What to do when nothing else is left to be done - metastatic non-HPV vulvar squamous cell carcinoma with multiple lines of chemotherapy.

Recurrent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma with multiple site metastases is a rare entity - (up to 14.2% of the total number of recurrences), with a poor prognosis (only 15% of the patients alive at 5 years). Due to its "hard to find" character, there are no standardized guidelines available and the treatment is extrapolated from advanced cervical carcinoma, anal carcinoma and other squamous cell carcinomas. Immunotherapy has shown some positive results in vulvar carcinoma with PD-L1 positive, high TMB, high MSI or with MMR deficiency. An alternative for selected cases without therapeutic resources could be the HPV vaccine. We present the case of a 64-year-old woman diagnosed in 2014 with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma stage II for which she underwent radical vulvectomy with bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy followed by external radiotherapy. In 2019 she developed local recurrence associated with lung, pleural, lymph nodes and subcutaneous metastasis, treated with three lines of chemotherapy: paclitaxel/carboplatin followed by cisplatin/5-fluorouracil and carboplatin/gemcitabine. The patient's general health status altered progressively, and she died after the 4th cycle of carboplatin/gemcitabine. This case's management could be a starting point for the vulvar carcinoma cases where the standard therapeutical options do not represent a choice anymore, providing the necessary example on how to approach it.

Treatment beyond progression in metastatic colorectal cancer: to double or not to double the dose of bevacizumab?

PURPOSE: Bevacizumab or cetuximab represent the standard treatment in association with classical chemotherapy in confirmed metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Bevacizumab could be continued after the first disease progression with an overall survival (OS) advantage, compared to chemotherapy alone, but the optimal dose remains a debatable issue. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab, we selected patients with administration beyond progression, and stratified them according to the dose received- same dose bevacizumab (SDB) as first-line chemotherapy or double dose bevacizumab (DDB). For each group we evaluated OS, time to treatment failure (TTF) and progression-free survival in the first-line (PFS1) and in the second-line (PFS2). RESULTS: In the first-line therapy, oxaliplatin backbone regimen was used in 73% SDB, compared with 22.5% DDB patients, while irinotecan was used in 75% DDB and 27% SDB patients. Second-line oxaliplatin was given to 50% DDB and 29.7% SDB patients, while irinotecan was administered to 47.5% DDB and 70.3% SDB patients. The median values were: OS - 41 months in the DDB group and 25 months in the SDB group (p = 0.01); TTF - 24 months in the DDB group and 19 months in the SDB group (p=0.009); PFS1 - 17 months in the DDB group and 12 months in the SDB group (p=0.008); PFS2 - 9 months in the DDB group and 5 months in the SDB group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Doubling the dose of bevacizumab at progression seems to provide OS and PFS advantage for mCRC patients.

Combined effect of propranolol, vincristine and bevacizumab on HUVECs and BJ cells.

Infantile hemangioma is one of the most common benign tumors affecting children, with ~10-15% requiring medical treatment. These tumors consist of endothelial cells and stromal components, including fibroblasts, pericytes and mast cells. Effects of propranolol treatment in combination with bevacizumab or vincristine on cell growth were compared in the current study using human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and BJ human normal fibroblasts (BJs) to determine potential synergic effects in vitro. Inhibition of cell growth was investigated using MTT assays and cytotoxicity of the drugs in various combinations was expressed as half inhibitory concentration (IC50). Apoptosis was investigated using flow cytometry, with Alexa Fluor 488 and propidium iodide. Propranolol inhibited BJ and HUVEC growth in a dose-dependent manner, with increased response observed in BJs (IC50, 148,32 µg/ml; standard error logIC50, 0.07). Treatment with vincristine induced the strongest growth inhibition in HUVECs (IC50, 17,89 µg/ml; standard error log IC50, 0.07) and BJs (IC50, 24,81 µg/ml; standard error log IC50, 0.08) compared with propranolol (HUVEC IC50, 81,94 µg/ml; standard error log IC50, 0.06; BJ-IC50, 148,32 µg/ml; standard error logIC50, 0.07) or bevacizumab (HUVEC IC50 96,91 µg/ml; standard error log IC50, 0.06; BJ IC50, 182,70 µg/ml; standard error log IC50, 0.09) alone. Bevacizumab was the weakest cytotoxic agent. Combination treatment of vincristine with bevacizumab induced the highest levels of apoptosis in HUVECs compared with all other treatments and triple-drug therapy induced the levels of apoptosis in BJs. Single treatment with vincristine, propranolol or bevacizumab induced apoptosis in BJs and HUVECs. In BJs, triple treatment exhibited the greatest influence on apoptosis, compared with single and dual treatments and in HUVECs, vincristine and bevacizumab combination treatment induced apoptosis to the highest level. The present study offers novel perspectives in drug repurposing studies for the three drugs, particularly in diseases where the pathogenesis is based on healthy endothelial cell proliferation, including hemangiomas.