RESUMO
Metabolic control in recipients of segmental-pancreas grafts with pancreaticoenterostomy (performed in Stockholm) or duct obstruction by polymer injection (performed in Oslo) were compared. The recipients were uremic diabetic patients and also received a kidney from the same donor. Because the patient population in the two Scandinavian countries is very similar and the immunosuppressive protocols used are almost identical, such a comparison seemed reasonable. The number of patients available for study at 1, 2, and 3 yr was 22, 10, and 4, respectively, with duct injection and 28, 10, and 3 with pancreaticoenterostomy. The mean age of the patients was somewhat higher in the Oslo series. There were no significant differences regarding immunosuppression or kidney-graft function as estimated by serum creatinine at 1, 2, and 3 yr. No significant differences were found in fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, and intravenous glucose tolerance between the two groups at 1, 2, and 3 yr.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirurgia , Transplante de Pâncreas , Adulto , Creatinina/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/fisiopatologia , Enterostomia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Terapia de Imunossupressão , Transplante de Rim , Métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ductos PancreáticosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A single-center study of 655 nonsensitized recipients of primary cadaveric kidney grafts is presented. RESULTS: Graft survival in serologically HLA-DR 1-10 antigen-matched grafts to nonsensitized recipients at 1 year was 90%, compared with 82% (P=0.004) and 73% (P=0.001) in one and two DR antigen-mismatched grafts. The corresponding figures at 5 years were 76%, 62%, and 56%, respectively. Matching for the DR antigens 11-14, or for some DR alleles only detectable by genomic typing, further improved graft survival, but the differences did not reach statistical significance. Matching also for the serologically defined HLA-A and -B antigens did not significantly further improve overall graft survival, but some effects for grafts surviving at least 1 year were observed. Among recipients of grafts mismatched for zero, one, or two HLA-DR antigens, acute rejection episodes were experienced in 48%, 64% (P<0.001), and 82% (P<0.001), respectively, within the first 3 months. HLA-A and -B mismatches showed no significant correlation to acute rejection episodes. CONCLUSION: Matching for the DR antigens 1-10 significantly secures and prolongs the survival of first cadaveric renal grafts. Our results also show that DR 1-10 antigen-matched combinations can often be obtained even in rather small recipient pools, when actively sought for.
Assuntos
Rejeição de Enxerto/imunologia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/imunologia , Antígenos HLA-DR/imunologia , Transplante de Rim/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Rejeição de Enxerto/epidemiologia , Humanos , Imunocompetência , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for the majority of patients with end-stage renal disease. However, the shortage of kidneys for transplantation is a global problem, and any attempt to improve the donor situation would be of benefit to the growing number of patients on transplant waiting lists. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since 1984, we have transplanted 141 kidneys from genetically unrelated living donors. Donors were most often spouses and were accepted regardless of HLA match grade. Preemptive transplantation was performed in 39% of the patients. Standard triple-drug immunosuppression with prednisolone, cyclosporine, and azathioprine was used. The patients were followed from 6 months to 13 years. RESULTS: The incidence of acute rejection during the first 3 months after transplantation was higher in recipients of grafts from unrelated donors than in recipients of grafts from related living donors or cadaveric donors. However, unrelated living donor grafts survived significantly better than did cadaveric grafts (P < 0.02) and had a survival rate similar to that of living-related donor grafts mismatched for one or both HLA haplotypes. The perioperative complication rate for the donor was low. CONCLUSION: We consider unrelated living donors an excellent source for alleviating the shortage of donor kidneys.
Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Doadores Vivos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Rejeição de Enxerto/epidemiologia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/fisiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Falência Renal Crônica/genética , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Cônjuges , Doadores de TecidosRESUMO
The purpose of this study was to determine whether glandular kallikrein in rat pancreas is located in the beta cells of the endocrine pancreas or in the acinar cells of the exocrine pancreas. Kallikrein was measured by radial immunodiffusion and a direct radioimmunoassay in homogenates of pancreas obtained from 1) control rats, 2) rats with pancreatic beta cells selectively destroyed by streptozotocin, and 3) rats with acinar cell atrophy induced by pancreatic duct occlusion. Beta cell destruction was confirmed by the presence of hyperglycemia and by an almost total depletion of insulin-producing cells as demonstrated immunohistochemically. Acinar cell atrophy was confirmed histologically and by an almost total depletion of trypsin-like enzymes in pancreatic homogenates. The concentration of kallikrein in pancreatic homogenates was unchanged after beta cell destruction, whereas it was greatly decreased following acinar cell atrophy. Kallikrein was, by immunohistochemistry, demonstrated in the acinar cell only. The immunohistochemical localization of kallikrein agrees with the above results. These studies strongly indicate that kallikrein is predominantly located in the acinar cells of the exocrine pancreas.
Assuntos
Ilhotas Pancreáticas/fisiologia , Calicreínas/análise , Pâncreas/fisiologia , Animais , Caseínas/metabolismo , Imunodifusão , Ilhotas Pancreáticas/enzimologia , Masculino , Pâncreas/enzimologia , Radioimunoensaio , Ratos , Ratos EndogâmicosRESUMO
The Nordic collaboration in organ transplantation was initiated nearly 30 years ago in the frame of Scandiatransplant. With a recent formalization of its structure, Scandiatransplant has become a modern organ exchange organization. The increasing activities of Scandiatransplant clearly reflect the continuously growing need for a close and firm Nordic collaboration in the transplantation field, for the benefit of the numerous patients waiting for an organ transplant.
Assuntos
Doadores de Tecidos/provisão & distribuição , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/organização & administração , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Dinamarca , Europa (Continente) , Finlândia , Transplante de Coração/estatística & dados numéricos , Teste de Histocompatibilidade , Humanos , Islândia , Transplante de Rim/estatística & dados numéricos , Transplante de Fígado/estatística & dados numéricos , Transplante de Pulmão/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Noruega , Suécia , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/estatística & dados numéricos , Listas de EsperaRESUMO
From June 1983 to October 1985, 25 uremic diabetic patients aged 24 to 52 (mean 38) years were treated with combined pancreas and kidney transplantation. Mean duration of diabetes was 24 years, and end-stage renal disease was associated with severe extrarenal diabetic complications in all recipients. All transplants were harvested from cadaveric, heart-beating donors aged 5-55 years. The segmental pancreas transplant was duct-occluded with neoprene before it was transplanted to the left iliac fossa. Immunosuppressive treatment was given with cyclosporine and steroids in all cases while azathioprine was added in the last 5 cases. The one year survival of patient, kidney and pancreas was 96, 79 and 60 per cent respectively. Of 17 patients with functioning pancreas transplants, 13 are insulin independent and have normal or near normal glucose homeostasis. Based on the excellent patient survival and the improvement in quality of life experienced by the recipients, it is concluded that simultaneous transplantation of pancreas and kidney should be the treatment of choice for uremic diabetic patients when a living related kidney donor is unavailable.