Acanthamoeba: An Overview of the Challenges to the Development of a Consensus Methodology of Disinfection Efficacy Testing for Contact Lens Care Products.

With the increasing incidence of more pathogens that can cause microbial keratitis (MK), it is necessary to periodically reassess disinfection multipurpose solutions testing requirements to ensure that relevant organisms to challenge them are being used. Current testing protocols have included common pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Serratia marcescens, Candida albicans, and Fusarium solani but have omitted less common pathogens such as Acanthamoeba. Specifically, Acanthamoeba sp. has recently been identified as a prevalent cause of MK in certain countries. Developing an appropriate protocol for this unique organism presents a challenge, given its two distinct life stages, methods to grow the organism, encystment techniques, and many other parameters that can affect testing outcomes. Therefore, the appropriate combination of these parameters is crucial to developing a protocol that ensures consistent, accurate results. The FDA has recognized the importance of establishing a standardized testing protocol for this pathogen and embarked on research efforts to provide a recommended testing protocol for testing contact lens care products.

Optimized Protocol for Testing Multipurpose Contact Lens Solution Efficacy Against Acanthamoeba.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the interlaboratory and intralaboratory reproducibility of a proposed protocol for multipurpose contact lens solution (MPS) disinfection efficacy against Acanthamoeba. METHODS: Acanthamoeba castellanii and Acanthamoeba polyphaga and four MPS with different biocidal agents were used to evaluate the protocol in two different laboratories. In addition to the negative control, a positive control and neutralization control were used. One experiment was performed in triplicate, and all other experiments were performed in duplicate in each laboratory. Acanthamoeba trophozoites were grown axenically, and cysts were generated using the starvation method. Trophozoites and cysts at a concentration of 2.0 × 10 to 2.0 × 10 organisms per milliliter were exposed to the test MPS for 0, 4 or 6 (manufacturer's recommended soak time [MRST]), 8, and 24 hr. Survivors were determined by a limiting dilution method that used a most probable number evaluation. RESULTS: The positive and negative controls displayed consistent results and trends both within each laboratory and between each laboratory for trophozoites and cysts of both A. castellanii and A. polyphaga. The neutralization control consistently demonstrated the ability of the neutralizing agents to neutralize the MPS and the positive control and demonstrated no inhibition of Acanthamoeba by the negative control. Testing in triplicate and duplicate demonstrated the reproducibility of the protocol both within each laboratory and between the laboratories. Our results demonstrated that the MPS at the MRST and at 8 hr (likely overnight soak time) are generally more effective against trophozoites than they are against cysts. Only the MPS with hydrogen peroxide as the biocidal agent was able to provide a greater than three-log kill of cysts at the MRST and longer. Among the MPS we tested, trophozoites of A. castellanii and A. polyphaga showed similar responses. Some variability was observed when testing cysts of both species. In both laboratories, one nonhydrogen peroxide containing MPS had some effect (>1 log kill) on A. polyphaga cysts. This solution had no effect (<1 log kill) on A. castellanii cysts, A. castellanii trophozoites, and A. polyphaga trophozoites. CONCLUSIONS: The protocol that we have revised and evaluated is a well-controlled and reproducible procedure that can effectively evaluate the efficacy of MPS against Acanthamoeba trophozoites. Some variability was observed when testing the cyst stage.