Interferon Alfa-2b Adjuvant Therapy of High-Risk Resected Cutaneous Melanoma: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial EST 1684.

PURPOSE: Interferon alfa-2b (IFN alpha-2b) exhibits antitumor activity in metastatic melanoma and on this basis has been evaluated as an adjuvant therapy following surgery for deep primary (T4) or regionally metastatic (N1) melanoma. METHODS: A randomized controlled study of IFN alpha-2b (Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ) administered at maximum-tolerated doses of 20 MU/m2/d intravenously (i.v.) for 1 month and 10 MU/m2 three times per week subcutaneously (SC) for 48 weeks versus observation, was conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) in 287 patients. RESULTS: A significant prolongation of relapse-free survival (P = .0023, one-sided) and prolongation of overall survival (P = .0237, one-sided) was observed with IFN alpha-2b therapy in this trial, which is now mature with a median follow-up time of 6.9 years. The impact of treatment on relapse rate is most pronounced early during the treatment interval. The overall benefit of treatment in this trial was analyzed stratified by tumor burden and the presence or absence of microscopic nonpalpable and palpable regional lymph node metastasis. The benefit of therapy with IFN alpha-2b was greatest among node-positive strata. Toxicity of IFN alpha-2b required dose modification in the majority of patients, but treatment at > or = 80% of the scheduled dose was feasible in the majority of patients through the IV phase of treatment, and for more than 3 months of SC maintenance therapy. Discontinuation of treatment due to toxicity was infrequent after the fourth month of therapy. CONCLUSION: IFN alpha-2b prolongs the relapse-free interval and overall survival of high-risk resected melanoma patients. The increment in median disease-free survival (from 1 to 1.7 years) and overall survival (from 2.8 to 3.8 years) that results from this therapy is associated with a 42% improvement in the fraction of patients who are continuously disease-free after treatment with IFN (from 26% to 37%) in comparison to observation. IFN alpha-2b is the first agent to show a significant benefit in relapse-free and overall survival of high-risk melanoma patients in a randomized controlled trial.

Pharmacokinetics of the cardioprotector ADR-529 (ICRF-187) in escalating doses combined with fixed-dose doxorubicin.

BACKGROUND: Although doxorubicin is an anticancer agent with a wide spectrum of activity, therapy with this anthracycline must often be discontinued at a time of benefit to the patient because of the drug's cumulative cardiotoxicity. ICRF-187 (ADR-529, dexrazoxane) is a bisdioxopiperazine compound that protects against cardiac toxicity induced by doxorubicin. PURPOSE: Our objectives in this study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose of ADR-529 (which uses a different vehicle than ICRF-187) when given with a fixed doxorubicin dose and to determine whether ADR-529 alters doxorubicin pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Twenty-five patients were treated with doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) preceded by administration of ADR-529 in escalating dosages (i.e., 60, 300, 600, 750, and 900 mg/m2) to groups of three to nine patients. ADR-529 was administered over a 15-minute period beginning 30 minutes before doxorubicin treatment; the protocol was repeated every 3 weeks. Blood was sampled frequently for drug levels, which were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography with fluorescence (doxorubicin) and electrochemical detection (ADR-529). RESULTS: Dose-limiting neutropenia occurred in four of six previously treated patients at an ADR-529 dose of 600 mg/m2; the dose ratio of ADR-529 to doxorubicin was 10:1. For three additional patients with better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and a maximum of one prior chemotherapy regimen, 600 mg/m2 was tolerated, but grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in four of six patients who received an ADR-529 dose of 900 mg/m2 and in three of four patients at a dose of 750 mg/m2. Doxorubicin's estimated terminal half-life was 39.5 +/- 18.3 (mean +/- SD) hours; the area under the curve for plasma concentration of drug x time (AUC) was 1.74 +/- 0.40 (micrograms/microL) x hour. Total-body clearance was 598 +/- 142 microL/m2 per minute (N = 20), and it did not vary with ADR-529 dose. Estimated distribution and elimination phase half-lives for plasma ADR-529 were 0.46 +/- 0.30 hours and 4.16 +/- 2.94 hours, respectively. Total-body clearance was 111 +/- 87 microL/m2 per minute (N = 18); AUC was linear (r2 = .92), and the clearance rate was constant (r2 = .18) from 60 to 900 mg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: Myelotoxicity was dose limiting for ADR-529 at 600-750 mg/m2 when given with a fixed dose of doxorubicin at 60 mg/m2 (dose ratios of ADR-529 to doxorubicin ranged from 10:1 to 12.5:1). When used in combination, ADR-529 did not perturb doxorubicin's distribution, metabolism, or excretion; therefore, other mechanisms of cardioprotection must be involved. IMPLICATIONS: We recommend that an ADR-529 dose of 600 mg/m2 be given with single-agent doxorubicin at a dose of 60 mg/m2 in future studies.

