Immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose of the hepatitis B vaccine HepB-CpG (HEPLISAV-B®) compared with HepB-Eng (Engerix-B®) and HepB-AS04 (Fendrix®) in adults receiving hemodialysis who previously received hepatitis B vaccination and are not seroprotected: Results of a randomized, multicenter phase 3 study.

This study compared the immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose of HepB-CpG (HEPLISAV-B® vaccine) with HepB-Eng (Engerix-B®) and HepB-AS04 (Fendrix®) in patients receiving chronic hemodialysis. This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of adults receiving hemodialysis with antibodies to HBsAg (anti-HBs) <10 mIU/mL at study entry. The objective was to compare the seroprotection rate (SPR) induced by HepB-CpG with HepB-Eng or HepB-AS04. The SPR was defined as the percentage of patients with anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL post-vaccination. At 20 sites in Germany, 155 participants were randomized: HepB-CpG = 54; HepB-Eng = 50; and HepB-AS04 = 51. Of the 149 participants in the modified intention-to-treat population, 76.5% had not previously responded to at least one series of hepatitis B vaccine. Based on a post hoc analysis, the SPR in HepB-CpG recipients (52.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.6%, 66.7%) was significantly higher than in HepB-Eng recipients (32.6%; 95% CI: 19.5%, 48.0%), and non-inferior to that in HepB-AS04 recipients (43.1%; 95% CI: 29.3%, 57.8%). Local post-injection reactions occurred in significantly fewer HepB-CpG (9.3%) than HepB-AS04 recipients (31.4%; p = .007) and at a similar rate to HepB-Eng recipients (8.2%). Systemic post-injection reactions in HepB-CpG recipients (18.5%) were similar to the HepB-AS04 group (19.6%) and higher than in the HepB-Eng group (12.2%). In this difficult-to-immunize population, a booster dose of HepB-CpG induced significantly higher levels of seroprotection than HepB-Eng with a similar safety profile. The higher levels of immunogenicity were not accompanied by higher levels of local post-injection reactions compared with HepB-AS04.

Longitudinal relationships between fluid status, inflammation, urine volume and plasma metabolites of icodextrin in patients randomized to glucose or icodextrin for the long exchange.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials have shown that icodextrin reduces the volume of extra-cellular fluid (ECFv) with variable effects on residual renal function. To explore this fluid shift and its possible mechanisms in more detail, prospectively collected data from one such trial, including measures of inflammation (C-reactive protein, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, albumin and low and high molecular weight hyaluronan) ANP (atrial naturetic peptide), an indirect marker of intra-vascular volume, plasma concentrations of icodextrin metabolites and alpha-amylase activity were analysed. METHODS: 50 patients were randomized to either 2.27% glucose or icodextrin (n = 28) for a long exchange following a month run in. Blood samples were obtained at -1, 0, 3 and 6 months, coincident with measurements of urine volume and fluid status. RESULTS: In both randomized groups, a significant correlation between the fall in ECFv and the decline in urine volume was observed (P = 0.001), although the relative drop in urine volume for patients randomized to icodextrin tended to be less. At baseline, ANP was higher in patients with proportionately more ECFv for a given body water or height. Icodextrin patients had non-significantly higher ANP levels at baseline, whereas by 3 (P = 0.026) and 6 months (P = 0.016) these differed between groups due to divergence. There was a correlation between increasing ANP and reduced ECF at 3 months, r = -0.46, P = 0.007, in patients randomized to icodextrin, but not glucose. There were no relationships between fluid status and any inflammatory markers at any point of the study, with the exception of albumin at baseline, r = -0.39, P = 0.007. Amylase activities at -1 month and baseline were highly correlated, r = 0.89, P < 0.0001. Within patients, concentrations of icodextrin metabolites were highly correlated; the only predictor of between-patient variability on multivariate analysis was body weight. There was no relationship between plasma concentrations of icodextrin metabolites and any of the other clinical parameters, including change in daily ultrafiltration, urine volume, fluid or inflammatory status. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis supports observational data that changes in fluid status are associated with changes in urine volume. Icodextrin was not associated with a greater fall in urine output despite its larger effect on ECFv. Changes in fluid status could not be explained or did not appear to influence systemic inflammation. Nor can they be explained by individual variability in plasma concentrations of icodextrin that are in turn inversely proportional to the volume of distribution.

[Necrotizing granulomatosis with pulmonary, intestinal and renal involvement]. / Komplizierter Verlauf einer nekrotisierenden Granulomatose mit pulmonaler, intestinaler und renaler Vaskulitis.

CASE REPORT: In a 45 year old patient pulmonary, renal and ocular manifestations of ANCA-associated vasculitis is reported that required immunosuppressive therapy. On admission the patient complained about enduring lower abdominal pain. A CT scan revealed free intraabdominal fluid and dilated small intestine filled with fluid. Laparotomy was performed with the working diagnosis of paralytic ileus. Intraoperatively, hemorrhagic-necrotic alterations of the small intestinal wall were conspicuous and resected. Microscopic examination revealed transmural ischemic necrosis of the resected intestinal tissue with prominent granulomatous vasculitis of arteries. CD20-antibody rituximab was applied due to the life-threatening condition and as ultima ratio therapy. Subsequently the disease activity was controlled, renal function improved and abdominal discomfort subsided. CONCLUSION: Gastrointestinal involvement with necrotizing vasculitis is an uncommon but serious complication. Most patients respond to established therapy protocols encompassing cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids. Administration of rituximab may be a promising alternative in refractory cases.

High sensitive detection of double-stranded DNA autoantibodies by a modified Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test.

Anti-double-stranded (ds)DNA antibodies are serological markers of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Of all anti-dsDNA antibody detection methods, the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (CLIFT) is thought to have the highest specificity for SLE. However, the clinical application is hampered by the low diagnostic sensitivity. A CLIFT with modified assay buffer (mCLIFT) was developed and compared with conventional CLIFT, using sera from 110 patients with SLE, 89 anti-dsDNA ELISA-positive patients with other diseases (non-SLE group A), 157 non-SLE patients with undetectable anti-dsDNA antibodies by ELISA (non-SLE group B), 77 disease controls (non-SLE group C), and 50 healthy blood donors. Out of the 110 anti-dsDNA antibody ELISA-positive SLE patients, 84 (76.4%) demonstrated a positive kinetoplast staining, using the mCLIFT, compared to only 42.3%, using the conventional CLIFT. The diagnostic specificity of mCLIFT was 100% with healthy blood donors and 98.1% with the non-SLE group C (anti-nuclear antibodies negative; no signs or symptoms of an autoimmune disease) included. In the non-SLE groups A and B with various other autoimmune diseases or symptoms of a possible autoimmune disease, positive mCLIFT results were obtained in 33.7% and 3.2%, respectively. In conclusion, by modification of the assay buffer, a significant increase in sensitivity of the CLIFT could be observed while retaining the high specificity for SLE. Further investigation is required to check whether the CLIFT-positive non-SLE patients develop SLE and whether anti-dsDNA antibodies detected by the mCLIFT represent a pathogenetic and diagnostic subgroup of autoantibodies that may improve the early diagnosis of SLE or SLE-overlap syndromes.

Icodextrin improves the fluid status of peritoneal dialysis patients: results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Worsening fluid balance results in reduced technique and patient survival in peritoneal dialysis. Under these conditions, the glucose polymer icodextrin is known to enhance ultrafiltration in the long dwell. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was undertaken to compare icodextrin versus 2.27% glucose to establish whether icodextrin improves fluid status. Fifty patients with urine output <750 ml/d, high solute transport, and either treated hypertension or untreated BP >140/90 mmHg, or a requirement for the equivalent of all 2.27% glucose exchanges, were randomized 1:1 and evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 mo. Members of the icodextrin group lost weight, whereas the control group gained weight. Similar differences in total body water were observed, largely explained by reduced extracellular fluid volume in those receiving icodextrin, who also achieved better ultrafiltration and total sodium losses at 3 mo (P < 0.05) and had better maintenance of urine volume at 6 mo (P = 0.039). In patients fulfilling the study's inclusion criteria, the use of icodextrin, when compared with 2.27% glucose, in the long exchange improves fluid removal and status in peritoneal dialysis. This effect is apparent within 1 mo of commencement and was sustained for 6 mo without harmful effects on residual renal function.