0.77-0.90, P < 0.0001). Data were then analyzed separately for two cancer types. In the CRC-only cohort, the use of DPP4 inhibitors alone had a positive trend but did not meet statistically significant threshold (HR of 0.87; CI: 0.75-1.00, P = 0.055), while the combined use of DPP4 inhibitors and metformin was associated with statistically significant survival advantage (HR of 0.77; CI: 0.67-0.89, P = 0.003). Similarly, for the lung cancer cohort, use of DPP4 alone was not found to be statistically significant (HR of 0.93; CI: 0.83-1.03, P = 0.153), whereas lung cancer patients treated with the combination of DPP4 inhibitors and metformin showed statistically significant survival advantage (HR of 0.88; CI: 0.80-0.97, P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: DPP4 inhibition in CRC and lung cancer is associated with improved OS, which possibly may be due to the effect of DPP4 inhibition on immunoregulation of cancer.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/complicações , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicações , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Programa de SEER , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
J Gastrointest Oncol ; 10(5): 869-877, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31602324

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Incidence of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SNETs) is increasing and they now comprise the most common types of small intestinal cancer. SNETs frequently present with distant metastasis. Significant uncertainty prevails with regards to the surgical management strategies in metastatic SNETs. Therefore, we aim to analyze survival trends in metastatic SNET patients stratified by type of surgical treatment. METHODS: We analyzed the data from the SEER database: Incidence - SEER 18 Regs Research Data + Hurricane Katrina Impacted Louisiana Cases, Nov 2016 Sub (1973-2014 varying). Relative survival rates (RSRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were measured for patients diagnosed with metastatic SNET between 2000 and 2014. Treatment received was divided into two broad categories; surgical resection and no surgery and further subcategorized into local resection (LR) (surgery of the primary tumor only) and radical resection (RR) (surgery for primary tumor and metastasectomy). RESULTS: We identified 1,138 metastatic SNET cases. Median age was 61 years. Median survival was 41 months and 5 year RSR was 72%. Age >50 years (HR 2.10, P<0.001), poorly differentiated histology (HR 3.50, P<0.001) and tumor size >2 cm (HR 1.27, P=0.07), showed poor outcome. The group which did not receive any tumor directed surgery showed the worst survival (5 years RSR 45.30% vs. 76%, respectively for no surgery vs. surgery group, P<0.001). We found no significant difference in survival between LR and RR (HR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.73-1.40, P=0.92). Upon further stratification, surgery significantly improved survival on patients who were >50 years (HR 0.37), and for primary tumor location in the duodenum (HR 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for the primary tumor (LR or RR) significantly improved 5-year survival even in the presence of distant metastasis irrespective of primary tumor size, grade, or histology. Poor prognostic factors include, age >50 years, duodenal primary, tumor size >2 cm, and poorly differentiated histology.

15.
Mol Clin Oncol ; 10(1): 118-124, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30655986

RESUMO

Cluster of differentiation 26 (CD26), also known as dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP4), is a cell surface protein with exopeptidase activity and is expressed by most cell types. CD26/DPP4 is a multifunctional molecule with diverse biological effects, including regulatory effects on tumor growth, invasion and metastasis, and is a potential novel therapeutic target for selected cancers. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed diabetic patients with concurrent advanced airway or colorectal cancer to examine the effect of DPP4-inhibitors on progression-free survival (PFS). We performed a multi-center retrospective review of patients with advanced colorectal or airway (lung, head and neck) cancer and a concurrent diagnosis of diabetes. The control group included patients on metformin and a sulfonylurea, and the study group included patients on metformin and a DPP4 inhibitor. Ninety-six patients were eligible for the study. The cancers progressed in 23.7% of patients treated with DPP4 inhibitors compared to 50.9% of patients in the control group with an odds ratio of 0.303 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.106-0.809] and P=0.010. There was a statistically significant improvement in PFS in the study group as compared to the control group, hazard ratio=0.42 (95% CI: 0.21-0.84) and P=0.014. There was a trend toward improvement in overall survival, although this effect was not statistically significant (P=0.11). Exposure to DPP4 inhibitors in the study group led to higher PFS in patients with advanced colorectal and airway cancers. Additional investigations with larger patient cohorts are needed to validate the relationship between DPP4 inhibition and the clinical outcome of selected malignancies.

16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30586955

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Traditionally, Morbidity and Mortality Conference (M&MC) are forums where medical errors are discussed. Though M&MC can lead to identification of opportunities for system wide improvements, there is little in the literature to describe the use for this purpose, particularly in residency training programs. This paper describes the use of M&MC case review as a quality improvement activity that teaches systems-based practice and can engage residents in improving systems of care. METHODS: Internal medicine residents at a tertiary care academic medical center reviewed 347 consecutive mortalities from March 2104 to September 2017. Residents used case review worksheets to categorize and track causes of mortality. The residents then debriefed with a faculty member. Selected cases were then presented at a larger interdepartmental meeting and action items were implemented. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to analyze the results. RESULTS: The residents identified a diagnosis mismatch from admission to death in 54.5 % (n=189) of cases and possible need for improvement in management in 48.0% cases. Three 'management failure' themes were identified including failures to plan, failure to communicate and failure to rescue, consisting of 21.9%, 10.7 %, and 10.1% of cases respectively. Following the reviews, quality improvement initiatives proposed by residents lead to system-based changes. CONCLUSION: A resident-driven mortality review curriculum can lead to improvement in systems of care. This type of novel curriculum can teach systems-based practice. The recruitment of teaching faculty with expertise in quality improvement and mortality case analyses is essential for such a project.


Assuntos
Currículo , Morte , Medicina Interna/educação , Internato e Residência , Erros Médicos , Médicos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Administração de Caso/normas , Comunicação , Humanos , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde
17.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 59(11): 2557-2569, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29465266

RESUMO

Carfilzomib is a second-generation proteasome inhibitor (PI) that is approved for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who failed ≥1 prior lines of therapy. We performed a systematic review of carfilzomib literature with meta-analysis to determine cumulative incidence of cardiotoxicity. After the literature search, we included a total of 29 eligible phase I/II, phase II and phase III clinical trials which used carfilzomib. The cumulative incidence and overall odds ratios (OR) were calculated with random effect model, using 'R' software with metaphor package. A total of 4164 patients with various malignancies were included. The overall estimated cumulative incidence of cardiotoxicity was 8.68% and 4.92%, respectively, for all-grade and high-grade (≥ grade 3) toxicity, which seems higher than other PIs. Compared to control group, the odds of developing cardiotoxicity due to carfilzomib was significantly higher with OR of 2.03 (95% CI: 1.19-3.46, p = .010) and 2.04 (95% CI: 1.31-3.17, p = .002) for all-grades and high grades, respectively. Concomitant immunomodulatory agents seem to increase the risk of cardiotoxicity (high-grade cardiotoxicity 6.45% and 4.34% with and without concomitant immunomodulatory agents, respectively (p = .033)). There was no variation in the incidence of cardiotoxicity among newly diagnosed versus RRMM (p = .38), and high versus standard dose carfilzomib (p = .86).


Assuntos
Cardiotoxicidade/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Oligopeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteassoma/uso terapêutico , Cardiotoxicidade/etiologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Oligopeptídeos/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteassoma/efeitos adversos
18.
Oncotarget ; 9(34): 23704-23717, 2018 May 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29805768

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Carfilzomib (Carf) is a second-generation proteasome inhibitor approved for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who failed ≥ 1 prior lines of therapy. We performed a systematic review of Carf literature with meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety in RRMM patients. METHODS: Based on literature search, we included a total of 14 eligible phase I/II, phase II and phase III Carf based clinical trials. The cumulative incidence and odds ratios (OR) were calculated with random effect model, using ''R'' software with metaphor package. RESULTS: 2906 evaluable RRMM patients from published clinical trials included. The pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 45% (95% CI: 29-62). The pooled clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 56% (95% CI: 41-71). OR from 3 randomized clinical trials showed that Carf significantly improved ORR and CBR compared to control groups (OR 2.4, P < 0.0001; 2.02, P = 0.0007, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed significantly better ORR (P < 0.0001) and CBR (P < 0.001) with combination regimens compared to monotherapy. Response was significantly higher with high dose of Carf (>20/27 mg/m2) compared to standard dose (ORR 65% vs. 35%, P = 0.03). Compared to control group, the OR of developing cardiotoxicity (P = 0.002) and hypertension (P < 0.0001) were significantly higher with Carf, while no difference in peripheral neuropathy (P = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Carf produces significantly better responses with acceptable safety profile in RRMM patients. Combination regimens and higher dose Carf offers better response with no significant extra toxicity. Its efficacy is regardless of cytogenetics or disease stage. Incidences of cardiotoxicity and hypertension seem higher with Carf.

19.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res ; 10: 611-618, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30323637

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The recommendations of the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation's "Choosing Wisely®" initiative recognize the importance of improving the appropriateness of testing behavior and reducing the number of duplicate laboratory tests. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of an electronic medical record Best Practice Alert (BPA or "pop up") intervention aimed at reducing duplicate laboratory tests and hospital costs. DESIGN: Comparison of the number of duplicated laboratory tests performed on inpatients before and after the intervention. SETTING: University of Florida Health Shands Hospital, Gainesville, FL, USA, during 2014-2017. INTERVENTION: The electronic medical record intervention was a BPA pop-up alert that informed the ordering physician if a recent identical order already existed along with the "ordering time", "collecting time", "resulting time", and the result itself. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage change in the number of inpatient duplicate orders of selected clinical biochemistry tests and cost savings from reduction of the duplicates. Student's t-test and beta-binomial models were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Results from the beta-binomial model indicated that the intervention reduced the overall duplicates by 18% (OR=0.82, standard error=0.016, P-value<0.000). Percent reductions in 9 of the 17 tests were statistically significant: serum hemoglobin A1C level, vitamin B12, serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum folate, serum iron, lipid panel, respiratory viral panel, serum thyroid stimulating hormone level, and Vitamin D. Additionally, important cost savings were realized from the reduction of duplicates for each lab test (with the exception of CRP) with an estimated overall savings of $72,543 over 17 months in the post-intervention period. CONCLUSIONS: The present study included all hospital inpatients and covered 17 clinical laboratory tests. This rather simple and low-cost intervention resulted in significant reductions in percentage duplicates of several tests and resulted in cost savings. The study also highlights the role of hospitalists in quality improvement.

20.
Oxf Med Case Reports ; 2018(1): omx078, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29340160

RESUMO

Castration-resistant prostate cancer is an incurable disease. To date, six agents-abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel, cabazitaxel, radium-223 and sipuleucel-T- have shown clinical efficacy in phase III clinical trials, leading to their FDA approval. Patients are typically sequenced through most or all of these agents, and then eventually succumb to their disease. Development of new treatments remains an unmet need. We report a case of a patient who progressed on enzalutamide with a single enlarging metastatic lesion, was treated with ablative stereotactic body radiation therapy while maintaining the same systemic treatment, who then had durable complete remission. Our findings have important clinical implications and suggest novel clinical trials for this difficult to treat disease.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA