Established Time Goals Can Increase the Efficiency of Trauma Resuscitation.

Introduction Our institution uses video review as a quality improvement tool. Starting in March 2018, we specifically focused on meeting certain time goals during trauma resuscitation aimed at decreasing time to final disposition. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of establishing strict time goals on total time spent in the trauma bay by pediatric trauma patients. Materials and methods A retrospective review of all level I trauma activations at a level I pediatric trauma center between November 2017 and December 2018 was performed via manual review of the recorded trauma activations. Data on key time points such as time from arrival to transfer to gurney, to completion of primary survey, to chest x-ray, to Emergency Medical Services (EMS) report, to CT scan, and to disposition (CT or admission/operating room [OR] if no CT scan was performed) were analyzed and compared between the cohort of patients prior to implementation of the time goals with that after. The cohort of patients who presented between March 2018 and May 2018 were excluded to allow for time for the intervention to take effect. Results There were 13 level I trauma activations before implementation of the time goals and 41 after. There was a significant decrease in time to transfer to gurney (1.8 minutes vs. 1.0 minutes; p=0.02), to CT scan (18.8 minutes vs. 14.2 minutes; p=0.01), and to disposition (18.3 minutes vs. 14.9 minutes; p=0.047). There was no decrease in time to completion of primary survey, EMS report, or chest x-ray. Conclusions Utilizing video review in pediatric trauma as a quality improvement initiative with a focus on meeting specific time goals for key elements of the activation led to decreased total time in our trauma bay with critically ill patients.

Reduction of resource utilization in children with blunt solid organ injury.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Nonoperative management of blunt solid organ injuries continues to progress and improve cost-effective utilization of resources while maximizing patient safety. The purpose of this study is to compare resource utilization and patient outcomes after changing admission criteria from a grade-based protocol to one based on hemodynamic stability. METHODS: A retrospective review of isolated liver and spleen injuries was done using prospectively collected trauma registry data from 2013 to 2017. The 2 years preceding the change were compared to the 2 years after protocol change. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.4. RESULTS: There were 121 patients in the preprotocol cohort and 125 patients in the postprotocol cohort. Baseline demographics were similar along with injury mechanisms and severity. The ICU admission rate decreased from 40% to 22% (p = 0.002). There were no adverse events on the floor and no patient needed to be transferred to the ICU. CONCLUSIONS: A protocol for ICU admission based on physiologic derangement versus solely on radiologic grade significantly reduced admission rates to the ICU in children with solid organ injury. The protocol was safe and effectively reduced resource utilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparison study.