Incidence of highly important extravascular findings detected on CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and the lower extremities.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and significance of extravascular findings on CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reports of CT angiograms of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities for 275 patients (164 men and 111 women; mean age, 72 years) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were scanned from the level of diaphragm to toes. Extravascular findings were classified into three groups-low, moderate, and high importance-on the basis of clinical significance. Low-importance findings were defined as those with little, if any, clinical significance. Moderate-importance findings were those that may not be clinically apparent but recognition of which could be beneficial at a later time. Highly important findings were defined as previously unknown results requiring further imaging or investigation. For highly important findings, electronic chart review determined the subsequent clinical course. RESULTS: Highly important extravascular findings were found in 40 (15%) patients. Of 462 findings overall, 43 (9%) were of high importance, 77 (17%) were of moderate importance, and 342 (74%) were of low importance. The most common highly important findings were indeterminate lesions of kidney (n = 9), lung (n = 7), and liver (n = 6). Overall, eight (3%) of the 275 patients had findings of high clinical significance that resulted in medical therapy or surgical intervention, including lung carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, colon carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and pulmonary coccidioidomycosis. CONCLUSION: Of patients undergoing CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities, 15% had previously undiagnosed, highly important findings. Radiologists and referring clinicians should be aware of the frequency of these clinically significant extravascular findings at CT angiography.

Prediction of Limb Salvage Following Percutaneous Vascular Intervention Using a Composite Tibial Artery Perfusion Score.

PURPOSE: To assess a novel tibial artery perfusion score (TPS) for predicting limb salvage in critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients undergoing percutaneous vascular intervention (PVI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive cohort of 115 CLI patients undergoing PVI in 144 limbs from 2011 to 2016 was analyzed. TPS comprised a 27-point scale based on: (1) patent tibial vessels following PVI, (2) severity of calcification of the tibial arteries, (3) presence of an intact pedal arch following intervention, (4) whether or not revascularization was direct or indirect based on the target angiosome, (5) presence of angiosome blush at the completion of index intervention. Limbs were stratified into (1) High [21-27 points], (2) Medium [13-20 points], and (3) Low [0-12 points] TPS. Predictive value of TPS was evaluated using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 15.7 months (range 0.4-69.9 months). Limb salvage in High, Medium, and Low TPS groups was 90.6%, 85.9%, and 55.6%, respectively, as freedom from the composite outcome: (1) limb complication resulting in death, (2) tibial bypass surgery, (3) above-the-knee amputation, or (4) below-the-knee amputation in patients without supratibial disease at the time of PVI. TPS was significantly associated with limb salvage defined as freedom from both the composite outcome and major amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this preliminary investigation, TPS was associated with limb salvage in CLI limbs, particularly in high-risk limbs. Further validation in a prospective cohort may identify patients with high-risk limbs in need of closer surveillance and earlier reintervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

#TwittIR: Understanding and Establishing a Twitter Ecosystem for Interventional Radiologists and Their Practices.

The use of social media among interventional radiologists is increasing, with Twitter receiving the most attention. Twitter is an ideal forum for open exchange of ideas from around the world. However, it is important for Twitter users to gain a rudimentary understanding of the many potential communication pathways to connect with other users. An intentional approach to Twitter is vital to efficient and successful use. This article describes several common communication pathways that can be utilized by physicians in their interventional radiology practice.