RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Balloons are used in EUS to improve visualization. However, data on the safety of latex balloons in patients with latex allergies are limited, and nonlatex alternatives can be costly. We investigated the safety of latex balloon use during EUS. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted at a tertiary center between 2019 and 2022. Patients with reported latex allergies who underwent linear EUS were included. Baseline demographics, EUS characteristics, and adverse events were collected. The primary outcome was the rate of adverse events. RESULTS: Eighty-seven procedures were performed on 57 unique patients (mean age, 65.3 ± 14.5 years). Latex balloons were used in 59 procedures (67.8%), with only 8 procedures (13.6%) using prophylactic medications. No adverse events occurred during or after procedures, regardless of medication use or history of anaphylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: The use of EUS latex balloons in patients with a latex allergy was associated with no adverse events.
Assuntos
Endossonografia , Hipersensibilidade ao Látex , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Látex/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Coaxial double-pigtail plastic stent (DPPS) placement is often performed within lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) to prevent adverse events (AEs) such as stent occlusion and bleeding. This study compares the safety and outcomes of LAMSs alone versus LAMSs with coaxial DPPSs for PFC management. METHODS: Patients undergoing drainage of a PFC with LAMSs were retrospectively identified and categorized as LAMS or LAMS/DPPS based on initial drainage strategy. The AE rate, AE type, and clinical success were extracted by chart review. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-five individuals (83 LAMS, 102 LAMS/DPPS) were identified. No significant differences were found in rates of clinical success (75.9% LAMS vs 69.6% LAMS/DDPS, P = .34) or overall AEs (15.7% LAMS vs 15.7% LAMS/DPPS, P = .825). CONCLUSIONS: In this comparative single-center study, placement of a coaxial DPPS for drainage of PFCs with LAMSs did not affect rates of AEs or clinical success.
Assuntos
Pancreatopatias , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pancreatopatias/cirurgia , Pancreatopatias/etiologia , Stents/efeitos adversos , Drenagem/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with infected or symptomatic walled-off necrosis (WON) have high morbidity and health care utilization. Despite the recent adoption of nonsurgical treatment approaches, WON management remains nonalgorithmic. We investigated the impact of a protocolized early necrosectomy approach compared with a nonprotocolized, clinician-driven approach on important clinical outcomes. METHODS: Records were reviewed for consecutive patients with WON who underwent a protocolized endoscopic drainage with a lumen-apposing metal stent (cases), and for patients with WON treated with a lumen-apposing metal stent at the same tertiary referral center who were not managed according to the protocol (control subjects). The protocol required repeat cross-sectional imaging within 14 days after lumen-apposing metal stent placement, with regularly scheduled endoscopic necrosectomy if WON diameter reduction was <50%. Control patients were treated according to their clinician's preference without an a priori strategy. Inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted analysis was used to evaluate the influence of being in the protocolized group on time to resolution. RESULTS: A total of 24 cases and 47 control subjects were included. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Although numbers of endoscopies and necrosectomies were similar, cases had lower adverse event rates, shorter intensive care unit stay, and required nutritional support for fewer days. On matched multivariate Cox regression, cases had earlier WON resolution (hazard ratio, 5.73; 95% confidence interval, 2.62-12.5). This was confirmed in the inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted analysis (hazard ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.92-6.01). CONCLUSIONS: A protocolized strategy resulted in faster WON resolution compared with a discretionary approach without the need for additional therapeutic interventions, and with a better safety profile and decreased health care utilization.
Assuntos
Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda , Stents , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents/efeitos adversos , Endoscopia/métodos , Drenagem/métodos , Necrose/etiologia , Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , EndossonografiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The optimal therapeutic approach for walled-off necrosis (WON) is not fully understood, given the lack of a validated classification system. We propose a novel and robust classification system based on radiologic and clinical factors to standardize the nomenclature, provide a framework to guide comparative effectiveness trials, and inform the optimal WON interventional approach. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent endoscopic management of WON by lumen-apposing metal stent placement at a tertiary referral center. Patients were classified according to the proposed QNI classification system: quadrant ("Q"), represented an abdominal quadrant distribution; necrosis ("N"), denoted by the percentage of necrosis of WON; and infection ("I"), denoted as positive blood culture and/or systemic inflammatory response syndrome reaction with a positive WON culture. Two blinded reviewers classified all patients according to the QNI system. Patients were then divided into 2 groups: those with a lower QNI stratification (≤2 quadrants and ≤30% necrosis; group 1) and those with a higher stratification (≥3 quadrants, 2 quadrants with ≥30% necrosis, or 1 quadrant with >60% necrosis and infection; group 2). The primary outcome was mean time to WON resolution. Secondary procedural and clinical outcomes between the groups were compared. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients (75% men) were included and stratified by the QNI classification; group 1 comprised 17 patients and group 2, 54 patients. Patients in group 2 had a higher number of necrosectomies, longer hospital stays, and more readmissions. The mean time to resolution was longer in group 2 than in group 1 (79.6 ± 7.76 days vs 48.4 ± 9.22 days, P = .02). The mortality rate was higher in group 2 (15% vs 0%, P = .18). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the heterogeneous nature of WON in severe acute pancreatitis, a proposed QNI system may provide a standardized framework for WON classification to inform clinical trials, risk-stratify the disease course, and potentially inform an optimal management approach.