Phase I clinical trial of 9,10-anthracene dicarboxaldehyde (Bisantrene) administered in a five-day schedule.

Bisantrene is a substituted anthracene derivative which preclinically demonstrated a spectrum of activity similar to that of doxorubicin but without associated cardiotoxicity. A Phase I evaluation of the drug has been performed using daily i.v. administrations for 5 days. Sixty courses of treatment were administered to 23 patients at doses from 2.5 to 90 mg/sq m/day. Courses were repeated at 4-week intervals. Dose-limiting toxicities were leukopenia and local cutaneous reactions. The leukopenia was dose related, noncumulative, and of brief duration. Local reactions occurred in 14 of 37 courses administered at doses greater than 60 mg/sq m and in 13 patients resulted in clinical cellulitis of the infused extremity. Gastrointestinal side effects were mild. No alopecia or cardiotoxicity was observed. Two mixed responses were obtained in patients with hypernephromas. Using a daily schedule for 5 days, approximately 40% more drug can be delivered per course than by single-day i.v. administration. However, with this schedule, local cutaneous reactions may prove additionally dose limiting. Phase II studies of Bisantrene in a daily i.v. schedule for 5 days are planned at a dose of 80 mg/sq m/day to be repeated every 4 weeks.

Phase I trial of escalating dose doxorubicin administered concurrently with alpha 2-interferon.

The clinical use of alpha 2-interferon and doxorubicin is based on in vitro and preclinical in vivo observations of synergistic antitumor efficacy. To test this combination a Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of the concurrent use of alpha 2-interferon and doxorubicin was initiated in patients with malignant solid tumors. Each 5-wk treatment cycle consisted of 3 wk of drug administration and 2 wk of rest. The alpha 2-interferon was administered s.c. at a constant dose of 10 million IU/m2 on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays in all patients while the doxorubicin was administered weekly beginning with a dose of 5 mg/m2 and escalated to the maximum tolerated dose of 25 mg/m2. At least three evaluable patients were entered at each dose level, and no dose escalations were allowed within patients. The dose-limiting toxicities were granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia. Hepatic enzyme elevations and systemic symptoms due to interferon occurred at all dose levels. None was severe or dose limiting, and all were reversible. These toxicity data suggest that the hepatotoxic effects of interferon do not enhance doxorubicin toxicity when given by this dose and schedule. Doxorubicin plasma levels were measured at each dose level. The recommended dose of doxorubicin is 25 mg/m2 per wk when administered with 10 million IU/m2 of interferon in this schedule. This schedule allows for the administration of a greater total dose of doxorubicin than has been achieved when given every 3 wk with the same dose and schedule of alpha 2-interferon in a parallel study.

Phase III trial of dacarbazine versus dacarbazine with interferon alpha-2b versus dacarbazine with tamoxifen versus dacarbazine with interferon alpha-2b and tamoxifen in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the response rate, time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival, and toxicity in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with dacarbazine alone, dacarbazine plus interferon (IFN), dacarbazine plus tamoxifen (TMX), or dacarbazine plus IFN plus TMX. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred seventy-one patients (258 were eligible) were randomized in a 2 x 2 factorial design to receive one of the above treatments. The trial was designed to detect a 50% improvement in survival with 83% power. RESULTS: Nine complete (CRs) and 18 partial responses (PRs) were observed in the patients who received treatments that contained IFN compared with four CRs and 18 PRs in the patients who received treatments that did not contain IFN. Five CRs and 20 PRs occurred in patients treated with TMX compared with eight CRs and 16 PRs in those treated without TMX. Response differences were nonsignificant. The overall median TTF was 2.6 months, and the overall median survival was 8.9 months. There was no significant difference in TTF or survival among any of the different treatments. Poor performance status (PS), hepatic metastases, and weight loss were significant adverse prognostic factors. Twenty-three patients had a TTF greater than 20 months, and these durable responses were evenly distributed among the treatment arms. Significantly more severe and life-threatening toxic events occurred with treatments that contained IFN. CONCLUSION: Neither IFN, TMX, nor the combination significantly improved the response rate, TTF, or survival when added to dacarbazine, but IFN significantly increased toxicity.

Combination chemotherapy versus single agents followed by combination chemotherapy in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

During the last decade, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) has studied a series of combination chemotherapy regimens in metastatic (stage IV) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In January 1984, the ECOG activated a randomized study, EST 1583, which concluded the evaluation of combination regimens in phase III trials and initiated the evaluation of single agents exclusively in previously untreated patients. The treatment regimens in EST 1583 consisted of: (1) mitomycin, vinblastine, and cisplatin (MVP); (2) vinblastine and cisplatin (VP); (3) MVP alternating with the regimen cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, methotrexate, and procarbazine (CAMP); (4) carboplatin followed by the MVP regimen at the time of progression; and (5) iproplatin followed by MVP at the time of progression. From January 1984 to July 1985, 743 patients were entered on this trial and 699 fulfilled the eligibility requirements. The following objective response rates (complete plus partial remissions) were observed: first-line MVP, 20%; VP, 13%; MVP/CAMP, 13%; carboplatin, 9%; iproplatin, 6%; and second-line MVP, 6%. First-line MVP produced a significantly higher response rate than the other treatments (P = .03) adjusted for prognostic variables. Using analyses that were adjusted for prognostic covariates, survival for patients treated on a given regimen was compared with survival for all remaining patients. These analyses showed that treatment with carboplatin was associated with longer survival (median survival time, 31.7 weeks; P = .008) while initial treatment with MVP was associated with a trend for shorter survival (median survival time, 22.7 weeks; P = .09). It should be noted that none of these regimens appear to have produced a clinically meaningful prolongation of survival. Similar analyses evaluating time to progression disclosed that carboplatin-treated patients had a significantly longer time to progression (median time to progression, 29 weeks) than all remaining patients (P = .01). Life-threatening and lethal toxicities (toxicity grades 4 and 5) were greater on the combination regimens than on the single agents (P less than .0001). Based on these results, current group-wide ECOG trials in stage IV NSCLC consist of randomized phase II trials evaluating single agents.

High- and low-dose interferon alfa-2b in high-risk melanoma: first analysis of intergroup trial E1690/S9111/C9190.

PURPOSE: Pivotal trial E1684 of adjuvant high-dose interferon alfa-2b (IFNalpha2b) therapy in high-risk melanoma patients demonstrated a significant relapse-free and overall survival (RFS and OS) benefit compared with observation (Obs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, three-arm, intergroup trial evaluated the efficacy of high-dose IFNalpha2b (HDI) for 1 year and low-dose IFNalpha2b (LDI) for 2 years versus Obs in high-risk (stage IIB and III) melanoma with RFS and OS end points. RESULTS: A total of 642 patients were enrolled (608 patients eligible), of whom a majority (75%) had nodal metastasis (50% had nodal recurrence). Unlike E1684, E1690 allowed entry of patients with T4 (> 4 mm) deep primary tumors, regardless of nodal dissection, and 25% of the patients entered onto this trial had deep primary tumors (compared with 11% in E1684). At 52 months' median follow-up, HDI demonstrated an RFS benefit exceeding that of LDI compared with Obs. The 5-year estimated RFS rates for the HDI, LDI, and Obs arms were 44%, 40%, and 35%, respectively. The hazards ratio for the intent-to-treat analysis of HDI versus Obs was 1.28 (P(2) =.05); for LDI versus Obs, it was 1.19 (P(2) =.17). By Cox analysis, the impact of HDI on RFS achieved significance (P(2) =.03). The RFS benefit was equivalent for node-negative and node-positive patients. Neither HDI nor LDI has demonstrated an OS benefit compared with Obs at this time. A major improvement in the median OS of patients in the E1690 Obs arm was noted in comparison with E1684 (6 years v 2.8 years). An analysis of salvage therapy for patients who relapsed on E1690 demonstrated that a significantly larger proportion of patients in the Obs arm received IFNalpha-containing salvage therapy compared with the HDI arm; this therapy was unavailable to patients during E1684, and patients with undissected regional nodes were not included in E1684. This study did not specify therapy at recurrence. Analysis of treatments received at recurrence demonstrated significantly more frequent use of IFNalpha2b at relapse from Obs than from HDI, which may have confounded interpretation of the survival benefit of assigned treatments in E1690. CONCLUSION: The results of the intergroup E1690 trial demonstrate an RFS benefit of IFNalpha2b that is dose-dependent and significant for HDI by Cox multivariable analysis.

