New Picture Stimuli for the NIH Stroke Scale: A Validation Study.

BACKGROUND: The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale is a widely accepted tool for structured graded neurological examination of stroke or suspected stroke in the hyperacute setting. Concerns have arisen about the use of its picture stimuli in a contemporary and global health context. Here, we present new stimuli prepared to serve the needs of stroke providers worldwide: the precarious painter image description and updated objects for naming. METHODS: This was a validation study of 101 healthy fluent English speakers. Participants were reached by the Johns Hopkins Outpatient Center, the University of South Carolina, and Prisma Health from 2022 to 2023 and included residents of the United States, Germany, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Zambia. Participants were recorded in person or via video conferencing when asked to describe the new picture, while a subset named seven illustrations. Multivariate analyses of variance were used for primary analyses. In a complementary investigation, 299 attendees of the 2023 International Stroke Conference were asked about their preference for the existing or new stimuli and why. RESULTS: Each of the 44 content units from the picture description was included by at least 5% of respondents in the demographically representative subsample. Performance was similar across healthy participants irrespective of age, sex, race, ethnicity, or education. Typical descriptions were characterized by an average of 23 content units (SD=5) conveyed with 167 syllables (SD=79). The new naming stimuli were recognized by 100% of participants from many countries as being familiar and identifiable, and names provided in response to the task were highly convergent. The majority of stroke health care providers preferred both the precarious painter and naming stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: The description of the new National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale picture, the precarious painter, results in rich samples among healthy speakers that will provide an appropriate basis for the detection of language deficits.

Training and Certifying Users of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

Background and Purpose- The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, designed and validated for use in clinical stroke trials, is now required for all patients with stroke at hospital admission. Recertification is required annually but no data support this frequency; the effect of mandatory training before recertification is unknown. Methods- To clarify optimal recertification frequency and training effect, we assessed users' mastery of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale over several years using correct scores (accuracy) on each scale item of the 15-point scale. We also constructed 9 technical errors that could result from misunderstanding the scoring rules. We measured accuracy and the frequency of these technical errors over time. Using multivariable regression, we assessed the effect of time, repeat testing, and profession on user mastery. Results- The final dataset included 1.3×106 examinations. Data were consistent among all 3 online vendors that provide training and certification. Test accuracy showed no significant changes over time. Technical error rates were remarkably low, ranging from 0.48 to 1.36 per 90 test items. Within 2 vendors (that do not require training), the technical error rates increased negligibly over time (P<0.05). In data from a third vendor, mandatory training before recertification improved (reduced) technical errors but not accuracy. Conclusions- The data suggest that mastery of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scoring rules is stable over time, and the recertification interval should be lengthened. Mandatory retraining may be needed after unsuccessful recertifications, but not routinely otherwise.