Extending duration of letermovir prophylaxis in haploidentical stem cell transplantation.

Not available.

Persistent Impairment in Immune Reconstitution and Worse Survival Outcomes in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients with Early Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection.

Patients undergoing allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are at an increased risk of mortality due to transplantation-related complications in the first year post-transplantation, owing in part to the profound immune dysregulation with T cell and B cell lymphopenia and functional impairment. Although several large studies have reported higher mortality rates from Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in HSCT recipients, to date no study has focused on the impact of early COVID-19 infection on immune reconstitution post-transplantation and the correlation with transplantation outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed 61 consecutive adult patients who underwent their first allogeneic HSCT at our institution. Thirteen patients (21.3%) experienced early COVID-19 infection, with a median time to diagnosis of 100 days post-transplantation. In multivariable analysis, patients with early COVID-19 infection had significantly worse overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 4.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26 to 13.05; P = .019) and progression-free survival (aHR, 6.68; 95% CI, 2.11 to 21.11; P = .001). This was attributed mainly to higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM) among early COVID-19 patients (P = .042). Allogeneic HSCT recipients with early COVID-19 infection had significant delays in absolute lymphocyte count (95% CI, -703.69 to -56.79; P = .021), CD3+CD4+ cell (95% CI, -105.35 to -11.59; P = .042), CD3+CD8+ cell (95% CI, -324.55 to -57.13; P = .038), and CD3-CD56+ cell (95% CI, -193.51 to -47.31; P = .014) recovery compared to those without early COVID-19 infection. Our findings suggest that patients with early COVID-19 infection after allogeneic HSCT have higher NRM and worse survival, at least in part due to impaired immune reconstitution post-transplantation.

Validation of SeptiCyte RAPID to Discriminate Sepsis from Non-Infectious Systemic Inflammation.

(1) Background: SeptiCyte RAPID is a molecular test for discriminating sepsis from non-infectious systemic inflammation, and for estimating sepsis probabilities. The objective of this study was the clinical validation of SeptiCyte RAPID, based on testing retrospectively banked and prospectively collected patient samples. (2) Methods: The cartridge-based SeptiCyte RAPID test accepts a PAXgene blood RNA sample and provides sample-to-answer processing in ~1 h. The test output (SeptiScore, range 0-15) falls into four interpretation bands, with higher scores indicating higher probabilities of sepsis. Retrospective (N = 356) and prospective (N = 63) samples were tested from adult patients in ICU who either had the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), or were suspected of having/diagnosed with sepsis. Patients were clinically evaluated by a panel of three expert physicians blinded to the SeptiCyte test results. Results were interpreted under either the Sepsis-2 or Sepsis-3 framework. (3) Results: Under the Sepsis-2 framework, SeptiCyte RAPID performance for the combined retrospective and prospective cohorts had Areas Under the ROC Curve (AUCs) ranging from 0.82 to 0.85, a negative predictive value of 0.91 (sensitivity 0.94) for SeptiScore Band 1 (score range 0.1-5.0; lowest risk of sepsis), and a positive predictive value of 0.81 (specificity 0.90) for SeptiScore Band 4 (score range 7.4-15; highest risk of sepsis). Performance estimates for the prospective cohort ranged from AUC 0.86-0.95. For physician-adjudicated sepsis cases that were blood culture (+) or blood, urine culture (+)(+), 43/48 (90%) of SeptiCyte scores fell in Bands 3 or 4. In multivariable analysis with up to 14 additional clinical variables, SeptiScore was the most important variable for sepsis diagnosis. A comparable performance was obtained for the majority of patients reanalyzed under the Sepsis-3 definition, although a subgroup of 16 patients was identified that was called septic under Sepsis-2 but not under Sepsis-3. (4) Conclusions: This study validates SeptiCyte RAPID for estimating sepsis probability, under both the Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 frameworks, for hospitalized patients on their first day of ICU admission.