Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Fenestrated and Branched Grafts Versus Open Surgery in Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: An Updated Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression of efficacy and safety of fenestrated/branched endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) compared with open repair. BACKGROUND: Endovascular repair of TAAAs may be a promising alternative to open surgery by reducing invasiveness and expanding the eligible population, but evidence remains limited. METHODS: We applied "Prepared Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis" guidelines to retrieve, quantitatively pool, and critically evaluate the efficacy and safety (including 30-day mortality, reintervention, spinal cord injury [SCI], and renal injury) of both approaches. Original studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library until April 20, 2022, excluding papers reporting <10 patients. Pooled proportions and means were determined using a random-effect model. Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated with I2 statistics. RESULTS: Sixty-four studies met the predefined inclusion criteria. Endovascular cohort patients were older and had higher rates of comorbidities. Endovascular repair was associated with similar proportions of mortality (0.07, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.06-0.08) compared with open repair (0.09, 95% CI: 0.08-0.12; P = 0.22), higher proportions of reintervention (0.19, 95% CI: 0.13-0.26 vs 0.06, 95% CI: 0.04-0.10; P < 0.01), similar proportions of transient SCI (0.07, 95% CI: 0.05-0.09 vs 0.06, 95% CI: 0.05-0.08; P = 0.28), lower proportions of permanent SCI (0.04, 95% CI: 0.03-0.05 vs 0.06, 95% CI: 0.05-0.07; P < 0.01), and renal injury (0.08, 95% CI: 0.06-0.10 vs 0.13, 95% CI: 0.09-0.17; P = 0.02). Results were affected by high heterogeneity and potential publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Despite these limitations and the lack of randomized trials, this meta-analysis suggests that endovascular TAAA repair could be a safer alternative to the open approach.

Healthcare-Associated-Infections: preliminary results from a real-time reporting system of an Italian neurologic research hospital.

Background: Healthcare-Associated-Infections are a critical concern in healthcare settings, posing serious threats to patient safety and causing significant morbidity, mortality, and financial strain. This study aims to calculate healthcare-associated-infections trends in the hospital setting through an automatic reporting system. Study design: The study is a descriptive analysis of automatically generated trends of an innovative digital tool based on existing hospital information flows. Methods: An algorithm was developed within a Clinical Information System to create a suite of quality indicators for monitoring healthcare-associated-infections trends. The algorithm used criteria related to admission, laboratory tests and antimicrobial administrations. A descriptive analysis was conducted for patients aged 18 or older, admitted to a neurological or to a neuro-rehabilitation department of a neurologic hospital from 2019 to 2022. Results: The results showed fluctuations in healthcare-associated-infections prevalence from 2.9% to 5.6% and hospital infec-tions prevalence from 4.5% to 10.9%, with notable increases in 2020 and 2021. The majority (70.3%) of healthcare associated infections identified by the tool were confirmed to be potentially hospital-acquired, according to the European Centre of Disease Prevention and Control's definition. Discussion and Conclusions: The study posits the algorithm as a vital tool for automatically monitoring hospital infections, providing valuable preliminary results for improving care quality and guiding the infections' prevention and control strategies, with plans to benchmark the algorithm against a gold standard in the future.

Quality of hospital care and clinical outcomes: a comparison between the Lombardy Region and the Italian national data.

Background: Improving the quality and effectiveness of healthcare is a key priority in health policy. The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic has exerted considerable pressure on hospital networks, requiring unprecedented reorganization and restructuring actions. This study analyzed data from the Italian National Outcomes Program to compare some volumes and outcomes of public and private accredited hospitals in the Lombardy Region with national data. Study design: Observational study. Methods: A thorough examination of hospital outcomes between 2019 and 2021 was conducted, considering 45 volume indicators and 48 process and outcome indicators, comparing Lombardy with other Italian regions and public versus private accredited hospitals. Results: In 2020, Italy and Lombardy experienced a considerable reduction in overall hospital admissions, with Lombardy showing a deeper decline (21.3% compared with 16.0% in Italy). In 2021, both experienced a partial recovery, especially marked in the Lombardy region (+7.3%, compared with national data). Focusing specifically on the private sector in Lombardy, a recovery of +9.3% in hospitalization was observed. In the analysis of clinical outcomes, Lombardy outperformed the national average for 63% of the indicators in 2020 and 83.3% in 2021. Conclusions: The study shows the continuing decline in volumes compared to 2019 (pre-COVID), the excellent performance of hospitals in Lombardy and a relevant contribution for the volumes and the quality of outcomes of private accredited hospitals.