Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 1/2 Study to Determine the Appropriate ATX-101 Concentration for Reduction of Submental Fat.

BACKGROUND: ATX-101 is indicated for submental fat treatment. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate ATX-101 versus placebo for reducing submental fat. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults with unwanted submental fat across 6 global sites were randomized to ATX-101 (0.5%, 1.0%, or 2.0%) or placebo for ≤4 treatments every 28 days. Outcomes included safety (adverse events and pain visual analog scale) throughout the study and efficacy (submental fat rating, patient satisfaction, and submental fat improvements) at Week 16. RESULTS: Eighty-four of 85 enrolled patients received ≥1 ATX-101 treatment (0.5% [n = 20], 1.0% [n = 20], 2.0% [n = 22] or placebo [n = 22]). Most patients (n = 82) experienced adverse events, which were mostly mild/moderate, seemed to be dose-related, and led to no study discontinuations. The mean pain scores were highest in the ATX-101 1.0% and 2.0% groups. Week-16 change from baseline in the submental fat rating scale was significantly greater for ATX-101 0.5% and 1.0% versus placebo (p ≤ .05). At Week 16, 71%, 74%, 53%, and 40% of patients in the ATX-101 0.5%, 1.0%, 2.0%, and placebo groups, respectively, achieved a ≥1-grade reduction in submental fat from baseline. Satisfaction with appearance and patient-assessed global improvement ratings increased in all ATX-101 treatment groups versus placebo. CONCLUSION: All ATX-101 concentrations were safe and efficacious for moderate/severe submental fat reduction.

Improvements in Submental Contour up to 3 Years After ATX-101: Efficacy and Safety Follow-Up of the Phase 3 REFINE Trials.

BACKGROUND: ATX-101 (deoxycholic acid) significantly reduced submental fat (SMF) severity in two 24-week Phase 3 studies (REFINE-1 and REFINE-2). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the durability of effect and long-term safety of ATX-101. METHODS: REFINE study patients who maintained ≥1-grade improvement on the Clinician-Reported SMF Rating Scale (CR-1 responders) 12 weeks after their last REFINE treatment were eligible for enrollment in this multicenter, double-blind, nontreatment, long-term, follow-up study (NCT02163902). The primary endpoint was CR-1 response at Years 1, 2, and 3. Patient-reported satisfaction, psychological impact, and adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: In total, 224 patients (ATX-101, n = 113; placebo, n = 111) were enrolled. Maintenance of CR-1 response was significantly better in the ATX-101 group than in the placebo group at Year 1 (86.4% vs 56.8%; P < 0.001), Year 2 (90.6% vs 73.8%; P = 0.014), and Year 3 (82.4% vs 65.0%; P = 0.03). Most (74%) ATX-101‒treated patients satisfied at 12 weeks remained satisfied at Year 3. Significant reductions from baseline in psychological impact scores were sustained through Year 3 (P < 0.001). No new treatment-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in submental contour achieved with ATX-101 are maintained for 3 years in most patients. No new safety signals emerged.

Histological Analysis of the Effect of ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid Injection) on Subcutaneous Fat: Results From a Phase 1 Open-Label Study.

BACKGROUND: ATX-101 is approved for submental fat reduction. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the histological effect of ATX-101 injection into subcutaneous fat. METHODS: This Phase 1 open-label study enrolled 14 adults to receive injections of ATX-101 into abdominal fat at varying concentrations (0.5%, 1.0%, 2.0%, or 4.0%), volumes (0.2 or 0.4 mL), spacing (0.7, 1.0, or 1.5 cm), and time points before scheduled abdominoplasty (1, 3, 7, or 28 days). During abdominoplasty, tissue was excised and preserved for histology. RESULTS: All injection paradigms resulted in histological changes confined to the subcutaneous layer, which were more prominent at higher concentrations and independent of volume and spacing. Key features at Day 1 after injection were adipocytolysis, blood vessel injury, neutrophilic inflammation, and lysis of locally present neutrophils. At Day 3, inflammation was reduced versus Day 1, and hemorrhage and lipid lake formation (at higher concentrations) were observed. Day 7 samples exhibited prominent adipocytolysis, mild inflammation, lipid-laden macrophages in the septae, and repair of vascular injury. At Day 28, inflammation was largely resolved and prominent features were septal thickening, neovascularization, and atrophy of fat lobules. CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous injection of ATX-101 induces adipocytolysis and local inflammation with septal thickening and resolution of inflammation by 28 days after injection.

A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3b Study of ATX-101 for Reduction of Mild or Extreme Submental Fat.

BACKGROUND: ATX-101 (deoxycholic acid injection) is approved for reduction of moderate or severe submental fat (SMF). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ATX-101 in subjects with mild or extreme SMF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults with mild or extreme SMF (based on clinician assessment) were randomized to receive ≤6 treatments with ATX-101 or placebo. Efficacy end points, evaluated at 12 weeks after last treatment, included percentage of subjects who achieved ≥1-grade improvement in SMF from baseline based on both clinician and patient assessment (composite CR-1/PR-1 response) as well as multiple subject-reported outcomes. Safety end points included change in skin laxity and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, 61.3% of ATX-101-treated subjects versus 6.7% of placebo-treated subjects with mild SMF and 89.3% versus 13.3% of subjects, respectively, with extreme SMF achieved a composite CR-1/PR-1 response (p < .001 for both). ATX-101-treated subjects also reported higher levels of satisfaction and greater reductions in the psychological impact of SMF versus placebo-treated subjects regardless of baseline SMF severity. Skin laxity was unchanged or improved in most of the subjects. Adverse events were mainly mild/moderate, transient, and associated with the injection site. CONCLUSION: ATX-101 was efficacious and well tolerated for reduction of mild or extreme SMF.

Submental fat reduction using sequential treatment approach with cryolipolysis and ATX-101.

BACKGROUND: Submental fat (SMF) detracts from facial aesthetics and negatively impacts self-image. AIMS: To evaluate safety, effectiveness, and satisfaction of cryolipolysis and ATX-101 used sequentially to reduce SMF. METHODS: A prospective, open-label, interventional, single-site study enrolling 22- to 65-year-old participants rated as Grade 4 (extreme) on the Clinician-Rated SMF Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS). Co-primary effectiveness endpoints were proportions of participants with ≥1-grade and ≥2-grade improvement on CR-SMFRS at 12 weeks post final treatment. Additional assessments included ultrasound measurement of fat thickness and Subject Self-Rating Scale (SSRS) scores at 12 weeks post final treatment. Safety was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: Of 16 enrolled participants, 62.5% were female, mean age of 43, and mean body mass index of 31.8 kg/m2 . 100% of participants achieved ≥1-grade improvement, and 71.4% achieved ≥2-grade CR-SMFRS improvement. Mean (SD) reduction in SMF thickness was 0.2 mm (1.3), and SSRS scores ≥4 (slightly to extremely satisfied) were reported by 71.4% of participants. Adverse events (AEs) were mild and resolved by study end. No unanticipated adverse device effects or serious or unexpected AEs occurred. CONCLUSION: Sequential treatment with cryolipolysis and ATX-101 was found safe and effective for reducing extreme SMF, resulting in approximately a 2-grade improvement.

Rapid onset of response and patient-reported outcomes after onabotulinumtoxinA treatment of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines.

INTRODUCTION: no previously published botulinum toxin type A cosmetic trials included both physician and subject measures of onset. OBJECTIVE: determine physician- and subject-reported onset of onabotulinumtoxinA. METHODS: Two-center open-label, 14-day study in toxin-naive female patients with moderate-to-severe glabellar lines (GL) treated with 20-U onabotulinumtoxinA. Onset endpoint was categorical (physician assessed: days 2, 3, 4, 7 and 14; subject: 14-day diary). Subjects rated improvements in GL severity and completed the Facial Line Outcomes (FLO) and Self-Perception of Age (SPA) questionnaires. RESULTS: nearly half, 48 percent (n=45) of subjects, reported onset by day 1. Subject- and physician-reported onset rates, respectively, were 77 percent and 87 percent (day 2), 93 percent and 91 percent (day 3), 98 percent and 100 percent (day 4), and 100 percent thereafter. At all time points, FLO and SPA improved (P=0.008 and P=0.01, respectively). No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: onabotulinumtoxinA provides rapid onset (one to two days) based on physician and subject assessment.

Safety and tolerability of onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of facial lines: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from global clinical registration studies in 1678 participants.

BACKGROUND: OnabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of facial lines is a widely used cosmetic medical procedure and, as such, the safety and tolerability profile is of interest to health care providers and patients. Based on data from individual studies that were conducted according to regulatory guidelines to provide adequate safety and efficacy data to support product licensure (registration studies), the overall benefit:risk profile of onabotulinumtoxinA for facial lines has been favorable. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to increase statistical power through meta-analysis to detect treatment group differences in adverse event (AE) incidence that may not have been evident in individual registration studies. METHODS: Individual participant data (n = 1678) were from 6 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and 3 open-label studies. Two double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were for lateral canthal lines (3-18 U/side) and all others were for glabellar lines (10 or 20 U). Doses used reflect global product labeling in countries where licensed. RESULTS: Participant population was non-Hispanic white (43%) or Asian (52%) and predominantly female (88%). In double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, overall AE incidence did not significantly differ by treatment group (onabotulinumtoxinA vs placebo). The only individual AEs with significantly greater incidence in the onabotulinumtoxinA group were eyelid sensory disorder (2.5% vs 0.3%, P = .004; verbatim phrases "tight," "pressured," "heavy," "drooping feeling," "feeling of droopiness") and eyelid ptosis (1.8% vs 0%, P = .02), both present only in glabellar studies. Overall treatment-related (per investigator) AE incidence was greater in the onabotulinumtoxinA group versus placebo (24% vs 16%, P = .005), and treatment-related eyelid edema was an additional AE with significantly higher incidence in the onabotulinumtoxinA group versus placebo (P = .04). Incidence of all 3 of these AEs significantly decreased as number of treatment cycles increased. Eyelid sensory disorder and eyelid edema were more common in Asian participants. Acne, injection site pruritus, oral herpes, rash, lower respiratory tract infection, dental caries, and eye pain were significantly more common in placebo-treated compared with onabotulinumtoxinA-treated participants. Serious AE incidence did not significantly differ by treatment (onabotulinumtoxinA vs placebo) and no serious AEs were treatment related. There were no symptoms of weakness remote to the injection site or related to the central nervous system. LIMITATIONS: Limitations included: (1) highly visible efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA may have resulted in reporting bias; (2) reliance on participant intervisit recall; (3) a relatively short follow-up period (1 year); (4) conclusions are based solely on the doses analyzed (ie, those used in the respective trials); and (5) exclusion of patients with severe medical disease in registration studies. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis confirms the safety and tolerability of onabotulinumtoxinA for glabellar and lateral canthal lines, at the doses studied, based on the most comprehensive controlled safety analysis of onabotulinumtoxinA performed to date. The AEs observed were generally mild to moderate; most treatment-related AEs were related either to physical injection of product or local pharmacologic effects. Even with the increased statistical power of a large sample size, no new onabotulinumtoxinA-associated AEs emerged.

Pooled analysis of the safety of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of poststroke spasticity.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A). DESIGN: Analysis of pooled data of 9 double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of patients with spasticity after stroke. SETTING: University hospitals and specialty rehabilitation centers in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 482 patients with upper-limb spasticity and 310 with lower-limb spasticity (overall mean age, 58y; 60% men). INTERVENTION: Treatment with BTX-A (n=534; 1-3 treatments; mean dose, 231U) or placebo (n=258). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Adverse events. RESULTS: Most patients (69%) received only 1 treatment with BTX-A. Patients were followed for a mean of 17.8 weeks (range, 0.1-44.7wk) after each treatment. A total of 352 (65.9%) patients in the BTX-A group and 163 (63.2%) in the placebo group reported at least 1 adverse event (P=.475). The most frequent adverse events reported by patients (>5% but <10% in either group) were respiratory infection, seizures, incoordination, and injection site pain, none of which occurred at a significantly higher rate in the BTX-A group (all P>.05). The majority of adverse events were rated as mild or moderate in severity. Only nausea was reported at a significantly higher rate in the BTX-A group (12/534 [2.2%]) than the placebo group (0/258) (P=.011); in contrast, injection site pain, chest pain, and allergic reaction were reported significantly more frequently in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: BTX-A has an acceptable safety profile for treatment of patients with focal spasticity following stroke, a population in which adverse events and comorbidities are common.