Efficacy and safety of bilateral thoracic paravertebral blocks in outpatient breast surgery.

Unilateral thoracic paravertebral blocks (TPVBs) have demonstrated reliable intraoperative analgesia, low postoperative pain scores, and an opioid-sparing effect in breast cancer surgery. However, secondary to the perceived risk of complications, bilateral TPVB have been less well accepted and are less frequently used. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using bilateral TPVBs in outpatient surgery for patients undergoing bilateral mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction. Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patients receiving bilateral TPVBs for bilateral mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction performed by a single surgeon from September 2012 to September 2015. Records were reviewed for incidence of complications, time to discharge, and incidence of unplanned admission or readmission. Clopper-Pearson method for binomial distribution was used to calculate confidence intervals for proportions. Forty-five patients undergoing bilateral mastectomy with immediate reconstruction received bilateral TPVBs. There were 4 TPVB-related complications, all of which were symptomatic hypotension or bradycardia (9%; 95% CI, 2%-21%). There was no incidence of symptomatic pneumothorax. Mean time to discharge readiness from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) was 1.9 hours (SD = 1.0). Overall, 91% (n = 29) of the 32 patients scheduled for day surgery were discharged home as planned. Mean time from entry to PACU to home discharge for day surgery patients (n = 32) and planned admissions (n = 13) was 5.9 hours (SD = 4.3) and 16.3 hours (SD = 3.6), respectively. There was no incidence of readmission following discharge. Bilateral TPVBs can safely facilitate day surgery in carefully selected patients undergoing bilateral mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction.

Wrist ganglion treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To review the clinical outcomes of treatment for adult wrist ganglions and to conduct a meta-analysis comparing the 2 most common options: open surgical excision and aspiration. METHODS: The review methodology was registered with PROSPERO. We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE for articles published between 1990 and 2013. Included studies reported treatment outcomes of adult wrist ganglions. Two independent reviewers performed screening and data extraction. We evaluated the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials (RCT) and cohort studies using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, respectively; Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. RESULTS: A total of 753 abstracts were identified and screened; 112 full-text articles were reviewed and 35 studies (including 2,239 ganglions) met inclusion criteria for data extraction and qualitative synthesis. Six studies met criteria for meta-analysis, including 2 RCTs and 4 cohort studies. In RCTs surgical excision was associated with a 76% reduction in recurrence compared with aspiration. Randomized controlled trial quality was moderate. In cohort studies surgical excision was associated with a 58% reduction in recurrence compared with aspiration. Cohort study quality was very low. In cohort studies aspiration was not associated with a significant reduction in recurrence compared with reassurance. Across all studies mean recurrence for arthroscopic surgical excision (studies, 11; ganglions, 512), open surgical excision (studies, 14; ganglions, 809), and aspiration (studies, 12; ganglions, 489) was 6%, 21%, and 59%, respectively. Mean complication rate for arthroscopic surgical excision (studies, 6; ganglions, 221), open surgical excision (studies, 6; ganglions, 341), and aspiration (studies, 3; ganglions, 134) was 4%, 14%, and 3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Open surgical excision offers significantly lower chance of recurrence compared with aspiration in the treatment of wrist ganglions. Arthroscopic excision has yielded promising outcomes but data from comparative trials are limited and have not demonstrated its superiority. Further RCTs are needed to increase confidence in the estimate of effect and to compare complications and recovery. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic I.

Rotational strength, range of motion, and function in people with unaffected shoulders from various stages of life.

BACKGROUND: Different measurements are used to assess shoulder function, including range of motion, strength, functional performance and self-report function. To understand disablement, it is necessary to understand the relationship between impairments and function in persons without shoulder problems. This study was conducted to enhance existing comparative data in subjects without upper extremity pathology, and to assess the relationships between impairments (range of motion, strength) and self-reported or measured function/disability. The impact of age, gender and dominance was determined. METHODS: Two-hundred ninety-four subjects with unaffected shoulders were recruited. The subjects (mean age: 37 years old) were divided into three subgroups, 18-39, 40-59, and over 60 years of age. During a single session, at least two of the following variables were measured: self-reported function (shoulder disability scales), range of motion, isometric rotational strength, or upper limb functional performance (FIT-HaNSA). Two-way analysis of variance was used to determine, for each variable, the effects of age and gender. The relationship between the outcomes was established using Pearson product correlations. RESULTS: Men were significantly stronger than women for all age categories. There was an age-related decline in strength in men in the over-60 age category. Significant negative correlations between strength and range of motion were demonstrated (-0.22