Randomized comparison of doxorubicin alone versus ifosfamide plus doxorubicin or mitomycin, doxorubicin, and cisplatin against advanced soft tissue sarcomas.

PURPOSE: This three-armed phase III study in adults with advanced soft tissue sarcomas was planned as a comparison of objective regression rates, toxicity, and survival of patients receiving doxorubicin alone, ifosfamide plus doxorubicin, and mitomycin plus doxorubicin plus cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between December 1987 and July 1990, 279 patients with histologically confirmed sarcomas were enrolled to receive treatment A (doxorubicin 80 mg/m2), treatment B (ifosfamide 7.5 g/m2 plus doxorubicin 60 mg/m2), or treatment C (mitomycin 8 mg/m2 plus doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m2). RESULTS: Of 262 assessable patients, 74 (29%) achieved objective tumor regression. Objective regression occurred in 20% of the 90 patients who received doxorubicin alone (complete remission [CR] rate, 2%), in 34% of the 88 who received ifosfamide plus doxorubicin (CR rate, 3%), and in 32% of the 84 who received mitomycin plus doxorubicin plus cisplatin (CR rate, 7%). With grade 3 or greater myelosuppression in 53% of group A, 80% of group B, and 55% of group C, regimen B was significantly more myelosuppressive than either regimen A or C (P = .01) with two, three, and one treatment-related deaths, respectively. Synovial sarcomas were responsive to ifosfamide plus doxorubicin, especially among patients younger than 40 years of age. CONCLUSION: Ifosfamide plus doxorubicin produced a significantly higher regression rate (P = .03) than did doxorubicin alone; however, this was achieved at a level of myelosuppression significantly more intense than that produced by the single agent or by the three-drug combination. Mitomycin, doxorubicin, and cisplatin also appeared to be more active than the single agent; however, at a myelosuppression level similar to that of doxorubicin alone, this trend (P = .07) did not attain the usual level for significance. No significant survival differences were observed.

Interferon alfa-2b adjuvant therapy of high-risk resected cutaneous melanoma: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial EST 1684.

PURPOSE: Interferon alfa-2b (IFN alpha-2b) exhibits antitumor activity in metastatic melanoma and on this basis has been evaluated as an adjuvant therapy following surgery for deep primary (T4) or regionally metastatic (N1) melanoma. METHODS: A randomized controlled study of IFN alpha-2b (Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ) administered at maximum-tolerated doses of 20 MU/m2/d intravenously (i.v.) for 1 month and 10 MU/m2 three times per week subcutaneously (SC) for 48 weeks versus observation, was conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) in 287 patients. RESULTS: A significant prolongation of relapse-free survival (P = .0023, one-sided) and prolongation of overall survival (P = .0237, one-sided) was observed with IFN alpha-2b therapy in this trial, which is now mature with a median follow-up time of 6.9 years. The impact of treatment on relapse rate is most pronounced early during the treatment interval. The overall benefit of treatment in this trial was analyzed stratified by tumor burden and the presence or absence of microscopic nonpalpable and palpable regional lymph node metastasis. The benefit of therapy with IFN alpha-2b was greatest among node-positive strata. Toxicity of IFN alpha-2b required dose modification in the majority of patients, but treatment at > or = 80% of the scheduled dose was feasible in the majority of patients through the IV phase of treatment, and for more than 3 months of SC maintenance therapy. Discontinuation of treatment due to toxicity was infrequent after the fourth month of therapy. CONCLUSION: IFN alpha-2b prolongs the relapse-free interval and overall survival of high-risk resected melanoma patients. The increment in median disease-free survival (from 1 to 1.7 years) and overall survival (from 2.8 to 3.8 years) that results from this therapy is associated with a 42% improvement in the fraction of patients who are continuously disease-free after treatment with IFN (from 26% to 37%) in comparison to observation. IFN alpha-2b is the first agent to show a significant benefit in relapse-free and overall survival of high-risk melanoma patients in a randomized controlled trial.

Effect of prolonged topotecan infusion on topoisomerase 1 levels: a phase I and pharmacodynamic study.

Topoisomerase 1 (topo-1) inhibitors act on the target enzyme by forming "cleavable complex," a high molecular weight DNA protein adduct. The formation of such cleavable complexes results in depletion of the Mr 100,000 "free" topo-1 band detectable by Western blot. The objectives of this study were to determine the maximally tolerated dose of prolonged topotecan infusion in previously untreated and minimally pretreated patients. A secondary objective was to measure the effect of prolonged topotecan infusion on topo-1 levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) as a pharmacodynamic end point. In a prior Phase I study of 21-day topotecan infusion (H. Hochster et al., J. Clin. Oncol., 12: 553-559, 1994), the maximum tolerated dose for patients treated previously was 0.53 mg/m2/day for 21 days every 28 days. In this study, patients with no prior therapy were treated similarly at 0.7 mg/m2/day for 21 days, and doses were escalated in 0.1 mg/m2/day increments. Patients who had one prior chemotherapy regimen or radiation therapy to a portal of

Prospective evaluation of cardiotoxicity during a six-hour doxorubicin infusion regimen in women with adenocarcinoma of the breast.

In order to test the possible cardiac-sparing effect of doxorubicin administered by six-hour intravenous infusion and to prospectively evaluate the role of resting left ventricular ejection fraction in monitoring these patients, 33 women with advanced breast cancer were treated with combination chemotherapy containing 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin. Doxorubicin was administered via a femoral catheter as a six-hour infusion. Cardiac function was monitored prior to therapy and at intervals during therapy by history and physical examination and by measurement of resting left ventricular ejection fraction with gated pool radionuclide angiography. Twenty-six responses were observed (complete response, seven [21 percent]; partial response, 19 [57 percent]). Systemic toxicity included alopecia, myelosuppression, and nausea and vomiting. There was a progressive fall in resting left ventricular ejection fraction during treatment from a median baseline value of 0.63. Mean fall from baseline left ventricular ejection fraction at a cumulative doxorubicin dose of 200 to 300 mg/m2 was 0.06 (p less than 0.005); at 301 to 449 mg/m2 it was 0.09 (p less than 0.0005); and at 450 mg/m2 or greater it was 0.15 (p less than 0.0005). Clinical congestive heart failure developed in three patients. Even though the decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction was often within the "normal range" (left ventricular ejection fraction 0.50 or greater), these changes were progressive and appeared to be part of a continuum of doxorubicin-induced myocardial damage. Steady-state infusion levels of doxorubicin in plasma ranged from 90 to 120 nM. They confirm the hypothesis that lower concentrations can be achieved by continuous infusion rather than by bolus infusion. In this study, however, administration of doxorubicin by six-hour infusion did not appear to have a major cardiac-sparing effect. Studies of anthracycline cardiac toxicity should include determination of baseline left ventricular ejection fraction and serial observations during therapy. Failure to include deteriorations in function above an arbitrary cutoff point or to make observations only at higher cumulative doses may underestimate drug-induced myocardial damage.

High dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue. Rationale and spectrum of antitumor activity.

Methotrexate (MTX) in high doses (3 to 7.5 g/m2) with leucovorin rescue (HDMTX-LCV) can be delivered on a weekly basis in a setting of proper pharmacologic monitoring. Myelosuppression occurs in 28 per cent of the patients and in 8 per cent of the courses and usually results from delayed MTX excretion secondary to mild reversible nephrotoxicity. The incidence of tumor regression was 50 per cent in head and neck cancer; 59 per cent in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; 40 per cent in small cell lung cancer; 24 to 50 per cent in breast cancer and 50 per cent in osteogenic carcinoma, for an over-all response rate of 39 per cent (70 of 178) in patients with disseminated cancer. HDMTX-LCV is not recommended for the conventional treatment of metastatic cancer because of the potential for toxicity and the fact that the response rates cited are probably not superior to those which can be achieved by conventional doses of MTX. However, the relative lack of myelosuppression and mucositis, when compared to conventional unrescued MTS, and the achievement of therapeutic concentrations of MTX in the central nervous system with the HDMTX-LCV program have led to its incorporation into clinical trials of combination chemotherapy.

Role of chemotherapy in the treatment of lung cancer: evolving strategies for non-small cell histologies.

Lung cancer treatment has been considered to have made little progress except for advances in small cell carcinoma. For other histologies an attitude of nihilism has prevailed principally because of lack of effective systemic therapy and of no persuasive evidence that results could be improved by combined modality treatment. On the other hand, favorable results from surgery are confined to a small percent of all patients with this disease. This review emphasizes possibilities for progress in evolving new therapeutic strategies. Although improvement over other systemic therapies is modest, cisplatin-containing regimens yield more consistent response rates and apparent survival advantage relative to single agents. Immediate progression occurs in the minority of patients. In addition, regimens combining cisplatin with vinca alkaloids have no substantial deleterious effects on the lung, marrow or esophagus to aggravate radiation-induced complications. These features encourage the evolution of strategies which begin with chemotherapy and then use consolidation with radiation therapy. Clinical trials using these and newer strategies must be instituted if progress is to occur in the treatment of non-small cell histologies at all stages.

A randomized Phase II study of interleukin-2 with and without beta-interferon for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study (PZ586).

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and beta-interferon (beta-IFN) are biologic agents with antitumor activity observed in preclinical models. Some studies of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with IL-2 report relatively long survival, despite low response rates. Seventy-six evaluable patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer were treated in a randomized Phase II study with either IL-2 alone or IL-2 plus beta-IFN. Patients received either IL-2 at 6 x 10(6) Cetus units/m2 3 days weekly or the combination of IL-2 at 5 x 10(6) Cetus units/m2 plus beta-IFN at 6 x 10(6) units/m2, both given 3 days weekly. Both biologic agents were administered by intravenous bolus injection on an outpatient basis. Objective responses were observed in 3/76 (4%)) patients. Grade 4 toxicity occurred in 3/39 patients treated with IL-2 alone, and in 4/37 patients treated with IL-2 plus beta-IFN. An additional lethal respiratory toxicity occurred in a patient who received IL-2 plus beta-IFN. The median survival of all patients treated on this study was 33 weeks. Despite producing only a 4% objective response rate. IL-2 appears to have a favorable impact on survival comparable to chemotherapy. The role for this immune therapy in the management of non-small cell lung cancer requires further study.

Phase I study of doxorubicin, ICRF-187 and granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor.

A group of 16 patients with advanced malignancy were entered on a phase I trial of escalating doses of doxorubicin with ICRF-187 for cardioprotection and granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GMCSF) for bone marrow protection. Patients received intravenous ICRF-187 (dose ratio 20:1 ICRF-187:doxorubicin) 30 min prior to doxorubicin. GMCSF at a dose of 15 micrograms kg-1 day-1 was self-administered subcutaneously on days 3-14 of the cycle. Doxorubicin was administered every 21 days. Substantial hematological and non-hematological toxicity was seen. Fever, malaise, and pulmonary symptoms, thought to be due to GMCSF, were not eliminated by reduction in the GMCSF dose to 10 or 5 micrograms kg-1 day-1. Severe hematological toxicity was seen despite GMCSF administration and it was not possible to escalate the doxorubicin dose above 72 mg/m2 with this combination. Dose escalation of doxorubicin may be more feasible with the use of other growth factors or growth factor combinations.

Management of cancer pain with oral controlled-release morphine sulfate.

Morphine sulfate Contin (MSC) is an investigational matrix delivery system for oral morphine sulfate that allows for prolonged blood levels of morphine. Twenty-six patients with inadequately controlled cancer-related pain were examined in an open but controlled study using MSC. Initially, all patients were converted from the prestudy analgesic regimen to an equianalgesic amount of immediate-release morphine sulfate (IRMS) on a q4h dose schedule that was in turn titrated to the level of adequate pain relief. Patients then were switched to MSC q8h and eventually to q12h, starting at doses representing the same total daily amount of morphine that was in the final IRMS dose. Of the 18 patients who completed the study, all achieved satisfactory levels of analgesia on MSC, seven at q8h and 11 at q12h dosing intervals. All patients reported better analgesia while taking MSC compared with their previous regimen. Side effects associated with MSC included sedation and constipation but not nausea or respiratory difficulty. Significant drug tolerance did not develop during a mean follow-up period of four weeks (range, 1-18 weeks). MSC is an effective oral opioid analgesic that allows an increased dose interval without increased side effects or decreased potency. It can improve the quality of life of cancer patients by allowing them to be maintained without frequent dosing or parenteral medication.

