Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 42(10): 1331-1339, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31424091

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Enterococcal cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are not well characterized. METHODS: Data from the Multicenter Electrophysiologic Device Infection Cohort, a prospective study of CIED infections, were used for descriptive analysis of adults with enterococcal CIED infections. RESULTS: Of 433 patients, 21 (4.8%) had enterococcal CIED infection. Median age was 71 years. Twelve patients (57%) had permanent pacemakers, five (24%) implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and four (19%) biventricular devices. Median time from last procedure to infection was 570 days. CIED-related bloodstream infections occurred in three patients (14%) and 18 (86%) had infective endocarditis (IE), 14 (78%) of which were definite by the modified Duke criteria. IE cases were classified as follows: valvular IE, four; lead IE, eight; both valve and lead IE, six. Vegetations were demonstrated by transesophageal echocardiography in 17 patients (81%). Blood cultures were positive in 19/19 patients with confirmed results. The most common antimicrobial regimen was penicillin plus an aminoglycoside (33%). Antibiotics were given for a median of 43 days. Only 14 patients (67%) underwent device removal. There was one death during the index hospitalization with four additional deaths within 6 months (overall mortality 24%). There were no relapses. CONCLUSIONS: Enterococci caused 4.8% of CIED infections in our cohort. Based on the late onset after device placement or manipulation, most infections were likely hematogenous in origin. IE was the most common infection syndrome. Only 67% of patients underwent device removal. At 6 months follow-up, no CIED infection relapses had occurred, but overall mortality was 24%.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis/microbiologia , Endocardite Bacteriana/microbiologia , Enterococcus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologia , Marca-Passo Artificial/microbiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Endocardite Bacteriana/diagnóstico por imagem , Endocardite Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/diagnóstico por imagem , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico por imagem , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 41(5): 524-531, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29518265

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Published guidelines mandate complete device removal in cases of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection. Clinical predictors of successful salvage of infected CIEDs have not been defined. METHODS: Data from the Multicenter Electrophysiologic Device Infection Collaboration, a prospective, observational, multinational cohort study of CIED infection, were used to investigate whether clinical predictors of successful salvage of infected devices could be identified. RESULTS: Of 433 adult patients with CIED infections, 306 (71%) underwent immediate device explantation. Medical management with device retention and antimicrobial therapy was initially attempted in 127 patients (29%). "Early failure" of attempted salvage occurred in 74 patients (58%) who subsequently underwent device explantation during the index hospitalization. The remaining 53 patients (42%) in the attempted salvage group retained their CIED. Twenty-six (49%) had resolution of CIED infection (successful salvage group) whereas 27 patients (51%) experienced "late" salvage failure. Upon comparing the salvage failure group, early and late (N = 101), to the group experiencing successful salvage of an infected CIED (N = 26), no clinical or laboratory predictors of successful salvage were identified. However, by univariate analysis, coagulase-negative staphylococci as infecting pathogens (P = 0.0439) and the presence of a lead vegetation (P = 0.024) were associated with overall failed salvage. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with definite CIED infections, clinical and laboratory variables cannot predict successful device salvage. Until new data are forthcoming, device explantation should remain a mandatory and early management intervention in patients with CIED infection in keeping with existing expert guidelines unless medical contraindications exist or patients refuse device removal.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Marca-Passo Artificial , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/terapia , Terapia de Salvação , Idoso , Remoção de Dispositivo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Falha de Tratamento
3.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 37(8): 955-62, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24665867

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) pocket infections are often related to recent CIED placement or manipulation, but these infections are not well characterized. The clinical presentation of CIED pocket infection, based on temporal onset related to last CIED procedure, deserves further study. METHODS: The MEDIC (Multicenter Electrophysiologic Device Infection Cohort) prospectively enrolled subjects with CIED infection. Subjects were stratified into those whose infection occurred <12 months (early) or ≥ 12 months (late) since their last CIED-related procedure. RESULTS: There were 132 subjects in the early group and 106 in the late group. There were more females (P = 0.009) and anticoagulation use (P = 0.039) in the early group. Subjects with early infections were more likely to have had a generator change or lead addition as their last procedure (P = 0.03) and had more prior CIED procedures (P = 0.023). Early infections were more likely to present with pocket erythema (P < 0.001), swelling (P < 0.001), and pain (P = 0.007). Late infections were more likely to have pocket erosion (P = 0.005) and valvular vegetations (P = 0.009). In bacteremic subjects, early infections were more likely healthcare-associated (P < 0.001). In-hospital and 6-month mortality were equivalent. CONCLUSION: A total of 45% of patients with CIED pocket infection presented >12 months following their last CIED-related procedure. Patients with early infection were more likely to be female, on anticoagulation, and present with localized inflammation, whereas those with late infection were more likely to have CIED erosion or valvular endocarditis.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
4.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 59(7): 681-7, 2012 Feb 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22322085

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the timing of the most recent cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedure, either a permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, influences the clinical presentation and outcome of lead-associated endocarditis (LAE). BACKGROUND: The CIED infection rate has increased at a time of increased device use. LAE is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. METHODS: The clinical presentation and course of LAE were evaluated by the MEDIC (Multicenter Electrophysiologic Device Cohort) registry, an international registry enrolling patients with CIED infection. Consecutive LAE patients enrolled in the Multicenter Electrophysiologic Device Cohort registry between January 2009 and May 2011 were analyzed. The clinical features and outcomes of 2 groups were compared based on the time from the most recent CIED procedure (early, <6 months; late, >6 months). RESULTS: The Multicenter Electrophysiologic Device Cohort registry entered 145 patients with LAE (early = 43, late = 102). Early LAE patients presented with signs and symptoms of local pocket infection, whereas a remote source of bacteremia was present in 38% of patients with late LAE but only 8% of early LAE (p < 0.01). Staphylococcal species were the most frequent pathogens in both early and late LAE. Treatment consisted of removal of all hardware and intravenous administration of antibiotics. In-hospital mortality was low (early = 7%, late = 6%). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical presentation of LAE is influenced by the time from the most recent CIED procedure. Although clinical manifestations of pocket infection are present in the majority of patients with early LAE, late LAE should be considered in any CIED patient who presents with fever, bloodstream infection, or signs of sepsis, even if the device pocket appears uninfected. Prompt recognition and management may improve outcomes.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Endocardite/etiologia , Endocardite/terapia , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Estudos de Coortes , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/microbiologia , Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Endocardite/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Marca-Passo Artificial/microbiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA