Perspectives of health care providers referring patients to a newly implemented sexual health program in a Canadian cancer center.

PURPOSE: Screening and discussion about sexual health concerns within cancer care are frequently impeded by lack of access to sexual health resources and lack of fluency with sexual health topics. To address this, a multi-disciplinary sexual health program was developed and piloted in a Canadian tertiary cancer center. The aim of this study was to assess referring health care providers' perspectives on the newly implemented oncology sexual health program. METHODS: A brief online survey was administered system-wide to cancer care providers to query their perceptions of the pilot multidisciplinary sexual health program, the Oncology and Sexuality, Intimacy and Survivorship (OASIS) program. RESULTS: According to survey results, the OASIS program was perceived by health care providers as valuable, helpful for patients, and important for addressing gaps in clinical care. Additional comments indicated an ongoing need for increased access to information about the program and referral procedures. CONCLUSION: Survey results highlight the need for consistent program dissemination efforts to equip health care providers with accessible patient education materials and easily implemented referral procedures. Importantly, providers indicated that they were more likely to raise the topic of sexuality with patients because they had somewhere to refer patients who had sexual concerns. Overall, findings inform efforts to implement sexual health programming within cancer care institutions.

The Oncology and Sexuality, Intimacy, and Survivorship Program Model: An Integrated, Multi-disciplinary Model of Sexual Health Care within Oncology.

Cancer-related sexual dysfunction is documented as one of the most distressing and long-lasting survivorship concerns of cancer patients. Canadian cancer patients routinely report sexuality concerns and difficulty getting help. In response to this gap in care, clinical practice guidelines were recently published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. A sweeping trend is the creation of specialized clinics for patients' sexual health concerns. However, this much-needed attempt to address this service gap can be difficult to sustain without addressing the cancer care system from a broader perspective. Herein, we describe the implementation of a tiered systemic model of cancer-related sexual health programming in a tertiary cancer center. This program follows the Permission, Limited Information, Specific Suggestions, Intensive Therapy (PLISSIT) model, used previously for guiding individual practitioners. Visually, the model resembles a pyramid. The top 2 levels, corresponding to Intensive Therapy and Specific Suggestions, are comprised of group-based interventions for common cancer-related sexual concerns and a multi-disciplinary clinic for patients with complex concerns. The bottom 2 levels, corresponding to Permission and Limited Information, consist of patient education and provider education and consultation services. We describe lessons learned during the development and implementation of this program, including the necessity for group-based services to prevent inundation of referrals to the specialized clinic, and the observation that creating specialized resources also increased the likelihood that providers would inquire about patients' sexual concerns. Such lessons suggest that successful sexual health programming requires services from a systemic approach to increase sustainability.

Development, implementation, and evaluation of a multidisciplinary oncology sexual health clinic in a Canadian cancer care setting.

PURPOSE: Untreated cancer-related sexual health concerns cause significant distress for cancer survivors. To appropriately address the complex sexual health needs of cancer patients, we piloted a specialized, multidisciplinary oncology sexual health clinic within a tertiary cancer center. A quality assurance evaluation was conducted. METHODS: During once monthly half-day clinics, a multidisciplinary team of psychologists, advanced practice nurses, and radiation and gynecological oncologists offered specialist integrated care to oncology patients. Patients completed assessment questionnaires prior to each clinic appointment and a follow-up telephone interview approximately 4 months after their initial appointment. RESULTS: Over the 2-year pilot, 224 patients were referred to the cancer center's broader sexual health program; 100 patients were triaged to the clinic. A total of 79 new and 58 follow-up appointments were offered. Average wait time for an initial visit was 97 days. Patients' most frequent concerns included vulvovaginal atrophy, dyspareunia, reduced sexual desire, and erectile dysfunction. Self-reported sexual distress was well above the clinical cutoff at baseline (N = 77, M = 29.78, SD = 12.74). A significant reduction in sexual distress was observed at follow-up (N = 67, M = 21.90, SD = 11.34, t(66) = 7.41, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Referral rates indicate a high demand for specialized sexual health services within cancer care. Ongoing specialist care is needed to appropriately address the multifaceted sexual concerns of cancer survivors and to adequately manage high distress and symptom comorbidity. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Results inform a more comprehensive characterization of the presenting concerns of cancer survivors seeking multidisciplinary sexual health care.