Efficacy of ifosfamide in combination with doxorubicin for the treatment of metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

On the basis of ifosfamide's demonstrated single-agent activity in adult soft-tissue sarcoma, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) tested whether ifosfamide would add to the efficacy of doxorubicin in a three-regimen, controlled phase III trial. Doxorubicin, ECOG's standard to which newer chemotherapeutic treatments are compared, was given at a dose of 80 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and was designated the control regimen. Ifosfamide was given at a dose of 3,750 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 every 3 weeks in combination with 30 mg/m2 doxorubicin given each day for 2 days; additionally, mesna was given to counter the genitourinary toxicity associated with ifosfamide. A second experimental regimen consisted of doxorubicin (40 mg/m2), mitomycin (8 mg/m2), and cisplatin (60 mg/m2), all given intravenously on day 1, with repeated cycles being scheduled for day 21. Of the 279 adults with soft-tissue sarcoma who were entered in the study, 260 were analyzed. The overall response rate was 20% for doxorubicin, 34% for ifosfamide/doxorubicin, and 31% for doxorubicin/mitomycin/cisplatin, with the difference between the first two regimens being significant (P = 0.04). The median survival was 8.8, 11.5, and 9 months, respectively, for the three regimens. Myelosuppression, the predominant toxicity, occurred in 60%, 88%, and 58% of patients, respectively.

Phase II study of carboplatin in recurrent ovarian cancer: severe hematologic toxicity in previously treated patients.

Carboplatin (CBDCA) is a second-generation cisplatin analog that has shown activity in early clinical trials. Its spectrum of toxicity is quantitatively and qualitatively different from that of the parent compound. Between November 1984 and September 1986 we conducted a phase II trial of CBDCA in 46 women with epithelial ovarian cancer. All patients had undergone at least one prior chemotherapy regimen; 41 (89%) had previously received cisplatin (mean cumulative dose, 540 mg/m2). The CBDCA dose was based on renal function and was injected i.v. once every 4 weeks. Patients were stratified on the basis of baseline creatinine clearance: those with a baseline creatinine clearance of greater than or equal to 60 ml/min received 400 mg/m2 CBDCA; those with a creatinine clearance between 30 and 60 ml/min received an initial dose calculated according to a previously published formula that corrected for renal insufficiency and projected nadir platelet counts of 75,000/mm3. Of 41 evaluable patients, 6 (15%) had an objective response [2 complete responses (CRs); 4 partial responses (PRs)]; 5 of the 6 responders had previously responded to cisplatin treatment. No responses were observed in 12 patients who had not responded to prior cisplatin therapy. Significant hematologic toxicity was seen. Of 18 patients with a creatinine clearance of greater than or equal to 60 ml/min (dose, 400 mg/m2), 6 had nadir platelet counts of less than 25,000/mm3, 4 with symptomatic bleeding. Of the 21 evaluable patients for whom the dose-modification formula was applied, 10 had nadir platelet counts of less than 75,000/mm3; 5 had counts of less than 50,000/mm3. CBDCA has activity even in patients who have previously undergone extensive cisplatin therapy; however, its toxicity is variable and thrombocytopenia is dose-limiting. We did not confirm the ability of the above-mentioned formula to calculate the CBDCA dose and accurately predict the nadir platelet count for all patients. Other factors, such as prior radiotherapy, may also be important in the dosing of CBDCA in pretreated patients.

A phase III randomized trial of epirubicin versus 5-fluorouracil in metastatic rectal/sigmoid adenocarcinoma.

Seventy-seven patients with previously untreated, measurable, histologically confirmed, metastatic adenocarcinoma of the rectum or sigmoid were randomized to receive either epirubicin 90 mg/m2 (75 mg/m2 if prior radiotherapy) i.v. once every 3 weeks or 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 (450 mg/m2 if prior radiotherapy) i.v. once daily for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks. None of 38 (0%) evaluable patients who received epirubicin demonstrated a response, whereas seven of 39 (18%) patients who received 5-fluorouracil had an objective response. Epirubicin is ineffective against metastatic rectal cancer at the dose and schedule used.

Phase II trial of cyclophosphamide and cis-platinum for non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma.

We hypothesized that cyclophosphamide and cis-platinum, without adriamycin, which had been used in previous studies, may be equally efficacious, but less toxic. We treated 27 patients with non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma with the combination of cyclophosphamide and cis-platinum. We report six responses (25% response rate), with median survival of 79 weeks as compared to 28 weeks in nonresponders (p less than 0.01). Our regimen had acceptable hematologic toxicity and tolerable gastrointestinal toxicity. However, cumulative nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity were observed. We conclude that cyclophosphamide and cis-platinum may compare favorably to the cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and cis-platinum combination, with respect to response and toxicity.