"The Graves Cannot Be Dug Fast Enough": Excess Deaths Among US Amish and Mennonites During the 1918 Flu Pandemic.

Estimating the lethal impact of a pandemic on a religious community with significant barriers to outsiders can be exceedingly difficult. Nevertheless, Stein and colleagues (2021) developed an innovative means of arriving at such an estimate for the lethal impact of COVID-19 on the Amish community in 2020 by counting user-generated death reports in the widely circulated Amish periodical The Budget. By comparing monthly averages of reported deaths before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, Stein and colleagues were able to arrive at a rough estimate of "excess deaths" during the first year of the pandemic. Our research extends the same research method, applying it to the years during and immediately preceding the global influenza pandemic of 1918. Results show similarly robust findings, including three notable "waves" of excess deaths among Amish and conservative Mennonites in the USA in 1918, 1919, and 1920. Such results point to the promise of utilizing religious periodicals like The Budget as a relatively untapped trove of user-generated data on public health outcomes among religious minorities more than a century in the past.

Pharmacist involvement in blood culture follow up for patients discharged from the emergency department.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the time to attempted patient contact for positive blood cultures in patients discharged from the Emergency Department (ED) resulting when an Emergency Medicine (EM) pharmacist is on-duty compared to off-duty. METHODS: This single center, retrospective study included patients who were discharged from the ED and had subsequent positive blood cultures. Blood cultures were reviewed utilizing an algorithm previously approved and implemented by an interdisciplinary team in 2016. Standard practice was for the microbiology lab to notify the ED charge nurse of the positive blood culture, however, the algorithm placed the pharmacist as the responsible reviewer when on duty, leaving charge nurses and physicians as the responsible reviewers when a pharmacist was off duty and not on site. The primary outcome was time from ED notification of the positive gram stain of the blood culture to first attempted patient contact; we compared this outcome for cultures resulting when an EM pharmacist was on duty to those resulting when an EM pharmacist was off duty. Despite being off duty, a pharmacist may have reviewed these cultures if they remained unaddressed when the pharmacist returned on-site. In this case, the blood culture review was included in the off-duty cohort. Secondary outcomes included evaluation for appropriateness of the recommendation made to the patient during contact, 30-day infection-related readmission rates, patient's adherence to the recommendations, and barriers to patient contact. An infectious disease attending physician independently reviewed cases where the algorithm was not followed. RESULTS: A total of 127 patients identified by a query of our institution's database were screened against inclusion/exclusion criteria and 56 were excluded, leaving 71 patients for final analysis (54 and 17 in the on- and off-duty cohorts, respectively). Baseline demographics with respect to sex, age and risk factors for bacteremia were not different between groups, except there were more immunocompromised patients in the on-duty cohort (35.2%) compared to off-duty cohort (5.9%) [p = 0.01]. Median [IQR] time to first attempted patient contact was significantly shorter in the on-duty cohort at 0.8 h [0.4-2.8] vs 5.6 h [1.4-11.7] (p = 0.025). A pharmacist acted upon 93% of all cultures, including several resulting during off-duty hours. Secondary outcomes did not differ. Fourteen (25.9%) of on-duty cultures and six (35.3%) of off-duty cultures were deemed contaminants. Two recommendations in the off-duty group were inappropriate based on the infectious disease attending physician review. The lack of active voicemail was the main barrier to contacting a patient. CONCLUSIONS: In patients discharged from the ED with subsequent positive blood cultures, time to attempted patient contact was significantly shorter when a pharmacist was on-duty. Our data emphasizes the importance of having a standardized practice in place to optimize ED patient care and outcomes and the benefit of a pharmacist's involvement in the process.

Comparing Opioid Usage in Non-Intensive Care Unit Trauma Patients After Implementing Multimodal Analgesia Order Sets.

INTRODUCTION: Opioid addiction frequently occurs after exposure to prescribed pain medications. Trauma patients are likely to receive opioids due to injuries and surgeries resulting in high levels of pain. Multimodal analgesia has been shown to decrease opioid consumption postoperatively. A multimodal analgesia order set was implemented with the goal of increasing prescription of multimodal analgesia contributing to decreased overall opioid use. We hypothesized that the multimodal order set would be associated with significantly less opioid utilization without affecting pain scores. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort analysis included non-intensive care unit trauma patients. Patients were propensity-matched by the year of treatment. Oral morphine equivalents and pain scores were compared before and after implementation of the order set. The primary objective was to evaluate differences in oral morphine equivalents 24 h prior to discharge before and after implementation of the multimodal analgesia order sets. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen patients in the preimplementation group and 121 patients in the postimplementation group met inclusion criteria. Oral morphine equivalents did not differ significantly between the cohorts, 21.3 [0-53.5] OME in 2018 versus 18.8 [0-56.3] in 2020 (P = 0.85). Pain scores 24 h prior to discharge, 6 [4-8] versus 5.7 [3.5-7] (P = 0.4), did not differ significantly between groups despite more operations in the 2020 cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a multimodal order set was not associated with significant reduction in the amount of opioids used in non-intensive care unit trauma patients. However, pain scores were unchanged despite an increased number of procedures performed suggesting that multimodal analgesia sets may be a useful tool to aid in decreasing opioid utilization after traumatic injuries.