Assuntos
Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doença Aguda , Resultado do Tratamento , Drenagem/efeitos adversos , Stents/efeitos adversos , Necrose/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Post-operative pancreatic fluid collections (POPFCs) can be drained using percutaneous or endoscopic approaches. The primary aim of this study was to compare rates of clinical success between endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage (EUSD) with percutaneous drainage (PTD) in the management of symptomatic POPFCs after distal pancreatectomy. Secondary outcomes included technical success, total number of interventions, time to resolution, rates of adverse events (AEs), and POPFC recurrence. METHODS: Adults who underwent distal pancreatectomy from January 2012 to August 2021 and developed symptomatic POPFC in the resection bed were retrospectively identified from a single academic center database. Demographic data, procedural data, and clinical outcomes were abstracted. Clinical success was defined as symptomatic improvement and radiographic resolution without requiring an alternate drainage modality. Quantitative variables were compared using a two-tailed t-test and categorical data were compared using Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Of 1046 patients that underwent distal pancreatectomy, 217 met study inclusion criteria (median age 60 years, 51.2% female), of whom 106 underwent EUSD and 111 PTD. There were no significant differences in baseline pathology and POPFC size. PTD was generally performed earlier after surgery (10 vs. 27 days; p < 0.001) and more commonly in the inpatient setting (82.9% vs. 49.1%; p < 0.001). EUSD was associated with a significantly higher rate of clinical success (92.5% vs. 76.6%; p = 0.001), fewer median number of interventions (2 vs. 4; p < 0.001), and lower rate of POPFC recurrence (7.6% vs. 20.7%; p = 0.007). AEs were similar between EUSD (10.4%) and PTD (6.3%, p = 0.28), with approximately one-third of EUSD AEs due to stent migration. CONCLUSION: In patients with POPFCs after distal pancreatectomy, delayed drainage with EUSD was associated with higher rates of clinical success, fewer interventions, and lower rates of recurrence than earlier drainage with PTD.
Assuntos
Pancreatectomia , Pancreatopatias , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Drenagem , Endossonografia , Pancreatopatias/cirurgia , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Management of symptomatic chronic pancreatitis (CP) has shifted its approach from surgical procedures to minimally invasive endoscopic procedures. Increased experience and advanced technology have led to the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as a therapeutic tool to provide pain relief and treat CP complications including pancreatic stones, strictures, and distal biliary strictures, pseudocysts, and pancreatic duct fistulas. In this article the authors will discuss the use of ERCP for the management of CP, its complications, recent advancements, and techniques from the most up to date literature available.
Assuntos
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Pancreatite Crônica , Humanos , Pancreatite Crônica/terapia , Pancreatite Crônica/complicações , Pancreatite Crônica/cirurgia , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Stents , Constrição Patológica/cirurgia , Constrição Patológica/terapia , Constrição Patológica/etiologia , Pseudocisto Pancreático/cirurgia , Pseudocisto Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagem , Pseudocisto Pancreático/terapia , Esfinterotomia Endoscópica/métodosRESUMO
Of the chronic bacterial infections that affect humans, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is one of the most common. It inhabits the stomachs of half of the adult human population. In Puerto Rico, a US territory, it has an overall prevalence of 33%, similar to the prevalence reported in the population of the US as a whole. Helicobacter pylori infection is responsible for mucosal inflammation that may lead to chronic gastritis, most peptic ulcers, gastric adenocarcinoma, and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. The International Agency for Research on Cancer identified H. pylori as a definite carcinogen in 1994, the only bacterium to be given such a classification. Its oncogenic effect has been postulated to be caused by different mechanisms, including bacterial characteristics and host factors. Epidemiologic studies have shown that gastric cancer risk differs among regions. One of the top 10 causes of cancer death in Puerto Rico is gastric cancer. Although the eradication of H. pylori has well-known benefits, there are some concerns when considering mass screening and treatment of infected patients. These include the fact that such eradication could provoke an increase in antibiotic resistance rates, the disturbance of the gut microbiota, an increase in body weight, and the aggravation of existing gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Gastric cancer is a major health concern, and we should understand the role of H. pylori eradication in its prevention. This article is geared to summarize current knowledge and controversies.
