Radiographic diagnosis of proximal caries-influence of experience and gender of the dental staff.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the influence of experience and gender on the radiographic detection of proximal caries lesions and on therapeutic decisions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey of 220 examiners (students and employees at three universities and dentists in the field) was taken using a standardized written questionnaire concerning radiographic diagnosis and therapy planning. An expert opinion of four dentists was determined as radiographic reference. A mixed effect logistic regression model was used for statistical evaluation and the odds ratio and p values were calculated (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Examiners with experience had an almost four times greater chance of a correct assessment, if proximal caries lesion was present or not, than examiners with low experience (OR 3.7 (95% CI 2.4-5.8)). No gender-specific differences were discovered (OR women vs. men 0.9 (95% CI 0.6-1.4)). There was a relationship between the severity of the burnout effect on the x-ray and false positive caries diagnosis. Overall, 43% of respondents would plan invasive treatment in the enamel on a patient at low risk of caries and 78% on a high-risk patient. The results showed that the more experienced practitioners would be more likely to postpone restorative therapy on proximal caries until the lesion reached a later stage. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that examiner's experience influences the radiographic diagnosis of proximal lesions. No gender-specific differences could be found. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Examiner's professional experience is an important factor when radiography is included for detection and treatment planning of proximal lesions.

[Changes in therapy for breast cancer patients as a result of mammography screening. An analysis of Bavarian cancer registry data from 2000 to 2008]. / Veränderungen der Therapie des Mammakarzinoms in Bayern seit Einführung des Mammografie-Screenings. Eine Analyse bayerischer Krebsregisterdaten der Jahre 2000 bis 2008.

PURPOSE: A quality controlled mammography screening programme was initiated at the end of 2003 in Bavaria, a region with 12.5 million inhabitants, and transferred over to the national screening programme at the end of 2006. The purpose of this study was to evaluate immediate population-based consequences of mammography screening on breast cancer therapy. METHODS: Data from 75 475 breast cancer cases, diagnosed between 2000 and 2008 and registered in one of the 6 Bavarian clinical cancer registries were analysed. 51.4% of these patients were between 50 and 69 years of age and therefore the target population for screening. Trends of prognostic factors and standard therapies were calculated for 3 age groups (≤49 years, 50-69 years, ≥70 years) by means of annual percentages as well as 95%-confidence intervals for the percent difference between 2000 and 2008 (year of diagnosis). For interpretation of therapy trends, logistic regression models were calculated. RESULTS: Therapy trends showed that the increasingly favourable stage distribution may have resulted in the reduction of more radical surgical methods such as mastectomy (2000: 32.6%; 2008: 19.6%) or axillary dissection (89.0% vs. 37.0%), especially for women aged 50-69. An increase of radiation therapies (59.7% vs. 66.6%) can be explained to some extent by the increase in breast conserving surgeries. The shift to more favourable prognostic factors led, in accordance with the guidelines, to an increase of the proportion of singular endocrine therapies (28.5% vs. 40.7%), a decrease of chemotherapies (20.4% vs. 13.1%) and therefore to more gentle systemic therapies overall. These trends strengthened in the years following the introduction of screening, with a simultaneous rise of screening participants in the target population. CONCLUSION: The introduction of mammography screening in Bavaria has already shown the expected trend towards more favourable prognostic factors. Among other things, this could be a reason for the increasing use of more gentle therapies. Whether the screening in Bavaria leads to a mortality reduction, has to be analysed on the basis of an initial comparison of participation status followed by the trends in mortality thereafter.