Benign uterine mass-discrimination from leiomyosarcoma by a preoperative risk score: a multicenter cohort study.

PURPOSE: Discrimination of uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and leiomyoma (LM) prior to surgery by basic preoperative characteristics and development of a preoperative leiomyosarcoma score. METHODS: A predominantly prospective cohort of 826 patients with LM from a clinical institution and an outpatient center was included in the study. Further a predominantly retrospective cohort of 293 patients with LMS was included from the counseling database of the German Clinical Center of Excellence for Genital Sarcoma and Mixed Tumors (DKSM, University Medicine Greifswald, Germany). We analyzed and compared anamnestic, epidemiological and clinical findings between both cohorts. Tenfold cross-validated logistic regression and random forest was performed on the 80% training set. The preoperative LMS score (pLMS) was developed based on logistic regression and independently evaluated by analyzing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with the 20% test set. RESULTS: In the LMS cohort, 63.1% had initially surgery for presumed LM and only 39.6% of endometrial biopsies revealed LMS. Key features for LMS discrimination were found to be bleeding symptoms: intermenstrual bleeding [RRc = 2.71, CI = (1.90-3.49), p < 0.001], hypermenorrhea [RRc = 0.28, CI = (0.15-0.50), p < 0.001], dysmenorrhea [RRc = 0.22, CI = (0.10-0.51), p < 0.001], postmenstrual bleeding [RRc = 2.08, CI = (1.30-2.75), p < 0.001], suspicious sonography [RRc = 1.21, CI = (1.19-1.22), p < 0.001] and the tumor diameter (each centimeter difference: ß = 0.24, SD = 0.04, p < 0.001). pLMS achieved a mean cross-validated AUC of 0.969 (SD = 0.019) in the training set and an AUC of 0.968 in the test set. CONCLUSIONS: The presented score is based on basic clinical characteristics and allows the prediction of LMS prior to a planned surgery of a uterine mass. In case pLMS is between - 3 and + 1, we suggest subsequent diagnostics, such as endometrial biopsy, color Doppler sonography, LDH measurement, MRI and transcervical biopsy.

Diagnosing chronic endometritis: when simplification fails to clarify.

Reproductive immunology has grown in importance in recent years and has even developed into a discipline of its own within the field of reproductive medicine. Many aspects of reproductive failure such as repeated implantation failure or recurrent miscarriages are, meanwhile, seen as a consequence of aberrant expression of immunological factors. This is reflected by the increasing number of tests for assessing and quantifying different immune cell types as well as by a wide range of immune therapies offered to a clientele consisting of desperate patients requesting additional 'IVF tools': first, what is still usually disregarded is the enormous plasticity and fluctuation of most immune cells in the genital tract; second, their still poorly characterized functions in the endometrial cycle: further, their partially unknown role in embryo implantation and in establishing a pregnancy; and third, the fact that one of the fundamental hypotheses of reproductive immunology-of note-the Medawar concept or 'Medawar's Paradox' of semi-allogeneic graft embryo, is partially based on an erroneous assumption, i.e. the immunologic rejection and tolerance of an embryo. In the present opinion article, we comment on the diagnostic procedures and therapy approaches for chronic endometritis within the scope of reproductive medicine.