Assuntos
Gastrite Atrófica , Infecções por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Neoplasias Gástricas , Adulto , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/etiologia , Infecções por Helicobacter/complicações , Infecções por Helicobacter/epidemiologia , Gastrite Atrófica/complicações , Gastrite Atrófica/microbiologia , Gastrite Atrófica/patologia , Porto RicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is technically challenging in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) due to altered anatomy. OBJECTIVE: To compare the procedural and clinical outcomes of 4 different ERCP techniques in RYGB patients. SETTING: Academic tertiary referral center in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study including patients with RYGB anatomy who underwent an ERCP between January 2015 and September 2020. We compared procedural success and adverse events (AEs) rates of balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE), gastrostomy-assisted ERCP (GAE), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE), and rendezvous guidewire-assisted ERCP (RGA). RESULTS: Seventy-eight RYGB patients underwent a total of 132 ERCPs. The mean age was 60 ± 11.8 years, with female predominance (85.7%). The ERCP procedures performed were BAE (n = 64; 48.5%), GAE (n = 18; 13.7%), EDGE (n = 25; 18.9%), and RGA (n = 25; 18.9%), with overall procedure success rates of 64.1%, 100%, 89.5%, and 91.7%, respectively. All approaches were superior to BAE (GAE versus BAE, P = .003; EDGE versus BAE, P = .034; RGA versus BAE, P = .011). The overall AE rates were 10.9%, 11.1%, 15.8 %, and 25.0%, respectively. There was no statistical difference in AEs. There were also no differences in bleeding, post-ERCP pancreatitis, and perforation rates between the 4 approaches. CONCLUSION: Procedure success was similar between GAE, RGA, and EDGE, but superior to BAE. AE rates were similar between approaches.
Assuntos
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Derivação Gástrica , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Masculino , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Derivação Gástrica/efeitos adversos , Derivação Gástrica/métodos , Endossonografia/métodos , AlgoritmosRESUMO
Background: Visceral fat represents a metabolically active entity linked to adverse metabolic sequelae of obesity. We aimed to determine if celiac artery mesenteric fat thickness can be reliably measured during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and if these measurements correlate with metabolic disease burden. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent celiac artery mesenteric fat measurement with endosonography (CAMEUS) measurement at a tertiary referral center, and a validation prospective trial of patients with obesity and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis who received paired EUS exams with CAMEUS measurement before and after six months of treatment with an intragastric balloon. Results: CAMEUS was measured in 154 patients [56.5% females, mean age 56.5 ± 18.0 years, body mass index (BMI) 29.8 ± 8.0 kg/m2] and was estimated at 14.7 ± 6.5 mm. CAMEUS better correlated with the presence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (R2 = 0.248, P < 0.001) than BMI (R2 = 0.153, P < 0.001), and significantly correlated with metabolic parameters and diseases. After six months of intragastric balloon placement, the prospective cohort experienced 11.7% total body weight loss, 1.3 points improvement in hemoglobin A1c (P = 0.001), and a 29.4% average decrease in CAMEUS (-6.4 ± 5.2 mm, P < 0.001). CAMEUS correlated with improvements in weight (R2 = 0.368), aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (R2 = 0.138), and NAFLD activity score (R2 = 0.156) (all P < 0.05). Conclusions: CAMEUS is a novel measure that is significantly correlated with critical metabolic indices and can be easily captured during routine EUS to risk-stratify susceptible patients. This station could allow for EUS access to sampling and therapeutics of this metabolic region.
RESUMO
Background and study aims A percutaneous intragastric trocar (PIT) enables intraluminal use of laparoscopic tools and helps overcome traditional limitations of endoscopy. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of using a PIT to perform an anti-reflux stapling procedure. Materials and methods Trocars were placed in four animals and an articulating stapler was used to perform fundoplication under endoscopic guidance. Animals were monitored for 14 days post-procedure. Functional lumen imaging of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) was performed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 14 days. Results The procedure was successful in all animals who survived to day 14 without distress or significant adverse events. Baseline EGJ distensibility was 5.0â±â1.2âmm 2 /mmHg, 2.7â±â0.7âmm 2 /mmHg post-procedurally, and 3.0â±â0.8mm 2 /mmHg on day 14.âAverage change in distensibility pre- and post-procedure was -2.3â±â1.8âmm 2 /mmHg (95â% confidence interval [CI] -0.5 to 5.1, P â=â0.08) while change in pre- and day 14 distensibility was -2.0â±â1.4âmm 2 /mmHg (95â% CI -0.1 to 4.2, P â=â0.06). Conclusions An intragastric trocar allows for use of large-diameter laparoscopic instruments to safely and effectively perform endoluminal fundoplication with anti-reflux properties that persist for at least 14 days.