[Analgesia for trauma patients in emergency medicine]. / Analgesie bei Traumapatienten in der Notfallmedizin.

Adequate analgesia is one of the most important measures of emergency care in addition to treatment of vital function disorders and, if indicated, should be promptly undertaken; however, a large proportion of emergency patients receive no or only inadequate pain therapy. The numeric rating scale (NRS) is recommended for pain assessment but is not applicable to every group of patients; therefore, vital signs and body language should be included in the assessment. Pain therapy should reduce the NPRS to <5 points. Ketamine and fentanyl, which have an especially rapid onset of action, and also morphine are suitable for analgesia in spontaneously breathing patients. Basic prerequisites for safe and effective analgesia by healthcare professionals are the use of adequate monitoring, the provision of well-defined emergency equipment, and the mastery of emergency procedures. In a structured competence system, paramedics and nursing personnel can perform safe and effective analgesia.

Intraoperative fluoroscopy during MPFL reconstruction improves the accuracy of the femoral tunnel position.

PURPOSE: Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has been established as standard of care for patellofemoral instability. An anatomic femoral tunnel position has been shown to be a prerequisite for restoration of patellofemoral stability and biomechanics. However, the incidence of malpositioning of the femoral tunnel during MPFL reconstruction continues to be notable. Palpation of anatomic landmarks and intraoperative fluoroscopy are the two primary techniques for tunnel placement. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of these two methods for femoral tunnel placement. METHODS: From 2016 to 2017, 64 consecutive patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction for patelllofemoral instability were prospectively enrolled. During surgery, the presumed femoral MPFL insertion was identified by both palpation of anatomic landmarks and using fluoroscopy, both of these points were separately documented on true lateral radiographs. They were then analysed and deviations from the Schoettle's Point were measured as anterior-posterior and proximal-distal deviations. A tunnel position within a radius of 7 mm around the Schoettle's Point was designated as an "accurate tunnel position". RESULTS: Compared to the method of palpation, fluoroscopy led to significantly more anatomic femoral tunnel positoning (p < 0.0001). The mean proximal-distal and anterior-posterior distances between the femoral insertion site identified by palpation and the Schoettle's Point were 5.7 ± 4.5 mm (0.3-20.3 mm) and 4.1 ± 3.7 mm (0.1-20.3 mm), respectively, versus 1.7 ± 0.9 mm (0.1-3.6 mm) and 1.8 ± 1.3 mm (0.1-4.8 mm) for fluoroscopy, respectively. Using fluoroscopy, all femoral insertion sites were identified within a 7 mm radius around the centre of the Schoettle's Point. In contrast, only 52% (33) of femoral insertion sites identified by palpation were within this radius. These data were independent of patients' age, gender and BMI. No improvement in accuracy of femoral tunnel positions was detected over time. CONCLUSIONS: The main finding of this study was that, compared to the method of palpation of anatomic landmarks, the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy in MPFL reconstruction leads to more accurate femoral tunnel positioning. Based on these results, the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy has to be recommended for femoral tunnel placement in daily surgical practice to minimize the incidence of malpositioning and to restore native patellofemoral biomechanics. STUDY DESIGN: Level III Case-control study.

[Soft tissue techniques in hallux valgus surgery]. / Weichteiltechniken in der Hallux-valgus-Chirurgie.

The hallux valgus represents combined bony and soft tissue pathology. In addition to known bony surgical procedures, addressing the soft tissue with regard to the anatomical structures, the surgical technique and the extent of correction are discussed.The goal of the operation is the restoration of the physiological balance between the active and passive stabilizing factors of the MTP-I-joint. The joint capsule, the ligaments and the tendons of the first ray act directly as stabilizing structures, whereas the hind foot and the position of the upper ankle have an indirect influence on the MTP-I-joint.The present work gives an overview of the pathoanatomy of the MTP-I-joint in the hallux valgus pathology. The individual anatomical structures are presented with regard to their physiological and pathological influence and the possible therapeutic options.

[Rupture of the tendon of the tibialis anterior muscle : Etiology, clinical symptoms and treatment]. / Ruptur der Musculus-tibialis-anterior-Sehne : Ätiologie, klinische Symptome und Therapie.

Ruptures of the tendon of the tibialis anterior muscle tend to occur in the context of degenerative impairments. This mainly affects the distal avascular portion of the tendon. Owing to the good compensation through the extensor hallucis longus and extensor digitorum muscles, diagnosis is often delayed. In addition to the clinical examination, magnetic resonance inaging (MRI) diagnostics are of particular importance, although damage or rupture of the tendon can also be demonstrated sonographically. Therapeutic measures include conservative or operative measures, depending on the clinical symptoms. Conservative stabilization of the ankle can be achieved by avoiding plantar flexion using a peroneal orthosis or an ankle-foot orthosis. Subsequent problems, such as metatarsalgia or overloading of the medial foot edge can be addressed by insoles or a corresponding shoe adjustment. An operative procedure is indicated when there is corresponding suffering due to pressure and functional impairment. The direct end-to-end reconstruction of the tendon is only rarely possible in cases of delayed diagnosis due to the degenerative situation and the retraction of the tendon stumps. Depending on the defect size and the tendon quality, various operative techniques, such as rotationplasty, free transplants or tendon transfer can be used.

Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the Rockwood classification in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

PURPOSE: The reliability of the Rockwood classification, the gold standard for acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations, has not yet been tested. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of visual and measured AC joint lesion grades according to the Rockwood classification. METHODS: Four investigators (two shoulder specialists and two second-year residents) examined radiographs (bilateral panoramic stress and axial views) in 58 patients and graded the injury according to the Rockwood classification using the following sequence: (1) visual classification of the AC joint lesion, (2) digital measurement of the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) and the horizontal dislocation (HD) with Osirix Dicom Viewer (Pixmeo, Switzerland), (3) classification of the AC joint lesion according to the measurements and (4) repetition of (1) and (2) after repeated anonymization by an independent physician. Visual and measured Rockwood grades as well as the CCD and HD of every patient were documented, and a CC index was calculated (CCD injured/CCD healthy). All records were then used to evaluate intra- and interobserver reliability. RESULTS: The disagreement between visual and measured diagnosis ranged from 6.9 to 27.6 %. Interobserver reliability for visual diagnosis was good (0.72-0.74) and excellent (0.85-0.93) for measured Rockwood grades. Intraobserver reliability was good to excellent (0.67-0.93) for visual diagnosis and excellent for measured diagnosis (0.90-0.97). The correlations between measurements of the axial view varied from 0.68 to 0.98 (good to excellent) for interobserver reliability and from 0.90 to 0.97 (excellent) for intraobserver reliability. CONCLUSION: Bilateral panoramic stress and axial radiographs are reliable examinations for grading AC joint injuries according to Rockwood's classification. Clinicians of all experience levels can precisely classify AC joint lesions according to the Rockwood classification. We recommend to grade acute ACG lesions by performing a digital measurement instead of a sole visual diagnosis because of the higher intra- and interobserver reliability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, Level IV.

[Pain assessment of severely injured patients 2 years after trauma]. / Bestandsaufnahme der Schmerzsituation von Schwerstverletzten zwei Jahre nach Trauma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Trauma patients often suffer from persisting pain even years after injury, and data on long-term pain management is lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of persisting pain and health-related quality of life (HrQoL) among trauma victims 2 years after injury. Furthermore, the frequency of pain specialist consultation and the quality of outpatient pain management, including phamacological management, was assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed prospectively collected data on severely injured adult patients treated between 2008-2011 at the Cologne Merheim Medical Center (CMMC)/Germany.  Data included the 'Polytrauma Outcome Profile' and a standardized questionnaire on outpatient pain management. Exclusion criteria were death, inability to answer the questionnaire due to cognitive disabilities and lack of language knowledge. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: 207/391 (53 %) data sets were available for analysis, presenting a typical trauma collective with injury severity of ISS 19, predominantly male and a mean age of 44 years. 2 years after trauma 59 % still reported that they suffered from severe persisting pain; 53 % of these patients were under pharmacological pain medication. Only 1/5 of the patients with severe persisting pain was treated by a pain specialist. Successful treatment options do exist; improvement of treatment is required.

[Treatment of severely injured patients : Impact of the German Trauma Registry DGU®]. / Versorgung Schwerverletzter in Deutschland : Einfluss des TraumaRegister DGU®.

The German Trauma Registry DGU® started in 1993 as an initiative of five dedicated trauma centers and has evolved significantly since then. Data were obtained at four points of time from the site of the accident until discharge from hospital. In the first year (1993), the registry collected data of 260 patients from 5 hospitals. In 2015 more than 38.000 were included from 640 hospitals.This paper focusses on the impact of the trauma registry on the treatment of severely injured patients. Several authors could show that the data can be used by hospitals for benchmarking. This can help to detect problems in individual hospitals and to find solutions that can be implemented into the process of care and its subsequent reevaluation. Due to structural and process-related changes, the time necessary for the management in the emergency room could be reduced significantly. Various scientific analyses of the Trauma Registry DGU® data were implemented in the treatment of severely injured patients. In the prehospital treatment, this changed the criteria for intubation and led to a reduction of volume replacement. In the hospital setting, the analysis influenced the radiologic work-up and the treatment of coagulopathy of severely injured patients. Moreover, the risk-adjusted mortality of severely injured patients in Germany could be continuously reduced over the past 20 years.

[P.A.R.T.Y. An initiative for more risk awareness among young road users]. / P.A.R.T.Y. Eine Initiative für mehr Risikobewusstsein bei Jugendlichen.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Accident prevention strategies aim to inform young people about risk-taking behavior and the consequences of trauma. The Prevent Alcohol and Risk-related Trauma in Youth (P.A.R.T.Y.) program is an accident prevention program that focuses on the prevention of road traffic accidents among young road users. Initial results of the program were evaluated to find out if the implementation of this prevention program is feasible in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During a 1-day interactive course young road users were introduced to the work carried out in an accident trauma unit and were informed about injury mechanisms and about the consequences of trauma. A systematic evaluation was made by all participants. The results were analyzed to find out whether it is possible to implement the program and the impressions gained by the participants of the program in order to be able to make further adjustments. RESULTS: A total of 219 young road users participated in the P.A.R.T.Y. program between 2011 and 2013. All participants reviewed the structure of the program with the help of school grades. Of the participants 59 % (n = 129) rated the program as "very good" and 41 % gave the rating of "good". Overall, 70 % of all participants advocated that all people of the same age should participate in the program. The structure was described as being well-balanced with respect to the theoretical and practical stations. CONCLUSION: The P.A.R.T.Y. program is a standardized and well-established concept that can also contribute to accident prevention in Germany. It provides the possibility to implement an accident awareness program throughout Germany. Initial results show that the program can be implemented in German hospitals and that the program appeals to the target group of young road users.

[Current standard of care for initial management of open fractures in emergency departments : A nationwide survey in German trauma centers]. / Realität initialer Versorgung offener Frakturen in deutschen Notaufnahmen : Eine Umfrage aus der Sektion NIS der DGU.

BACKGROUND: Limiting the morbidity of open fractures requires highly specific initial treatment. In addition to a stringent surgical strategy, correct antibiotic prophylaxis seems to be associated with an improved outcome. In the current literature, the duration and type of antibiotic prophylaxis are under discussion. The aim of the study was to survey the current initial treatment regimes for open fractures in German emergency departments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: With an online-based anonymous 16-item questionnaire all 3006 members of the German Trauma Society were surveyed. A total of 585 questionnaires (19.5 %) were returned completed. This article presents a descriptive analysis of the current state of treatment. RESULTS: Mainly specialists (35 %), senior physicians (30 %) and chief physicians (17 %) answered as well as interns (8 %) and out-patient practitioners (10 %). Of the participants 65 % did not accept the classification of emergency services; however, 93 % carried out urgent or emergency surgery, 84 % started an antibiotic prophylaxis in the emergency department and 63 % used a standard operating procedure (SOP). A total of 60 % used 1 antibiotic drug, 25 % used 2 and 15 % used 3 or more substances. An antibiotic treatment for more than 3 days was performed by 60 % of participants. CONCLUSION: The early initiation of antibiotic prophylaxis seems to be the standard practice in German emergency departments as well as early surgery. Strategies to improve the communication between prehospital and in-hospital teams, as well as graded antibiotic prophylaxis depending on the severity of soft tissue damage are needed.

[Interpersonal competence in orthopedics and traumatology : Why technical and procedural skills alone are not sufficient]. / Interpersonelle Kompetenz in Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie : Warum technische und prozedurale Fähigkeiten alleine nicht ausreichen.

Patient safety has increasingly gained significance as criterion which clinics and doctors will be measured against in terms of ethics and finances. The "human factor" moved into focus regarding the question of how to reduce treatment errors in clinical daily routine. Nevertheless, systematic mediation of interpersonal competences only plays a minor role in the catalogue of requirements for medical specialization and professional training. This is the case not only in orthopedics and traumatology, but in other medical fields as well. At the insistence of DGOU and in cooperation with Lufthansa Flight Training, a training model was initiated, comparable to training models used in aviation. In aviation, apart from the training of procedural and technical abilities, regular soft skills training has become standard in the training of all Lufthansa staff. Several studies confirm that by improving communication, interaction, and teamwork skills not only a reduction of intolerable incidents is observed, but also a positive economic effect. Interpersonal competences should be firmly anchored in orthopedics and traumatology and thus be implemented as third post in specialist training.

Patterns of early resuscitation associated with mortality after penetrating injuries.

BACKGROUND: Penetrating injuries are rare in European populations so their management represents a particular challenge. The aim was to assess early therapeutic aspects that are associated with favourable outcomes in patients with penetrating trauma. METHODS: Patients with penetrating injuries documented from 2009 to 2013 in the TraumaRegister DGU® were analysed. Patients with a primary admission and an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of at least 9 were included. The Revised Injury Severity Classification (RISC) II score was used for mortality prediction, and a standardized mortality ratio (SMR) calculated per hospital. Hospitals with favourable outcome (SMR below 1) were compared with those with poor outcome (SMR 1 or more). RESULTS: A total of 50 centres had favourable outcome (1242 patients; observed mortality rate 15.7 per cent) and 34 centres had poor outcome (918 patients; observed mortality rate 24.4 per cent). Predicted mortality rates according to RISC-II were 20.4 and 20.5 per cent respectively. Mean(s.d.) ISS values were 22(14) versus 21(14) (P = 0.121). Patients in the favourable outcome group had a significantly shorter time before admission to hospital and a lower intubation rate. They received smaller quantities of intravenous fluids on admission to the emergency room, but larger amounts of fresh frozen plasma, and were more likely to receive haemostatic agents. A higher proportion of patients in the favourable outcome group were treated in a level I trauma centre. Independent risk factors for hospital death following penetrating trauma identified by multivariable analysis included gunshot injury mechanism and treatment in non-level I centres. CONCLUSION: Among penetrating traumas, gunshot injuries pose an independent risk of death. Treatment of penetrating trauma in a level I trauma centre was significantly and independently associated with lower hospital mortality.

[Acute acromioclavicular joint injuries. Changes in diagnosis and therapy over the last 10 years]. / Die akute Schultereckgelenkverletzung. Diagnostik, Therapie und Entwicklungen der letzten 10 Jahre.

BACKGROUND: The goal of the present study was to summarize current treatment for acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations. METHOD: In all, 796 orthopedics and/or trauma departments in Germany were identified in the national hospital directory (www.dka.de). Using the respective hospital web sites, the email addresses of the responsible shoulder/sports surgeon or, if not available, the head of department (successful in 746 cases) were identified. Emails with a link to an online survey with 36 questions and two reminders were sent; 60 were undeliverable. Thus, 686 emails probably reached the addressee. A total of 203 colleagues (30%) participated in the survey. Findings were compared to results of the survey published by Bäthis et al. in 2001. RESULTS: More than 90% treat Rockwood I or II injuries conservatively and Rockwood IV to VI injuries surgically. However, 34% answered having never seen a Rockwood VI injury. Of those replying, 73% prefer surgical treatment for Rockwood III injuries. Favored surgical techniques were the hook plate in 44% and the arthoscopic TightRope® in 27%, while 11% prefer coracoclavicular cerclage, 6% AC joint transfixation, 3% minimally invasive AC joint reconstruction (MINAR), 1% coracoclavicular screw fixation, and 8% a completely different procedure. Concerning acute Rockwood III injuries, orthopedics and/or trauma surgeons still prefer surgical treatment but less often than 10 years ago (84%). CONCLUSIONS: Favored techniques have completely changed since 2001 when the majority of physicians preferred AC joint transfixation or coracoclavicular cerclages, both techniques that are hardly used today. The hook plate appears to have become "standard therapy". The arthroscopic TightRope® is the second most common despite being the newest technique.

[Current practice in coagulation and transfusion therapy in multiple trauma patients: A German nation-wide online survey]. / Stand der Gerinnungs- und Transfusionstherapie beim Schwerverletzten : Eine deutschlandweite Online-Umfrage.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the treatment of trauma-associated coagulopathy and bleeding has advanced enormously. The aim of this study was to assess the current practice of coagulation and transfusion management in Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 2011 until January 2012 we conducted a survey via online-questionnaire that was sent per E-Mail to all members of the German Society for Trauma Surgery. It comprised 12 questions with respect to current treatment of coagulopathy and haemorrhage in trauma patients. RESULTS: The response rate was 145/3006 (5 %). The respondents had following specialties: 77.2 % trauma surgery 15.9 % anesthesiology, 6.9 % others. 64 % of respondents were employed by a Level 1 trauma centre, wheras 17 % worked in a local level 3 centre. The majority (94 %) claimed to treat hypothermia regularly. Only about half of the participants reported to follow a massive transfusion protocol in their institution. The potential components of these protocols were reported in varying rates, being it well-established components (e.g. FFP 78 %; Fibrinogen 75 %) or therapies with poor evidence in multiple trauma (Desmopressin 39 %, rFVIIa 47 %). Calcium was provided by only 48 % of respondents although generally recommended in all guidelines. CONCLUSION: The current study suggests that in Germany strategies and principles regarding management of trauma-associated coagulopathy are standardized only poorly. Level 1 centres appear to apply a more advanced approach, however to much variability exists with respect to the components of the transfusion protocols. The low response rate indicates that most German trauma surgeons consider coagulation and hemorrhage as "expert-topics" beyond their field of duty.

[Penetrating neck injury of a blacksmith by splitter projectile]. / Penetrierende Halsverletzung durch ein Splitterprojektil bei Schmiedearbeiten.

Laryngeal injuries are rare but potentially life-threatening injuries. Due to the topography of the neck, accompanying injuries of the greater blood vessels, cervical nerves, thoracic organs and spinal cord are common. Therefore in initial diagnostics, these must be excluded from injuries which determine the prognosis. A patient presented with ventral perforation of the larynx, initial dyspnea, hematemesis and left-sided emphysema of the neck. Cause of the findings, we treated the patient non-operatively in interdisciplinary consensus.

Long-term effects of a perioperative safety checklist from the viewpoint of personnel.

BACKGROUND: While positive short-term effects of the use of safety checklists have previously been reported by personnel, it is unclear to which extent these effects are maintained for a long-term period. The aim of the present study was to evaluate perioperative safety standards and the quality of interprofessional cooperation from the viewpoint of the involved personnel for up to 2 years following the introduction of a safety checklist. METHODS: A survey of 99 co-workers in the departments of anaesthesiology and traumatology was conducted using a 19-point questionnaire concerning perioperative safety-relevant aspects and the quality of interprofessional cooperation before and at 3, 18, and 24 months after the introduction of a safety checklist. RESULTS: Verification of written consent for surgery (P < 0.01), clear marking of the surgical site (P < 0.01), and time management (P < 0.05) were rated more positively over time by the anaesthesiologists and nurses. Items involving communication were rated less positively after 18 and 24 months than at 3 months. Orthopaedic surgeons rated being better informed about the patients (P < 0.05), the planned operation (P < 0.01), and the assignment of tasks during surgery (P < 0.01) progressively more positively over the time. CONCLUSIONS: Some positive effects concerning the perioperative organisation and management were rated more positively even 2 years after checklist implementation. However, interprofessional communication and cooperation did not show long-term improvement from staff members' point of view. Probably longer lasting effects for the latter aspects could be achieved by repeated instruction and communication training.

[Surgical patients with chronic pain or chronic postsurgical pain: a prospective analysis of psychological and social factors]. / Chirurgische Patienten mit chronischem Schmerz oder chronisch-postoperativem Schmerz : Eine prospektive Analyse psychologischer und sozialer Faktoren.

INTRODUCTION: The interference of biological, social, and psychological factors of the patient, collectively known as the biopsychosocial perspective, plays an important role in the chronification of postsurgical pain. The aim of this pilot study was to detect whether patients suffering from chronic pain without a relationship to a recent operation (CP) differ from chronic pain patients whose pain exists since a recent operation and is related with it (CPSP) in these factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A step-by-step analysis of patients with chronic pain was conducted via a questionnaire of 36 questions in which mental state, pain, fear, and depression [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Deutsche Version (HADS-D), Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire (CPGQ, von Korff), SF-12, McGill Pain Questionnaire (sensoric/affective)] were surveyed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Fisher's exact test for counts, U test for continuous variables; group comparisons with: χ(2) test; p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: On average 29 months postoperatively (24-35 ± 3.5 months), 113 chronic pain patients were analyzed. A group comparison between the CPSP group (n = 73 with chronic postsurgical pain) and the group CP (n = 29 with chronic pain) was conducted. Both groups showed highly significant reductions of SF-12 data compared to a German normal collective (p < 0.001), but normal results regarding depression in the HADS-D and a moderately limiting, highly pain-related limitation in the CPGQ (von Korff III). No differences in the sensoric and affective parameters of the McGill Pain Questionnaire were found. Compared with the CPSP group, the CP group demonstrated higher pain intensities (p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Regarding these results critically, there were no group differences concerning psychological and social patient factors in chronic pain patients with or without postsurgical pain.

[Recombinant factor VIIa for the treatment of exsanguinating trauma patients: a matched-pair analysis from the Trauma Registry of the German Society for Trauma Surgery]. / Rekombinanter Faktor VIIa in der Hämorrhagiebehandlung des Schwerstverletzten: Eine Matched-pair-Analyse anhand des TraumaRegisters der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess whether the use of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) in trauma patients was associated with improved outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients documented in the TraumaRegistry of the German Society for Trauma Surgery (primary admissions; Injury Severity Score, ISS ≥ 9) who received rFVIIa in the first 6 hours upon admission (rFVIIa +) were matched with patients that had not received rFVIIa (rFVIIa-). RESULTS: The matching comparison yielded two identical groups with 100 patients each (rFVIIa+: average age 40.6 ± 18.5 years, ISS 47.1 ± 16.7 versus rFVIIa-: 40.1 ± 19.1 years, ISS 45.1 ± 15.6). Patients were administered an average of 18.3 ± 13.1 (rFVIIa+) versus 19.5 ± 14.0 (rFVIIa-) red blood cell units (p = 0.55) and 15.2 ± 13.7 (rFVIIa+) versus 15.0 ± 13.1 (rFVIIa-) units of fresh frozen plasma (p = 0.92). Thromboembolisms occurred in 5% (rFVIIa+) versus 2% (rFVIIa-) (p = 0.44), multiple organ failure (MOF) in 82% versus 62% (p = 0.003) and hospital mortality was 48% versus 43% (p = 0.57), respectively. CONCLUSION: The early use of rFVIIa in severely injured patients was not associated with either lower transfusion requirements or with mortality reduction but with increased MOF.

Evaluation of the interhospital patient transfer after implementation of a regionalized trauma care system (TraumaNetzwerk DGU®) in Germany.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate how many patients are being transferred between trauma centers and and their characteristics in the 2006 initiated TraumaNetzwerk DGU® (TNW). We further investigated the time point of transfer and differences in outcome, compared to patients not being transferred. We wanted to know how trauma centers judged the performance of the TNW in transfer. Method: (1) We analyzed the data of the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU) from 2014-2018. Included were patients that were treated in German trauma centers, maximum AIS (MAIS) >2 and MAIS 2 only in case of admission on ICU or death of the patient. Patients being transferred were compared to patients who were not. Characteristics were compared, and a logistic regression analysis performed to identify predictive factors. (2) We performed a survey in the TNW focussing on frequency, timing and communication between hospitals and improvement through TNW. Results: Study I analyzed 143,195 patients from the TR-DGU. Their mean ISS was 17.8 points (SD 11.5). 56.4% were admitted primarily to a Level-I, 32.2% to a Level-II and 11.4% to a Level-III Trauma Center. 10,450 patients (7.9%) were transferred. 3,667 patients (22.7%) of the admitted patients of Level-III Center and 5,610 (12.6%) of Level-II Center were transferred, these patients showed a higher ISS (Level-III: 18.1 vs. 12.9; Level-II: 20.1 vs. 15.8) with more often a severe brain injury (AIS 3+) (Level-III: 43.6% vs. 13.1%; Level-II: 53.2% vs. 23.8%). Regression analysis showed ISS 25+ and severe brain injury AIS 3+ are predictive factors for patients needing a rapid transfer. Study II: 215 complete questionnaires (34%) of the 632 trauma centers. Transfers were executed within 2 h after the accident (Level-III: 55.3%; Level-II: 25.0%) and between 2-6 h (Level-III: 39.5%; Level-II: 51.3%). Most trauma centers judged that implementation of TNW improved trauma care significantly (Level III: 65.0%; Level-II: 61.4%, Level-I: 56.7%). Conclusion: The implementation of TNW has improved the communication and quality of comprehensive trauma care of severely injured patients within Germany. Transfer is mostly organized efficient. Predictors such as higher level of head injury reveal that preclinical algorithm present a potential of further improvement.

The implementation of a perioperative checklist increases patients' perioperative safety and staff satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: The implementation of the 'Surgical Safety Checklist' caused a significant reduction in the incidence of complications and mortality among patients undergoing surgery. The aim of the present study was to evaluate perioperative safety standards and the quality of interprofessional cooperation before and after the introduction of a safety checklist from staff members' point of view. METHODS: Employees' attitude concerning safety-relevant aspects of the perioperative period, work processes, and quality of interprofessional cooperation was surveyed before and 3 months after introducing an adapted form of the 'Surgical Safety Checklist' by a 19-item questionnaire. RESULTS: After the implementation of the checklist, the cognizance of the names and functions of the individual operating room (OR) staff members, verification of the patient's written consent for surgery, indication for antibiotics before the surgical incision, and the quality of interprofessional cooperation were rated more positively. Traumatology physicians were more convinced that all artifacts had been removed from the surgical field. Finally, communication about intraoperative complications had improved. CONCLUSIONS: Our attitude surveys demonstrate that from the OR staff's perspective, in the perioperative setting, safety-relevant factors can be handled significantly better and with greater awareness by implementing a safety checklist as proposed by the World Health Organization.

[Prevention of infection in the current treatment of open fractures: an evidence-based systematic analysis]. / Prävention von Infektionen bei offenen Frakturen heute: Ein evidenzbasierter systematischer Review.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of open fractures remains an interdisciplinary challenge. Even success and evidence of infection prevention especially of new treatment options is not clear. METHOD: A systematic search in available electronic databases over the years 1974 until 2011 was conducted. Only clinical analyses with more than 5 adult patients in the German, English or French languages were included. All studies were rated according to Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) criteria. RESULTS: Over 855 articles were found due to the search and after applying the exclusion and inclusion criteria 49 studies were finally assessed to contribute to the evidence-based recommendations. Grade A recommendation: early application of antibiotics against gram-positive organisms for all open fracture types, additional coverage of gram-negative organisms for type III open fractures. Early surgical debridement should be performed. Grade B recommendation: type III open fractures should be treated with antibiotics for a minimum of 72 h but not longer than 24 h after wound closure. Vacuum treatment is justified and beneficial if wound closure is not achieved. Grade C recommendation: additional local antibiotic treatment in combination with systematic antibiotics may be of benefit. Definitive wound closure should be achieved within 1 week. DISCUSSION: This evidence-based analysis shows that there is good evidence for the treatment of open fractures with antibiotics and surgical debridement. Vacuum treatment can be recommended if wound closure is not possible.