Long-term outcomes after hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion and transplantation of 1,202 donor livers in a real-world setting (HOPE-REAL study).

BACKGROUND & AIM: We aimed to assess long-term outcome after transplantation of HOPE-treated donor livers based on real-world data (i.e., IDEAL-D stage 4). METHODS: In this international, multicentre, observational cohort study, we collected data from adult recipients of a HOPE-treated liver transplanted between January 2012 and December 2021. Analyses were stratified for brain-dead (DBD) and circulatory-dead (DCD) donor livers, sub-divided by their respective risk categories. The primary outcome was death-censored graft survival. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of primary non-function (PNF) and ischemic cholangiopathy (IC). RESULTS: We report on 1202 liver transplantations (64% DBD) performed at 22 European centres. For DBD, a total number of 99 benchmark (8%), 176 standard (15%), and 493 extended-criteria (41%) cases were included. For DCD, 117 transplants were classified as low-risk (10%), 186 as high-risk (16%), and 131 as futile (11%), with significant risk profile variations among centres. Actuarial 1-, 3-, and 5-year death-censored graft survival for DBD and DCD was 95%, 92%, and 91%, vs. 92%, 87%, and 81%, respectively (logrank p=0.003). Within DBD and DCD-strata, death-censored graft survival was similar among risk groups (logrank p=0.26, p=0.99). Graft loss due to PNF or IC was 2.3% and 0.4% (DBD), and 5% and 4.1% (DCD). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows excellent 5-year survival after transplantation of HOPE-treated DBD and DCD livers with low rates of graft loss due to PNF or IC, irrespective of their individual risk profile. HOPE-treatment has now reached IDEAL-D stage 4, which further supports the implementation of HOPE in routine clinical practice. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrates the excellent long-term performance of HOPE-treatment of DCD and DBD liver grafts irrespective of their individual risk profile in a real-world setting, outside the evaluation of randomized controlled trials. While previous studies have established safety, feasibility, and efficacy against the current standard, according to the IDEAL-D evaluation framework, HOPE-treatment has now reached the final IDEAL-D Stage 4, which further supports the implementation of HOPE in routine clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05520320.

Novel Benchmark Values for Open Major Anatomic Liver Resection in Non-cirrhotic Patients: A Multicentric Study of 44 International Expert Centers.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims at establishing benchmark values for best achievable outcomes following open major anatomic hepatectomy for liver tumors of all dignities. BACKGROUND: Outcomes after open major hepatectomies vary widely lacking reference values for comparisons among centers, indications, types of resections, and minimally invasive procedures. METHODS: A standard benchmark methodology was used covering consecutive patients, who underwent open major anatomic hepatectomy from 44 high-volume liver centers from 5 continents over a 5-year period (2016-2020). Benchmark cases were low-risk non-cirrhotic patients without significant comorbidities treated in high-volume centers (≥30 major liver resections/year). Benchmark values were set at the 75th percentile of median values of all centers. Minimum follow-up period was 1 year in each patient. RESULTS: Of 8044 patients, 2908 (36%) qualified as benchmark (low-risk) cases. Benchmark cutoffs for all indications include R0 resection ≥78%; liver failure (grade B/C) ≤10%; bile leak (grade B/C) ≤18%; complications ≥grade 3 and CCI ® ≤46% and ≤9 at 3 months, respectively. Benchmark values differed significantly between malignant and benign conditions so that reference values must be adjusted accordingly. Extended right hepatectomy (H1, 4-8 or H4-8) disclosed a higher cutoff for liver failure, while extended left (H1-5,8 or H2-5,8) were associated with higher cutoffs for bile leaks, but had superior oncologic outcomes, when compared to formal left hepatectomy (H1-4 or H2-4). The minimal follow-up for a conclusive outcome evaluation following open anatomic major resection must be 3 months. CONCLUSION: These new benchmark cutoffs for open major hepatectomy provide a powerful tool to convincingly evaluate other approaches including parenchymal-sparing procedures, laparoscopic/robotic approaches, and alternative treatments, such as ablation therapy, irradiation, or novel chemotherapy regimens.

The Survival Benefit of Repetitive Ultrasound-Guided Liver Resections in the Absence of Chemotherapy for Multiple Colorectal Recurrent Liver Metastases.

We present the case of a 54-year-old female patient, diagnosed with stage IV rectal cancer, with multiple (12) synchronous liver metastases, the largest of 10 cm in diameter, bilobar distributed. The operative management consisted in simultaneous ultra-low robotic anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis (protected by ileostomy) and multiple ultrasound-guided non-anatomical liver resections (in open approach). The patient was unable to follow neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy due to the systemic side effects. The intrahepatic disease presented 2 episodes of recurrence, sanctioned by ultrasound-guided non-anatomical parenchyma sparing liver resections. In total 32 liver metastases were addressed (31 resected and 1 radiofrequency ablated). The patient presented 1 episode of lung recurrence, sanctioned by right superior lobectomy and lymphadenectomy for a singular metastasis. The patient died with disease progression both intra-, and extrahepatically after 34 months post first surgical intervention.

Parenchyma-Sparing Liver Resection or Regenerative Liver Surgery: Which Way to Go?

Liver resection for malignant tumors should respect oncological margins while ensuring safety and improving the quality of life, therefore tumor staging, underlying liver disease and performance status should all be attentively assessed in the decision process. The concept of parenchyma-sparing liver surgery is nowadays used as an alternative to major hepatectomies to address deeply located lesions with intricate topography by means of complex multiplanar parenchyma-sparing liver resections, preferably under the guidance of intraoperative ultrasound. Regenerative liver surgery evolved as a liver growth induction method to increase resectability by stimulating the hypertrophy of the parenchyma intended to remain after resection (referred to as future liver remnant), achievable by portal vein embolization and liver venous deprivation as interventional approaches, and portal vein ligation and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy as surgical techniques. Interestingly, although both strategies have the same conceptual origin, they eventually became caught in the never-ending parenchyma-sparing liver surgery vs. regenerative liver surgery debate. However, these strategies are both valid and must both be mastered and used to increase resectability. In our opinion, we consider parenchyma-sparing liver surgery along with techniques of complex liver resection and intraoperative ultrasound guidance the preferred strategy to treat liver tumors. In addition, liver volume-manipulating regenerative surgery should be employed when resectability needs to be extended beyond the possibilities of parenchyma-sparing liver surgery.

Extended Lymphadenectomy for Proximal Transverse Colon Cancer: Is There a Place for Standardization?

Background and Objectives: Complete mesocolon excision and high vascular ligation have become a standard procedure in the treatment of colon cancer. The transverse colon has certain embryological and anatomical particularities which require special attention in case of oncological surgeries. Proximal transverse colon cancer (TCC) can metastasize to the lymph nodes in the gastrocolic ligament. The aim of this study is to assess the tumor involvement of these lymph nodes and to determine the applicability of gastrocolic ligament lymph nodes dissection as the standard approach for proximal transverse colon cancer. Materials and Methods: this study analyzes the cases of patients admitted to the Surgery Department, diagnosed with proximal transverse colon cancer, with tumor invasion ≥ T2 and for which complete mesocolon excision with high vascular ligation and lymphadenectomy of the gastrocolic ligament (No. 204, 206, 214v) were performed. Results: A total of 43 cases operated during 2015−2020 were included in the study. The median total number of retrieved central lymph nodes was 23 (range, 12−38), that had tumor involvement in 22 cases (51.2%). Gastrocolic ligament tumor involvement was found in 5 cases (11.6%). The median operation time was 180 min, while the median blood loss was 115 mL (range 0−210). The median time of hospitalization was 6 days (range, 5−11). Grade IIIA in the Clavien-Dindo classification was noticed in 3 patients, with no mortality. Upon Kaplan−Meier analysis, tumors > T3 (p < 0.016) and lymph node ratio < 0.05 (p < 0.025) were statistically significant. Conclusions: lymph node dissection of the gastrocolic ligament in patients with advanced proximal transverse colon cancer may improve the oncological outcome in T3/T4 tumors, and therefore standardization could be feasible

A multi-center post-market clinical study to confirm safety and performance of PuraStat® in the management of bleeding during open liver resection.

BACKGROUND: PuraStat® is a non-bioactive haemostatic agent that has demonstrated efficacy in a number of different surgical procedures. We performed a prospective multi-centre post-market study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PuraStat® in liver resections performed for metastatic tumors. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. Patients undergoing liver resection for metastatic tumor were screened for eligibility, and included if they were ≥18 years old, undergoing open liver resection, had normal liver function, and required application of PuraStat® for haemostasis where standard haemostatic techniques were either insufficient or impractical. The primary endpoint was "time to haemostasis" (TTH). Secondary endpoints included blood loss, total postoperative drainage volume, transfusion of blood products, and ease of use. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included for analysis in the intention to treat population. 207 bleeding sites were treated with PuraStat. Of these, 190 (91.7%) bleeding sites reached haemostasis after PuraStat® application. Mean TTH (mm:ss) was 1:01 (SD 1:06, range 0:09-6:55). Ease of use of the product was described as either "excellent" or "good" in 78 (98.8%) patients. No serious adverse events were identified. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the safety, efficacy and ease of use of PuraStat® in the management of bleeding in liver surgery.

Parenchyma Sparing ALPPS - Ultrasound Guided Partition Through Segment 4 to Maximize Resectability (with video).

Background: Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation (ALPPS) has evolved as a treatment strategy for patients with liver tumors who are not amenable for upfront hepatectomy because of an insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). Aim of this study was to test the applicability of ultrasound guided parenchyma sparing surgery to ALPPS concept, by non-anatomically shifting the plane of transection in favor of FLR, resulting in a new technical variant of ALPPS, entitled parenchyma sparing ALPPS (psALPPS). Materials and Methods: Patients who could not safely undergo right trisectionectomy ALPPS because of insufficient FLR were considered eligible for psALPPS, consisting in liver partition through segment 4 using ultrasound guidance. Results: Between April 2017 and April 2021, five patients with median age of 68 years (range: 66-78), four male and one female, underwent psALPPS for colorectal liver metastases (N=2), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (N=2), and hepatocellular carcinoma (N=1). Standardized FLR (sFLR) for segments 2-3 before stage 1 surgery would have been a median of 11.6%. PsALPPS could double the sFLR at stage 1 resulting in an increase of ps-sFLR from a median of 22.7% (at stage 1) to 34.0% (at stage 2) after a median interstage interval of 15 days. All patients tolerated surgery well and no major complications were recorded. Conclusions: Applying the principles of parenchyma sparing surgery to ALPPS offers the advantage to maximize FLR and simultaneously reduce ischemic injury of segment 4 compared to conventional ALPPS. In this way, psALPPS may markedly increase resectability while reducing morbidity. Video version: https://www.revistachirurgia.ro/pdfs/?EntryID=922974&art=2021-parenchyma-sparing-ALPPS-ultrasound-guided-partition.pdf

Parenchyma Sparing ALPPS Ultrasound Guided Partition Through Segment 4 to Maximize Resectability (with video).

Background: Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation (ALPPS) has evolved as a treatment strategy for patients with liver tumors who are not amenable for upfront hepatectomy because of an insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). Aim of this study was to test the applicability of ultrasound guided parenchyma sparing surgery to ALPPS concept, by non-anatomically shifting the plane of transection in favor of FLR, resulting in a new technical variant of ALPPS, entitled parenchyma sparing ALPPS (psALPPS). Materials and Methods: Patients who could not safely undergo right trisectionectomy ALPPS because of insufficient FLR were considered eligible for psALPPS, consisting in liver partition through segment 4 using ultrasound guidance. Results: Between April 2017 and April 2021, five patients with median age of 68 years (range: 66-78), four male and one female, underwent psALPPS for colorectal liver metastases (N=2), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (N=2), and hepatocellular carcinoma (N=1). Standardized FLR (sFLR) for segments 2-3 before stage 1 surgery would have been a median of 11.6%. PsALPPS could double the sFLR at stage 1 resulting in an increase of ps-sFLR from a median of 22.7% (at stage 1) to 34.0% (at stage 2) after a median interstage interval of 15 days. All patients tolerated surgery well and no major complications were recorded. Conclusions: Applying the principles of parenchyma sparing surgery to ALPPS offers the advantage to maximize FLR and simultaneously reduce ischemic injury of segment 4 compared to conventional ALPPS. In this way, psALPPS may markedly increase resectability while reducing morbidity. Video: https://www.revistachirurgia.ro/pdfs/?EntryID=922974&art=2021-parenchyma-sparing-ALPPS-ultrasound-guided-partition.pdf

Is Long-Term Survival in Metastases from Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Improved by Liver Resection?

Background and Objectives: Although many of the neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) have a typically prolonged natural history compared with other gastrointestinal tract cancers, at least 40% of patients develop liver metastases. This study aims to identify whether liver resection improves the overall survival of patients with liver metastases from NEN. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study at "Fundeni" Clinical Institute over a time period of 15 years; we thereby identified a series of 93 patients treated for NEN with liver metastases, which we further divided into 2 groups as follows: A (45 patients) had been subjected to liver resection complemented by systemic therapies, and B (48 patients) underwent systemic therapy alone. To reduce the patient selection bias we performed at first a propensity score matching. This was followed by a bootstrapping selection with Jackknife error correction, with the purpose of getting a statistically illustrative sample. Results: The overall survival of the matched virtual cohort under study was 41 months (95% CI 37-45). Group A virtual matched patients showed a higher survival rate (52 mo., 95% CI: 45-59) than B (31 mo., 95% CI: 27-35), (p < 0.001, Log-Rank test). Upon multivariate analysis, seven independent factors were identified to have an influence on survival: location (midgut) and primary tumor grading (G3), absence of concomitant LM, number (2-4), location (unilobar), grading (G3) of LM, and 25-50% hepatic involvement at the time of the metastatic disease diagnosis. Conclusions: Hepatic resection is nowadays the main treatment providing potential cure and prolonged survival, for patients with NEN when integrated in a multimodal strategy based on systemic therapy.

Regenerative Liver Surgery - ALPPS and Associated Techniques.

Hepatectomy is the only potentially curative treatment of hepatic tumors, but remains challenging in case of multiple, bilobar lesions and those located in the vicinity of the hepatic hilum and hepatic veins. Regenerative liver surgery utilizes the unique ability of the liver to re-grow after tissue loss and vascular deprivation. All concepts subsumed under this term aim to increase the resectability of hepatic tumors by stimulating growth of future liver remnant. Many of these techniques have evolved over the last decades. ALPPS (associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) is an advanced technique combining portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection which gave rise to many variants, all with the common goal of extending resectability. This article reviews techniques currently available for regenerative liver surgery focusing on ALPPS, its mechanisms of liver regeneration, indications, advantages, drawbacks, results and future perspectives.

En-Bloc Complete Segment 1 Resection and Left Hepatectomy for Klatskin Tumor.

video width="640" height="480" controls controlsList="nodownload" poster="https://www.revistachirurgia.ro/pdfs/video/Complete_segment_resection_hepatectomy_klatskin_tumor.jpg" style="margin-top: -20px;" source src="https://www.revistachirurgia.ro/pdfs/video/Complete_segment_resection_hepatectomy_klatskin_tumor.mp4" type="video/mp4" Your browser does not support the video tag. /video We present the case of a 37-year-old male patient with no significant history, hospitalized in our center for painless jaundice with sudden onset. CT contrast portal phase imaging revealed a tumor located at the main biliary confluence, in the proximity of the main portal bifurcation, with no venous or arterial vascular invasion, nor extrahepatic metastases. MRCP diagnosed a Bismuth- Corlette type Klatskin IIIb tumor. For complete assessment of biliary involvement and surgical planning, in addition to the Bismuth-Corlette classification, we took into consideration the presence of infiltration of the bile ducts for segment 1, documented at MRCP. Therefore, a left hepatectomy with en-bloc complete segment 1 resection, along with the main bile ducts and hilar lymphadenectomy, was considered best suited for achieving curative resection in this case. After an uneventful postoperative course, the patient was discharged in the 12th postoperative day. Currently, the patient is disease-free after 84 months. We consider that the long-term recurrence free survival was favored by the complete segment 1 resection. Therefore, for complete assessment of biliary involvement in Klatskin tumor, we recommend that in addition to Bismuth-Corlette classification, infiltration of the bile duct for segment 1 should always be evaluated. If present, the entire segment 1 should be removed for best oncological results.

Ultrasound-Guided Liver Resection of a Tumor Involving the Hepatocaval Confluence.

We present the case of a 72-year-old patient with multiple cardiovascular comorbidities, hospitalized in our center for a liver tumor, impossible to biopsy percutaneously. CT examination detected a tumor formation with radiological features of cholangiocarcinoma, located in the upper part of segment I, extending to segments VII, VIII, IV superior and II, invading the right and middle hepatic vein, adherent to the left hepatic vein and to the retrohepatic inferior vena cava. Worth mentioning is the existence of 2 accessory lower right hepatic veins, which allowed us to perform a superior transverse non-anatomical ultrasound resection of the upper I, VII, VIII, IV and II segments, which also involved the right and middle hepatic veins, preserving the left hepatic vein, by detaching the tumor from it, but also from the retrohepatic inferior vena cava. Although the literature still debates the R1 vascular resection for cholangiocarcinoma, we decided to adopt this approach on the hepatic veins. Of note, we consider this policy not applicable for the portal pedicles. By adopting this strategy, the venous drainage of the remaining left hemiliver was ensured by the hepatic vein, and of the right one by the accessory veins. Although resecting tumors located at the hepato-caval confluence involving all hepatic veins is technically difficult, we consider it feasible especially when intraoperative ultrasound is used. (video article https://www.revistachirurgia.ro/pdfs/video/Ultrasound-Guided-Liver-Resection-Tumor-2282.mp4).

Resection of Giant Liver Metastasis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Using Intraoperative Ultrasound Guidance.

We present the case of a 37-year-old patient with a surgical history of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor with jejunal location, AFIP classification 6a, hospitalized in our center for synchronous liver metastases. The oncological assessment performed after 12 months from surgery for primary tumor, during which Imatinib was administered, reveals stable disease. CT scan showed a single very large centrally located liver metastasis, 14 cm in diameter, involving segments V and VIII IV, IV and VII, compressing the main portal bifurcation, right hepatic vein, umbilical (scizural) vein and left hepatic vein, invading the middle hepatic vein. We considered it feasible to apply the concept of R1 vascular resection, performing a limited, non-anatomical, ultrasound-guided central hepatectomy, allowing detachment of the tumor from the right hepatic vein and from the umbilical vein. Thus, we sacrificed only the ventral portal pedicles of segments V and VIII and partially preserved these segments to avoid the risk of post-resection liver failure.Currently, the patient is disease-free after 53 months, supporting the concept of ultrasound-guided R1 vascular resection, in the context of systemic therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for metastases of stromal gastrointestinal tumors. (video article https://www.revistachirurgia.ro/pdfs/video/Liver-Resection-Metastases-Stromal-Tumors-2283.mp4).

Definitive Surgery for Liver Trauma in a Tertiary HPB Center (with video).

Background: Surgery for severe liver trauma remains challenging even for HPB surgeons, mainly due the hemodynamical instability, involvement of major vascular and biliary elements, impaired background liver and frequent anatomical variants. In this setting, despite conservative policy, major liver resection is still required in selected cases. Also salvage liver transplantation may be needed. Our study aims to analyze the results after definitive surgery for hepatic injury (HI) in a tertiary HPB center. Methods: Sixty-six patients with HI were admitted and treated in our center between June 2000 and June 2021. The median age was 29 years (mean 35, range 10-76). The male/female ratio was 50/16. According to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) system, HIs were grade II in one patient (1.5%), grade III in 11 pts (16.7%), grade IV in 25 pts (37.9%), and grade V in 29 pts (43.9%); no patient had grade I or VI HI. Results: Fifty-two pts (78.8%) benefitted from surgery and 14 pts (21.2%) from non-operative treatment (NOT). Perihepatic packing was previously performed in 38 pts (73.1%). Surgery consisted in hepatic resections (HR) in 51 pts (77.3%) and liver transplantation in one patient (1.5%). The rate of major HR was 51.9% (27 HRs). The overall major morbidity and mortality rates were 33.3% (20 pts) and 13.6% (9 pts), respectively. For surgery, the major complication rate was 35.3% (18 pts), while for major and minor HR were 40.7% (11 pts) and 29.2% (7 pts), respectively; the mortality rate was 15.7% (8 pts). After NOT, the major morbidity and mortality rates were 14.3% (2 pts) and 7.1% (1 pt), respectively. Conclusions: Hepatic resections, especially major ones and/or involving vascular and biliary reconstructions, as well as non-operative treatment for severe hepatic injuries, are to be carried out in tertiary HPB centers, thus minimizing the morbidity and mortality rates, while having the liver transplantation as salvage option.

Liver Resection for Metastases from Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Does it Improve Long-Term Survival?

BACKGROUND AIMS: The emergence of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, radically altered the management of GISTs and sparked controversy regarding the role of hepatic resection for metastatic tumors. This study aims to identify whether there is improvement in the overall survival of patients with gastrointestinal liver metastases, undergoing hepatic resection in the context of multimodal treatment strategy, as to those approached only by systemic therapy. Methods: Using a retrospective database, we identified 57 patients treated at our center over a 12-year period: Group A (n=31) underwent hepatic resection alongside systemic therapies, and B (n=26) only systemic therapies. In order to obtain a more robust sample, needed for the survival analysis, we performed a propensity score matching and a bootstrapping selection with Jackknife correction for errors; thus, we created an extended sample of 1000 virtual patients. Results: The overall survival measured in all patients was 47 months (95%CI:34-60); significantly higher for group A (56 months, 95%CI:37-75) compared to group B (38 months, 95%CI:19-56), (p=0.007, Log Rank test). Multivariate analysis identified one risk factor: the presence synchronous liver metastases upon diagnosis of primary. Conclusions: Liver resection following TKI therapy is the current mainstay of treatment strategy for potential cure and prolonged survival, in appropriately selected patients evaluated in an multidisciplinary tumor board.

Residual Gallbladder and Cystic Duct Stump Stone after Cholecystectomy: Laparoscopic Management.

Background: Cholecystectomy is the standard treatment for symptomatic gallstones, and the persistence of symptoms after surgery defines postcholecystectomy syndrome. Biliary causes of postcholecystectomy syndrome include subtotal cholecystectomy and remnant cystic duct stump stone; causes that are encountered with a low frequency, but which require diagnosis and provocative treatment. Laparoscopic management of such cases is recommended, but requires well-trained teams in laparoscopic surgery. Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of patients who required surgical treatment for residual gallbladder and cystic duct stump stone after a cholecystectomy, hospitalized in the Surgery Department of Constanta County Hospital, who required completion of resection and were operated laparoscopically. Results: Between January 2010 and March 2020, 14 patients were hospitalized with residual gallbladder and cystic duct stump stone that required surgery. All patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. Symptomatology was dominated by recurrent biliary colic (50%). The period between the primary surgery and the surgery to complete the resection varied between 2-22 years. There were 4 cases of subtotal cholecystectomies, and 10 cases of remnant cystic duct stump stones. Intraoperative complications were encountered in only one case (7.14%), the number of days of hospitalization was on average 3 days. No patient showed any symptoms at 6-month postoperative follow-up. Conclusions: Postcholecystectomy syndrome is difficult to diagnose, symptomatic patients with remnant cystic duct stump stone/ subtotal cholecystectomy requiring surgery are difficult to manage. Laparoscopic surgery is preferred for the benefits that laparoscopic surgery brings, but requires an experienced surgeon in advanced laparoscopic techniques.

Hypothermic Oxygenated Machine Perfusion of Liver Grafts: Preliminary Experience in a Single Center.

Background: The need to maximize the use of donor organs and the issue of ischemia-reperfusion injury led to the use of thermoregulated oxygenated machine perfusion that improves the function of liver graft prior to transplantation. Among these methods, the HOPE (hypothermic oxygenated perfusion) protocol shows significant benefits. The aim of the paper is to analyze the early experience in using such procedure in a high-volume liver transplantation center. Methods: Normal liver grafts with cold ischemia time â?¥6 hours, marginal grafts and discarded (beyond ECD criteria) grafts were perfused using HOPE. Our selection criteria for dual HOPE (hepatic artery and portal perfusion) were steatosis, at least 3 associated ECD criteria, and discarded grafts. The main criteria to establish graft improvement were the progressive increase of arterial and portal flows, with lactate under 3 mmol/L or, even if over this value, with a decreasing trend during perfusion. Results: Whole liver grafts harvested from 28 donors between February 2016 and June 2021 benefitted from HOPE: 9 otherwise discarded grafts were assessed and considered not fit for transplantation, while the other 19 were ECD or standard grafts that were subsequently transplanted. Dual HOPE was used in 8 out of the 19 procedures (42.1%). We obtained a significant increase of arterial and portal flow (p=0.005 and p=0.001, respectively). In recipients, significant improvement of AST, ALT, INR and lactate values were recorded (p 0.001, p 0.001, p 0.001, and p=0.05, respectively). The rate of major postoperative complications (Dindo-Clavien grade 3) after LT was 26.3%, while the rate of early graft dysfunction was 15.8%. No PRS or acute rejection was recorded. The postoperative mortality rate was 15.8%. After a median follow-up of 9.3 months (range 2-44), the late major complication rate was 15.8%, without mortality. Conclusion: Machine perfusion is nowadays part of current clinical practice. This way, marginal liver grafts (DCD, ECD-DBD) may be safely used for transplantation improving the outcome, thus effectively enhance the use of a persistent scarce pool of donors. For best results, we believe that both techniques of HOPE (mono and dual HOPE) should be used based on specific selection criteria.

Perioperative omega-3 fatty acids fail to confer protection in liver surgery: Results of a multicentric, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In a variety of animal models, omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (Ω3-FAs) conferred strong protective effects, alleviating hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury and steatosis, as well as enhancing regeneration after major tissue loss. Given these benefits along with its safety profile, we hypothesized that perioperative administration of Ω3-FAs in patients undergoing liver surgery may ameliorate the postoperative course. The aim of this study was to investigate the perioperative use of Ω3-FAs to reduce postoperative complications after liver surgery. METHODS: Between July 2013 and July 2018, we carried out a multicentric, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial designed to test whether 2 single intravenous infusions of Omegaven® (Ω3-FAs) vs. placebo may decrease morbidity. The primary endpoints were postoperative complications by severity (Clavien-Dindo classification) integrated within the comprehensive complication index (CCI). RESULTS: A total of 261 patients (132 in the Omegaven and 129 in the placebo groups) from 3 centers were included in the trial. Most cases (87%, n = 227) underwent open liver surgery and 56% (n = 105) were major resections (≥3 segments). In an intention-to-treat analysis including the dropout cases, the mortality rate was 4% and 2% in the Omegaven and placebo groups (odds ratio0.40;95% CI 0.04-2.51; p = 0.447), respectively. Any complications and major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3b) occurred in 46% vs. 43% (p = 0.709) and 12% vs. 10% (p = 0.69) in the Omegaven and placebo groups, respectively. The mean CCI was 17 (±23) vs.14 (±20) (p = 0.417). An analysis excluding the dropouts provided similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The routine perioperative use of 2 single doses of intravenous Ω3-FAs (100 ml Omegaven) cannot be recommended in patients undergoing liver surgery (Grade A recommendation). LAY SUMMARY: Despite strong evidence of omega-3 fatty acids having liver-directed, anti-inflammatory and pro-regenerative action in various rodent models, 2 single omega-3 fatty acid infusions given to patients before and during liver surgery failed to reduce complications. Because single omega-3 fatty acid infusions failed to confer liver protection in this trial, they cannot currently be recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov: ID: NCT01884948; Institution Ethical Board Approval: KEK-ZH-Nr. 2010-0038; Swissmedic Notification: 2012DR3215.

How to Write a Clinical Paper: Basics, Tips, Traps - Part II.

One of the main goals of clinicians is to constantly improve the healthcare by spreading their expertise and by introducing innovations in medical science. Therefore, publishing is of utmost importance. Moreover, publishing helps authors in developing their academic carrier. Learning how to properly write and submit a manuscript should be a goal for all medical students, residents, clinicians and researchers. Everyone, from students to senior physicians and surgeons, advance in their carrier by publishing papers and by getting their work cited by others. The aim of this paper, published in three parts, is to enable the readers to write and publish their work effectively; the current part is addressing the actual writing process of a clinical paper.

How to Submit a Clinical Paper: Basics, Tips and Traps - Part III.

One of the main goals of clinicians is to constantly improve the healthcare by spreading their expertise and by introducing innovations in medical science. Therefore, publishing is of utmost importance. Moreover, publishing helps authors in developing their academic carrier. Learning how to properly write and submit a manuscript should be a goal for all medical students, residents, clinicians and researchers. Everyone, from students to senior physicians and surgeons, advance in their carrier by publishing papers and by getting their work cited by others. The aim of this paper, published in three parts, is to enable the readers to write and publish their work effectively; the current part is addressing the actual writing workflow of a clinical paper and its submission process to a journal.