Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ; 39(5): 699-706, 2024 Oct 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38381968

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of immediate loading on the osseointegration and bone density of implants placed in a healed alveolar bone crest and supporting single crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two solid titanium transmucosal miniimplants were placed in the distal regions of the mandible in 14 patients. One mini-implant was immediately functionally loaded, whereas the other was left unloaded. After 2 months of healing, biopsy samples were retrieved and the levels of new bone, old bone, and total bone (new + old) were assessed. RESULTS: Histologic examination was performed on biopsies from 12 patients (n = 12). The new bone-to-implant contact percentage (BIC%) was 40.3% ± 16.8% and 55.1% ± 19.1% (P = .043) at the unloaded and loaded sites, respectively; in addition, the total BIC% was 44.9% ± 17.0% and 59.5% ± 18.8%, respectively (P = .034). The new bone density was 45.9% ± 11.6% for the unloaded implants and 45.9% ± 16.7% for the loaded implants (P = .622). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate loading had a positive effect on bone apposition at the implant surface, but no effect on bone density was observed after 2 months of healing.


Assuntos
Coroas , Carga Imediata em Implante Dentário , Osseointegração , Humanos , Osseointegração/fisiologia , Masculino , Carga Imediata em Implante Dentário/métodos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método Duplo-Cego , Mandíbula/cirurgia , Adulto , Densidade Óssea/fisiologia , Implantes Dentários para Um Único Dente , Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante , Resultado do Tratamento , Idoso , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/métodos , Biópsia , Titânio
2.
Vojnosanit Pregl ; 71(5): 451-61, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26137710

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: The modification of implant surfaces could affect mechanical implant stability as well as dynamics and quality of peri-implant bone healing. The aim of this 3-month experimental study in dogs was to investigate implant stability, marginal bone levels and bone tissue response to zirconia dental implants with two laser-micro-grooved intraosseous surfaces in comparison with nongrooved sandblasted zirconia and sandblasted, high-temperature etched titanium implants. METHODS: Implant surface characterization was performed using optical interferometric profilometty and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. A total of 96 implants (4 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length) were inserted randomly in both sides of the lower jaw of 12 Fox Hound dogs divided into groups of 24 each: the control (titanium), the group A (sandblasted zirconia), the group B (sandolasted zirconia plus microgrooved neck) and the group C (sandblasted zirconia plus all microgrooved). All the implants were immediately loaded. Insertion torque, periotest values, radiographic crestal bone level and removal torque were recorded during the 3-month follow-up. Qualitative scanning electon microscope (SEM) analysis of the bone-implant interfaces of each group was performed. RESULTS: Insertion torque values were higher in the group C and control implants (p < 0.05). Periotest values increased in all the periods in proportion to the extent of microgrooving as follows: the group C > the control > the group B > the group A (p < 0.05). Radiographic measurements showed minimal crestal bone loss at 3 months for microgrooved zirconia implants (groups C and B) and control implants compared with the group A implants (p < 0.05). The removal torque values increased with time for all the groups as follows: the group C > the control > the group B > the group A (p < 0.05). SEM showed that implant surfaces of the groups B and C had an extra bone growth inside the microgrooves that corresponded to the shape and direction of the microgrooves. CONCLUSION: The addition of microgrooves to the entire intraosseous surface of zirconia dental implants enhances primary and secondary implant stability, promotes bone tissue ingrowth and preserves crestal bone levels.


Assuntos
Perda do Osso Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagem , Implantes Dentários , Planejamento de Prótese Dentária , Implantes Experimentais , Animais , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Cães , Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura , Radiografia , Propriedades de Superfície , Titânio/química , Torque , Zircônio/química
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA