Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 45(2): 115-120, 2017 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27499191

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Major complications of central venous catheter (CVC) use include bloodstream infection and occlusion. We performed a prospective, observational study to determine the rate of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and CVC occlusion using a negative displacement connector with an alcohol disinfecting cap. METHODS: Patients were followed from the time of CVC insertion through 2 days after removal, at the time of hospital discharge if there was no documentation of removal, or 90 days after the insertion of the CVC if it was not removed. CLABSI was defined using National Healthcare Safety Network criteria. Data for evidence of lumen occlusions were extracted from the electronic health record. Direct observations were performed to assess adherence to hospital policy regarding CVC insertion practice. RESULTS: A total of 2,512 catheters from 2,264 patients were enrolled for this study. There were 21 CLABSIs (0.84%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48%-1.19%; 0.62 per 1,000 line days) and 378 occlusions (15.05%; 95% CI, 13.65%-16.45%; 11.23 per 1,000 line days). Eighty-five direct observations demonstrated insertion protocol adherence in 881 of 925 (95.24%; 95% CI, 93.87%-96.61%) measured criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Lines placed following a standardized protocol using a negative displacement connector with an alcohol cap have low rates of infection compared with historically published findings. We also established that the occlusion rate is >15-fold the CLABSI rate.


Assuntos
Álcoois/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Sepse/epidemiologia , Trombose Venosa/epidemiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 44(12): 1622-1627, 2016 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27492790

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance is a challenge in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). The objective of this study was to demonstrate that a novel, minimally invasive program not interfering with activities of daily living or socialization could lower methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) disease. METHODS: This was a prospective, cluster-randomized, nonblinded trial initiated at 3 LTCFs. During year 1, units were stratified by type of care and randomized to intervention or control. In year 2, all units were converted to intervention consisting of universal decolonization using intranasal mupirocin and a chlorhexidine bath performed twice (2 decolonization-bathing cycles 1 month apart) at the start of the intervention period. Subsequently, after initial decolonization, all admissions were screened on site using real-time polymerase chain reaction, and those MRSA positive were decolonized, but not isolated. Units received annual instruction on hand hygiene. Enhanced bleach wipe cleaning of flat surfaces was done every 4 months. RESULTS: There were 16,773 tests performed. The MRSA infection rate decreased 65% between baseline (44 infections during 365,809 patient days) and year 2 (12 infections during 287,847 patient days; P <.001); a significant reduction was observed at each of the LTCFs (P <.03). CONCLUSIONS: On-site MRSA surveillance with targeted decolonization resulted in a significant decrease in clinical MRSA infection among LTCF residents.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Assistência de Longa Duração , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Humanos , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Socialização , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia
3.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 80(1): 32-4, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24952987

RESUMO

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the Cepheid Xpert® SA Nasal Complete detection (N = 971) of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus was 86.5%, 98.5%, 94.6%, and 96.1%; detection of methicillin-resistant S. aureus was 89.3%, 97.9%, 79.8%, and 99.0%, respectively. Our results show that testing on long-term care facility patients had lower sensitivity and specificity compared to acute care patient results.


Assuntos
Portador Sadio/diagnóstico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Humanos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/genética
4.
Am J Infect Control ; 42(10 Suppl): S269-73, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25239721

RESUMO

We tested infection prevention strategies to limit exposure of long-term care facility residents to drug-resistant pathogens in a prospective, cluster randomized 2-year trial involving 3 long-term care facilities (LTCFs) using methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as a model. We hypothesized that nasal MRSA surveillance using rapid quantitative polymerase chain reaction and decolonization of carriers would successfully lower overall MRSA colonization. In year 1, randomly assigned intervention units received decolonization with nasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine bathing and enhanced environmental cleaning with bleach every 4 months. Newly admitted MRSA nares-positive residents were decolonized on admission. Control units were screened but not decolonized. All units received periodic bleach environmental cleaning and instruction on hand hygiene. In year 2, all units followed intervention protocol caused by failure of the cluster randomized approach to sufficiently segregate patients. MRSA colonization was monitored using point prevalence testing every 4-6 months. Colonization status at admission and discharge was performed 1 quarter per year to determine acquisition. Fisher exact test was used for statistical analysis. Baseline MRSA colonization rate was 16.64%. In year 1, the colonization rate of intervention units was 11.61% (P = .028) and 17.85% in control units (P = .613) compared with baseline. Intervention unit rate difference compared with the controls was significant (P = .001). In year 2, the colonization rate was 10.55% (P < .001) compared with baseline. The transmission rates were 1.66% and 3.52% in years 1 and 2, respectively (P = .034). The planned interventions of screening and decolonization were successful at lowering MRSA colonization.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Desinfetantes/farmacologia , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/patogenicidade , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Clorexidina/farmacologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Assistência de Longa Duração , Mupirocina/farmacologia , Nariz/microbiologia , Casas de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Hipoclorito de Sódio/farmacologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/transmissão
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA