Multilevel Determinants of Rapid Antiretroviral Treatment Implementation and Demand in Miami-Dade County.

BACKGROUND: Rapidly linking newly diagnosed HIV patients to antiretroviral treatment (ART) is the best practice for achieving optimal treatment outcomes, including viral suppression. However, rapid ART implementation varies throughout the United States, highlighting the importance of identifying rapid ART implementation determinants in US HIV epicenters, such as Miami-Dade County (MDC). METHODS: Clinic focus groups (N = 4 clinics) and patient interviews (N = 31 recently diagnosed patients) systematically and qualitatively assessed rapid ART implementation determinants in MDC. Independent coders analyzed focus groups and interviews using a directed content analysis approach guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS: For clinic stakeholders, key rapid ART implementation determinants included the following: complexity and adaptability (innovation characteristics); networks between clinics and patient needs rooted in structural inequities (outer setting); leadership and available resources (inner setting); staff/provider flexibility (characteristics of individuals); and appointing patient navigators and champions (process). For patients, key determinants included complexity and relative advantage of rapid treatment (innovation characteristics); patient needs and clinic networks (outer setting); provider knowledge and skills (inner setting); provider warmth and affirmation (characteristics of individuals); and need for improved outreach (process). CONCLUSIONS: Multilevel factors impact clinic implementation and patient demand for rapid ART in MDC. Informed by these factors, we identified potential implementation strategies to enhance rapid ART implementation throughout MDC. These implementation strategies can be tested in an implementation trial, enhancing the toolkit of strategies to ensure that evidence-based tools, particularly rapid ART, are readily available to the most impacted communities.

A Randomized Study of Passive versus Active PrEP Patient Navigation for a Heterogeneous Population at Risk for HIV in South Florida.

Effective approaches to promoting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and linkage to PrEP care among those who may benefit the most from PrEP has proven to be a major challenge. We designed and pilot tested a strengths-based case management (SBCM) intervention for PrEP linkage. Adults interested in PrEP and meeting criteria (n = 61) were randomized to passive referral (control) or active SBCM (treatment). Outcomes measured were completion of provider visit, initiation of PrEP, and time to initiation of PrEP. Overall, 34% initiated PrEP by 12 weeks: 9 (29%) in the control group and 12 (40%) in the treatment group. The mean time to PrEP initiation was 13.1 weeks (95% confidence interval, 12.0-14.2) with no difference between groups ( P = .382). There was a 21% difference in achieving a provider visit between the treatment and control groups (53.3% versus 32.3%) by 12 weeks ( P = .096). Participants encountered financial, logistical, social, and provider-related barriers to PrEP access. Strengths-based case management-based patient navigation is a promising strategy for assisting PrEP seekers in obtaining a medical provider visit and initiating PrEP.