Low-Dose Blue Light (420 nm) Reduces Metabolic Activity and Inhibits Proliferation of Human Dermal Fibroblasts.

Hypertrophic scarring in burn wounds is caused by overactive fibroblasts and myofibroblasts. Blue light reveals wavelength- and dose-dependent antibacterial and antiproliferative effects and may serve as a therapeutic option against wound infection and fibrotic conditions. Therefore, we evaluated in this study the effects of single and multiple irradiations with blue light at 420 nm (BL420) on the intracellular ATP concentration, and on the viability and proliferation of the human skin fibroblast (HDFs). In addition, possible BL420-induced effects on the catalase expression and differentiation were assessed by immunocytochemical staining and western blot analyses. Furthermore, we used RNA-seq analyses to identify BL420-affected genes. We found that BL420 induced toxicity in HDFs (up to 83%; 180 J/cm2). A low dose of 20 J/cm2 reduced the ATP concentration by ~50%. Multiple irradiations (4 × 20 J/cm2) inhibited proliferation without visible toxicity and reduced catalase protein expression by ~37% without affecting differentiation. The expression of about 300 genes was significantly altered. Many downregulated genes have functions in cell division/mitosis. BL420 can strongly influence the fibroblast physiology and has potential in wound therapy. However, it is important to consider the possible toxic and antiproliferative effects, which could potentially lead to impaired wound healing and reduced scar breaking strength.

Phototherapy of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Infected Wounds: Preclinical Evaluation of Antimicrobial Blue Light (450-460 nm) Using In Vitro Assays and a Human Wound Skin Model.

Objective: To determine effective treatment strategies against bacterial infections of burn wounds with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, we tested different treatment regimens with antibacterial blue light (BL). Background: Infections of burn wounds are serious complications and require effective and pathogen-specific therapy. Hereby, infections caused by P. aeruginosa pose a particular challenge in clinical practice due to its resistance to many antibiotics and topical antiseptics. Methods: LED-based light sources (450-460 nm) with different intensities and treatment times were used. Antibacterial effects against P. aeruginosa were determined by colony-forming unit (CFU) assays, human skin wound models, and fluorescence imaging. Results: In suspension assays, BL (2 h, 40 mW/cm2, 288 J/cm2) reduced bacterial number (>5 log10 CFU/mL). Applying 144 J/cm2, using 40 mW/cm2 for 1 h was more effective (>4 log10 CFU) than using 20 mW/cm2 for 2 h (>1.5 log10 CFU). BL with low irradiance (24 h, 3.5 mW/cm2, 300 J/cm2) only revealed bacterial reduction in thin bacteria-containing medium layers. In infected in vitro skin wounds only BL irradiation (2 h, 40 mW/cm2, 288 J/cm2) exerted a significant antimicrobial efficacy (2.94 log10 CFU/mL). Conclusions: BL treatment may be an effective therapy for P. aeruginosa-infected wounds to avoid radical surgical debridement. However, a significant antibacterial efficacy can only be achieved with higher irradiances and longer treatment times (min. 40 mW/cm2; >1 h), which cannot be easily integrated into regular clinical treatment protocols, for example, during a dressing change. Further studies are necessary to establish BL therapy for infected burns among tissue compatibility and interactions with previous therapeutic agents.

Characterization of Blue Light Treatment for Infected Wounds: Antibacterial Efficacy of 420, 455, and 480 nm Light-Emitting Diode Arrays Against Common Skin Pathogens Versus Blue Light-Induced Skin Cell Toxicity.

Objective: To determine effective treatment strategies against bacterial infections of chronic wounds, we tested different blue light (BL)-emitting light-emitting diode arrays (420, 455, and 480 nm) against wound pathogens and investigated in parallel BL-induced toxic effects on human dermal fibroblasts. Background: Wound infection is a major factor for delayed healing. Infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus are clinically relevant caused by their ability of biofilm formation and their quickly growing antibiotics resistance. BL has demonstrated antimicrobial properties against various microbes. Methods: Determination of antibacterial and cell toxic effects by colony-forming units (CFUs)/biofilm/cell viability assays, and live cell imaging. Results: A single BL irradiation (180 J/cm2), of P. aeruginosa at both 420 and 455 nm resulted in a bacterial reduction (>5 log10 CFU), whereas 480 nm revealed subantimicrobial effects (2 log10). All tested wavelengths of BL also revealed bacteria reducing effects on Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli (maximum 1-2 log10 CFU) but not on S. aureus. Dealing with biofilms, all wavelengths using 180 J/cm2 were able to reduce significantly the number of P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and S. epidermidis. Here, BL420nm achieved reductions up to 99%, whereas BL455nm and BL480nm were less effective (60-83%). Biofilm-growing S. aureus was more BL sensitive than in the planktonic phase showing a reduction by 63-75%. A significant number of cell toxic events (>40%) could be found after applying doses (>30 J/cm2) of BL420nm. BL455nm showed only slight cell toxicity (180 J/cm2), whereas BL480nm was nontoxic at any dose. Conclusions: BL treatment can be effective against bacterial infections of chronic wounds. Nevertheless, using longer wavelengths >455 nm should be preferred to avoid possible toxic effects on skin and skin cells. To establish BL therapy for infected chronic wounds, further studies concerning biofilm formation and tissue compatibility are necessary.